 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
Oops, just did... I hate the red "1" sign on the top right, so I always upgrade everything as soon as it's available. Just successfully recovered the old version in iTunes. Here is how I did it: First of first, go to iTunes ASAP, locate your most updated iPhone backup and make a copy before you try any recover trick.1. delete the new version of authenticator on your iPhone 2. disable auto sync in iTunes 3. Connect your iPhone via USB 4. Click your iPhone, then go to "application" tab 5. On the left side, scroll down, you gonna see the old version of authenticator, install it. So close...  |
|
|
|
^ exactly, you cannot just change that, you would be breaching the contract. You need to do buyback first then offer it with changes
Agree. Please respect the contract. Please respect people who trust you by putting money in your venture. |
|
|
|
|
It works here and no problem at all. Maybe you could check your Internet connection or try a different Browser.
|
|
|
|
实干兴邦 支持 |
|
|
|
Dividend for 08-01-2013 to 08-15-2013 sales posted. Total Dividend of 145.00 BTC or ฿0.00000290 per share.
Hi Ascension, I'm interested in buying. Could you please address a little bit more about my concern? - How you gonna deal with your legal risk? As you are a Denver based company, do you have any clue about preventing what happened on MtGox happen to you? Thank you! As I have said in my other posts we are working with a lawyer. We use a local bank, not a corporate one, we are also working on getting a business account setup with the Internet Archive Credit Union (a bitcoin friendly bank)- Good to know. Thx! |
|
|
|
I'm looking to buy 10 12-week ASICMINER-PT put options on btct.co with a strike price of 3.0 BTC for 0.3 BTC each.
Anyone interested in selling?
I could write you 53days, Strike 3.0/premium 0.3. Maximum 10 shares. Let me know |
|
|
|
|
刚试用了下，卖了几个币
4点50分 在网站上下订单
4点52分 把币从钱包转入网站
5点19分 3次确认完成
5点21分 钱已到账支付宝
全过程30分钟完成，非常满意，加油！
|
|
|
|
This stock seems a little weird to me. Despite breathtaking profits blooming, some people are trying to sell tons of shares. I was wondering if the management doesn't mind to disclose
1. How many shares are you holding currently?
2. Have you sold the 50,000 shares you proposed yet?
3. Is there any further share release plan from your part in near future (e.g. 10 weeks)?
I believe this kind of disclosure would greatly help investors to understand what's going on.
Part of problem is that no accounts are being produced. Couple that with the apparent need to sell shares to raise capital and it suggests that what's being dividended out may be more than profits - i.e. things like advertising costs etc aren't being deducted. Plus it's unclear to what extent capital is held in USD and hence loses BTC value when BTC rises vs USD. In short - it's not clear whether profit (in BTC) is actually being made or is an illusion. 1) I am working on getting these caught up... 2) The selling of shares is due to the fact that our current capital on hand is not enough to keep up with the rising demand. 3) We do not hold BTC, except for a small buffer in order to ensure orders are fulfilled as exchange orders lag, We purchase bitcoins at the same time the customer does in order to reduce btcQuick's risk to price volatility. Thank you for clearing. To your 1). Look forward to see the details soon. Theoretically, in worst scenario, you could just inflate profits and sell every single share since all 50 million shares are already being issued on BF. So I think a most detailed financial statement, especially with your position included, would greatly enhance investor confidence, and eventually benefit yourself. To your 2). Raising capital is definitely right thing to do to keep growth. Still, it would make more sense if you disclose how many you already sold, how many do you have, and how many you plan to sell next. To your 3). True. Its risky to hold either BTC or USD. That's you operational decision. I have no question with that. Thx and Congrats to your growth. |
|
|
|
|
This stock seems a little weird to me. Despite breathtaking profits blooming, some people are trying to sell tons of shares. I was wondering if the management doesn't mind to disclose
1. How many shares are you holding currently?
2. Have you sold the 50,000 shares you proposed yet?
3. Is there any further share release plan from your part in near future (e.g. 10 weeks)?
I believe this kind of disclosure would greatly help investors to understand what's going on.
|
|
|
|
|
人家有多少钱也不关咱啥事。
不过这条关注下 4、您先是在公开场合宣称投资ASICME，并给了很高的估值，后来bitfund又宣称“比特基金及李笑来先生曾一度支持ASICME的工作，只有口头协议”，到底哪一次您向公众撒慌了？
|
|
|
|
因为比特币产生是通过所谓的挖矿，也就是计算sha256，当然具体计算的是什么我们不得而知，计算的结果发送到什么地方我们不清楚，结果用来干什么我们也不清楚，其实这些都是次要的。
这么多关键问题你都“不得而知”就来下结论是不是太急了点？  |
|
|
|
Dividend for 08-01-2013 to 08-15-2013 sales posted. Total Dividend of 145.00 BTC or ฿0.00000290 per share.
Hi Ascension, I'm interested in buying. Could you please address a little bit more about my concern? - How you gonna deal with your legal risk? As you are a Denver based company, do you have any clue about preventing what happened on MtGox happen to you? Thank you! |
|
|
|
Basic math shows how overpriced the shares are: there are ~10million more bitcoins left to be mined over the next century or so. Even if ASICMiner were able to maintain 20% of the total network hashrate throughout that period (breathtakingly unlikely), they'd only mine 2million BTC. Split between the 400,000 shares that creates an upper limit of 5BTC/share.
Not necessary. A significant part of dividends come from selling mining equipment. Because of that, the real profit they are making could be 30% or even more while it has 20% of the total network. |
|
|
|
It can be made by anyone. If one wants to add messages to blocks, one needs to mine that block. Currently it's super hard for individuals to mine blocks themselves (without a pool). But a transaction like that can be made by anyone, yeah. Though I don't know do you need to mine a block to include this kind of tx or do nodes relay these normally. Yeah that makes 100% sense. I saw some posts which guess this transaction was made by Satoshi himself |
|
|
|
Also, according to Bitcoin Foundation's websites, it could standardize Bitcoin by changing codes. What if one day they start to play evil? There are many Bitcoin clients. Any change that implements a change that "breaks" the Bitcoin protocol will not be accepted by older clients. This is called a hard fork. So unless people upgrade to a client that understands the change, that change made will have no impact. There is the argument that the power to accepts changes comes from those who hold bitcoins and those who will buy the mined coins. They are referred to as the "economic majority": - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Economic_majorityThis played out this way with the accidental hard fork in March. There was a change to the v0.8 client that those using v0.7.2 and prior didn't use. Even though there were more v0.8 clients running at the time, the "economic majority" were using v0.7 and thus that's the side of the fork that mining capacity jumped to once it became obvious coins mined on v0.8 were going to become worthless. Thank you! The resource is great! So changes would be made as long as "economic majority" accept the new change. How it work is like by sort of democracy process. Just in case, if one day "economically majority" believe that keeping the total number of Bitcoins at 21 million is stupid and they'd like to add by, say 1 million. Could the total number increase to 22 million if "economically majority" accept and change and update their clients? |
|
|
|
I tried to search about this really hard but haven't got anything valuable. Look forward to hearing opinions from you. Thx! The question is that I wondering if Satoshi himself or organizations e.g. Bitcoin Foundation have higher authority over ordinary bitcoiners. I have noticed that a few days ago a weird 0.015BTC transaction ( https://blockchain.info/tx/77822fd6663c665104119cb7635352756dfc50da76a92d417ec1a12c518fad69) distorted part of the whole network. I don't know anything about codes, but I guess that it couldn't be done by ordinary folks. Also, according to Bitcoin Foundation's websites, it could standardize Bitcoin by changing codes. What if one day they start to play evil? Does anyone concern about this? I mean, many people devoted to Bitcoin because they hate traditional "central bank" system. Is there any possibilities that some people/organization could become a "central bank" in Bitcoin world by having authority to change Bitcoin's codes? Thanks a lot! |
|
|
|
|
