I have 760,000 eac
|
|
|
whats the current difficulty on the network? (shown in cgminer) i am curious.
|
|
|
5+ Minutes = forever ? Jesus...... you must be new to mining. Try mine some BTC solo the last few blocks have seemed to take forever to find. like 5+ minutes each.
you must be new to this coin. blocks are supposed to be 60 seconds, and had been taking only ~30 seconds per before the last ~20 blocks.
|
|
|
the last few blocks have seemed to take forever to find. like 5+ minutes each.
|
|
|
Hell no, vircurpool says 90k per day at 1100khash but only got 3K for mining 5h...
wtf is wrong ??
The coin is a scam. Don't waste power and time. There should be enough coins to mine, but the output is way lower than doge (and there is much, much more hashpower). If you can't mine 50-100k coins on the first day with a 2-10MH/s Rig with a coin that has a limit of 13.5 Billion coins, something is wrong.I mined 40k in the first 12 hours using 1.75Mh...pool mining. solo'd for the last 12 hours with 10mh. 650k so far. Nothing bad about this coin here. looks like a good coin IMO
|
|
|
wow since i started from 250k diff now almost 700 and rising. hahaha nice
|
|
|
Picked up 6 of those XFX 7970's from TigerDirect on the black friday deal. very unhappy to say the MAX i can pull from these cards is ~560 hashes, even massively overclocked. Would like to see if anyone else bought these, and have had any luck getting these to normal 7970 rates? (~650-750) Card specs are as follows: XFX Double Dissapation, Core edition model FX-797A-TDJV. Version 1.0 on box NON-REFERENCE PCB/matte black, NO ATI logo on bottom of card or BIOS switch at top. clocked at 925/1375 stock. GPUZ screenshot attached. MAX hashrate i was able to achieve was about 560khash, at about 1110/1675 clocks, with 7192 TC, 13 intensity, and 12.8 drivers. tried 13.4 as well, same problem. tried 24000 tc, tried 40960 tc, tried 8192 tc, tried I20, I19, I18, all give lower hashes. Funny thing is that the powertune settings dont seem to affect hashes at all, or even power consumption, tried it at +20, same hashes, tried it at -20, same hashes as well as same power pulled from the wall. Maybe this has something to do with the LOW LOW hashrate of these cards. in the screenshot, you can see my 7950 outperforming these by a longshot. this was all on a clean install of windows 7 64bit. Hi, only just seen your post.
Just to check quickly, as it wasn't in the command line you wrote - did you use -g 2 (-g is threads per GPU btw) with the 7970? If you don't put - g 2 in i believe it uses -g 1 which gives a lower hashrate.
I currently use this for my 7970's btw: -s 2 --thread-concurrency 20992 -I 13 -w 256 -g 2 1040 gpu / 1500 memory (1081mV/1500mV)
yeah, sorry forgot to add that, i am using 2 threads, that, with 8192, i can get a max of 560 as i said
|
|
|
Picked up 6 of those XFX 7970's from TigerDirect on the black friday deal. very unhappy to say the MAX i can pull from these cards is ~560 hashes, even massively overclocked. Would like to see if anyone else bought these, and have had any luck getting these to normal 7970 rates? (~650-750) Card specs are as follows: XFX Double Dissapation, Core edition model FX-797A-TDJV. Version 1.0 on box NON-REFERENCE PCB/matte black, NO ATI logo on bottom of card or BIOS switch at top. clocked at 925/1375 stock. GPUZ screenshot attached. MAX hashrate i was able to achieve was about 560khash, at about 1110/1675 clocks, with 7192 TC, 13 intensity, and 12.8 drivers. tried 13.4 as well, same problem. tried 24000 tc, tried 40960 tc, tried 8192 tc, tried I20, I19, I18, all give lower hashes. Funny thing is that the powertune settings dont seem to affect hashes at all, or even power consumption, tried it at +20, same hashes, tried it at -20, same hashes as well as same power pulled from the wall. Maybe this has something to do with the LOW LOW hashrate of these cards. in the screenshot, you can see my 7950 outperforming these by a longshot. this was all on a clean install of windows 7 64bit.
|
|
|
It does affect his profit, if it affects our profitability
I don't think so... he gets the same amount whether we submit 1000 shares or 10 shares. AFAIK difficulty will never effect how many blocks we find. His profit is 100% affected by hashrate and exchange rate. It seems to me that if hashrate goes much higher then the exchange rate will actually net him less profits until he manages to direct the hashpower to different coins and the same time. Would it not be, if we made more-he made more, because more of our shares are being accepted, our profits are higher(on same hash), so he gets more from our more profits? lol lol...nvm i think im getting it, were in the same pool, so it doesnt matter....hmmm... Yeah, maybe he should make 2 ports, and split us up.
|
|
|
It does affect his profit, if it affects our profitability, plus he said before he raised his fee to 3% for servers. Lol i have been paying attention, i just keep asking maybe he'll get tired of it haha
|
|
|
Should be 128 pool diff on low diff coins. "512 diff is the same as any other diff" doesnt apply here because were not constantly mining the same coin. It would if we were,but this is a multi pool I would bet money rejects (good for miners and pool operators as well) would drastically lower if we changed diff on low diff coins.
|
|
|
Today's profit was 0.0271 BTC per MH/s per day
For reference, LTC profit alone would be 0.0291
im back to ltc, this is like the xxxx'th day. what is going on?
|
|
|
the .15 payouts(would be making ~.24 JUST ltc'ing
This pool does not pay out everything you earned in a given 24 hour period. If you were to stop your miners cold, you're still going to get paid the next day, or even 2. As I understand it, there's a buffer that builds up due to the time it takes for blocks to mature, to transfer funds to exchanges, do the exchange itself, and transfer them back out. In order to understand what you're making in a day, switch one of your rigs to a separate address, and run it for a specific amount of time (the longer the better), and then disable that address. That way, you have real numbers with a known amount of time, and you can calculate how much you're making per unit time. that was my average over a week.
|
|
|
pool down for 1hour + went back to give-me-ltc. maybe ill come back once bugs are out.
|
|
|
giving it 1 more day. i got .19 today. i even upped my hash to ~8.5. still should be making at least .26 a day just ltcing. very sad for me, when i joined the pool, nothing at all has changed whatsoever, i was hoping for too much i guess. Did u change these values in cgminer.conf? queue 0 scantime 5 expiry 5 You will get a ton of rejects if you don't as the pool mines alot of coins with fast block times. I dont see any difference mining coins with higher block times with those settings. You might also want to check your ping time as it can cause rejects I make on average around 0.13-0.17btc per day mining with 4,000kh/s yes, i did that on all of my miners. my ping is between 70-80ms.
|
|
|
giving it 1 more day. i got .19 today. i even upped my hash to ~8.5. still should be making at least .26 a day just ltcing. very sad for me, when i joined the pool, nothing at all has changed whatsoever, i was hoping for too much i guess.
|
|
|
Looks like the pool is down...
Yes and my mining system physically stopped responding again. How does whatever the pool is doing effect a miner to the point it stops responding? Love this pool but may have to bail. Never had outages before joining this pool and profitability in some ways is dependent on your miner running. JR wow. i thought i was the only one encountering this. between the .15 payouts(would be making ~.24 JUST ltc'ing) the miner crashes/freezes, and the fact that for some reason, only when mining in this pool I have nearly 10% less hashrate reported by cgminer, i may have to bail as well, at least until some of the major bugs are fixed. ive had 3 or 4 out of my 9 miners completely crash and not respond, even when using teamviewer/cgwatcher. edit: also rejects are getting crazy for me:
|
|
|
The pool is mining one of the losing coins right now. In the last 4 minutes that I have been watching, my 7950's could only squeak in 1 share between the zillions of new block messages. No way that will be profitable... Oops, just squeaked in another one while I was typing...
Yeah, we have a 25% reject rate. But the math says we're 3 times more profitable than LTC. It will be nice to know for sure though. is it not worth it even for 1 day to try 256 diff?
|
|
|
I really think we need two things in this pool. 256 difficulty. 2 payments per day.(i thought we agreed this was ok before?) anyway, since were not constantly mining the same coin, the "512 diff is the same as any other diff" doesnt apply now if we were constantly mining one single coin, that is different. but when we switch to 512k diff coins, and only submit one share in an hour, then it changes to another coin that is 1m diff, then we wasted all that work on nothing.
|
|
|
Is there any issue with using the same bitcoin address (username) across all my miners?
Thanks.
JR
Shouldn't be im doing the same with no problems
|
|
|
|