Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 04:46:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 »
201  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 02, 2013, 10:35:49 AM
Exactly and you should reset the score for all miners at specific time, because the total score is a sum of all the miner's scores

EDIT: I guess you have missed my previous post to you - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg2330839#msg2330839

I see, but u should understand, when u reseting all scores, then we lost information.
That means when the all score is reset at 1:00:00 then its all newly, what i have shared before i would that lose. Because i would have then 0 score.
The users score should NOT be reseted!
202  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 02, 2013, 10:10:21 AM
I mean just before it is reset, because it based on time and not some value it will always be different, so ... wrong end results
The numbers are just for example
score = score + exp(round_time/C)
The result is only a number ^^
With these method, when the round time too long is, then the value would overflow.
203  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 02, 2013, 10:03:14 AM
So when the duration is on 1:00:00 then we reset the Total Score variable (we dont reset the user score variable!) and we set the "spin" to 1
on 2:00:00 we reseting again, and set the spin to 2
on 3:00:00 to 3 and so follow..
and when the block founded, then we calculate from these method:
reward = ( user score / spin ) / total score * 25
All is done?!

This will lead to wrong results: on spin 1 the total score is 1234567890, but on next spin it is 1934567890 - they are never equal
How are u calculated this? On the spin increment the total score reset it to 0.
204  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 02, 2013, 09:08:28 AM
I think we agree? cool!
From what I understand what you are saying it that reset doesn't happens for everyone at the same time. I think it dose. And it happens when total score gets to big. The error accrue during reset because some other system is imputing new share that was found.
Why is the total score not in double integer? Or a byte integer what is increase every time when score is reset, then when block found is divided from user score?!

You would have to ask the programmer. Most likely there is not a "type" that is large enough to handle the number we are dealing with. We can't say for sure what is happening, we can only take a WAG(Wild Ass Guess) based on what we are seeing. No one but Slush can answer your question and he is Missing I Action at the moment.
Why not? double integer has 18446744073709600000 max volume. Thats not enough?
But when not enough then the optimal solution would a extra byte.
When the current TOTAL SCORE variable is full, then we have to do only increase a variable (declare name with= "spin") with 1.
So when the duration is on 1:00:00 then we reset the Total Score variable (we dont reset the user score variable!) and we set the "spin" to 1
on 2:00:00 we reseting again, and set the spin to 2
on 3:00:00 to 3 and so follow..
and when the block founded, then we calculate from these method:
reward = ( user score / spin ) / total score * 25
All is done?!
205  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 02, 2013, 09:01:22 AM
I think we agree? cool!
From what I understand what you are saying it that reset doesn't happens for everyone at the same time. I think it dose. And it happens when total score gets to big. The error accrue during reset because some other system is imputing new share that was found.
Why is the total score not in double integer? Or a byte integer what is increase every time when score is reset, then when block found is divided from user score?!
Sorry I can't figure out what you are asking?

EDIT:
Still problems with these blocks (what red color has)
18324    2013-06-01 16:44:55    1:16:08    11826947    525    0.00088458    239094    25.13869000    90 confirmations left
18323    2013-06-01 15:28:47    0:19:51    3080262    135    0.00124384    239084    25.19121000    89 confirmations left
18322    2013-06-01 15:08:56    1:50:42    17158976    41    0.00101832    239080    25.18504000    85 confirmations left
18321    2013-06-01 13:18:14    1:35:10    14691384    none    none    239063    25.20347868    68 confirmations left
18320    2013-06-01 11:43:04    0:09:52    1544066    none    none    239053    25.00150000    58 confirmations left
18319    2013-06-01 11:33:12    0:04:08    627852    none    none    239051    25.11800000    56 confirmations left
18318    2013-06-01 11:29:04    1:58:52    18263762    none    none    239049    25.09950000    54 confirmations left
18317    2013-06-01 09:30:12    0:01:59    310597    none    none    239033    25.04160000    38 confirmations left
18316    2013-06-01 09:28:13    0:34:49    5394754    none    none    239032    25.06220000    37 confirmations left
18315    2013-06-01 08:53:24    0:21:58    3473112    none    none    239027    25.33340000    32 confirmations left
18314    2013-06-01 08:31:26    1:17:10    11856454    118    0.00000000    239025    25.17790000    30 confirmations left
18313    2013-06-01 07:14:16    0:13:14    2031444    38    0.00055482    239015    25.10000000    20 confirmations left
18312    2013-06-01 07:01:02    2:09:08    19734291    221    0.00056050    239012    25.46190000    17 confirmations left
18311    2013-06-01 04:51:54    2:10:19    20307448    176    0.00015807    238993    25.26838085    confirmed
18310    2013-06-01 02:41:35    0:52:58    7941437    68    0.00008204    238975    25.10570000    confirmed
18309    2013-06-01 01:48:37    5:15:09    49659498    325    0.00005240    238964    25.05830000    confirmed
18308    2013-05-31 20:33:28    1:42:52    16633401    292    0.00000081    238930    25.00000000    confirmed
18307    2013-05-31 18:50:36    0:18:57    3010041    77    0.00063556    238919    25.26863000    confirmed
18306    2013-05-31 18:31:39    2:17:49    21231848    501    0.00078153    238916    25.31229000    confirmed
18305    2013-05-31 16:13:50    0:45:01    7410765    178    0.00087783    238901    25.26605000    confirmed
18304    2013-05-31 15:28:49    3:24:52    34544624    756    0.00051999    238894    25.04760000    confirmed
18303    2013-05-31 12:03:57    0:28:10    4669471    105    0.00061763    238858    25.16995099    confirmed
18302    2013-05-31 11:35:47    3:12:56    31259218    688    0.00045144    238855    25.28059996    confirmed
18301    2013-05-31 08:22:51    4:54:34    46714536    456    0.00057801    238831    25.38963413    confirmed
18300    2013-05-31 03:28:17    0:56:08    8883215    67    0.00008960    238800    25.64249344    confirmed
18299    2013-05-31 02:32:09    0:55:51    8791245    69    0.00020915    238796    25.29477058    confirmed
18298    2013-05-31 01:36:18    0:23:53    3809057    24    0.00007815    238791    25.45422788    confirmed
18297    2013-05-31 01:12:25    0:48:41    7718499    50    0.00023318    238788    25.08535000    confirmed
18296    2013-05-31 00:23:44    0:07:53    1254360    14    0.00030901    238783    25.00370000    confirmed
18295    2013-05-31 00:15:51    4:40:25    44440241    522    0.00018694    238780    25.00640000    confirmed
Did you increase you hash rate? If so to can you give me a number on what it was and what it is.
We have there 2 PC's, every PC has one GPU. #1 with 300 mhps #2 with 200 mhps. All PC's are 10-20% in use (movie watch, any game playing) in a 24h day, but they dont run the whole day.
I work for 2 pools, one pps and the Slush pool for testing. I use cgminer with balance pool method.
My avarage hash rate on slush pool is ~240 mhps from  2013-05-30 14:27.
I work for the slush pool without any cheating, i dont have the block red colored (on the list) who i have changed the systems. I have only colored what i was on the whole block online, and the hash rate was fix, but i was punished with lower reward what did not deserve it.
I dont have "mining rig" what only run miner the whole 24h day. I have personal computers what when they online then work for the pools.
/sorry for bad grammar, i speak whole better in German and Hungarian language/

**EDIT**
The my account page says:
Average hashrate in last 10 rounds: 351 Mhash/s
**EDIT**
206  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 01, 2013, 05:47:19 PM
I think we agree? cool!
From what I understand what you are saying it that reset doesn't happens for everyone at the same time. I think it dose. And it happens when total score gets to big. The error accrue during reset because some other system is imputing new share that was found.
Why is the total score not in double integer? Or a byte integer what is increase every time when score is reset, then when block found is divided from user score?!
207  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 01, 2013, 05:24:20 PM
Still problems with these blocks (what red color has)
18324    2013-06-01 16:44:55    1:16:08    11826947    525    0.00088458    239094    25.13869000    90 confirmations left
18323    2013-06-01 15:28:47    0:19:51    3080262    135    0.00124384    239084    25.19121000    89 confirmations left
18322    2013-06-01 15:08:56    1:50:42    17158976    41    0.00101832    239080    25.18504000    85 confirmations left
18321    2013-06-01 13:18:14    1:35:10    14691384    none    none    239063    25.20347868    68 confirmations left
18320    2013-06-01 11:43:04    0:09:52    1544066    none    none    239053    25.00150000    58 confirmations left
18319    2013-06-01 11:33:12    0:04:08    627852    none    none    239051    25.11800000    56 confirmations left
18318    2013-06-01 11:29:04    1:58:52    18263762    none    none    239049    25.09950000    54 confirmations left
18317    2013-06-01 09:30:12    0:01:59    310597    none    none    239033    25.04160000    38 confirmations left
18316    2013-06-01 09:28:13    0:34:49    5394754    none    none    239032    25.06220000    37 confirmations left
18315    2013-06-01 08:53:24    0:21:58    3473112    none    none    239027    25.33340000    32 confirmations left
18314    2013-06-01 08:31:26    1:17:10    11856454    118    0.00000000    239025    25.17790000    30 confirmations left
18313    2013-06-01 07:14:16    0:13:14    2031444    38    0.00055482    239015    25.10000000    20 confirmations left
18312    2013-06-01 07:01:02    2:09:08    19734291    221    0.00056050    239012    25.46190000    17 confirmations left
18311    2013-06-01 04:51:54    2:10:19    20307448    176    0.00015807    238993    25.26838085    confirmed
18310    2013-06-01 02:41:35    0:52:58    7941437    68    0.00008204    238975    25.10570000    confirmed
18309    2013-06-01 01:48:37    5:15:09    49659498    325    0.00005240    238964    25.05830000    confirmed
18308    2013-05-31 20:33:28    1:42:52    16633401    292    0.00000081    238930    25.00000000    confirmed
18307    2013-05-31 18:50:36    0:18:57    3010041    77    0.00063556    238919    25.26863000    confirmed
18306    2013-05-31 18:31:39    2:17:49    21231848    501    0.00078153    238916    25.31229000    confirmed
18305    2013-05-31 16:13:50    0:45:01    7410765    178    0.00087783    238901    25.26605000    confirmed
18304    2013-05-31 15:28:49    3:24:52    34544624    756    0.00051999    238894    25.04760000    confirmed
18303    2013-05-31 12:03:57    0:28:10    4669471    105    0.00061763    238858    25.16995099    confirmed
18302    2013-05-31 11:35:47    3:12:56    31259218    688    0.00045144    238855    25.28059996    confirmed
18301    2013-05-31 08:22:51    4:54:34    46714536    456    0.00057801    238831    25.38963413    confirmed
18300    2013-05-31 03:28:17    0:56:08    8883215    67    0.00008960    238800    25.64249344    confirmed
18299    2013-05-31 02:32:09    0:55:51    8791245    69    0.00020915    238796    25.29477058    confirmed
18298    2013-05-31 01:36:18    0:23:53    3809057    24    0.00007815    238791    25.45422788    confirmed
18297    2013-05-31 01:12:25    0:48:41    7718499    50    0.00023318    238788    25.08535000    confirmed
18296    2013-05-31 00:23:44    0:07:53    1254360    14    0.00030901    238783    25.00370000    confirmed
18295    2013-05-31 00:15:51    4:40:25    44440241    522    0.00018694    238780    25.00640000    confirmed
208  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Try Now >>>] BTCOxygen.com - PPS | 2% fee | Stratum | Auto-Payout on: June 01, 2013, 02:51:47 PM
I have now 58% rejected shares, anything its wrong!

 [2013-06-01 16:52:03] Rejected aa5f599f Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 0 (local variable 'connection'
 [2013-06-01 16:52:05] Rejected 6955f171 Diff 2/1 GPU 0 pool 0 (local variable 'connection'
 [2013-06-01 16:52:14] Rejected 4b05ffc1 Diff 3/1 GPU 0 pool 0 (local variable 'connection'
 [2013-06-01 16:52:28] Accepted ae6e19aa Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 0
209  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Try Now >>>] BTCOxygen.com - PPS | 2% fee | Stratum | Auto-Payout on: June 01, 2013, 07:04:38 AM
I think the pool admin is away from home. Last week was away for 2-3 days too.
For me the automatic payout has worked, i have immediately received the reward when over 0.1 was.
210  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 02:42:58 PM
For pool abuse:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3165.msg44357#msg44357
Read the end of all:
Edit; It won't work, see the further discussion.
211  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 02:34:13 PM
On the http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/ Page
For the current block was the:
Total score of current round: 10645738685290.2051

and now alfter 5 min is 1726123.6787

The variable has flipped?

Score resets to zero top of every hour for everyone, but shares are not reset -- you don't lose anything.  Score has to reset because on long blocks, the number could get big enough to overflow the registers and peeps would start asking about why they were seeing negative scores Smiley

U mean that on 59:59 time i have 500000 score and the total score is 400billion, and after 1:00:00 i would have 0 score and the total score would are 0?
Then why can calculate from this?
U work me for 100$/h job, but every hour i reset your work time to 0min Cheesy and the end of day i pay you out with cents?Smiley
212  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 02:23:47 PM
iFA88, yes youre test case is valid if no-one hops the pool....
BUT, lets say theres pool B with exactly the same hashrate ---->

#1 Block Duration: 1:00:00 CDF: 30%
Total Shares: 10'000'000 My shares: 500
My estimated reward: 0.00125BTC

#2 I hop to pool B at this time with 500 shares.
->

#3, pool A Block Duration: 2:00:00 CDF: 60%
Total Shares: 20'000'000 My shares: 500
My estimated reward: 0.000625BTC

#3, pool B Block Duration: 1:00:00 CDF: 30%
Total Shares: 10'000'000 My shares: 500
My estimated reward: 0.00125BTC

== Total estimated reward from 2hours = 0.000625BTC + 0.00125BTC = 0,1875BTC.
(vs. mining only with pool A, without disconnects, which case reward is still 0.00125BTC)
and you must understand that if someone gets more than he should its less BTC for the rest.
nb. This example is very simplified


0.000625BTC + 0.00125BTC = 0,001875 ^^
But its very important, when the block is founded. I think i dont recvive more BTC with these method^^
213  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 01:05:36 PM
On the http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/ Page
For the current block was the:
Total score of current round: 10645738685290.2051

and now alfter 5 min is 1726123.6787

The variable has flipped?
214  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 12:58:05 PM
Because it has been mathematically proven that to improve personal gain (in cost of everyone else in the pool), you should hop into another pool when pool's CDF is around 43.5%
This is why theres this score system (also pplns, dgm, etc...)

you can read more from: http://bitcoin.atspace.com/poolcheating.pdf
Quote
It means that with optimal strategy it is possible to
gain on average 28% of ones hashrate by switching from the pool after 43.5%
of the current difficulty number of shares have been contributed.

Thank you for the PDF, but this is for me mathematically too high Smiley
For example:
The round duration is 1:00:00 and the CDF is 50%, i have 500 share soon. When i disconnect from the pool, and the pool work continue, then my shares value would every time less.
with 30% CDF (10k total shares) i earn (with simple method) 0,00125BTC. But we dont have now a block. The pool work continue for half hour. Then the CDF is 45% and the total shares is 15k, then my shares value is now only 0.000833. While the duration would more and more, my shares would every time less.
Sorry for my bad English, its possible that i write wrong many thing, i write here with numbers:

#1
Block Duration: 1:00:00
CDF: 30%
Total Shares: 10'000'000
My shares: 500
My estimated reward: 0.00125BTC

#2
I disconnect at this time with 500 shares.

#3
Block Duration: 1:30:00
CDF: 45%
Total Shares: 15'000'000
My shares: 500
My estimated reward: 0.000833BTC

#4
Block Duration: 2:00:00
CDF: 55%
Total Shares: 20'000'000
My shares: 500
My estimated reward: 0.000625BTC

#5
Block found! 25BTC
Block Duration was: 2:30:00
Total Shares was: 25'000'000
My Shares was: 500
My reward is: 0.0005BTC

Why is that method bad? I become the reward what i worked for the block^^

And what its whit these block?
18284    2013-05-30 09:23:24    5:14:27    48529423    764    0.00000027    none    238658    25.41754350    confirmed
I has
         764
-----------------
     48529423
split worked for the block, and im quasi not rewarded    though that i have the whole block duration worked?
215  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 11:10:44 AM

OK so that is what happens to block 18290. It looks like you were mining only first 3 minutes of that block. So this is normal. But I don't get it why you got double from block 18291 since you didn't increase hashes... Did you change anything? The only thing I can think of that could be is a difficulty error in a score system and you change it from 2 to 1. But I guess someone would report that already... Looks really strange...

I haven't changed anything. so it's kind of confusing. Also, I'm on difficulty 6

Losing most of my reward for a short disconnect seems to be very unfair in my opinion. I would really appreciate if slush would explain what happened.

This is the way the scoring method works in order to prevent pool hopping. As the round goes on, shares from earlier in the round have less and less value until they are worth absolutely nothing, so if you only work for the beginning of the round and then disconnect, it is possible to get 0 reward even though you have submitted shares.

Read up on the "Slush method" of scoring for more detail
This is not a little unfair?
Why is bad when the worker recvive the reward what they shared has? I mean the block value is 25 BTC and we have total X shares, and when u have Y shared then u become this reward. ((25/X)*Y)
Why is that bad?
Please anyone explain me the score based pay system, i dont understand why is that good for all?!
216  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 08:33:48 AM
Namecoins are not supported here. The ones we get are just a bonus due to the want things are set up. (paraphrased)

Bonus = Supported... (Not sure who told you they were not supported. I earn them here and get them delivered just fine.)

I understand that... But why NOT submit all the valid chances? That is an extra $40 a month I am loosing-out on, with my 4GHs machine here. Instead, I am getting $4, where on other servers I am getting $40. All you do is submit/check the shares from bitcoins that are returned. It doesn't take any extra "work" to submit/forward that to the namecoin wallet.

Just because it isn't setup correctly. BTCguild is the same issue... improper setup, thus, they "think" it isn't worth it... Yes it isn't worth it, if it isn't setup right. (I would submit the shares myself, if I could, but that would just submit MY valids, to the whole wallet... not all of our valids.)
Only getwork is getting NMC. And it is 2% of the pool. And when a block is found all miners with address gets part of that. That is why. If you would like to get altcons I would suggest Bitparking... You can mine 4 coins...

On BitMinter work with stratum too, i'm rewarded with 0.01BTC and 0.13 NMC for the same shares.

**EDIT 0.103 NMC**
217  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 30, 2013, 04:23:41 PM
Actually, he has stated it's just a 'display' error with cgminer - the real speed is 330mh/s as expected - pitty...

No, they started soon a while. 14:56:14, and the log is displayed too what accepted soon 1 min.
When i started the cgminer then they display wrong hash rate for 5 sec.
218  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 30, 2013, 03:46:34 PM
Any from the UK interested in a USB miner?


Small UK group buy Block Erupter USB @ 1.99 BTC + taxes/duty & postage
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=219555.msg2312370#msg2312370

Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P

This.  I could pay half that, get a device that mines at twice the speed, and allows me to play games as well.  Oh, and heats my house in the winter.  

Block Erupter is far too slow and far too expensive.  

This guy is getting 660mh/s out of his...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195037.msg2318757#msg2318757


Yeah overclocked with hardware failures :S
219  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 30, 2013, 12:48:10 PM
Any from the UK interested in a USB miner?


Small UK group buy Block Erupter USB @ 1.99 BTC + taxes/duty & postage
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=219555.msg2312370#msg2312370

Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P
220  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 30, 2013, 12:19:48 PM
Thanks.
I dont understand these score system:S Can u please explain for me that?
I have again really low reward received.
18284    2013-05-30 09:23:24    5:14:27    48529423    764    0.00000027    none    238658    25.41754350

I cannot check this, because i dont know my score and the total score for this block. I can only calculate again from total shares, my shares and block value. :S
What is your speed. Did you mined whole block and did you noticed any disconnections?

My speed is ~178 mhps. I was online in the whole day no one disconnections. (CGminer started at 2013-05-29 09:04:12, and still running. i have +1GMT)
Rejected is 3 shares.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!