|
iFA88
|
 |
May 30, 2013, 12:19:48 PM |
|
Thanks.
I dont understand these score system:S Can u please explain for me that?
I have again really low reward received.
18284 2013-05-30 09:23:24 5:14:27 48529423 764 0.00000027 none 238658 25.41754350
I cannot check this, because i dont know my score and the total score for this block. I can only calculate again from total shares, my shares and block value. :S
What is your speed. Did you mined whole block and did you noticed any disconnections? My speed is ~178 mhps. I was online in the whole day no one disconnections. (CGminer started at 2013-05-29 09:04:12, and still running. i have +1GMT) Rejected is 3 shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:45:40 PM |
|
Thanks.
I dont understand these score system:S Can u please explain for me that?
I have again really low reward received.
18284 2013-05-30 09:23:24 5:14:27 48529423 764 0.00000027 none 238658 25.41754350
I cannot check this, because i dont know my score and the total score for this block. I can only calculate again from total shares, my shares and block value. :S
What is your speed. Did you mined whole block and did you noticed any disconnections? My speed is ~178 mhps. I was online in the whole day no one disconnections. (CGminer started at 2013-05-29 09:04:12, and still running. i have +1GMT) Rejected is 3 shares. OK 3 hours ago so it would probably fix itself if it was planing to do so... You are also the only one for now who is complaining... So it was not blocks calculation error(probrbly). Hmm... 178 MH is about 2,45somthing shares/minute. So total shares should be 769... You are right there... Everything looks fine so it looks like it is stratum again. Sorry you are really unlucky... Or it is a location specific... Not sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
iFA88
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:48:10 PM |
|
Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P |
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
May 30, 2013, 01:07:47 PM |
|
Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P This. I could pay half that, get a device that mines at twice the speed, and allows me to play games as well. Oh, and heats my house in the winter. Block Erupter is far too slow and far too expensive. |
|
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
May 30, 2013, 01:12:21 PM |
|
hi all, i was on a trip for some weeks and the first thing i've done was to restart my mining pc. now after the restart the gui miner will not work on slushs pool. every time i start the miner the message appears: api2.bitcoin.cz:8332....no json object could be decoded. failed to subscribe.io erros - 1, tolerance 2. my miner was working for the last weeks without an interuption on an ati 7870/win7-300 mhash. maybe someone have an idea? i'm at work and have no time to read the hole postings since the last 3 weeks. kind regards, tea SOLVED it seems that the solution was to update my bitcoin client to the newest version 0.8.2  7870 doing 300mh/s??? do you have it under clocked? you should be doing around 400mh/s. 1100 gpu = approx 399mh/s. 1150 = 425ish. I have 4 7870's all 4 have different stable areas but adding a fan will keep them under 80C at 1150ish. base not clocked they are 360mh/s so i am confused why you are 300mh/s |
|
|
|
|
|
PrintMule
|
|
May 30, 2013, 01:14:09 PM |
|
Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P I also wonder about people who buys those. It's over 6 months for sure, even without considering increased difficulty. |
|
|
|
temporalcausality
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2013, 01:29:44 PM |
|
with all this complaining, pool luck is down to 66%... so, everybody just shut up, mine, and think happy thoughts  |
|
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
May 30, 2013, 01:58:23 PM |
|
Up to 78% in half an hour. Happy thoughts, happy thoughts.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
May 30, 2013, 02:23:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TomKeddie
|
|
May 30, 2013, 02:41:17 PM
Last edit: May 31, 2013, 05:14:48 AM by TomKeddie |
|
Something went crazy for me overnight (PST), reported hash rate is still the same but all rewards halved. Switching to stratum2 from stratum3.
*edit* I switched the difficulty on all my workers yesterday, looks like there is a bug in the math. *edit2* Yep, reconnect caused shares to return to normal.
# Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares Your BTC reward Your NMC reward Block # Block value Validity
18290 2013-05-30 14:09:35 0:06:41 1082066 379 0.00865958 none 238701 25.03670001 96 confirmations left
18289 2013-05-30 14:02:54 0:08:53 1435947 482 0.00825450 none 238699 25.10150000 94 confirmations left
18288 2013-05-30 13:54:01 0:58:36 9411368 3186 0.00889315 none 238697 25.36806400 92 confirmations left
18287 2013-05-30 12:55:25 1:36:06 15299674 5348 0.00897908 none 238687 25.14287327 82 confirmations left
18286 2013-05-30 11:19:19 1:08:21 10842003 3889 0.00820724 none 238676 25.42300000 71 confirmations left
18285 2013-05-30 10:10:58 0:47:34 7497655 2667 0.00901283 none 238665 25.23700194 60 confirmations left
18284 2013-05-30 09:23:24 5:14:27 48529423 24730 0.00956819 none 238658 25.41754350 53 confirmations left
18283 2013-05-30 04:08:57 3:59:51 37961064 26542 0.01839739 none 238622 25.50438406 17 confirmations left
18282 2013-05-30 00:09:06 3:16:40 30931819 21662 0.01684185 none 238598 25.47875001 confirmed
18281 2013-05-29 20:52:26 1:16:42 12114395 8170 0.01603135 none 238576 25.28999000 confirmed
18280 2013-05-29 19:35:44 0:03:11 492178 372 0.01886548 none 238569 25.06720000 confirmed
18279 2013-05-29 19:32:33 4:19:11 40522055 28468 0.01807137 0.06189197 238567 25.32425902 confirmed
18278 2013-05-29 15:13:22 0:04:36 733240 518 0.01685538 none 238540 25.17080000 confirmed
18277 2013-05-29 15:08:46 0:03:45 600292 454 0.01867413 none 238539 25.22790000 confirmed
18276 2013-05-29 15:05:01 0:40:39 6434013 4138 0.01662324 none 238538 25.16745000 confirmed
|
|
|
|
|
|
desired_username
|
|
May 30, 2013, 03:20:38 PM |
|
same thing here, but I haven't changed anything:  I have got some disconnect because of bad weather too at the same time :S Is it possible that my rewards degraded this much because of ~10min(overall) spent offline? |
|
|
|
|
|
oroboras
|
|
May 30, 2013, 03:32:52 PM |
|
I have also noticed a drop in reward - also the Getwork seems to be surprisingly small, especially since the pool as a whole is now well over 11000GH/s now.
Could the two be connected?
|
|
|
|
|
|
nottm28
|
|
May 30, 2013, 03:34:23 PM |
|
Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P This. I could pay half that, get a device that mines at twice the speed, and allows me to play games as well. Oh, and heats my house in the winter. Block Erupter is far too slow and far too expensive. This guy is getting 660mh/s out of his... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195037.msg2318757#msg2318757 |
donations not accepted
|
|
|
|
iFA88
|
|
May 30, 2013, 03:46:34 PM |
|
Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P This. I could pay half that, get a device that mines at twice the speed, and allows me to play games as well. Oh, and heats my house in the winter. Block Erupter is far too slow and far too expensive. This guy is getting 660mh/s out of his... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195037.msg2318757#msg2318757Yeah overclocked with hardware failures :S |
|
|
|
|
nottm28
|
|
May 30, 2013, 04:08:25 PM |
|
Price is too high. Half year need to return the buy price:P This. I could pay half that, get a device that mines at twice the speed, and allows me to play games as well. Oh, and heats my house in the winter. Block Erupter is far too slow and far too expensive. This guy is getting 660mh/s out of his... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195037.msg2318757#msg2318757Yeah overclocked with hardware failures :S Actually, he has stated it's just a 'display' error with cgminer - the real speed is 330mh/s as expected - pitty... |
donations not accepted
|
|
|
|
iFA88
|
|
May 30, 2013, 04:23:41 PM |
|
Actually, he has stated it's just a 'display' error with cgminer - the real speed is 330mh/s as expected - pitty...
No, they started soon a while. 14:56:14, and the log is displayed too what accepted soon 1 min. When i started the cgminer then they display wrong hash rate for 5 sec. |
|
|
|
ewitte
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 30, 2013, 05:34:39 PM
Last edit: May 30, 2013, 07:53:54 PM by ewitte |
|
Yeah first time I've blown a breaker...
EDIT: Lol someone also turned on a heater
|
Donations
BTC - 13Lgy6fb4d3nSYEf2nkgBgyBkkhPw8zkPd
LTC - LegzRwyc2Xhu8cqvaW2jwRrqSnhyaYU6gZ
|
|
|
|
Trongersoll
|
|
May 30, 2013, 05:49:38 PM |
|
I have also noticed a drop in reward - also the Getwork seems to be surprisingly small, especially since the pool as a whole is now well over 11000GH/s now.
Could the two be connected?
I think it is more likely because our slice of the pie has shrunk: http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.phpOther pools are growing faster than us. Probably because of all the negative comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
May 30, 2013, 06:24:41 PM
Last edit: May 30, 2013, 06:57:50 PM by Lucko |
|
I have also noticed a drop in reward - also the Getwork seems to be surprisingly small, especially since the pool as a whole is now well over 11000GH/s now.
Could the two be connected?
I think it is more likely because our slice of the pie has shrunk: http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.phpOther pools are growing faster than us. Probably because of all the negative comments. No. If the pool speed is constant and difficulty is the same number of found blocks is the same no matter what others are doing. And a reword for a round is(simplified ofcourse) your hashrate verses pool hashrate... Since there was no big difference in pool hashrate reword per block should be about the same. And the last change of difficulty was 7 days ago. EDIT: Getwork is small since it is 10% fee. Only ones that from some reasen stays with Slush and can't use stratum are using it... And negative comments have there reasons... So you might start looking there also. Also some miners probably left since they were told to do so by other miners who didn't see or didn't wanna see a problem... |
|
|
|
|
|
