paid 0.16 for two units and sent PM

Transaction id

45533f35cd1123ccd689d734940fcf04e3cf076046f4d261a9c9f4bc74edea07

My address in the spreadsheet is 1JZa1pyfuUnjwHjMgFnNyP1WZEPTYJ2EDw and it is correct. Thank you.

Thank you Sebastian and akw.  

Some people don't realize that akw probably needs to work a real job like the rest of us. Even if he was being paid to manage this GB there wouldn't be enough in management fees to buy him lunch. So chill a little and appreciate the efforts he has gone to. I'm sure he has learned a painful lesson as to what a pain in the backside it is to handle others monies. Even with quantities as low as 0.15BTC.

Any more shares left for #3? I have some in #2 and want to add more.

Now that Sebastian has spoken we all know this group buy is good to go. AKW is between a rock and a hard spot but a lot of inexperienced people in this bitcoin market are. Welcome to the wild west. The money is secure. Let's move forward. If BTC hits $1400 next week will you be clamoring for more shares also? I'm staying in. Being in the first batch is an advantage I do not want to give up. Thank you AKW and do better next time.

They are not stored in you wallet literally.  Your wallet is just an ID number and gives you control of the transactions associated with the ID. The payment should have been made to your ID and recorded in the blockchain. As soon as your backup wallet is synchronized with the blockchain you will see it "in" your wallet. It is always good to keep a backup and offsite preferably. You haven't lost anything.

10 shares

Net amount: -0.50 BTC
Transaction ID: dcb6b6b3777b04fd530e067f6c60ada89f7d84ed1db936d528df75a9bca14226
 
Thanks

One share please

Net amount: -1.50 BTC
Transaction ID: fb46e0322486c33c2e83facebe1fba7da00b04997c095523d05f27f4e484337a

Right now I am running bitcoin-qt version 0.8.5 Beta

My wallet says I have 1.76867944 BTC and this seems correct. All the transaction history looks correct.

When I look at the blockchain.info for my address in the wallet it says that I only have  1.18567944 BTC

The discrepancy seems to have occurred with transaction ID 6d49c2df910250a3cae6cbe3ed157e300de8b5cddfc0882db89980f29ca28391 back in June. In that transaction my bitcoin-qt wallet says I paid 2.0 BTC to 16qMbvYmbm7n1CPHT415DRX4JPrn3KEZHp which is correct and the blockchain transaction ID shows that also. The blockchain transaction ID also shows a near simultaneous payment  of 0.583 BTC to 15yGGVTKuTmDJJVe5CgcDYW8R7htDgWgqL.  I don't have any knowledge of that transaction with that wallet and the blockchain shows that address  15yGGVTKuTmDJJVe5CgcDYW8R7htDgWgqL  only has that single transaction in its history. In addition the blockchain shows the Estimated BTC transacted as 0.583. That is neither the amount I sent nor the total. It seems I have lost control of 0.583 BTC. Not much granted but as I want to transact more and more in BTC I also want to feel good about the integrity of this system.

The 0.583 BTC seems to be not yet redeemed and is now 4 months old. Given the fact that I did not spend it and my wallet says I should have it. What do I do?

Any help. Thanks.

So what is the hash rate we ended up with?? Thanks.

After zefir stopped sebastianju started groups buys. His 6th one is progressing at a snails pace. It looks like interest in chips only is waning.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=187660.0

My computer is dying. I am trying to transfer Office Pro 2007 to a new one but it refuses to activation either by internet or by phone. I am hoping a new key will fix it.  I could actually get away with a Standard or Small Business version if you are out of the Professional. Thanks.

I've been using mine with BTCGuild without any issues.

Do you have a preorder in already? What is the number approximately? thanks.

Just tried the 3.2.1 version on Windows 7. It seems to have the same problem I have seen in the past. It opens a command line window for about 200 milliseconds and then closes.

Short cut command used was C:\cgminer\cgminer3.2.1\cgminer-nogpu.exe -o  stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u XXXXXX_2 -p 123 --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100 -S //./COM3

This command works well in version 3.1.1. It also does not work in 3.2.0

I'm happily hashing with 3.1.1

Looks like I'm in for the first 2 shares to go for Jupiter

6d49c2df910250a3cae6cbe3ed157e300de8b5cddfc0882db89980f29ca28391

This guy has some good intructions.

http://rdmsnippets.com/2013/05/29/setting-up-asicminer-block-erupters-on-windows-7/

I got mine up and running on a Windows 7 and a Windows XP machine.

Download the correct drivers from http://www.silabs.com/products/mcu/Pages/USBtoUARTBridgeVCPDrivers.aspx

I had problems letting Windows search for the driver on the XP machine. It found the wrong one. Under Devices in the Ports section it should say Silicon Labs CP210x USB to UART Bridge (COM3) 

Yours may have a different COM number. Mine was 3. It is important for the command line later on.

I was initially unsuccessful with CGminer 3.2.0 but it may have been my problem.

I backed down to cgminer 3.1.1. Created a short cut to cgminer-nogpu.exe.

The I edited the properties of the short cut so the Target  looks like this on the Windows 7 machine

C:\cgminer\cgminer-3.1.1-windows\cgminer-nogpu.exe -o  stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u yourusername_2 -p 123 --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100 -S //./COM3

And this on the Windows XP machine

"C:\cgminer\cgminer-3.1.1-windows\cgminer-nogpu.exe" -o  stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u yourusername_3 -p 123 --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100 -S //./COM3

Note the parenthesis on the XP command. I do not know if it is critcal but it defaults that way.

The name after -u is really the worker name for btcguild. Which in btcguild is yourusername_suffix. So I have two workers called yourusername_2 and yourusername_3. Some of the examples have periods instead of underscores and I don't think that works with btcguild. I have played with any other options. Both units are hashing around 334M. And btcguild does not care about passwords for the stratum servers so use "123"

Thanks  Canary. I got the two units today and they are busy hashing. I left you positive trust kudos also.

Can you put me down for 2 shares please. Bitinstant is having problems with ZIPZAP for hours now and I am unable to make a conversion into bitcoins. I will as soon as they clear up their problems. Let me know if you will reserve it. Thanks.

Is the plan to mine in a pool or independently?

If this moves up to a Jupiter unit, what is the expected delivery on them and what happens to your queue  position?

Are you taking delivery on this even if you don't sell many shares?

KNCMiner states on their website they won't take money until they can predict delivery dates better. How have they indicated a September delivery for your unit? Thanks. I'm interested in two shares but not committing just yet.