Try mining with fixed difficulty.
just add ".100000" or ".200000" after your wallet adress in mining configuration.
Your hashrate seems fine for those cards - I'm getting around 830-850 with Claymores's, slightly less (but also less power comsumption) with xmr-stak.
Port should be fine.
Try mining on itns.west-pool.org:6666
Very promising pool, fee is still 0%, they are implementing PPLNS and new XMR Intense support announced yesterday.
|
|
|
Wrong; latest AMD drivers, if you change Graphics -> Compute in Radeon settings give the same performance as August BC drivers and are much more stable, in my experience.
Just trying to known if someone already tried these 18.1.1, if Pixel Patcher works and so on.
|
|
|
I'm mining on https://itns.west-pool.orgPool reported hashrate seems fine to me. Pay attention you should choose the port according to your hashing power, or too many found shares will be submitted too fast, and pool will temporarily ban your IP (preventing DDoS).
|
|
|
Yes, that should be adjusted. Siacoin is very hard to mine those days, compared to 3 months ago. I mined 2000 without too many effort.
|
|
|
What about Intense Coin (ITNS)?
Looks promising.
|
|
|
A week ago i take MSI RX550 2Gb, upgraded bios and now I have 480H\s from 1 card with only 27-30W. 1 card here was about 100$ price, so its perfect choice for cryptonight right now.
How? I have a 5 60 4 Gb, 1190/200 clocks, modded bios with PBE 1.6 and I can only get ~380 H/s. who is the manufacturer of memory? and try sgminer 5.5.5-gm rawintensity/worksize 420/8 (448/2), gpu-threads 2 Micron. Couldn't get sgminer-gm to run, though. Coud you share bat file?
|
|
|
A week ago i take MSI RX550 2Gb, upgraded bios and now I have 480H\s from 1 card with only 27-30W. 1 card here was about 100$ price, so its perfect choice for cryptonight right now.
How? I have a 5 60 4 Gb, 1190/200 clocks, modded bios with PBE 1.6 and I can only get ~380 H/s.
|
|
|
According to information provided by the pool itself the Intense Hashvault pool handles over 51% of the network percentage (56.21% atm.) Isn't that bad for the network/ coin if a single point controls so much (aka 51% attack)? Or is this more a theoretical problem for bitcoin and monero-based blockchains like IntenseCoin are more immune to this problem?
That happens when Nicehash contracts hop in to get the most of a block, sometimes network hashrate just doubles! One more reason to ban NH traffic.
|
|
|
Try this one https://drive.google.com/open?id=1buFOCC3j87tw5U5809KLqxQUQPflHuiQIt's 1200/2000, not so hard on undervolting, it seems not to have those strange clock issues in Windows. It gives me 29+ MH/s on ETH. As I said I'm not unhappy with performance, but power consumption optimization. The card is more than stable @ 1100 core and 900 mv or less. No problem in Linux, but Windows drivers somehow mess up with clocks with this undervolting.
|
|
|
Anyway, this is a windows only behaviour. As I said, with Linux, core is always @ 1100 Mhz.
I'm satisfied with performance, 28,7 MH/s in ETH, not bad with Elpida memory @ 2000 Mhz.
is this result of 28,7 single mining or same result also for dual mining? Looking for some time for a working bios but nothing worked for me atm.... Would be grateful for any help..... Single, but it can do it dual mining as well if you adjust -dcri in Claymore's. Here is the modded bios I use now. Pay attention this Pulse ITX has Elpida memory. https://drive.google.com/open?id=13s4QMRM7XwQVSl2cCHNOUSDLJxcl-ONW
|
|
|
Anyway, this is a windows only behaviour. As I said, with Linux, core is always @ 1100 Mhz.
I'm satisfied with performance, 28,7 MH/s in ETH, not bad with Elpida memory @ 2000 Mhz.
|
|
|
Does anyone have problems in windows with weird clock speeds on custom bios cards?
I modded a Saphire 570 ITX 4 Gb Elpida memory to 1100/2000 clocks and 900mv, stable 24/7 in linux with those clocks.
However, in Windows 10, both with blockchain drivers and newest ones, sometimes card is clocked at something like 300 / 533 Mhz core with huge loss of performance, and I can't set clock speed manually with Radeon settings or MSI afterburner.
Huge PIA.
Anyone?
|
|
|
Hi . I have a strange situation , mining on Intense. I recently put my new i7-8700k to mine this coin , but something strange is happening. If I use all 6 threads of the CPU the hash rate is bigger than the case I use 12 threads. Can somebody explain this ? Thanks for your answers.
You should have one thread for each 2 Mb CPU cache, not cores.
|
|
|
How can you ban crypto without banning the internet? Anyone care to explain?
|
|
|
Nicehash traffic is hopping Intense pools and ruining mining for small miners.
Network hash rate simply doubles at times from 8/10 to 20+ MH/s and difficulty skyrockets.
Totally agree, Nice Hash is a pain in the ass. They dip in till the difficulty is sky high then jump out until its low again. Becoming a joke really. Of course, and many small miners meanwhile have quit Intense mining because of low reward. itns.west-pool.org has blocked nicehash traffic this morning. I'm sticking with them. Every intense pool should do the same. And what a reason, if another pools have nicehashports?)) You are only lowering your pools hashrate) Good luck! Problem with NH traffic is that it is episodic, probably hopping in just before a block is found to get most of the reward with insane hash rates for a few minutes while others have been mining there for hours and are left with almost nothing. That's what screws the system, not the high hasrate. Just look at network hashrate, it was 21 MH/s 30 minutes ago and now it's half of that. This can't be good for network. I don't know how pools are calculating payments, but some other pools / coins are adapting PPLNS system instead of proportional, to discourage this predatory hop in / hop out behaviour.
|
|
|
Nicehash traffic is hopping Intense pools and ruining mining for small miners.
Network hash rate simply doubles at times from 8/10 to 20+ MH/s and difficulty skyrockets.
Totally agree, Nice Hash is a pain in the ass. They dip in till the difficulty is sky high then jump out until its low again. Becoming a joke really. Of course, and many small miners meanwhile have quit Intense mining because of low reward. itns.west-pool.org has blocked nicehash traffic this morning. I'm sticking with them. Every intense pool should do the same.
|
|
|
Nicehash traffic is hopping Intense pools and ruining mining for small miners.
Network hash rate simply doubles at times from 8/10 to 20+ MH/s and difficulty skyrockets.
Of cause - price is rising and core team has done a special port for nicehash a mounth ago. So there is no amazing thing. They shoud have kept nicehash out of intense. Nicehash is a cancer for mining community, and I can't believe even after being scammed in 64 million USD, they came back to them.
|
|
|
|