 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
-rvram -1
Yes use -rvram -1 or NBminer maby it works better,i think maby Phoenixminer developer is dead !!!  This worked for me too. That DAG epoch change caused 3 rigs to crash this morning. 4GB cards are getting tight now... -rvram -1 WORKS PERFECTLY FOR 4GB AMD CARDS!!! That was literally the first thing I said... Get ready to move on Linux slowly. Windows reserves 300 + MB of VRAM. The current DAG size is 3.57gb. The Phoenix miner free vram check was set to 384mb by def. When the dag + win reservation is taken away from 4gb vram, only 130MB of vram is left (that's why Phoenix made the problem). And with the command -rvram -1 you have time up to DAG 3.7gb or ~ 1.7.2020. After that, Linux....until 21.12.2020.
In the case of mixed rigs with 8gb and 4gb cards, what will be the behavior? I seemed to have understood that if there is at least an 8GB card the rig should continue to work correctly, is it correct? I think the lead card (GPU0) is better with 8GB VRAM as it reserves more than the rest if you check GPU memory usage in MSI Afterburner, or you can try integrated graphics for the main display output but I had problems with not being able to control the GPU voltages after that - that was nearly 2 years ago that I last tried though. It would be interesting to understand now if it is working because this would allow to keep the 4Gb cards having only 1 8Gb card |
|
|
|
Get ready to move on Linux slowly. Windows reserves 300 + MB of VRAM. The current DAG size is 3.57gb. The Phoenix miner free vram check was set to 384mb by def. When the dag + win reservation is taken away from 4gb vram, only 130MB of vram is left (that's why Phoenix made the problem). And with the command -rvram -1 you have time up to DAG 3.7gb or ~ 1.7.2020. After that, Linux....until 21.12.2020.
In the case of mixed rigs with 8gb and 4gb cards, what will be the behavior? I seemed to have understood that if there is at least an 8GB card the rig should continue to work correctly, is it correct? |
|
|
|
my rx 5700s are humming nicely at 50mhs each. but i wonder if they can pushed even further?  Same here... Getting 51+ at 107w per card. Hoping once the BIOS lock is removed, we can adjust mem timings, lower the clock and achieve similar performance with a lower power draw. Also, these Navi cards run cool so lower db's from the fan. Anxiously waiting... Same problem ... then you confirm that there is a bios lock for the rx 5700? Now I understand why I could not in any way lower the clock.... |
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have a question: I have a rig with some 4Gb and 8Gb amd RX 5xx cards.
When the size of the DAG file exceeds 4GB (next December), will it be necessary to replace the 4GB cards with 8GB models or since I have 8Gb cards will everything work?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have a question: I have a rig with some 4Gb and 8Gb amd RX 5xx cards.
When the size of the DAG file exceeds 4GB (next December), will it be necessary to replace the 4GB cards with 8GB models or since I have 8Gb cards will everything work?
|
|
|
|
Try to use Msi Afterburner 4.6.2 beta 2 (go to settings/general and unlock voltaje control and voltage monitoring), after adjust to around to -43% power limit, leaving all others (Gpu, Mem, Voltage) stock, untouched. Check for at least 24 hours of stability, if fails increase power limit from -43% to around -40%. When found stability, increase mem clock with 5MHz steps at 10-20 hours interval until find max OC stable. Then increase again power limit from -40% to -39% and that's it. Settings are for Sapphire 5700XT. Do no try for first time to increase memory to 900-915Mhz, it could fail, first find max OC stable, test 24 hours for stability and after go further. Example here: https://i.postimg.cc/YqdRr4R0/Stability.jpgCan I use this procedure also for RX 5700 Pulse? I tried to use MSI Afterburner (but I don't remember which version I used..) to decrease the voltage to 0,750V but the value was not set... |
|
|
|
Hi, do you have experience with the Sapphire RX 5700 Pulse? I can't change the board parameters into the program (4.6c), the board seems to be locked ... especially the memory voltage locked to 0.85V (and Tmem is always approx 80°)... do you have any suggestions?
Memory voltage is locked on Navi cards, also tmem can get high u run card on high voltage, try running card on 1300mhz/750mv and put mem on 900-930, that should lower temps on card alot. How did you get the card to run at 750mV? Mine never goes under 800mV regardless of -cvddc setting in Phoenixminer. Fan is at 70-90% all the time and power 112-118W. Same problem...it seems that the settings are not followed by the card...and this reflects on the memory temp (approx 80°C)... |
|
|
|
|
Hi, do you have experience with the Sapphire RX 5700 Pulse? I can't change the board parameters into the program (4.6c), the board seems to be locked ... especially the memory voltage locked to 0.85V (and Tmem is always approx 80°)... do you have any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
Theoritically, you can put Four Reference cards Navi in MSI X570 Godlike. My current tower cooler blocks the first GPU slot. Waiting on 3950X before actually putting the bonus MasterLiquid AIO from MSI X570's promotions. Anyway, I tried with three GPUS (one custom AIO cooled, two reference coolers) and it works just fine. Their temps are not catastrophic either; With fan speeds less than 50% (therefore noise is tame), the GPU temps are around 65-75 oC, with memory junction temp around 90 oC. https://youtu.be/IDsYGdhxayAAfter 3950X is here, I will get one of that and another reference card 5700 and my goal of having four GPUs in one motherboard will be achieved. For now the RX 5700 yiels around 48-49 Mh/S each with maximum GPU temps around 70 oC with memory temps around 90 oC, with fans running below 40 %. This RX 5700 reference design is just great for me. Can't see any reason not to make 52 mh/s with lower power consumption and gpu temps about 62 and mem temps about 72 and fans below 40. You will damage your memory in long term on 90 degree. Read my previous post and use PM with -tt 62 -cclock 1300 -mclock 900 -cvvdc 750 You can even use -mclock 910 for 52.7mh/s but you have to find lower -tt between 54 and 62. 54 works for sure. The fans will go between 40% and 60% depending on -tt .Currently testing ... -mclock 910 -tt 58 ..., seems very stable. Memory at 76 degree C. Fans at 46%. Power consumption 94 Watts. Hi everyone, I have a Sapphire RX 5700 Pulse and I'm in this same situation: if I set -tt 58 -cclock 1300 -mclock 900 -cvvdc 750 the memory temperature never drops below 88-90 °. I tried to decrease mclock value but it seems that any value inherent the memory that I set the program does not take it into consideration...do you have any suggestions? Is it necessary to unlock the card in any way? I'm willing to get a few Mh / s less than the current 50 but with slightly lower temperatures ... |
|
|
|
|
Hi, I've a Sapphire RX 5700 Pulse. Today I was trying to set claymore v15 and without specifying any clock value for gpu and memory I get 49.2Mh/s.
The card in these conditions goes to a cpu clock of 1700Mhz and a memory clock of 1750Mhz. If I try to lower the cpu clock to 1325Mhz I get the same result.
Can anyone give me some accurate settings to get something extra? thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone, at this moment what are the best cards in terms of price / performance based on RX 5700 for mining eth?
I plan to build a 4-card rig soon and I am undecided between the purchase of reference cards or some 2-fan variants (for example Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 or MSI RX 5700 MECH)...thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I've a rig with 4 x RX570 4Gb, Windows 10 v.1709 and AMD Drivers Blockchain. Claymore 11.9 work fine but I wanted to ask if it would be better to upgrade the AMD video driver....what is currently the best AMD driver to install?
thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone, I'm using claymore in dual miner mode (ETH with ethermine pool and Pascal with Nicehash pool)
I wanted to ask if you could give some advice on which second coin is most profitable to mine (without having eth drop). Actually i try to mine pascal with Nicehash but the result is very poor (with 17 polaris cards < 2€/day)
thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, someone using blake2s with the NiceHash pool? since yesterday the server seems down and I miss very little to get to the minimum balance to make a withdrawal...
Wich other currency on nicehash is it possible to dig with profit?
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm using claymore v11 since about 2 weeks in dual mining mode ETH + BLAKE2S with Ethermine pools for ETH and Nicehash for BLAKE2S.
After the 1st payment my Nicehash "profitability" has dropped (from 0.0005-6 BTC/day to 0.0001 BTC/day)... Gh/s and difficulty are the same...Do you have similar experiences? thank you
You should never mine at nicehash unless you are okay with their payments, is always 40% - 150% less than you would receive mining on a proper pool. I did some tests just to check the earnings on nicehash, I was supposed to earn $8 on a proper pool and nicehash paid $3.40, that is just an example.
Ok thank you...Do you have any suggestions on which second coin / pools to mine without dropping mh/s with ethermine? Is DCR with dcr.suprnova pool still a possibility? |
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm using claymore v11 since about 2 weeks in dual mining mode ETH + BLAKE2S with Ethermine pools for ETH and Nicehash for BLAKE2S.
After the 1st payment my Nicehash "profitability" has dropped (from 0.0005-6 BTC/day to 0.0001 BTC/day)... Gh/s and difficulty are the same...Do you have similar experiences? thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm using claymore v11 since about a week in dual mining mode ETH + BLAKE2S with Ethermine pools for ETH and Nicehash for BLAKE2S.
Since yesterday I'm having problems with Nicehash, it seems stuck and on Claymore appears the inscription "socket closed" ... do you have any suggestions? thank you
|
|
|
|
i think was a problem with all majority of the miners pool,
But is it a problem that is being solved? because in my case with ethermine it's happening now too.. |
|
|
|
I have the same isues and I think that is a DNS problem, but I can not check it because I'm on private network that can not change the DNS , I make a proxy outside this network and I connected the proxy to the pool and now it's fine
It was not a DNS problem. I had a machine that could ping eu2.ethermine.org, I got the pool's IP and tried to ping it (no domain, the IP) from a mining rig and still no ping. As I said, in my case the problem got resolved on its own. Must be some European ISP route or something In my case ethermine connects normally to eu2.ethermine.org but since monday returning more stale shares (> 30%). Can it be a related problem related? |
|
|
|
|
Hi, since last week I've some problem with the latest versione of Claymore. I use dual mining ETH + Decred with Ethermine pool and DCR suprnova and I'm having a high number of "Stale Shares".
If I delete Claymore folder and "reinstall" (unzip) an restart the rig the problem resolves for about 12 hours...do you have any suggestions?
thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
