We spoke with the Developer via Discord and we like what we hear so far. We are going to take part in today's Auction and We hope
everybody here also participates this looks to us like its going to be a real long-term stable project.

Great Work Guys keep it up!

Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.

So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.

Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.

My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.

The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...

I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.

Yes, we know a story about "mysterious someone" who leaked on 4chain  

I'm really tired of devs mining their own coin making the difficulty so high the only way is to buy a master node

Yes, and I honestly don't understand why they just run with it. Is it really that much work to move to a new chain? Serious question.

I wonder who the lucky person is that started mining all by himself. The 96 first block seem to have gone to the same wallet. Then mining stopped for a number of minutes and then from 97 the blocks ended up in another wallet address. Likely the same miner I guess, just changed address.

Seems like that address got all block rewards up until at least block 3000 and they currently have 137,093 Akroma. So that person will set up 27 masternodes, LOL.

Pretty poor distribution IMHO.

The sad thing is that as long as someone hasn't stepped forward and verified that they have control over that address, it might as well be the devs that have control of it. Who knows.

I'm not saying this is a scam by the devs. The project seems legit.

But in my mind, this would be the best way to set up a scam and it will always be in the back of my head for this project.

Already premined for 10days?  Come on,  ....
We need fair launch

None of those people are associated with the Bulwark project in any way, shape, or form.

Why don't you guys actually UNDERSTAND what Blackmailing is?

I'm no newbie and I can assure you I do not comment on these things lightly. But there are EXACT logo copies, with NO PROOF that the developers contacted the original artist of the logo, with nothing but hearsay FROM the 'dev' of this coin, with FACTS coming from the 'newbie'.

Regardless of what you might think, there are inconsistencies with what is said, and rightly so, questions need to be raised.

Blackmailed? No blackamiling here - he just THREATENED them to go public. That is NOT blackmail.

Oh, and before you start claiming falsities about me, or the company I keep (long term people who are respected developers in this industry), or the actually company I work for and run, remember that this is NOT about the coin or the 'devs', or the fact that you are arguing a moot point. It is about the fact that the logo is a copyrighted logo, is being used in it's EXACT format as the original (ie - a copy of, NOT inspiration from) and the inconsistencies that the 'devs' have proven in print on various forums and texts.

If the 'devs' want to attribute the logo to being the result of an 'inspiration' from somewhere, surely there would be some differences and not an exact copy? If the 'dev's want to debunk the claim, then why are their stories inconsistent with what they were claiming initially? That they had their designer come up with an EXACT replica of a copyrighted logo from some geometric inspiration? REALLY?

If the 'devs' REALLY want to push this out of the public eye, then come clean with the facts. Otherwise, this is looking like a crapfight and bringing doubt into the 'devs' honourable standing by performing a circus stunt that cannot be backed by facts, only excuses.

I hope this blows over, as it does get messy. I know - I'm in a court case this month for something along these lines.

#crysx

I just finally got the point, you tried to blackmail lux dev team by all this nonsense above, and when you failed you decided to write this senseless message that you allegedly sent to original company that allegedly sent some notice to Cryptopia. So now I can say for sure, you are not ridiculous boy that I was thought about you a half-hour ago, you are just disgusting person that won't be wellcomed any project that involved/will be involved in.

Watching this person trying to discredit lux is pitiful. That is a screenshot of someone filling out a form on Cryptopia. What did he fly to France and stand over the shoulder of the "ceo"?  Not quite sure this company is even around. Give me a break. There are some bugs with Lux but shut the frick up and move on if you dont like it