Looks like it has failed to break out upwards We're gonna go below 800 thats for sure. Less book-talking and more chart dinosaurs, please. Agree. And I would like to see something other than a t-rex or brontosaurus. Please be creative.
|
|
|
http://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthasharf/2014/01/15/10-one-perspective-on-what-bitcoin-will-be-worth-in-2014/Bitcoin began 2013 at $13 a coin, only to ring in 2014 around $800 with worldwide fascination driving the 60-times gain. But according to Boston University Finance Professor Mark Williams the price has really been driven by an influential few. Just 47 people own 29% of all outstanding Bitcoins; 930 own 50%. Another 10,000 folks bring the total owned by the largest coin holders to roughly 75%, leaving a sliver to be split among about 1 million small-change Bitcoiners.
Williams, a former trader and bank examiner for the Federal Reserve, argues that in 2013 the 47 powers coordinated to push prices up. They counted on what economists call Greater Fools. Investors make money when someone is willing to pay a higher price for a security than you did — Greater Fool Theory states that there is always someone willing to pay a higher price. But Williams sees the broader market wising up to Bitcoin’s limitations and taking back control in 2014.
Awesome article. Conclusion? Load up on silly alts before the fools greater than you.
|
|
|
Irrelevant. Nobody buys bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency because they are superior payment systems. We buy for one and only one reason: to hodl and sodl our way to more fiat. Please do not respond to my post with lies. thx.
|
|
|
One of these plots is actual hourly closing price (USD/BTC) from one exchange, the other is a series of fake prices generated by a simple "log-Brownian" model. Can you tell which is which, without looking at other charts? If you think you can, what difference do you see? Honestly, they both look very plausible. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if they're both BTC/USD, but from different exchanges. The red line (Y) is Bitstamp's hourly closing price from 2014-01-05 to 2014-01-13. The blue line (X) is generated by starting with X(0) = 840 Z(0) = log_10(X(0)), then, for i = 1,2,... Z(i) = Z(i-1) + 0.058*RND(), X(i) = 10^Z(i) where RND() is a random number with normal distribution, mean 0 and standard deviation 1. In simple words, the simulated price X(i) increases or decreases at each step by a random percentage, without regard for the past history. I had to try twice, with different random generator's seeds; on my first attempt the simulated price dropped too low at one point, it would have been a dead giveaway. Are you trying to tell us bitcoin is a purely speculative investment? Nah, GTFO!
|
|
|
We have to ask Walsoraj. He's the last resort.
WALSORAJ!!!!
What to do? Hodl or sodl?
That is a complex question. Bitcoin = always sodl. Dogecoin = always hodl.
|
|
|
In 2016:
Dogecoin overtakes Bitcoin.
|
|
|
what kind of drugs are those that hope for 100$ COINS TAKING??
The kind that make you do this:
|
|
|
i panic sold once and i felt so dumb that i've adopted the strict HODL policy and it's been working out for me so far
you guys should try it out too
I've moved to a pure SODL strategy, since we're clearly heading to zero. Agree, but I am HODLING Dogecoins. Please tell me you are doing the same.
|
|
|
houbi just needs to go bi bi already
overstock taking us to the moon on monday as soon as funds arrive
Agreed. If Huobi goes bi bi, what will the price stabilize at in the short term? According to most experts: $10.
|
|
|
Cross post, because: brilliant. Immediately converting bitcoin through a payment processor is not "accepting bitcoin." It is accepting fiat, both functionally and literally.
Newegg and Overstock are irrelevant.
You idiots.
Correct they accept fiat and allow bitcoin users to ay with their bitcoin. I think it is pretty awesome that they would completely adjust their accepted payment methods to include the bitcoin community. You are a stupid person and have missed the point. Awe cute. Instead of positing an intelligent response you just resort to name calling. I never knew you were still in middle school and had limited intelligence. This explains a lot. What would be the point of an intelligent response when the first statement I made was so easy to understand? You idiot.
|
|
|
Cross post, because: brilliant. Immediately converting bitcoin through a payment processor is not "accepting bitcoin." It is accepting fiat, both functionally and literally.
Newegg and Overstock are irrelevant.
You idiots.
Correct they accept fiat and allow bitcoin users to ay with their bitcoin. I think it is pretty awesome that they would completely adjust their accepted payment methods to include the bitcoin community. You are a stupid person and have missed the point.
|
|
|
Cross post, because: brilliant. Immediately converting bitcoin through a payment processor is not "accepting bitcoin." It is accepting fiat, both functionally and literally.
Newegg and Overstock are irrelevant.
You idiots.
|
|
|
Immediately converting bitcoin through a payment processor is not "accepting bitcoin." It is accepting fiat, both functionally and literally.
Newegg and Overstock are irrelevant.
You idiots.
|
|
|
Eaten or pulled?
Irrelevant if trader eats his own wall.
|
|
|
"We're going up/down in next 8 hours. Nothing happens in next 48 hours.. UPDATE: we stopped going up/down."
i do remember this call now, actually, and i'm still a little puzzled why that particular triangle didn't break out. i've noticed that if the breakout time corresponds with a natural low in volume, like the middle of the night, or the weekend, it can affect the model. i've also come to understand better the stochastic manner in which smaller triangles break into bigger triangles but continue consolidating, a behavior i did not fully understand at the time, and was just beginning to model. i just tried to go through my posts so i could dig it up for accountability (no one's right 100% of the time ), but i can't seem to find it. i hope my concession here, at least, is enough to make peace with you, seleme, on this matter. i would appreciate it if you didn't hold poor calls i made six months ago against my work now. --arepo less words, more dinosaur drawings. plz.
|
|
|
Lol that stamp dump
Huobi went the other way I have no idea which way this will go by tomorrow. Could be anywhere, 50/50 for me for now. When I see stamp leading a drop, it tells me people are taking fiat profits off the exchange, not trading. Stamp is the place to go for that. My hunch is those three big dumps we saw at 3:15, 10:45 and 17:15 PST were guys cashing out. All triggered by the mining centralization issue, in my opinion. This mining centralization thing is ridiculous. Its not an issue for so many different various reasons, the most obvious one is who wants to take a gun and shoot themselves right between the eyes? You find me that person who is also a powerful miner and I will start worrying too. Actually I won't. Because the whole issue is retarded mentally handicapped. If you're content relying on all "powerful miners" having the same interests as you do, there's nothing much more I can say. Furthermore, it is not necessarily against the interest of bitcoin miners to attack the network. Doing so would cause altcoins to rocket. Investing in them before the attack = early retirement.
|
|
|
Anybody know Baidu's total bitcoin sales?
Less than 1 BTC, I think. Hilarious. Source?
|
|
|
Anybody know Baidu's total bitcoin sales?
|
|
|
Unless they intend to hodl, major retailers accepting bitcoin is a bad sign (for bulls).
|
|
|
CHOOOOO-CHOOOOO: OVERSTOCK WENT LIVE !
That is not bullish. Overstock has nothing to do with bitcoin. They simply use bitpay and accept fiat Bitpay sells the coins asap -» Selling pressure but it increases bitcoins usefulness, and this brings up the value. now i can save AND spend with BTC, these days you can pretty much live on BTC without any problems. how far we've come in so little time. General public will not want bitcoin for its usefulness if actually using it decreases its fiat value.
|
|
|
|