 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
3
|
Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [CLOSED] CoiningSolutions.com Cointerra Shares ฿2 = 25GH/s [CLOSED]
|
on: March 01, 2014, 04:34:36 AM
|
Hopefully this explains a bit to answer the above: - Next payout I will be subtracting ฿.1 ($50)/miner in fees to address the overpay in fees from this week. This means your next dividend payout will have the BTC that was missed on the first round. - I was mistaken about .31 KwH, it's actually .30 KwH. http://imgur.com/dcGywPf- I was also mistaken about 2900W, it's closer to ~2800W w fluctuation spikes up to 2900W. http://imgur.com/H0B6sld and http://youtu.be/uvVCISb9N14 *Note I'm only measuring half the power consumption with the meter.- .30c @ 24/7 still, has about $300 in fees per bi-weekly payout per miner. That is literally what it costs to run the machine.. not including cooling and maintenance. I know that is not ideal, obviously. We're hashing at 25% less than what we should be and using a crazy amount of power. All we can do at this point is wait for firmwares from Cointerra. Cheers WH Dear waldo , i guess it's best if you get another power meter. from my previous experience with server PSUs , they have something called PMU , which is abbreviated for Power Management Unit . PSUs can work in active-active/active-passive , they can work in 20% - 90% capacity and so on. so measuring one PSU and assuming that it consumes twice the amount can be wrong . and the reason to do so is that , usually PSUs yield better efficiency in loads greater than 70%. |
|
|
|
|
4
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Dummy Plug] DVI-D solution?
|
on: February 23, 2014, 05:20:41 AM
|
|
I'm looking for the same thing , and came across the same results as yours.
i have 13 miners running Tri-X's and it's such a pain , because not only they need the dummy to bootup, but also they require the monitor when the mining is getting started !!!
i talked to a guy who produces some modified hardware equipments for us , he told me that he can build up some for me , but not 13 that i need .
he needs an order of at least 50pcs , so basically if there is enough interest it's possible.
he asked for 15$ for each dummy .
if anyone has a better solution please speak up.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: Interest in a GPU Group Buy?
|
on: February 04, 2014, 04:49:52 AM
|
|
I'd be interested in buying many 270Xs , if they are the right price (less than 200$) and delivered to UAE .
i have access to electricity as cheap as 1.5cents/kwh , and i have over 300 amps of 220V .
we've already bought 50x 290 + 60 7950 , i guess 270 is a good bang for the buck !.
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance
|
on: January 18, 2014, 06:05:15 AM
|
I think the best way to support the developers is if he can post referral links to VPS that's recommended to solo mining with this HP. I would certainly sign up with more than 10 instances on the ones that are good to mine on a couple of different hosts.
BTW, I got this error msg when compiling the latest checked-out git on RH 6.5:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/root/primecoin/src -I/root/primecoin/src/obj -I/usr/local/include -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/root/primecoin/src/leveldb/include -I/root/primecoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/main.d -o obj/main.o main.cpp
In file included from main.cpp:16:
prime.h:13:33: warning: boost/timer/timer.hpp: No such file or directory
In file included from main.cpp:16:
prime.h:51: error: ‘boost::timer’ has not been declared
prime.h:51: error: expected initializer before ‘minerTimer’
main.cpp: In function ‘void BitcoinMiner(CWallet*)’:
main.cpp:4635: error: ‘minerTimer’ was not declared in this scope
main.cpp:4645: error: ‘boost::chrono’ has not been declared
main.cpp:4645: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘time_now’
main.cpp:4646: error: ‘boost::chrono’ has not been declared
main.cpp:4646: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘ns_now’
main.cpp:4647: error: ‘ns_now’ was not declared in this scope
make: *** [obj/main.o] Error 1
Not sure what's wrong if I'm missing something?
dear AnhBen , Just browse around this thread you'll find your answer , the problem is that you need to use a newer version of libboost , the one RH6 provides is pretty old . you'd better compile boost yourself. |
|
|
|
|
9
|
Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: CoiningSolutions.com HashFast Batch 1 next action Poll
|
on: January 10, 2014, 05:29:41 AM
|
|
for god's sake , all of you know that if we win the legal case . the company might/will go bankrupt and since it's LLC. they are only obliged to pay as much as their company is worth, and that means that you wouldn't even get your US$ equivalant .
all of you people please be realistic .
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [CLOSED] CoiningSolutions.com HashFast Shares ฿2.5 = 20GH/s [CLOSED]
|
on: December 03, 2013, 05:07:44 AM
|
What do you guys think?
I think Waldo's right about stating he can not do anything about it right now. Not a 1% chance they would give refunds in 2013. What I do not understand, and think Waldo's wrong is not clarifying about the return amount in BTC in 2014 if they do not deliver. I don't know where Waldo get's his confidence they'll return full BTC amount, when it is well known they've officially changed TOS. I'm convinced this is a mistake and may cost us greatly if we make an ill-informed decision to ask for refund in a month based on this wrong presumption. What I do think is a need for group organizer to clarify this issue personally with someone of authority at HF. Waldo needs to get just one piece of information: Tell HF we've bought 7 batch#1 BabyJets + 7 upgrade kits for XYZ BTC. Ask how many BTC will we get back in total in case we ask for a refund, is it XYZ BTC or few percents of that sum? If we are offered just percentage BTC back in refund, than it's foolish to ask for a refund without forming the lawyer fund and suing HF, and I'm against of optimistically asking for a refund and getting slammed by a hammer when we see the amount HF sent back. itod I agree with you, but the problem is lawyering up would cost us a lot and even if we win the case, HF will get bankrupt for sure . and it's probable that you wouldn't get all your BTC in that way either ! imagine that you've lost your BTC for the GB and BTC for the lawyer and didn't even get back 10% of your investment back  does anyone know if HF is LLC or not ? |
|
|
|
|
