Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 08:52:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 [200] 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 »
3981  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which Pool ??? on: March 15, 2014, 01:59:45 PM
Question: Does a large pool have any advantage over a smaller pool (or a single person with a block erupter) for finding the next block?

Reason I am asking is this: If a large pool has found the last block, they know this before anyone else, and can start working on the next block. Meantime the guy with the BE does not know this and is whacking away on an invalid block. Small advantage, but with blocks being generated every 10 minutes it could add up.

Or is this totally wrong?

C
3982  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ghash.io is becoming SHOCKINGLY AGGRESSIVE NOW, closing in 45% on: March 15, 2014, 01:46:18 PM
This is something I have been wondering: Does a big pool have an advantage in luck over a smaller one. Reason being I switched about a terrahash from Eliguis to Eclipse and the luck on eclipse has been bad. Right now it's back to back 1 day periods since a block was found.

Does a large pool have a skewed chance of finding the next block over a little pool or an individual with a CPU due to having more local info about the last block generated (ie: they made it)?

If not I'll stick with a smaller pool because variance should even out. If so then I'm being a "chump".
3983  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The Chili – 30+GH/s BFL based Bitcoin Miner Assembly on: March 14, 2014, 08:41:52 PM
Well, how hard can it be?

Seriously: The BFL chips are probably using the same programming because why change it? Based on the board picture it looks like similar power needs/provides (1 volt, 3.3 volts, 5 volts with 3.3 volts running the logic, 1 volt running the engines), and the signaling to these things is remarkably simple (SPIO, basically unbalanced serial, low rate). All the clocks, details, and fun stuff is kept in the chip.

In theory one would need to supply it with power, read the signals, and get rid of the heat. An adapter board could be built with solder balls on the bottom to match the jalapeno board, then replace the trimmer resistors to set the 1 volt supplies to 1.3 volts or so, then either hack the Atmel code to provision the work or use the defaults and go.

Heat's tricky, but underclock it a bit and put a nice heat sink on top and it might stay cool. Getting it to all fit in a jalapeno box might be the challenge, but wouldn't it look cool?

C
3984  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The Chili – 30+GH/s BFL based Bitcoin Miner Assembly on: March 14, 2014, 08:16:07 PM
I'll be honest: It's going to be a race to see if Mr. Teal gets the 500gh chili out before I deliver the 300gh Jalapeno. :-)

C
3985  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: {BFL} Who here already pre-ordered the Monarch 28 nm Bitcoin mining card ??? on: March 14, 2014, 05:47:28 PM
but they never ship a product you can get ROI with it was supposed to ship (monarch) dec now they say may i ordered items last april would have got them in nov 25th so did a force update to the monarchs with those orders (dec) and now may (brick now brick later)....in other words if they do offer a refund if you wait 6 months on monarch as they say i'm so gonna grab it

Searing
I understand the frustration, but that is the nature of difficulty. I keep saying that at this time mining is not a profitable venture, it's technically impossible to make long term profits on it.

As bitcoin's adoption picks up and transaction fees increase this might happen, we shall see.
3986  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: {BFL} Who here already pre-ordered the Monarch 28 nm Bitcoin mining card ??? on: March 14, 2014, 03:54:18 PM
I will say the pictures of the air cooling on the board look... cool. And the thought of a th in that form factor to replace what is a maze in my house is also... interesting.

Hm.
3987  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Butterfly - Powersupply has an incredibly poor quality on: March 13, 2014, 06:29:39 PM
Clattered in the box ... the thing is probably flown in the box. I have to now buy a good power supply ggggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
They have a warranty on them.
So you can get a replacement for free.
Since we all know the quality of these bad boys, I would put it somewhere that is flammable though. Smiley

I remember reading that BFL claimed only 1% defective/RMAs.
I have had an ASIC on one of the singles blow up.
Also 5 or 6 power supplies too.

I love the fact that each time I get a new one from them it has a new colored led!

Pretty much all the failures I have run into have been power supply related. Did have one USB failure that was caused by someone shoving something into the USB port, but I don't think that is BFL's issue.

Overall the HW has been excellent, just the power supplies that are junk.

C
3988  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 13, 2014, 02:33:49 PM
NO dont start putting the fear of god in the group.
God, Gox, what's the difference.

Given that WK recently paid out over a million dollars worth of bitcoin to keep the wait times minimal, I'd trust him and not worry about it.

C
3989  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Hacking a BFL Jalapeno to 32GH and beyond....(???) on: March 13, 2014, 02:18:56 PM
Another note: I did some power calculations, and it looks like the 8 chip jally pulls 5.2 watts per gh, while a standard single/30 pulls about 4.0 watts per gh. I'm guessing most of the difference is the cooling pump, but I think the newer boards are more efficient than turbo-charged jallies.

C
3990  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Hacking a BFL Jalapeno to 32GH and beyond....(???) on: March 13, 2014, 02:17:20 PM
Very interesting little update: Last night my 6 miners out in the shed faulted out my Rpi at 4am. Went out at 6am to check on them, brought a laptop and after some analysis found that my 28gh air cooled jalapeno was screwing up the USB bus. Not sure why, but it's out of the loop for now and everything else (8 chip jally, chili, two single/30's and two single/60's) are running normally.

Unit was a factory good 2 chip December Jally that was upgraded to 7 chips with dual heat sinks. It tended to get quite warm but not insanely hot.

Now it is true the temps last night in the shed dropped under 15f, and this was a confirmed good unit, but it's still odd. I'll have to sit down and figure out what's going on.

C
3991  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The first Bitcoin Solar mining device coming soon - SolarMiner USB2 machine on: March 12, 2014, 09:28:34 PM
Honest answer: I had them on my roof. 1800 watts of Siemens 75 watt single crystaline panels. With some shading around here I was pulling about 8-10kw a day. Not bad, but cute.

7 years later there was a hole in the roof shingles. Granted they were older, but it turned out that leaves had gotten under the panels in one spot and the acid in them burned a hole in my shingles. Cost $1,200 to have the panels taken off the roof (and a LOT of calls, the installers had long since gone and no one wanted to do it) and with the new roof on I figured "screw this, put them on the shed".

So they're all grid-tied right now, although the install does not meet NEC 2010 so it's somewhat renegade although the SB1800 and dual SB700's are fully certified for grid isolation and all that. So I can't put power back into the grid. But I can run my miners on the shed as long as they consume more than the panels can generate. So there you go.

C
3992  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The first Bitcoin Solar mining device coming soon - SolarMiner USB2 machine on: March 12, 2014, 08:06:21 PM
Note: I have about 2,000 watts of solar on one shed and 900 watts on the other. They're finally putting out power now that spring is coming and I'm moving about 3,000 watts worth of miners out into the shed.

This is enough to balance out the load of 850gh of hashing power while the sun is shining right on the panels, maybe 4 hours a day. That's it. Going 24 hours it would barely cover 100gh with batteries supporting the load.

What you really need to do is this:

Find an abandoned dam
Enter it with a penstock turbine, miners, and a cell phone
Set everything up
Leave

The cell phone would provide the internet, and so forth. That would work.

C
3993  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Butterfly - Powersupply has an incredibly poor quality on: March 12, 2014, 08:00:58 PM
Interesting. Where was the blown cap on the board? I'm wondering if it's a PFC modulating cap and the reason it doesn't blow up devices is because it goes to ground instead of neutral (on the jalapeno it goes to neutral which is beyond bad when run on 240 volt lines)

I have one myself, it's not as good as a Corsair power supply, but it's not too bad overall. Warmer than it should be though, less efficient than a Corsair 500 (which can power two singles)

C
3994  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 12, 2014, 04:19:47 PM
I would like the CEO of Eligius to personal call me when something is wrong.  That would be nice.
Well, I'm having problems with my wife and girlfriend. Eligius should notify me when there is a schedule conflict in my bitcoin use keeping them all happy.

C
3995  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 12, 2014, 04:14:47 PM
There's plenty of piece of software available that can monitor miners and notify you if something dies.  cgwatcher is one that instantly comes to mind.

Other pools have email notifications, but you pay 2% fees for that privilege.  Eligius is a fee-free pool for miners who can monitor their own miners, and don't get their knickers in a knot when stats die or a payout is 10 minutes late.
Eclipse doesn't have a fee for their notification and it's pretty good. However I've been noticing that Eclipse will sometimes reject a lot of shares (a couple of percent as opposed to <1%) which is a bit odd and I don't think they share block rewards.

Eclipse also has more short term variation because it's a bit smaller. Over time things will average out, but in the short term I go a bit bonkers when it takes 20 hours to find a block, followed by 1 minute to find another one. Whatever, luck averages out over time.

C
3996  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Name something you've actually BOUGHT with bitcoin on: March 11, 2014, 02:23:55 AM
...

A 0.25 oz Gold Eagle.  I think that as time goes by, I will save most BTC that get (I buy them for cash), and what I spend will likely be for more gold.
Hm. Who is selling gold? That could be nice.
3997  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 11, 2014, 02:05:16 AM
And I just went into the payout queue with a 3 block delay. No problem...
3998  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 10, 2014, 11:01:25 PM
My systems are mining as normal. I'm sure the stats page will come up at some point.

C
3999  Economy / Exchanges / Re: MtGox withdrawal delays [Gathering] on: March 10, 2014, 06:02:39 PM
Tinfoil hats are in reality made of Aluminium foil! They are just called tin foil hats to confuse conspiracy nuts.

Oh great, apply logic if you will, but the point is to ensure metal hat of some kind.  I myself use a tin pot, lined with aluminum.  And since I never trusted Gox, it worked.
Lame. Those of us *in the know* have had our foil surgically implanted between the scalp and skull. It allows us to work unseen and undetected and provides a cool crinkly sound when we wear our fez hats.

C
:-)
4000  Economy / Exchanges / Re: mtgox is really hacked again? on: March 10, 2014, 03:36:25 PM
By the way this is not unusual: Years ago at Defcon they released hardware based badges for hacking. I got mine a day early, reviewed the chips, and downloaded the spec sheets from motorola.

The next day (day one conference) I re-downloaded the tech sheet and my toolz told me there was a difference in the file from the one I downloaded the previous day. Fired up my hext editors and sure enough someone had hacked into motorola and replaced the spec sheet with a zero day virus. Nice....

Moral: Don't trust things.

C
Pages: « 1 ... 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 [200] 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!