|
All juices are squeezed out of the hamsters and it is worth noting that hamsters can step on the same rake several times. It is a pity that such projects scare investors away.
|
|
|
|
Did he mean digital will replace fiat all over the world? Or in some countries? Or in some cities? In the world, this is not possible. 2030 is just a decade from now and it is too short for such to happen. In Africa and Asia and if not all the countries in the world, some people do not have access to browsing phone. Although there could be ATMs but there are some trader that will not accept digital as payment. They will accept fiat because they are using small phones that they can afford that has no browsing features while some traders in Africa and Asia will not even know how to operate the phones. By that time, more people will deal with digital currencies but can not replace fiat fully. This could be achieve in more than 3 decades from now. Despite the fact that the technological cocoon is developing with a very rapid progression, do you think that ten years is not enough? Remember 10 years ago the Internet, our gadgets and the opportunities that have appeared. Adequate people can safely switch to digital but there are corporations that always slow down the process of all good undertakings. |
|
|
|
Well according to the article it appears meta mask has violate the Google financial service policies, you don't expect those who violate policies to go unpunished, you make it sound like they where ban without a reason, i guess people should do things according to what is specified, and for the good of the many users of this app, i hope both parties can come to a resolution, after what is already happening with Youtube it won't be good to have Google do same.
I agree that metamask simply violated the policy because it is a business and everyone wants to sell their products profitably. The question is, what kind of rules did the metamask break? There is no reason to ban just like that or there is another benefit for Google. |
|
|
|
|
After the cryptocurrency hype, the year 2019 turned out to be cold but it is worth noting that several projects still brought good profit. Trading on the exchange was smooth and calm and mostly traded as a plus. Watching how altcoins and ether go down in price, I bought with bitcoin and, as always took profits. In general, 2019 turned out to be without big bursts but also practically without losses.
|
|
|
|
It can't be, because even good projects can become scams and this forum also doesn't have a checking system for projects that will be promoted in this forum so there's nothing to do, to make this forum free of scammers
That's right, there were a lot of fraudulent projects but there were also many amateur projects that simply could not do the job or simply looked far into the future. There are many more slag projects where a token and blockchain are completely unnecessary. |
|
|
|
|
The authorities and higher structures just do not lag behind the scales, everyone wants to have their own profit, this is why the future of this coin is interesting. I also wonder who is behind Bitcoin? somebody knows?)
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds utopian and all of this is certainly cool but we all need to understand what kind of world we live in - at the moment, it is not at all interesting for corporations, and if it becomes interesting, they will still come up with a leash. These are the realities of life.
|
|
|
|
|
White paper is of course good and good if it is well written but I think that the main result, and as a result, as practice has shown is very bad for us, so it doesn’t matter whether it is copied or not, the main thing is what will be the result.
|
|
|
|
|
There are no arguments for roubini and it just looks like a troll which you should not pay attention to. It will be sad if he turns out to be right of course but I think that this is unlikely to happen because Ethereum also has an infrastructure, but on the other hand, Bitcoin can take on all of this infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
He himself has nurtured technology and can now nip off the fruit a little. 11 million is not so much. Does anyone have at least rough information about what he is going to pour this money into?
|
|
|
|
|
If youtube blocks content related to cryptocurrencies and does it for the sake of the law, then this platform should pay attention to the amount of advertising of pyramids, drugs and other fraudulent schemes.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to me, as in any business, you need to understand what you need it for and what exactly you want because the question is vague. In order to be a blockchain developer it is not necessary to have knowledge in all areas of programming, it is enough to find people with whom you are on the way and who have knowledge in the necessary areas.
|
|
|
|
|
It was always clear to me that for companies this is just marketing and advertising but it is also obvious that companies cannot say the exact price and you yourself must understand that all the numbers that they state may fluctuate depending on market conditions. In this case, I have nothing to show ico or ieo.
|
|
|
|
|
Higher authorities and banks are only interested but things are not moving forward because they are almost the main levers in strengthening cryptocurrencies, and unfortunately for many now the introduction of cryptocurrencies and blockchain into the system is not at all important. Therefore, it’s good that Bitcoin has a large infrastructure, we are moving forward with slow but sure steps.
|
|
|
|
Maybe youtube are just playing safe here. Since a lot of people are losing money in crypto investments, they want crypto related videos gone so they will not be blamed by the proliferation of crypto-related losses. But I think should not be all videos, they should assess the content. If it is more on informational videos towards crypto, they should not delete.
This is most likely an isolated case because on YouTube without cryptocurrencies many fraudulent projects are advertised (sports betting, pyramids, hydra, etc.). It’s interesting to find out the reason for the removal from YouTube itself. |
|
|
|
|
Both coins are cloudy in terms of transparency because we still don’t know who and why created Bitcoin but based on the fact of anonymity, I prefer bitcoin, and it doesn’t matter what the transaction fee and volatility is.
|
|
|
|
|
I look at actions and circumstances. Once I bought Ether for 8$ and imagine my joy when its price rose to 1000$. In general, I earned quite well, but now the situation with the ether is incomprehensible, so at the moment I stick closer to bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin was probably not mentioned, probably because it is by default) I remained dissatisfied with ethereum, and now the price has completely fallen, but I made good money on ATOM in August this year.
|
|
|
|
Additional exchange points  I would never have to store my cryptocurrency in a bank, what's the point of this at all? And people who do not understand cryptocurrency all the more so do not need this. |
|
|
|
|
In fact, I know traders who take money into management on certain conditions and they are not scammers, that's why such projects are not always fraudulent but if you don’t know then don’t go anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
