Everything that happens reminds me a bit of sec and ethereum. It seems to me when the scales make concessions and the needs of higher authorities then the matter will go forward. Everyone is looking for their own benefit.

Maybe they say investing money not in old but in top coins? Because there is no point in it and delete them because they do not meet the requirements.

If the United States authorities did not shove their hands wherever they need to be shoved and did not start a war themselves, then there would be no terrorism. The black market has existed before and will continue to exist on this issue of payment is not the most important here.

The bot may be wrong but if you use it as an add-on then it’s normal. In addition to trading, you can buy a chat in a telegram where you can look at the setups of experienced traders and do how they are or adjust as you like.

It is impossible to guess or predict the worst but I keep bitcoin because this coin has a large infrastructure, which means that it will not be so easy for many to part with it. At altcoins, I do not see the gap in front but everything can turn upside down.

Back in the spring of 2018 when altcoins became much cheaper, I sold most of them because many projects seemed useless but I still made good money. I left a lot of altcoins in my portfolio but many of them currently cost almost nothing and some projects simply stopped working.

I agree with you that scammers are among us and know how to create the appearance of a good project, so we can say that scammers are often one step ahead. What we can do is be vigilant and report suspicious characters on the forum.

I absolutely do not see any prerequisites for the rise of altcoins, why would it? You need to really look at this state of affairs in the crypto industry.

This is said by the ethereum press service. How things are actually known only to the developers but we are really looking forward to and hope that ethereum will work through the bugs and update.

That's right, there are two sides of the same coin. I have said more than once that decentralization is the laying of fees for the maintenance of data centers and responsibility for glitches on the shoulders of the users themselves. The blockchain becomes fully controlled when someone reaches 51% of the computing power and that already was.

The fact is that cryptocurrency is not needed in many areas and for this a lot of useless projects have been created, which greatly influenced altcoins and investor loyalty to them.

Based on past experience when there was a cryptocurrency hype and few people could understand which project was fraudulent and which was not, you can understand that crypto enthusiasts in the main part were deceived. Now we have become more experienced and now we can talk about it.

Stop looking at women as something weak, this is an imposed conviction. Read the biology of human behavior and genetics and you will find out that a woman is also capable of much, both physically and mentally. I have many friends of girls who have good financial knowledge and are technically savvy, and it seems strange to me to start such discussions.

Bitcoin has always been and to this day shows itself quite well but among other things, there is more confidence in Bitcoin because a large infrastructure has appeared around it. Obviously, this cannot be said about most altcoins.

It seems to me that Russia is most loyal to projects because there is no regulation there and generally in Russia the legal field in digital areas is very weak, so I think you can create almost anything you want there.

If you continue to discuss in line with conspiracy theories, then tell the newcomer that you do not know who and why invented Bitcoin and show the cover of the journal the economist of 1988. Tell him that the crisis may have been intentionally created by the same people who want to push their cryptocurrency to the masses. I know it sounds harsh but think it all the same. And then tell where and how you can buy, mine and store cryptocurrency safely.

It does not always depend on managers because managers are involved in counting and issuing tokens. And is there a big difference in the fact that the project delayed the payment of tokens that cost almost nothing or paid out tokens later? Just many projects are waiting for better times and can be understood sometimes.

I don’t understand who needs to create such news, especially if it’s fake and it’s not profitable. The US government is still a balamut and manipulators and, as practice shows, trusting them as not respecting yourself.

We go down to 3, then again back to 7) It is difficult to guess, of course, but in any case I keep bitcoin because for me at the moment it is the most confident digital asset.

My question is, is the payment in tokens? What is the result of such a calculation ($ 50 / week)? Because you wear a different signature, for which you receive clearly less than in the project that was offered.