 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
My masternody succesfully started 2 days ago but i have not anyone reward. Why? Maybe because it is sh*tcoin?
Don't start to claim shitcoin/fud and get out, my masternode works very well. |
|
|
|
Enemy seems completly ignore theses warnings about GPL licence, so don't think there is no way to have justice, thanks to crypto world, a generous donator gived lot of bitcoins for theses things too, this is not a problem anymore, FSF can contribute to crypto world too and force authors to respect GPL licence. Free Software Foundation receives $1 million donation from Pineapple Fund => https://www.fsf.org/news/free-software-foundation-receives-1-million-donation-from-pineapple-fund |
|
|
|
That'll never happen, don't worry. This is about two companies suing each other for commercial products. The worst thing that can happen is to make RMS shed a tear. This is different now, thanks to the crypto world, a generous donator gived lot of bitcoin for theses things too, so this is not a problem anymore. Free Software Foundation receives $1 million donation from Pineapple Fund => https://www.fsf.org/news/free-software-foundation-receives-1-million-donation-from-pineapple-fund. Ps : with the fees, theses releases with this stolen code is a commercial product. |
|
|
|
Hi, apparently, theses releases don't respect the GPL licence, your software is based on ccminer code, open source and free software under GPL v3 Licence. Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ. Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting. If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law. Thanks http://gpl-violations.orgThe GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.htmlWhere have you been for YEARS!? Solve this one first... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826901.0or be silent  There is not first or last to be warned or prosecuted, this is not a competition, law is the same for everything and everyone. Thanks for the url, it is done too. You can share other urls with people who don't respect the GPL licence too. |
|
|
|
Hi, apparently, theses releases don't respect the GPL licence, your software is based on ccminer code, open source and free software under GPL v3 Licence. Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ. Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting. If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law. Thanks http://gpl-violations.orgThe GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html |
|
|
|
Hi, apparently, theses releases don't respect the GPL licence, your software is based on ccminer code, open source and free software under GPL v3 Licence. Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ. Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting. If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law. Thanks http://gpl-violations.orgThe GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html |
|
|
|
Hi, apparently, theses releases don't respect the GPL licence, your software is based on ccminer code, open source and free software under GPL v3 Licence. Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ. Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting. If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law. Thanks http://gpl-violations.orgThe GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html |
|
|
|
|
