What happens if I join from several telegram accounts in your chat, but in the form of these accounts will have the same Etherium address?
I think in this case you will get banned. And what if I join the chat and then leave it after the reward?
|
|
|
How long will the bounty campaign last?
I think it will last until the end of ICO How long will the ICO last?
|
|
|
Great project! It is significantly different from most other projects, I believe in developers. Good luck! I'll wait for the beginning of the pre-sale!
pre-sale is not yet available? No, it starts on October 24 And I heard that right now there is a closed pre-sale. It's true? Yes, but it is only for large investors. (As far as I know) And how successful is the closed pre-sale? Is there any information about this? What exactly would you like to know? I wonder how successful this campaign is
|
|
|
Great project! It is significantly different from most other projects, I believe in developers. Good luck! I'll wait for the beginning of the pre-sale!
pre-sale is not yet available? No, it starts on October 24 And I heard that right now there is a closed pre-sale. It's true? Yes, but it is only for large investors. (As far as I know) And how successful is the closed pre-sale? Is there any information about this?
|
|
|
Great project! It is significantly different from most other projects, I believe in developers. Good luck! I'll wait for the beginning of the pre-sale!
pre-sale is not yet available?
|
|
|
With pleasure I will join, thank you!
|
|
|
Are all the funds that will operate in your ecosystem, will be on equal terms with each other?
And why they can not be on equal terms? Can anything affect this? Huh Well look. Funds are different, with different capitalization. There are larger funds, and there are smaller ones. Will large funds, with a greater capitalization, dominate and not allow funds to more proficiently disclose their investment potential? No, this can not happen, in this platform there are measures to prevent such situations from happening =) How are they going to cope with this problem?
|
|
|
Are all the funds that will operate in your ecosystem, will be on equal terms with each other?
And why they can not be on equal terms? Can anything affect this? Huh
|
|
|
As far as I understand, the internal payment system will be integrated inside the platform or, well, like that. It will be possible to pay both with fiat money and crypto currency and tokens, and also convert it all inside the system. And how will rates of different currencies and tokens be calculated?
Probably will work the same as on other exchanges and trader sites.
|
|
|
Pete
With the greatest respect to the platform, which I have loved using, this new system on the order book is just plain incorrect. It will drive away users and I am fairly sure this is already happening, I have seen very limited trading going through on the doge market compared to previous days since this system was implemented. No other exchange in the crypto world or the standard financial instrument implements their fees this way. This effectively makes fees exorbitantly high, on doge for example fees at 135sats that I have to trade at 136 becomes 0.74%. If we take Earthcoin as an example it gets worse, say 19/18=5.5%. This is fundamentally broken.
The system must be adjusted such that a flat fee of x.x%, for example 0.1%, is charged on the total value of each trade. Even if this had a minimum value, it would be acceptable.
If you stick with the current system, you will lose customers rapidly as they realise this is not just a temporary bug and is in fact a deliberate error of judgement.
As I stated, I want to keep my business here, but if this isn't resolved in a matter of days I will be forced to take my business elsewhere. I cannot live with this flawed system.
Kind regards
Mark
EDIT: Since I wrote this I read above and discovered this system works down to exchange rates of 50sats only, so my EAC example is wrong. I still think the system is fundamentally flawed though, as on a 50sat coin we have a 2% trading fee. If you wanted to maintain a maximum of 0.1% you would need to remove fees from any coins with an exchange rate lower than 1000sats. Otherwise the fee % rises rapidly to a ridiculous rate. Doge is one of the biggest volume markets, but you will kill it on CoinedUp. Having said this, even if the fees were not exorbitantly high for these low value coins, the system is still just massively uncomfortable for any user and is contrary to the fee systems customers are happy with. So this change alone would not allow me to continue my business here.
Pete does not read this. Message him on twitter. Hmm, don't use Twitter, any chance someone could tweet him and direct him here?
|
|
|
Pete
With the greatest respect to the platform, which I have loved using, this new system on the order book is just plain incorrect. It will drive away users and I am fairly sure this is already happening, I have seen very limited trading going through on the doge market compared to previous days since this system was implemented. No other exchange in the crypto world or the standard financial instrument implements their fees this way. This effectively makes fees exorbitantly high, on doge for example fees at 135sats that I have to trade at 136 becomes 0.74%. If we take Earthcoin as an example it gets worse, say 19/18=5.5%. This is fundamentally broken.
The system must be adjusted such that a flat fee of x.x%, for example 0.1%, is charged on the total value of each trade. Even if this had a minimum value, it would be acceptable.
If you stick with the current system, you will lose customers rapidly as they realise this is not just a temporary bug and is in fact a deliberate error of judgement.
As I stated, I want to keep my business here, but if this isn't resolved in a matter of days I will be forced to take my business elsewhere. I cannot live with this flawed system.
Kind regards
Mark
EDIT: Since I wrote this I read above and discovered this system works down to exchange rates of 50sats only, so my EAC example is wrong. I still think the system is fundamentally flawed though, as on a 50sat coin we have a 2% trading fee. If you wanted to maintain a maximum of 0.1% you would need to remove fees from any coins with an exchange rate lower than 1000sats. Otherwise the fee % rises rapidly to a ridiculous rate. Doge is one of the biggest volume markets, but you will kill it on CoinedUp. Having said this, even if the fees were not exorbitantly high for these low value coins, the system is still just massively uncomfortable for any user and is contrary to the fee systems customers are happy with. So this change alone would not allow me to continue my business here.
|
|
|
I was probably wrong on the "flash rate offers not being taken automatically" part. I'm still right when I say putting offers at variable rate when it ends up being 1/4 or less of the lowest offer avaiable is blatantly stupid.
some people probably don't want to log in all the time and just autolend at flash rate Most likely. And counterproductive for all. You literally have no idea what you're talking about...
|
|
|
It's basic economics guys, the rate is dictated by the market. It will always find it's level where it is both low enough for traders and high enough for lenders. That level will constantly be shifting.
|
|
|
I have a question about the BTC swaps. I have some used in positions and I have just taken some further BTC swaps at a cheaper rate. The amount of BTC is the same. If I close my swaps used in a margin position, will this close my positions too or will the positions automatically switch to use the unused swaps to cover themselves?
Edit: In addition, why is the amount of my borrowed BTC, not equal to the size of my BTC postion?
Thanks
Mark
|
|
|
How do I connect to the maxcoin IRC channel?
Google freenode, click on webchat and then enter the info, chat server being #maxcoin.
|
|
|
You should stop accusing each other because of hacking, cheating,dumping or premining. We all have one aim to make TittieCoin huge. TTC should be listed on coinmarketcap.com. Lets have think tank about how we gonna achive this aim. If somebody doesn't want to see this coin succeed just leave. Any suggestions on how to take tittiecoin one step further?
+1. And apparently, the devs succeeded to get back the hacked coins Very convenient! ...to answer another question above, if the devs were only ever out to make a quick buck, then a huge premine followed soon after by dumping is a perfectly valid way to do so. If so, then the devs dumping their coins is no more "foolish" than a hacker who managed to procure so many coins dumping them.
|
|
|
Soooo, to me this looks like the following:
a) The devs decided to dump some of their coins as was predicted. b) The devs were too stupid to realise that people would notice the sell order was too big to not be the premined coins. c) Now they are lying all over again about a supposed coin heist.
Utter scam. Horrific people.
|
|
|
Starting new month at post count 110.
Thanks for payment for previous month, excellent offer.
|
|
|
Raphael, couple of questions if I may ask: - I asked a little earlier in the thread, how often is it acceptable to poll the API for information?
- You have a policy of the name matching the verified customer name on the wire transfers in. Is this the same for wire withdrawals? I was hoping I might be able to use a FX broker for a preferable exchange rate over my bank?
Thanks Mark
|
|
|
|