 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
By different firmware i mean the latest ones not the recovery firmware . Say i was to SD recovery an S19 and now i wanted to update to the latest firmware , how would i know which one to use .
Yes i know i don't have to update to the latest but say someone wanted to for wtv reason , how would one know which one to take short of trial and error .
Well it is a trial and error if you don't know what exactly the firmware installed before you can start flashing it with the 2nd one which is this ANTMINER-S19-release-202111161922.bmu If you have some issue experience then repeat the procedure flash it again with recovery and then flash it with the first one "ANTMINER-S19-merge-release-20211216091201-8IN1.bmu" Then test it again. Ya that's what i been doing , was just wondering if there was a way to differentiate them to avoid that process |
|
|
|
Well my question is regarding that picture exactly . How do i differentiate a S19 that should be on the May 2021 firmware vs one that should have the Oct 15 . The reason i ask if because when u SD recovery a S19 with issues , the firmware shown is the recovery one which is the same for both versions .
So unless you marked down what Firmware u had prior to SD flashing , you'd have no idea but i'm thinking there must be a way to tell no ?
Currently, there is no other SD card firmware for s19 they only have one image even on BraiinsOS, ASIC.to, and Awesomeminer they do have SD card firmware but it won't flash directly to the nand. How about flashing it two times? And what exactly is the issue you currently experience? If the firmware from Bitmain does no solve your case you can use other firmware available from what I mentioned above it won't flash to nand but it will boot directly from your SD card. So you need to keep the SD card plugged. Or try to contact Bitmain and maybe they do have another SD card image that can totally clear the Nand program. By different firmware i mean the latest ones not the recovery firmware . Say i was to SD recovery an S19 and now i wanted to update to the latest firmware , how would i know which one to use . Yes i know i don't have to update to the latest but say someone wanted to for wtv reason , how would one know which one to take short of trial and error . |
|
|
|
how do you know which firmware version you want to use .
For example the S19 has 2 firmware. One for miners before May 2021 and one for after October 15, 2021.
So what's the way to know which version u should be putting . I looked on the bitmain site and can't find the answer to that question
anyone know ?
Have you tried to read their firmware description it should explain which firmware you should flash. Check this image below it was from the Bitmain firmware description for s19  Do not worry about flashing it to the most recent firmware you can able to revert it back by flashing it through SD card and only revert it back if you experienced some issue. Well my question is regarding that picture exactly . How do i differentiate a S19 that should be on the May 2021 firmware vs one that should have the Oct 15 . The reason i ask if because when u SD recovery a S19 with issues , the firmware shown is the recovery one which is the same for both versions . So unless you marked down what Firmware u had prior to SD flashing , you'd have no idea but i'm thinking there must be a way to tell no ? |
|
|
|
|
how do you know which firmware version you want to use .
For example the S19 has 2 firmware. One for miners before May 2021 and one for after October 15, 2021.
So what's the way to know which version u should be putting . I looked on the bitmain site and can't find the answer to that question
anyone know ?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the input .
I was inquiring just in case there was known reports of that software causing issues . Was not able to find any reports so i figured i’d ask here .
|
|
|
|
|
Hey everyone .
I looked on bitmain support page and they promote apminer tool for monitoring and batch control of antminers
Has anyone used it ?
Is it safe ? Any reports of people using this and getting hacked ?
Thank u for in input
|
|
|
|
 In 4h30m at 25.5C ambient. 101mh 39C CPU, 94C MemJunction. Needs a side fan for sure, need to figure out where to tap for power. Now I'm even more confused, you are getting 39C after four hours of mining? That's very good and you don't need any extra cooling system for the gpu, the safest high temperature for Nvidia graphics card is 75C, mine never goes over 69C and I mine 24/7, getting 39C is incredible What u talking about . All my 3080’s run between 38-44 C . Thats a normal operating temps for these gpu’s while mining . Also been running them for 5 months now with a junction temp of 104-110 c . It’s not ideal but they made to run this hot . |
|
|
|
im noticing on phoenix miner 5.6d alot more stale shares then using previous 5.5c any body else see a increase im using nvidia cards
This happened to me after activating a new feature in windows. it was on SYSTEM: Monitor (first item on top)- graphicsettings (the last one)- hardwarebased GPU (?). Dont turn this on. Turn OFF. I have it turned off and still get more stale shares than before .Anyone has an idea why this suddenly happens ? Been having 1% stale rate for months now its to 3-4 with no change in hardware or miner |
|
|
|
I dont understand the discussion about reported in the miner and shown in the pool.
The Miner in the rig reports the hashrate of the rig and the pool calculates the hashrate out
of the sended found shares. And thats always a difference.
Mostly my hashrate at the pool is a bit higher than in the miner. 1%. But thats Luck etc.
Simplemining:
+---+-----+----+---+-----------+----------+----+-----+-----+-------------+
| ID GPU Temp Fan Speed Shares Core Mem Power Efficiency |
+---+-----+----+---+-----------+----------+----+-----+-----+-------------+
| 0 3070 52 C 0 % 62.15 MH/s 8934/0/17 1365 8100 112 W 554.87 KH/W |
| 1 3070 57 C 0 % 61.89 MH/s 8928/0/0 675 8100 120 W 515.78 KH/W |
| 2 3070 50 C 0 % 62.18 MH/s 9002/0/0 1395 8100 113 W 550.24 KH/W |
| 3 3070 50 C 0 % 61.80 MH/s 9038/0/0 660 8100 114 W 542.08 KH/W |
| 4 3070 49 C 0 % 62.20 MH/s 8983/0/0 1470 8100 120 W 518.33 KH/W |
| 5 3070 48 C 0 % 62.15 MH/s 8978/0/4 1305 8100 120 W 517.96 KH/W |
| 372.37 MH/s 53863/0/21 699 W 532.71 KH/W |
+---+-----+----+---+-----------+----------+----+-----+-----+-------------+
2Miners: Current Average
3070-2 421.77 MH/s 386.75 MH/s
Simplemining:
+---+-----+----+---+-----------+----------+----+-----+-----+-------------+
| ID GPU Temp Fan Speed Shares Core Mem Power Efficiency |
+---+-----+----+---+-----------+----------+----+-----+-----+-------------+
| 0 1080 70 C 0 % 29.26 MH/s 2158/0/0 1594 4519 104 W 281.37 KH/W |
| 1 1080 72 C 0 % 29.65 MH/s 2191/0/0 1607 4519 104 W 285.07 KH/W |
| 2 1080 70 C 0 % 29.15 MH/s 2108/0/0 1582 4519 104 W 280.26 KH/W |
| 3 1080 66 C 0 % 29.91 MH/s 2222/0/0 1620 4519 104 W 287.57 KH/W |
| 4 1080 65 C 0 % 29.26 MH/s 2165/0/0 1582 4519 104 W 281.39 KH/W |
| 5 1080 67 C 0 % 29.90 MH/s 2175/0/0 1632 4519 104 W 287.52 KH/W |
| 6 1080 69 C 0 % 29.85 MH/s 2211/0/0 1607 4519 104 W 287.01 KH/W |
| 7 1080 69 C 0 % 29.87 MH/s 2232/0/0 1632 4519 104 W 287.22 KH/W |
| 236.85 MH/s 17462/0/0 832 W 284.68 KH/W |
+---+-----+----+---+-----------+----------+----+-----+-----+-------------+
2Miners: Current Average
1080-1 281.18 MH/s 240.44 MH/s
2Miners FAQ:
My hashrate is lower than in the miner
Since you start to mine your hashrate grows gradually. Please wait. The pool determines your hashrate based on the amount of shares sent by your mining rigs (workers). This value could be a little bit different from reported hashrate (in your mining software).
Well u see me my current hashrate is mostly below my reported hashrate. Also my avg hashrate is always below my current or reported and that’s only on my 3080 rig . My 1070 rig avg and reported are close by 5-6mhs . Do pools calculate ur payout by looking at avg hashrate or Current hashrate or |
|
|
|
I am running the suprim x i have got at 1100 Mhz and 1500 RAM (Windows and custom voltage).
Powerlevel is at 100% but i doesnt affect the hash.
Do you see a decent difference between reported hashrate and current hashrate ? Is he avg hashrate very close to ur reported ? |
|
|
|
@Seph213
Thats a point. But rising the powerlevel shouldnt help this much because
the 3080 dont need over 250 Watt for ETH. So i am amazed. Maybe faster
VRAM settings in the BIOS? My asus tuf oc cant do more than 98.5 at 1149.
Hope we can get more infos where the difference is.
I don’t think the PL is about how much watts the card is pushing cause if u play am intensive video game like cyberpunk , you card will dish out more than 250 watts with no issues yet when u mine it refuses to go above 220. The reason ur not seeing higher output is because the coreclock throttles once u go pass +500 memory . Now my trio X with PL at 108 is pushing 98mhs at 217watts according to phoenixminer . My suprim X with PL at 60 pushes 98mhs but at 229 watts cause i raises the coreclock trying to fix the reported hashtare problem i’m having with 30 series cards . So u see i don’t think PL only affects the power being delivered , i think theres more working in the backround that i’m simply not aware of so can’t really explain . |
|
|
|
Trying out the 5.6a beta right now on a 8 x 3090 rack. After 8 hours in and it seems like the stale rate has dropped a bit and hashrate seems a tad more stable on the pool end.
A bit early to say 100% success but so far 0 issues...
I have the same issue with my 3080’s . My 1070’s are performing very well Seems to be a problem with the 30 series and would be nice if Phoenixminer devs would address this and see if maybe its something they can tweak in their software . |
|
|
|
You dont need more power. You need well cooled ram.
My suprims doing 102.x hash with +1500 and around 225 Watt.
Suprims don’t have power issues . He has a gaming trio X , those cards have a power limit issue and flashing the surprim firmware fixes that . I have a gaming trio X and i tried everything including leaving it running in 0 celcius room to make sure it’s not thermal throttling problem. I was only able to hit 98-100mhs once i flashed the surpim Os and brought up the PL to 108 . |
|
|
|
Any of you guys have a 8-10% difference between effective current hashrate and current hashrate ?
I’m using pheonixminer on ethermine .
Yes, I had a lot of stale shares with pheonixminer. So I switched to Trex and the problem disappeared. I'm using Nanopool. But its odd cause my 1070 rig reports the same on all counts . The 3080’s are the ones with issues Same problem here, my 2080Ti, 3060Ti and 1660 were all fine with PhoenixMiner, only the 3080s had stale shares I tried using trex but i have the same result . What are the 3080’s u have and whats their Oc settings ? |
|
|
|
Hello, I also have MSI RTX3080 Gaming X and some problems with ETH hash rate (88 only).
My stock BIOS was: 94.02.42.00.FB, flashed new Supreme X from techpowerup: 94.02.42.00.F9 but still no results.
No matter what I do GPU core is about 930MHz. Can You share Supreme X bios version and Afterburner settings for that card to get higher mh/s.
Now that u flashed the suprim bios , in msi afterburner u can increase the Pl to 108. PL 108 Core curve at 1300 Memory at 1100 . With these settings u’ll hit 97-98 . If u want to hit 100 push the mem to 1300 . |
|
|
|
The new beta version is finally ready. You can download PhoenixMiner 5.6a from here: PhoenixMiner_5.6a_Windows.zip (GitHub) PhoenixMiner_5.6a_Linux.tar.gz (GitHub) To check the integrity of the downloaded file, please use the following hashes (you need the last file PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip only if you want to mine BCI with Nvdia cards under Windows): File: PhoenixMiner_5.6a_Windows.zip
===================================
SHA-1: e9134f0b3985e967597f1e82c1cd7b0246fe4568
SHA-256: e3e10bc0ed7af17c4f38fb8314f9c72350750a554475498346f67a0a590e759b
SHA-512: 66b3e39daaadcb85fb79143697d8e10f7fc27bc8fc464f48ce1f362fc96235b15aa8a78bcfc547cd1416ebed19bb6e65746136a93318bc17875f50754ba90e57
File: PhoenixMiner_5.6a_Linux.tar.gz
====================================
SHA-1: d733df2b92876a1ecaff8c7d1f8fe6d5bf675f2d
SHA-256: 671218da670fc02318e3b4c296b9335984997a512242bdc7d17ed2cde2506de0
SHA-512: b38934dbdbaff49894ee30d4ae2937b84cd9f997432d68fffc8e23fb1cf8cab57d139533eee354b3be6625987bf628956c54826d42a21bbcebdc76edc3e521d4
File: PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip
====================================
SHA-1: ff6fa5e018adbd52caf631c42b7c2fac7ce48a51
SHA-256: 8087757169405d51ea8ba818347fb05d0450aef985c29272165070346eb5a54a
SHA-512: 7b2d832f7f40578bb1f501d5174467f5ae06612e601dab769fd56d39da48a471b18c6373435a485155f70fec4017d8378797bf1e1dfe5d62fee30fa6a1d992c4
Please let us know if you have any problems or questions related to PhoenixMiner 5.6a. VERY THX BOOS PHOENIXMINER 5.6a is the nº1 thanks Will RTX 3060 mine without installation on a motherboard, speed 48-50 mh / s? Don’t 3060 run at 30 mhs ? |
|
|
|
Any of you guys have a 8-10% difference between effective current hashrate and current hashrate ?
I’m using pheonixminer on ethermine .
Yes, I had a lot of stale shares with pheonixminer. So I switched to Trex and the problem disappeared. I'm using Nanopool. Tried Trex and same issue . Current hashrate keeps fluctuating but my 1070 rig is constant 100% of the time |
|
|
|
|
Is there something different with phoenixminer and nvidia 3080’s ?
My 1070’s are mining fine , current hashrate and reported match very close . 3-5 mhs difference
My 3080’s have a 40mhs gap between reported and current .
What can i do to fix this ?
|
|
|
|
Any of you guys have a 8-10% difference between effective current hashrate and current hashrate ?
I’m using pheonixminer on ethermine .
Yes, I had a lot of stale shares with pheonixminer. So I switched to Trex and the problem disappeared. I'm using Nanopool. But its odd cause my 1070 rig reports the same on all counts . The 3080’s are the ones with issues |
|
|
|
|
Been mining for months now with some 3080’s on ethermine . The effective hashrate is about 10% lower than current hashrate .
My other rig thats running 1070’s has a 5% difference .
Is this normal ? What can i do to fix the 3080 rig if thats not normal .
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
