 Brian Colwell a.k.a The Crypto Hobbit is helping us on marketing.
He's a well known personality in cryptocurrencies. With an investment thesis focused on disruptions in this next Industrial Revolution, his research started in alternative investments such as emerging markets and commodities, but as his research grew, so did his questions.
His research areas span a range of topics including Fintech, Agtech, Biotech, Medtech, IOT, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, Drones, Cryptocurrencies, Cyber Security, Cannabis, Aerospace, Energy Metals (such as Lithium and Uranium) and more…
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BrianDColwell/
twitter: https://twitter.com/BrianDColwell
website: https://briandcolwell.com/
linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/colwellbrian/ |
|
|
|
Now you can check if your Force masternode is working and will receive rewards. Additionally if your node has not been seen for over 20 minutes, a notification will be sent to inform you, so that you have enough time to react before your node status changes to EXPIRED causing your rewards being lost. https://nodecheck.iohttps://discordapp.com/invite/3VV5GkGThank you very much! I will add it to our list of monitoring services.  |
|
|
|
another s*t coin, lol!
I love the bunch of arguments you detailed while saying that. Very interesting discussions here. |
|
|
|
Alts getting smashed everywhere. No official development news pending for Force and no marketing activities and little new retail money coming in to market.
Thanks for your interest, the new codebase repository will be released soon. The marketing plan has been released and comes along with key events on Force. I’m not sure why you posted here, any question? I have a question. I've been reading the WP but I'm still trying to know if Force will allow us to use the "regular" internet while being protected or if it will come as a "closed" network first. Hello, thank you for your questions! And the answer is: yes, you will be able to access to the centralized Internet using our solution, but more than that, your identity will be preserved. If there was a "closed" network first as you asked, Force network couldn't really function very well, could it? If you have something like gatekeepers this wouldn't be close to the vision the team here has I think. Or will there be something like gatekeepers that prevent some actors from joining? If you are talking about a governance system that will allow everyone to decide if a service can be delivered or not on the Force Network, this has yet to be decided but could be handled via the masternode governance system. Yes but I thought the comment before was referring to whether or not could join the network at any time. And that is possible isn't it? Or will there be any kind of ID checks? I doubt there will be an ID check. It would kill the idea of privacy and anonymity don't you think? Absolutely and that is why i brought this point up as someone else indicated there will be some kind of check or anything like that. Nothing like that |
|
|
|
you would think, project started an year ago that received almost half billion usd would have at least one functioning wallet right now that doesn't require you to trust third party.
They are supporting the projects which can help the community and they are focusing on main development. It is not bad way to go. Having official wallet where I can safely store my tezzies without having to trust third party is the least they could do and its not much to ask from a project that is valued over a billion. I agree, I also prefer official wallet. I don't know why they chose this way, maybe they wanted to keep their promise for relasing the betanet in time and focused on it. One of the main developer of Tezos (Stephen Andrews) has developed a webwallet which works perfectly: https://tezbox.comEven if it's not the official one, knowing that one of the main dev has developed it, should bring you some confidence using it. If you appear to have any problem, they are really responsive and willing to help on RIOT: https://riot.im/app/#/room/#tezos:matrix.org |
|
|
|
we will support this project. Thanks! |
|
|
|
The risk profile I submit in this summarized analysis in essence only relates to the topic of the premine which is a potential red flag for my own part after having been active in this space since early 2016.
So Ethereum, Ripple, Cardano, Stellar, NEM and IOTA for example are potential red flags to you? |
|
|
|
Alts getting smashed everywhere. No official development news pending for Force and no marketing activities and little new retail money coming in to market.
Thanks for your interest, the new codebase repository will be released soon. The marketing plan has been released and comes along with key events on Force. I’m not sure why you posted here, any question? I have a question. I've been reading the WP but I'm still trying to know if Force will allow us to use the "regular" internet while being protected or if it will come as a "closed" network first. Hello, thank you for your questions! And the answer is: yes, you will be able to access to the centralized Internet using our solution, but more than that, your identity will be preserved. If there was a "closed" network first as you asked, Force network couldn't really function very well, could it? If you have something like gatekeepers this wouldn't be close to the vision the team here has I think. Or will there be something like gatekeepers that prevent some actors from joining? If you are talking about a governance system that will allow everyone to decide if a service can be delivered or not on the Force Network, this has yet to be decided but could be handled via the masternode governance system. Yes but I thought the comment before was referring to whether or not could join the network at any time. And that is possible isn't it? Or will there be any kind of ID checks? I doubt there will be an ID check. It would kill the idea of privacy and anonymity don't you think? There will be no kind of ID check to join the network. Everyone will be able to join! |
|
|
|
Reason for price tanking right now which should sincerely be addressed:
1. Make a community vote on the coin swap with codebase "upgrade" and premine. What we know right now is that the ROI will be heavily pumped on the new algo which may or may not be a wise direction judging from how other newer coins with high ROI have developed since its impossible to sustain long term.
who did say here that there will be high ROI? We don't communicate on ROI nor said anything like that, you can double-check on all our communication channels, no news have been released regarding possible ROI.. 2. What happened to nearly $60 000 in funds raised from a 5 BTC masternode auction in january that were supposed to pay for coinexchange listing?
We used some for the incorporation and developments but kept the rest, nothing has been used yet to remunerate people. FYI 5 BTC is not $60,000 anymore, it's $35,000 and the incorporation costs are quite important. 3. Where did all the votes for Bitfineon listing come from? Were this from verified real users seeing as the crypto space is invaded by bots recently. For the sake of investor confidence, the bitfineon partnership should be elucidated further to prevent speculation into elaborate bot induced pump and dumps or exits when that exchange comes online. You also need to address the exit scam scenario from coin swapping and premines, it does not induce investor confidence as apparent from price development since these news came to light.
Please have a look at bitfineon voting system, it's governance from ALQO masternodes that allows a vote. Voting can't be bot induced like you're saying as it's a decentralized system and you need to own ALQO in order to vote. 4. One thing I learned from stock investing is the perpetual emission scam scenario that took place in a biotech stock called Epicept. Speculative tech lends itself well to diluting investors over long time, unfortunately it then becomes a long con.
We don't know Epicept nor are affiliated to them. If you're trying to say we attempt to scam people, you must not know how developments can be long when you start a novel blockchain.. We will soon reveal the github repository that will allow us to avoid such accusations.. 5. Funding will generally follow on delivery, this is a community take over after all. Right now developments can be interpreted as an attempt at power consolidation, which is not in the spirit of crypto.
Sorry, we don't know what you mean about that.. Feel free to ask more questions if you need, it will be a pleasure to answer them all. |
|
|
|
Thanks! Also you didn't answer about the masternode collateral. I saw the chat on Telegram and you said there will be masternodes and hop nodes. How much FOR for each? I'm sure you missed the answer below  500k for the Master node 100k for the Hop node *feels ignored*
sorry Alts getting smashed everywhere. No official development news pending for Force and no marketing activities and little new retail money coming in to market.
Thanks for your interest, the new codebase repository will be released soon. The marketing plan has been released and comes along with key events on Force. I’m not sure why you posted here, any question? I have a question. I've been reading the WP but I'm still trying to know if Force will allow us to use the "regular" internet while being protected or if it will come as a "closed" network first. Hello, thank you for your questions! And the answer is: yes, you will be able to access to the centralized Internet using our solution, but more than that, your identity will be preserved. Oh god damn that's awesome. Thanks! The masternode collateral will remain 500k? Yes the collateral will remain the same and we will introduce the hop nodes and payment nodes ( https://www.forcenetwork.io/files/lightpaper_forcenetwork_current.pdf) The collateral of the hop nodes will be 100k. |
|
|
|
Is there a bounty campaign?
yes, here is the link |
|
|
|
Unfortunately I had to absent myself from the FORCE bounty campaign because I didn't have twitter or discord! But I bought some FORCE in this dip and I will be supporting you in buying what will be dumped... Also, soon I'll be running an MN! Force Network will be giant! Trust me! At the end of this year or the beginning of 2019 with certezaz we will be in another moment. Thanks a lot for your support, this is just the beginning |
|
|
|
*feels ignored*
sorry Alts getting smashed everywhere. No official development news pending for Force and no marketing activities and little new retail money coming in to market.
Thanks for your interest, the new codebase repository will be released soon. The marketing plan has been released and comes along with key events on Force. I’m not sure why you posted here, any question? I have a question. I've been reading the WP but I'm still trying to know if Force will allow us to use the "regular" internet while being protected or if it will come as a "closed" network first. Hello, thank you for your questions! And the answer is: yes, you will be able to access to the centralized Internet using our solution, but more than that, your identity will be preserved. Oh god damn that's awesome. Thanks! The masternode collateral will remain 500k? Yes the collateral will remain the same and we will introduce the hop nodes and payment nodes ( https://www.forcenetwork.io/files/lightpaper_forcenetwork_current.pdf) The collateral of the hop nodes will be 100k. |
|
|
|
Alts getting smashed everywhere. No official development news pending for Force and no marketing activities and little new retail money coming in to market.
Thanks for your interest, the new codebase repository will be released soon. The marketing plan has been released and comes along with key events on Force. I’m not sure why you posted here, any question? I have a question. I've been reading the WP but I'm still trying to know if Force will allow us to use the "regular" internet while being protected or if it will come as a "closed" network first. Hello, thank you for your questions! And the answer is: yes, you will be able to access to the centralized Internet using our solution, but more than that, your identity will be preserved. If there was a "closed" network first as you asked, Force network couldn't really function very well, could it? If you have something like gatekeepers this wouldn't be close to the vision the team here has I think. Or will there be something like gatekeepers that prevent some actors from joining? If you are talking about a governance system that will allow everyone to decide if a service can be delivered or not on the Force Network, this has yet to be decided but could be handled via the masternode governance system. |
|
|
|
Alts getting smashed everywhere. No official development news pending for Force and no marketing activities and little new retail money coming in to market.
Thanks for your interest, the new codebase repository will be released soon. The marketing plan has been released and comes along with key events on Force. I’m not sure why you posted here, any question? I have a question. I've been reading the WP but I'm still trying to know if Force will allow us to use the "regular" internet while being protected or if it will come as a "closed" network first. Hello, thank you for your questions! And the answer is: yes, you will be able to access to the centralized Internet using our solution, but more than that, your identity will be preserved. |
|
|
|
I'm in your bounty:
1. Telegram @rodwark13
Thanks & welcome |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
