What's the ICO price of this token?
Still no info when this ICO will open even WP has no details about the structure and how many will generated and what is the distribution system. Hopefully they get it up soon. Is there an estimated timeframe on the WP? |
|
|
|
|
Any venture capitalist interest?
|
|
|
|
Have you heard of Flixxo? I was doing some research last night, and apparently it's an ICO utilizing P2P. How does it differ from UpFiring?
I'm curious what UpFiring thinks of this. They answered at the top of this page. |
|
|
|
|
Any venture capitalists on board?
|
|
|
|
Do you guys plan to bring on any more advisors?
Possibly. We are always in talks with people, but they have to be a strategic fit and a complement to our team. In our opinion, there's no point in adding numerous advisors just to make it look like you have a big team. Everyone needs to serve a purpose. Very true, thanks for the response. |
|
|
|
Do you guys have a slack or only telegram?
Can't find a link to the slack? |
|
|
|
Can you disclose who you've chosen for your legal counsel?
I can't (yet), until they release a public statement about Upfiring (likely an analysis of whether or not it is considered a security - of course we strongly believe that it is not, and do not intend for UFR to be used as such) Any idea how long until that gets sorted out? Any sort of time frame? |
|
|
|
Agreed. Many large creators have reached out expressing interest in helping grow the network. The content creation space on platforms like YouTube is actually very tightly knit and dozens of creators have offered to help spread the word in December. Our largest creators right now are between 500k followers to 800k followers. We're more focused in the mirco-creators with very engaged students and fans instead of the "celebrity level creators. Great question! We have some large creators on YouTube and Udemy. They will be announcing they accept ACAD when we list on the exchange  Who would you say is your biggest partnership to date?
Could you give a ballpark on how big they are? Like subscribers? 500k? 1m? Those are still solid numbers, especially for more educationally oriented channels. Aw man, December is so far away lol. I guess I will just have to be patient. |
|
|
|
Our largest creators right now are between 500k followers to 800k followers. We're more focused in the mirco-creators with very engaged students and fans instead of the "celebrity level creators. Great question!  We have some large creators on YouTube and Udemy. They will be announcing they accept ACAD when we list on the exchange Who would you say is your biggest partnership to date?
Could you give a ballpark on how big they are? Like subscribers? 500k? 1m? That's actually considerably higher than I anticipated. Do we really have to wait until ACAD is on the exchange until we get a few name drops??  |
|
|
|
Can you disclose who you've chosen for your legal counsel?
I can't (yet), until they release a public statement about Upfiring (likely an analysis of whether or not it is considered a security - of course we strongly believe that it is not, and do not intend for UFR to be used as such) Any idea how long until that gets sorted out? |
|
|
|
|
Do you guys plan to bring on any more advisors?
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, Here's a really clear blog posting by us that explains our core value to bettors. Hope you like it. https://medium.com/fansunite/fansunite-a-love-letter-to-bettors-eccaec73ce6cAlso, we've altered our Bounty Campaign... offering double stakes to all signatures before October 25th 09:00:00 UTC so get those sigs up! Below is the new Bounty Distribution, please note BitcoinTalk signature campaign now has an additional 10% allocated! 25% Twitter 30% Bitcointalk Signature 15% Bounty Translation 20% Reddit 10% Whitepaper Translation I need to get in on the signature campaign. You have a thread for it on BCT? |
|
|
|
|
Will you have some sort of open presale?
|
|
|
|
|
Still no chance of a bounty campaign?
|
|
|
|
ISP called my house once, not very happy..
if you know what I mean..
IDK if this still happens, but I assume so.
Would this service protect against this?
Short answer - we're going to try. All information sent across the network will be encrypted, so hopefully this will prevent this from happening. However, it's a decentralized app and thus users are responsible for what they choose to use it for. From your answer, you guys are not even sure of 100% protection of users, trying is completely different from 100% encryption. It is better to offer something new to the market that just rushing to take a cut of the ICO pie Or you could just turn on your VPN? Who doesn't have one nowadays? Yeah, even my grandma has one set up now. Just had to send her a guide on how to set it up. Or you can set up a proxy within the client and not have to mess with it again. Super convenient. |
|
|
|
We have some large creators on YouTube and Udemy. They will be announcing they accept ACAD when we list on the exchange Who would you say is your biggest partnership to date?
Could you give a ballpark on how big they are? Like subscribers? 500k? 1m? |
|
|
|
I believe that credible companies, grow their presence organically. Using other methods is devious and technically a scam.
GENESIS VISION is using a paid slack group to bolster up their thread count. 85% of the post on this thread is made by the Airdroptastic slack group
And where's your proof? Pretty bold claim... |
|
|
|
Very interesting partnership. You're going to be using machine learning to more accurately predict betting odds? Yes, we will be. We've tested it over a number of sports, and SaberCruncher has been doing it for years now. It is one reason that we can confidently offer our industry low 1% margin. There will be more articles expounding on this coming out in the next week so that you guys can see why we are confident in our abilities to produce. You need all the advantages you can get with such a low margin. What if it turns out to be unprofitable? Would you consider bumping to 1.5%? Pretty sure that still puts you below everyone else. I don't think we would, but I can't speak for everyone on the team, nor can I speak for the community, but personally I would not move from the 1% margin. It's not our intention to be a super profitable company, however. Our value will derive from the appreciation in purchasing power of the token, not from being outrageously profitable. Our goal is to cover our operating costs, perhaps a bit more, and for there to me massive demand for our token. This would reward our community, early adopters, and ourselves. That is our end game. All of that being said, I am very confident we will be able to operate with these low margins. Not only have I seen under the hood of SaberCruncher and their ability to accurately create industry leading sharp lines, but we are also in talks with another group that would only complement our existing capabilities. For a company such as ours to make claims of welcoming winners, not limiting individuals, and welcoming arbitrage betting, we need to be extremely certain in our ability to deliver. Good answer. Have you had face to face meetings with SaberCruncher, or is it handled remotely? The Founder is sitting across from me right now. Him and his team will work out of our office most days. So, all of our meetings thus far have been face to face. That's great. Glad you were able to find someone so locally. |
|
|
|
ISP called my house once, not very happy..
if you know what I mean..
IDK if this still happens, but I assume so.
Would this service protect against this?
Short answer - we're going to try. All information sent across the network will be encrypted, so hopefully this will prevent this from happening. However, it's a decentralized app and thus users are responsible for what they choose to use it for. From your answer, you guys are not even sure of 100% protection of users, trying is completely different from 100% encryption. It is better to offer something new to the market that just rushing to take a cut of the ICO pie Or you could just turn on your VPN? Who doesn't have one nowadays? |
|
|
|
Very interesting partnership. You're going to be using machine learning to more accurately predict betting odds? Yes, we will be. We've tested it over a number of sports, and SaberCruncher has been doing it for years now. It is one reason that we can confidently offer our industry low 1% margin. There will be more articles expounding on this coming out in the next week so that you guys can see why we are confident in our abilities to produce. You need all the advantages you can get with such a low margin. What if it turns out to be unprofitable? Would you consider bumping to 1.5%? Pretty sure that still puts you below everyone else. I don't think we would, but I can't speak for everyone on the team, nor can I speak for the community, but personally I would not move from the 1% margin. It's not our intention to be a super profitable company, however. Our value will derive from the appreciation in purchasing power of the token, not from being outrageously profitable. Our goal is to cover our operating costs, perhaps a bit more, and for there to me massive demand for our token. This would reward our community, early adopters, and ourselves. That is our end game. All of that being said, I am very confident we will be able to operate with these low margins. Not only have I seen under the hood of SaberCruncher and their ability to accurately create industry leading sharp lines, but we are also in talks with another group that would only complement our existing capabilities. For a company such as ours to make claims of welcoming winners, not limiting individuals, and welcoming arbitrage betting, we need to be extremely certain in our ability to deliver. Good answer. Have you had face to face meetings with SaberCruncher, or is it handled remotely? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
