anyone here heard about the instamine of 2m darkcoin ? i didn't understand it well, if some of the dev of this coin could explain this stupid story
i am holding about 10k dark and i hope this story isn't true ....
Here are some cliffs for you.
About 2mln got mined in the first 48h.
This was redistributed (sell) several times over.
Early miners were selling for 0.00001, those who bought later, sold at 0.0001, now the price is 0.0012-0.0013.
All this lead to a fair distribution - no one is dumping now (no big/whale bagholders) and the price is stable for > 2 months at a respectable level.
Now if you are greedy, it is very easy to think:
"If I were at launch, I would have mined million and I would have waited until the price jumped to 0.002 and got rich quick.
I didn't so now I'll blame everyone as the world is unfair"
So it's very easy to get incorrect conclusions, especially if you can't think clearly.
The reality is, not one got rich quick, constant (40-60BTC/day on 1 exchange only) trading takes place - coins change hands and the best is still ahead.
still you didn't answer my question .... is there a dev here to reject these accusations? some people on other threads are asking for redistribution but i don't know how it can be done .... and if the dev agreed to redistribute these alleged 9% premine it's really a huge amount i must say and still if this is true as i am not good in lokking on the blockchain and searching for these kind of stuff
i just read on bitcointalk what people are saying and i must say i am bit confused with this story, so now i am thinking to sell 8k of them as soon as it gets from 1200(today) to 1700.
i must say that it starts to smell a bit fishy imo but this is just my opinion. anyway who knows perhaps this coin would be the next bitcoin in the futur! but with a 9%premine and changing from 80m to 22m coins, well i dunno if it's healthy for the futur sake of this coin
Show Posts
around 3 times more efficient i can see 6.23mh per 280X 
