|
102
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [MCL] MiracleCoin | No ICO | Proof of Faucet distribution | Traders Coin
|
on: October 18, 2014, 05:56:28 PM
|
And looking for any smart member, who can tell me about the wallets commands: what's the command (or in the .conf file) to can have the option to dell/remove any address from the wallet  Was know it loooong time ago.., but I forgot it and cant find it in the networking search  ... Most wallets (including this one) have no way to delete an address once its been created. Generally you'll see it in wallets that have incorporated Sipa's watchonly functionality but I don't know of many. |
|
|
|
|
107
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 11:28:26 PM
|
It needs to be synced to 10k at least, or you won't have all the sends. Dooglus posted a method in python a while back for converting an address (sorry, don't have the pg number) I use the site http://gobittest.appspot.com/Address for quick one offs. Put the btc address in step 9, click send. In step 4, remove the leading 00 and replace it with 89, click send on step 4. You should now have the corresponding Clam address Here is an example or a random unfunded address. 16UwLL9Risc3QfPqBUvKofHmBQ7wMtjvM into step 9 Step 4 is 00010966776006953D5567439E5E39F86A0D273BEE and becomes 89010966776006953D5567439E5E39F86A0D273BEE hit send on step 4. Step 9 gives you the clam address x8Q7qDAchSMe5nmGBf7akyx4zHhMMLp9gD This works with BTC/DOGE and LTC addresses ok cool... but you're btc addr example wasn't entitled to any CLAMs distribution, so no hit on khashier so I tried with my own address and followed your instruction on gobittest, the result exactly the same as if I did it thru khashier search... THANKS now I know two ways to find CLAM address (and the third is the script, which I have no way to test it) Thats correct, my btc example wouldn't have shown up on khashier, it was just a randomly generated address to show how to do it. I'm glad I could be of help  Its also possible to go the other way. Put your clam address in step 9 and find the btc/doge/ltc address in step 4 you would replace 89 with 1e (for doge) 30 (for litecoin) or 00 (for bitcoin) |
|
|
|
|
108
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 10:11:28 PM
|
It doesn't check your 'current' balance on the DOGE chain.
(somewhat simplified and lacking technical details)
Your DOGE's are held by addresses that you own. Back in may a snapshot of the DOGE/BTC and LTC chain was taken. The snapshot included all addresses on these chains that had an above 0 balance (above dust more specifically). We then sent 4.6~ CLAMS to each address (converted into a CLAM address) on the CLAM chain.
When you import your DOGE wallet, what your doing is converting your DOGE address (stats with 'D') into a clam address ('x'). If when the snapshot was taken your original DOGE address had a positive balance you'll have a coresponding CLAM address with 4.6~ clams.
I hope that helps
can I do importprivkey even before the client fully sync-ed? by that I mean would I get the correct clam address? or maybe can someone show me an example of btc address and its corresponding clam address? I want to check if doing search on khashier actually correctly mapped the btc addr to its clam addr  It needs to be synced to 10k at least, or you won't have all the sends. Dooglus posted a method in python a while back for converting an address (sorry, don't have the pg number) I use the site http://gobittest.appspot.com/Address for quick one offs. Put the btc address in step 9, click send. In step 4, remove the leading 00 and replace it with 89, click send on step 4. You should now have the corresponding Clam address Here is an example or a random unfunded address. 16UwLL9Risc3QfPqBUvKofHmBQ7wMtjvM into step 9 Step 4 is 00010966776006953D5567439E5E39F86A0D273BEE and becomes 89010966776006953D5567439E5E39F86A0D273BEE hit send on step 4. Step 9 gives you the clam address x8Q7qDAchSMe5nmGBf7akyx4zHhMMLp9gD This works with BTC/DOGE and LTC addresses |
|
|
|
|
109
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 09:19:04 PM
|
I have to say that this is one of the coolest ideas for an altcoin I have seen. No fussing around with miners, no scam IPOs, just send out the coins and let people collect them! Brilliant!
Thanks for the kind words! Our team and the community volunteers (like dooglus and others) have and continue to put a ton of work into CLAMs to improve things. I can't speak for everyone but for me people enjoying our idea is all the validation I need for the time spent to have paid off. So thank you |
|
|
|
|
110
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 08:49:12 PM
|
How the CLAM client check my balance on DOGE chain?
It doesn't check your 'current' balance on the DOGE chain. (somewhat simplified and lacking technical details) Your DOGE's are held by addresses that you own. Back in may a snapshot of the DOGE/BTC and LTC chain was taken. The snapshot included all addresses on these chains that had an above 0 balance (above dust more specifically). We then sent 4.6~ CLAMS to each address (converted into a CLAM address) on the CLAM chain. When you import your DOGE wallet, what your doing is converting your DOGE address (stats with 'D') into a clam address ('x'). If when the snapshot was taken your original DOGE address had a positive balance you'll have a coresponding CLAM address with 4.6~ clams. I hope that helps |
|
|
|
|
111
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 08:20:53 PM
|
can anyone help me how to claim clam if i'm using multibit wallet? thx in advance For sure. Goto Tools->Export Private Keys put in your wallet password. Select "Do not password protect export file" and click on "Export to ..." to select where to put the file. You will see lines in the file like 5K13f6J8KySKqHhvME9rweRdV21hSNkcU5ZMd4rTWXwWusPFDrx 2014-01-24T00:04:35Z For each of those lines go to the clam client ->Help->debug->console and use the command importprivkey 5K13f6J8KySKqHhvME9rweRdV21hSNkcU5ZMd4rTWXwWusPFDrx You will need to do that with each key in the file. Theres not any scripts in the wild I'm aware of to automate it. |
|
|
|
|
113
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 07:42:35 PM
|
Will the --salwagewallet remove my DOGEs from my wallet?
It wouldn't, no, it would remove all the info aka settings/tx data etc but your DOGE's private keys would remain. The proper way to import a wallet now is directly thought the UI in 1.4.2.2. Doing it this way ensure's all the invalid DOGE data in the wallet.dat is removed. --salvagewallet is more destructive and should only be used in the normal cases where you would want to use salvagewallet. So I"will not lose any DOGE? I wanna be sure before i do it. It will change the structure of your wallet.dat, so make sure you use a copy, rather than your 'original' As far as changing your actual DOGE balance, no, it will not affect that, because CLAMS is a separate network. The new importwallet UI will not actually change the structure of the original wallet.dat. Its opened temporarily in memory, the keys are copied into the clams wallet and then its closed. The previous method was destructive, this however is not. |
|
|
|
|
114
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 07:40:14 PM
|
Will the --salwagewallet remove my DOGEs from my wallet?
It wouldn't, no, it would remove all the info aka settings/tx data etc but your DOGE's private keys would remain. The proper way to import a wallet now is directly thought the UI in 1.4.2.2. Doing it this way ensure's all the invalid DOGE data in the wallet.dat is removed. --salvagewallet is more destructive and should only be used in the normal cases where you would want to use salvagewallet. So I"will not lose any DOGE? I wanna be sure before i do it. You 100% will not lose any of your DOGE. I do suggest making a backup of your original DOGE. There have been no reports of wallet.dat files being corrupted and there have been a lot of imports at this point (at least 9300+ addresses). The way the import is done now lowers that risk significantly also as the wallet you import is left untouched.. but I always suggest backing up. |
|
|
|
|
115
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 20, 2014, 07:14:02 PM
|
Will the --salwagewallet remove my DOGEs from my wallet?
It wouldn't, no, it would remove all the info aka settings/tx data etc but your DOGE's private keys would remain. The proper way to import a wallet now is directly thought the UI in 1.4.2.2. Doing it this way ensure's all the invalid DOGE data in the wallet.dat is removed. --salvagewallet is more destructive and should only be used in the normal cases where you would want to use salvagewallet. |
|
|
|
|
116
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 12, 2014, 02:07:12 AM
|
Would be better if CLAM get listed on much bigger exchange to increase volume and investors interest.
CLAM has been amazingly stable between 100K and 200K sats... So much so that the Clam Shell where you see 100 or 200 size support bids is rarely seen... That means people love this coin... and are hoarding. A wild guesstimate of Clam Population: I have 4 active wallets with 235 Clams... And a Staking Weight of 184 vs Network Weight of 18,952... So if I have roughly 1% of active Clams that means there are about 25,000 active Clams... Possibly many more in off-line or cold wallets. We need more people to find Clams... if only for the FUN... It's almost as if the Devs wanna keep this quiet for a while before a Big Innovation. Maybe we should have a weekly Sunday Clam Hunt thread... And bring 20-50 people into the fold every week... week after week... Somebody just do it... because it can't be me I'm too controversial 'round here. I love the idea, bringing 20-50 people into the fold each week would be really great. I'm not sure about the logistics of such an event but its something I will bring up with the team, I just do the coding I can promise there is no conspiracy to keep it quite, we've been shouting it from the roof's since we started and its awesome to be getting traction now and the more the better! I can give some slightly more accurate numbers for you regarding the 'active' clams. Some members of the team don't like throwing the numbers around, and I get there point but I like numbers, even if there estimates.First (disclaimer here) There is absolutely no way to know exactly how many clams are sitting in peoples wallets. We can only count clams that a) have been staked or b) have been spent to another address. With that said, here on the current numbers from our friendly irc bot aptly named SuperClam on the #clams irc channel Lottery Winnings: 8962.94460818 Clams Staking Earning: 3484.69149075 Clams Amount Claimed: 42305.71642764 Clams, 9186 Addresses Current CLAMS in Circulation(estimate): 54319.26807218 Clams |
|
|
|
|
118
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: August 06, 2014, 12:17:03 PM
|
Hello everybody! this situation
received +4.60545574 CLAM(5e3200eaeb8f73a49da0256cb9c8743180d8fcdf99da191d5d645227b6fb4d2b) after transferred to another account 4(9aff8a4eacc5e53a657049343a0c7fa3996a3f8c43b2ba2cc7c306b0a2a78923) clam
on the idea should remain 0.60 or slightly less
wanted to transfer to another purse residues but they were not turned
question where did 0.6 ?
If you look on the block explorer you can see your transaction and the 0.60535574 in change that was sent to xCszox7aCdXDBDX619Ydx2zPxbSNJHDxJJ which according to your description would be a change address http://khashier.com:2750/tx/9aff8a4eacc5e53a657049343a0c7fa3996a3f8c43b2ba2cc7c306b0a2a78923The .6+ is stored in a change address which was created by your wallet when you sent the transaction. It will be in the wallet you originally had the Clams in. If you open that wallet back up you should see it in there. |
|
|
|
|
119
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: July 17, 2014, 07:15:52 AM
|
I was wondering whether it's possible to find out whether a particular Bitcoin address has any CLAMS associated with it without having to have access to the private key. The helpful folks on the #clams IRC channel told me it is - you can convert from Bitcoin address to CLAMS address without needing the private key. Here's one way of doing it, using the "python-bitcoinlib" library: $ git clone https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinlib.gitCloning into 'python-bitcoinlib'... remote: Reusing existing pack: 913, done. remote: Total 913 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) Receiving objects: 100% (913/913), 300.69 KiB | 145.00 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (487/487), done. Checking connectivity... done. $ cd python-bitcoinlib/ $ python Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:56) [GCC 4.8.2] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import bitcoin.base58 >>> def btc2clam(addr): return bitcoin.base58.CBase58Data(bitcoin.base58.decode(addr)[1:-4], 0x89).__str__() ... >>> print btc2clam('14o7zMMUJkG6De24r3JkJ6USgChq7iWF86') xC6ktEBwaTk8G27wCWwQjGmDuK14SZPvJa >>> Thats awesome! Not much of a python user but you got to love how simple it is. Updating for any one wondering about DogeCoin or Litecoin which is also possible with 3 simple changes to the pubkey address in base58.py For DogeCoin: Dec: 127 Hex: \x7f For LiteCoin: Dec: 48 Hex: \x30 The Decmial version of the pubkey address goes in the follow line: https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinlib/blob/master/bitcoin/base58.py#L106The hex goes in the 2 following lines: https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinlib/blob/master/bitcoin/base58.py#L40https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinlib/blob/master/bitcoin/base58.py#L106Once you make those changes the rest goes exactly like dooglus describes |
|
|
|
|
120
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMS, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Pearl, @Poloniex.com
|
on: July 13, 2014, 01:21:07 AM
|
So, you have 2,335/1,000,000 odds (467/200,000) of hitting a lotto block.
Must have been my head that was the problem, then. I assumed (wrongly) that the reward for every block would vary. Thanks for the math to prove it. I can now see some blocks that would have - if we were already on the lotto system - generated a reward higher than 0.1: 07/12/14 17:10:47 DebugProofOfStakeReward hash=989474017103111cb636 seed=17943395 random=2129073648 randCoefficient=0.991427176 nCoefficient=0.000000000 nSubsidy=0.10000001
07/12/14 19:04:53 DebugProofOfStakeReward hash=ad6472e8b0fa20a17657 seed=34215781 random=2143547323 randCoefficient=0.998167006 nCoefficient=0.004070347 nSubsidy=4.16993978
07/12/14 19:08:11 DebugProofOfStakeReward hash=22dd16b4b37f1493c1ec seed=21576734 random=2134171368 randCoefficient=0.993800987 nCoefficient=0.000000008 nSubsidy=0.10000792
I'll wait until the fork to confirm that I've properly matched hashes and blocks, but I'll repeat my concern: it appears to be possible to calculate the reward in advance, therefore it is simple to add a conditional to only try to mint PoS when it's worth it. I think you might be able to migrate the problem by setting a maxium stake time and resetting it once it reached the max. It would make staking more competitive (I think) and not really allow you to just sit around and not submit your blocks. If you were to wait to long then the advantage of not submitting would be lost as you would be on the same level as everyone when the reward block came around, giving you no advantage. Its just an ideaI had, might not work. thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
