|
No, with internal dhcp / dns / ntp you can have 10000+ miners and use less than 5 Mbps in total.
Do you have any network monitoring tools to analyze this traffic? You might be able to figure out why inbound traffic is so much larger than outbound.
|
|
|
|
Please note that according to EMA, it is currently unprofitable to mine in Singapore. You will lose more money in electricity than what the miners produce at current rates. If your plan is hold for the future, you are essentially purchasing bitcoins. Not only that, but you would be purchasing them at an insane premium: 3.5x the price you would pay if you simply bought them on an exchange (based on 26c/kwh). And you run all of the risks and inconveniences of mining... the heat, the noise, the possibility of various failures... |
|
|
|
|
Besides posting a screenshot of the status page you should also copy the kernel log as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Your IP report button might be stuck too. If you hold it down when booting it will reset.
|
|
|
|
|
It can vary over time, is this the AVG hashrate from miner status and also the 1 day average from slushpool?
|
|
|
|
|
If your slushpool is showing more than 20 TH you must have at least 2 T9 miners (?)
Assuming you gave them different worker names, you should be able to see the hash rate for each one in your workers page.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the job that you were offered?
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you have a FICO score of at least 640 you won't find anyone offering uncollateralized loans
|
|
|
|
|
If your pool shows the same hashrate for your worker that you see on the miner status page, I would not worry about resetting it or messing with it at all.
Trying to fix the temperature sensor would not gain you extra profit if the hashrate was the same on the pool side (check in your slushpool individual workers list). The other temp sensors are still working and will shut the miner down if things get too hot.
|
|
|
|
i do not suggest this over over-clocking at any situation, even if your psu was able to supply 2500w which n theory good enough to support freq of 850, it pretty a lot of load on the miner that will take it to snap city in a very short period of time.
I dunno, I still have an S9 running on 850 mhz with two apw3+ psus from before LPM firmware came out. You just have to adjust bmminer to force 9.4V to stay stable, and keep your environment cool I guess. It's definitely not that power efficient though so I would only recommend it for testing or if your power is nearly free. |
|
|
|
|
Well where is the vouch? It doesn't count if you give it to some new or unknown members, you know..
|
|
|
|
|
I have a 1060 3gb like new. I bought it new and only used it for a few weeks since I got a great deal on a 1080 soon after. I would be willing to part with it for 0.05 btc
|
|
|
|
UP
I received very good humor, at the moment we are at the stage of laughing! |
|
|
|
|
What is this trash?
If it earns a guaranteed $50 a day, why are you selling it for $100?
Garbage.
|
|
|
|
|
The T1 is less energy efficient than an S9 with enhanced LPM/asicboost, you probably wouldn't be able to get more than $150 for one by itself.
You didn't mention anything about PSUs but you might be able to get better offers if you have PSUs to include.
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide pictures or some other proof of inventory. Also, you didn't mention anything about escrow.
|
|
|
|
I don't know why, but I was under the impression that the decision to disallow guests from viewing feedback had something to do with cases where an employer or something is doing a google search on a potential employee, and ends up here, "Biggest Shitboi on forum, Skemmd my Grandmum for 5,000 BTC", "Guy sucks, l0l" etc feedback.
It seems to me that you could still display everyone's DT score on their posts without actually allowing access to each individual's trust page. |
|
|
|
The merkle root does not become larger when you add more transactions to the block. It is basically a checksum of the transactions. The reason you want to include lots of transactions in a block is to collect some extra transaction fees on top of the block reward, but this is not necessary, and you can find some empty blocks in the blockchain. You don't need to include transactions in your block, but mining an empty block is no easier than mining a full one. Per earlier responses I understood that generally miners execute second type of logic so head-start wont matter.
There is no way to get a "head start", since you can only start mining once the previous block has been solved, since its hash serves as an input for the next block. With today's difficulty, is there a website or something where I can see how long it will take to get the hash function output that is valid? Will it take > 10 minutes on most personal computers?
According to the bitcoin wiki, a Core i7 3930k can do around 67 MH/s (million hashes per second). At the current difficulty, CryptoCompare shows that you would earn approximately 0,00000105 btc by mining with 67 MH/s for a year. At today's difficulty, it would take an average of more than 32.600 years to solve one block with a Core i7 3930k, since the block reward is currently 12,5 btc. But the difficulty will rise much faster than your chance of ever solving a block with a CPU. |
|
|
|
|
RX 570 is not used for mining Bitcoin. You should move your post to the altcoin section for best results.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll offer 0.1 btc for the Z9
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
