Latest posts of: tomaszsz

hi

i have strange issue with dogecoin 1.6

when i send dogecoins sometimes on my list transactions appears 1Wh4bh instead real send address.

network see real dogecoin address. and on https://dogechain.info/chain/Dogecoin transaction looks ok

but when i use listtransactions send addres is wrong.,

this send addres appears after while (for few second on local list transaction adres is ok, and after while change to 1Wh4bh or other)

what should i do ?

BFL lies, and again and again

http://imgur.com/a/Tvjc6

and now they blocked forums.butterflylabs.com no more user can register ...

why no one has not sued BFL ? This is a multi-million dollar fraud, thousands of users have been deceived !! and still nothing

where is famous for justice in the U.S.?

instead hardware, another lies

but i cant send namecoin to other wallet,
because allmost all NMC transfers are unconfirmed Sad

i have send about 150 NMC in about 10 transaction but only one of them has been confirmed

and my balance is zero, with almost 150 NMC frozen in unconfirmed transactions

and i have this transaction

2012-05-10 13:46:09 stdClass Object
(
   [account] =>
   [address] => NHoMvrubGAUS24E34uzKHtCfrmfCGKApvb
   [category] => send
   [amount] => -165.97
   [fee] => 150.00300512
   [confirmations] => 63801
   [txid] => 564cfe4e1d5b1c057c2821eb090cbc2079d346fa92949ef6de7069abd56b874f
   [time] => 1336650369
)

2012-05-10 13:46:09 stdClass Object
(
   [account] =>
   [address] => NKD7PyEaF1teCHw97ByeNN4Zv5jSEBNhvL
   [category] => send
   [amount] => -34.03550512
   [fee] => 150.00300512
   [confirmations] => 63801
   [txid] => 564cfe4e1d5b1c057c2821eb090cbc2079d346fa92949ef6de7069abd56b874f
   [time] => 1336650369
)

with VERY expensive transaction fee....

I deleted a few transactions so at least my balance is not zero, but it still tries to send something its hanging some of the transaction without confirmation,

2013-06-28 20:23:44 stdClass Object
(
[account] =>
[address] => N4CFbYVGkbQSwGN1pYYDGwymVcL3vYZ6ug
[category] => send
[amount] => -1.1
[fee] => 0
[confirmations] => 15
[txid] => 012c34896c7888f6ebafa6aabfa1856e90cb4a1cf9506cc64823ebe65dc47469
[time] => 1372443824
)
2013-06-28 20:23:45 stdClass Object
(
[account] =>
[address] => N4CFbYVGkbQSwGN1pYYDGwymVcL3vYZ6ug
[category] => send
[amount] => -1.1
[fee] => -0.005
[confirmations] => 0
[txid] => bdd05074dc18eb37c75168d62789ee20deb0156096354947ac97333a00d5247d
[time] => 1372443825
)

and again,

what should i do ?

I have this transaction in namecoind (unconfirmed for two months ?!? )

2013-05-06 16:45:49

stdClass Object
(
   [account] =>
   [address] => NEh8xThvytdvrMxY5WpZA6Ju3KP55NmkaN
   [category] => send
   [amount] => -48.22
   [fee] => -0.005
   [confirmations] => 0
   [txid] => e4b34b09daed7cc35b64924d76ac0aff8bf7a450c8f83ecca1fd10778a3fb4ba
   [time] => 1367851549
)

namecoind
'version' => 35000
'blocks' => 119131,
'connections' => 11,
'difficulty' => 7872315.7429868,
'hashespersec' => 0, 'testnet' => false,
'keypoololdest' => 1316278664,
'paytxfee' => 0, 'mininput' => 0.0001,
'errors' => '', ))

so namecoind is up to date, but why this transaction (and few next ) are stil unconfirmed ?

u use rescan , but it doesnot help Sad

is there any way to confirm this transaction ?

UPDATE:

I can Pay 10 NMC for HELP

Bitcoin centralization is bad, and that's what companies such as ASICminer do !
big power / hashrarte in one hand !

when will the change in BitCoin algorithm eliminates ASICs ?

-rescan helps

thanks

but it was trange, all receive transaction was confirmed (in one minute )
, but all send transactions hang for over 20 minutes...

i use standard configuration without any modyfications ...

yes i can list it
transaction is on transaction list but still unconfirmed Sad

is there any chans to send bitcoin from this wallet ?
or BTC ar lost ?

i have downloaded new version os bitcoind 0.8.2
after syncing with the network, i have move all .bitcoin dir to another machine

receive transactions works ok .

BUT send CANNOT send bitcoins Sad

send transaction are unconfirmed... Sad

in logs i see ERROR: CTxMemPool::accept() : nonstandard transaction type

what should i do ?

Quote from: bo2573 on May 09, 2013, 02:53:58 PM

>>> 2013-05-09 09:52:26,704 sharelogging ERROR Error setting up share logger sql: (<class 'NameError'>, NameError("name 'long' is not defined",), <traceback object at 0x1ae0200>)

I am trying to get mysql to record the shares. I set up the 'shares' table and columns but it is not recording shares.

please post your config with Sharelogging section

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 10, 2013, 09:46:03 AM

Quote from: qubic on May 10, 2013, 09:39:40 AM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 10, 2013, 08:10:32 AM

Quote from: qubic on May 10, 2013, 06:12:44 AM

I got an error:

Code:

makeCoinbaseTxn	ERROR	Coinbaser failed!

then i do some debug
line 105 in eloipool.py raise an error

Code:

nout = int(p.stdout.readline())

I guess CoinbaserCmd is invalid, then i run the command in terminal

Code:

echo -e "1\\n$((%d / 100))\\n1579aXhdwvKZEMrAKoCZhzGuqMa8EonuXU"

the result is:

Code:

bash: %d / 100: syntax error: operand expected (error token is "%d / 100")

any ideas?

My guess would be a non-BASH default shell...

I found the reason

Code:

p.stdout.readline()

return

Code:

b'-e 1\n'

My default shell is Bash，I use Python 3.3.1 on Ubuntu

If your default shell was BASH, you wouldn't get that result.

i have the same with BASH, python 3.2 , on ubuntu 12.

commenting CoinbaserCmd, may help but it isn't good solution...

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 08, 2013, 10:43:48 AM

Looks okay. Does it work?

yes

many thanks

merged mining work ! (but i dont find any block yet )

but from time to time i get

Code:

2013-05-20T20:40:39.879372,solve,?,0,2125c31fb29aa6947264472d420e5f9e5582ef21576640c5eab4a4a300000000
Could not connect to http://127.0.0.1:9947/
Parent setworkaux failed: http://127.0.0.1:9947/
2013-05-20T20:40:40.001529,updateaux
2013-05-20T20:40:41.056715,solve,?,0,10cfc91c8c7b6dfa4c19fe0a8497411b9e439091da62c2bd6a9cd8d900000000

is it something with multithreading in eloipool ?

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 08, 2013, 10:01:58 AM

You're missing the GotWorkURI stuff.

You saw README, right?

yes , i saw

README:

Quote

"Eloipool supports merged mining using the setworkaux/gotwork RPC interface."

and in config.py

Quote

# URI to send gotwork with info for every share submission
#GotWorkURI = ''

and thats ALL...

SO
finall configuration

Quote

mining proxy command

Code:

python merged-mining-proxy  -w 8330 -p http://ssecreteloipool:222@127.0.0.1:9947/ -x http://namecoinrpc:manecoinrpcpass@localhost:9377/

eloipool config.py

Code:

# Secret username allowed to use setworkaux
SecretUser = "ssecreteloipool"

# Addresses to listen on for JSON-RPC GBT/getwork server
JSONRPCAddresses = (
        ('', 9947),
)

GotWorkURI = "http://mergedproxyuser:mergedproxypass@127.0.0.1:8330/"

namecoind config

Code:

rpcuser=namecoinrpc
rpcpassword=manecoinrpcpass
 
 
 rpcport=9377

Code:

and user miner program connect to 9947

is it ok ?

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 07, 2013, 08:23:17 PM

Miner talks to Eloipool.

ok it is easy

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 07, 2013, 08:23:17 PM

MMP talks to namecoind.

ok, thats easy too

but

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 07, 2013, 08:23:17 PM

Eloipool talks to bitcoind and MMP independently.

which params (MMP url, MMP host, MMP port ? )

in eloipool makes that eloipool talks to MMP ?

or my configuration

Quote

mining proxy command

Code:

python merged-mining-proxy  -w 8330 -p http://ssecreteloipool:222@127.0.0.1:9947/ -x http://namecoinrpc:manecoinrpcpass@localhost:9377/

eloipool config.py

Code:

# Secret username allowed to use setworkaux
SecretUser = "ssecreteloipool"

# Addresses to listen on for JSON-RPC GBT/getwork server
JSONRPCAddresses = (
        ('', 9947),
)

namecoind config

Code:

rpcuser=namecoinrpc
rpcpassword=manecoinrpcpass
 
 
 rpcport=9377

is ok, and i should just point miner to eloipool (port 9947 ) , instead MMP (port 8330) ?

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 07, 2013, 07:16:48 PM

Mining proxy talks to Eloipool and Namecoind, nothing else.

so we have this configuration

Code:

client miner <--->  mining proxy <--> eloipool  <---->   bitcoind
                            |
                             | -------> namecoind ?

mining proxy command

Code:

python merged-mining-proxy  -w 8330 -p http://ssecreteloipool:222@127.0.0.1:9947/ -x http://namecoinrpc:manecoinrpcpass@localhost:9377/

eloipool config.py

Code:

# Secret username allowed to use setworkaux
SecretUser = "ssecreteloipool"

# Addresses to listen on for JSON-RPC GBT/getwork server
JSONRPCAddresses = (
        ('', 9947),
)

namecoind config

Code:

rpcuser=namecoinrpc
rpcpassword=manecoinrpcpass
 
 
 rpcport=9377

and normal configuracjion connection to bitcoin

Code:

....

why i cannot connect /point miner to 8330 port ? and still get this errors

Quote

001-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-0001-02-01-1: Error: Invalid length of string: Disabling URL http://serverurl.com:8330 for 60s
...
...
..

miner with eloipool works perfect

but with merged mining configuracion still cannot connect minner to mining proxy ...

what should i change in my configuration ?

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 06, 2013, 09:12:54 PM

The only supported scenario is:

Code:

client miner <--> eloipool <--> bitcoind
                            |-> mining proxy <--> namecoind

[/quote]

so if

Code:

 client miner <--> eloipool <-->  mining proxy <--> (bitcond + namecoind)

is WRONG

how to connect eloipool to bitcoind AND to mining proxy ?

Code:

 client miner <--> eloipool <-->  (mining proxy  + namecoind) <--> bitcoind  ?

i see that normally mining proxy "split" connection into two daemon (BTC, NMC)

but how to do this in eloipool ?

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 05, 2013, 09:34:05 PM

Quote from: tomaszsz on May 05, 2013, 06:06:03 PM

mining proxy need setworkaux so i think 1) will be ok ?

so why in first scenario i get errors on client miner ?

The only supported scenario is:

Code:

client miner <--> eloipool <--> bitcoind
                            |-> mining proxy <--> namecoind

you mean

client miner <----> eloipool <-----> mining proxy <----> bitcoind
|
| ----> namecond

so i must use patched bitcoind (with setworkaux function) ?

or maybe

client miner <----> eloipool <-----> mining proxy <----> eloipool <--- > bitcoind
|
| ----> namecond

?

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 04, 2013, 07:42:01 PM

It's not a proxy. Miners continue to talk to Eloipool.

idont understand your suggestion Tongue

maybe it should be

1)
client minrer <---> mining proxy <--> eloipool <----> bitcoind
|
| -------> namecoind ?

or

2)

client miner <----> eloipool <-----> mining proxy <----> bitcoind
|
| ----> namecond

mining proxy need setworkaux so i think 1) will be ok ?

so why in first scenario i get errors on client miner ?