That's correct, we need to fork and reduce nTargetSpacing to increase the rate at which blocks are generated.  Reducing the stake age won't help with moving the blockchain.

Start a new github with a different name and updated code, start a new thread and direct people there.

Anybody have any idea why the blockchain is moving so slowly?  Is it too many nodes on the old wallet?

What is going on with this coin?  Update didn't seem to fix anything.  Blockchain's not moving, block explorer is offline, most of my coins are stuck in stake and am being told constantly estimated time to reward is 3 minutes.  Also the time since last block doesn't dynamically update, I have to close and reopen the wallet.

Thanks but still not syncing and info says it's still 2.0.0.0?

New Mac wallet missing dependencies.

Updated Mac wallet up:

https://mega.co.nz/#!McJEGDiT!WgEo-Z8QzSwWQiwlvT4pvtqyK_6ana4iB64shmGNjkk

Dev, please update OP with both wallets.

Mac wallet coming within the hour...

You're the dev, contact them and ask them what they're doing.  It looks like they're trying to just sweep it under the rug and hope it will go away, but you should give them an opportunity to respond first.

Anybody have any luck compiling a Mac wallet?  I've been banging my head against my desk all afternoon trying to figure out how to get past the "string file not found" once it hits the src/tor folder...   

If you're still getting stuck on 5000 after upgrading wallet, try closing and reopening.  I got stuck on 5000 again at first, closed and reopened, and am now on block 5011.

Nevermind, main.h

What file is this code in?

I couldn't agree with you more.  I was intrigued by SVR at the start but the low payouts really turned me off and I highly doubt the MMORPG will ever even see the light of day.  I've been mining FRAC almost exclusively for a couple of weeks now and holding.  I see a big upside coming up for that coin.  The fact that the X11 multiport keeps going back to it should tell you something.

Bullshit.  There were at least 325 blocks mined before the source was released.

Keep those charity coins flowing, mates!

Moment of truth...

I think having Bittrex send the coins to the compensation fork (secret address so nobody else can send to it), then sending the good coins back to Bittrex along with a chunk of the premine (also agree that holding some premine is a good idea) and have Bittrex distribute the coins back to their users is the best approach.  The problem is that I doubt Bittrex would cooperate.  Personally, I believe that Bittrex has a vendetta against this coin...a lot of people are pissed at them for losing money and they want to do anything they can to kill the coin.

By allowing individual bagholders to choose to convert their bad coins to good, you will at least get some people who have written off the coin as a total loss back into the community, which can help us build the coin back up.  This would be a positive thing even if Bittrex continues to refuse to delist the coin or move to the good fork.  The more good fork bagholders there are, the more incentive people will have to pressure other exchanges to to take the coin.  If it gets some momentum on other exchanges, it would be stupid at that point for Bittrex to not get on the good fork and get in on some of the action.

It is true that this approach would not be able to filter where the coins are coming from.  People holding bad coins in their old wallets would also be able to submit to the compensation fork and get some ninja in return.  I don't see a way around that, but I don't think there is a perfect solution here.  One thing that would definitely need to be implemented in the compensation fork would be to determine approximately what block the original fork was on when the hard fork was put in place, and invalidate any POS coins created after that block.  That would eliminate abuse by people opening their old wallets and generating millions of coins before submitting to the compensation wallet.

I think a good first step would be to contact Bittrex with a proposal for having them send dev all of their coins, dev filters out the bad coins and sends them back along with a sizable chunk of his premine, and Bittrex redistributes them to their users.  One thing that Bittrex and their bagholders should understand is that most of these bad coins were purchased well under what the market value of the good coins should be...millions at 1 satoshi.  If their users only get a small portion of what they bought back and hold, the value could potentially increase enough that they still break even or even profit from their purchase of the bad coins.  If Bittrex has lost faith in the coin and doesn't want to relist the good fork after that, fine, there are other exchanges.  But let's present this to them as a good faith effort by the dev to compensate their users the best way we can.  The coins sitting in their wallets right now are absolutely worthless, and we would be offering to turn them into something that's not.  They don't want to be sitting on those wallets forever either, they will have to delist eventually.  Nobody is trading them.

I have an idea for resolving the Bittrex situation and resurrecting the coin.

Bittrex wants the dev to come up with a way to compensate people who paid BTC for NJA on their site.  Fully compensating all of them is of course not possible.  But you could fairly distribute partial compensation in this way.

Step 1 - Go back to the last version of the wallet before the hard fork that fixed POS was implemented.  Make a separate hard fork from here.  I will call this the "compensation fork."  On this fork, the billions of NJA generated by POS are considered valid coins, but POS is now disabled, or set to a ridiculously long stake time, to ensure that no new bad coins are created.  Get Bittrex to upgrade to this wallet after reviewing the plan.  The compensation fork wallet should be called something different like "ninjacomp-qt" so that it can run side by side with the current good wallet.  Also, use the original logo as the icon so users can easily differentiate.

Step 2 - Post an announcement explaining the following plan, and set a deadline for compliance.  2 weeks, 4 weeks, whatever.  Bittrex will make an announcement at the same time that they are delisting NJA at the deadline, and all coins will need to be removed before the deadline.  This should not be a problem because exchanges and pools get rid of coins all the time and coins not withdrawn are lost.  The Bittrex announcement will point people to the Ninja announcement explaining the compensation process.

Step 3 - Instruct Bittrex holders to download the compensation wallet and withdraw all of their coins to it.  Dev will post an address from the compensation fork wallet that everyone should send their coins to.  When sending their coins to the compensation wallet, they should sign the transaction with an address from the good wallet that their compensation can be sent to.  To show the community that the dev is really trying to make amends, he will also deposit the entire remainder of his premine into the compensation wallet.

Step 4 - Once the deadline is reached, Bittrex delists NJA, and any remaining coins are gone forever.  The dev will calculate what percentage of total coins in the compensation wallet (good and bad), minus the dev's premine, were deposited by each address.  Once this calculation is performed and recorded, the wallet.dat file from the compensation wallet is moved into the good wallet.

Step 5 - The good wallet with the wallet.dat file is opened, and the bad coins become invalid.  Each person who deposited coins into the compensation wallet get whatever percentage of coins they deposited sent to them from the good wallet.  So if someone deposited 1,000,000 coins into the compensation wallet, and that was 10%, and there are now 100,000 good coins, that person will receive 10,000 coins, or 10%.

This unique approach to compensation could generate interest in the community, with the main idea behind it being that the dev is working to get the value of the coins up and back on exchanges so that even though they have fewer coins, they will eventually be able to sell to get back what they spent on them, or even turn a profit.

The next phase would involve the dev working to add features to the coin to increase interest, while the community that has been compensated works to show the exchanges that there is a renewed interest in the coin via Twitter and other outlets.  I'm not a big fan of anon, but it seems like a perfect fit for a ninja coin, so I think that the first feature to be implemented would be to add a "stealth" option, where people can check a box in the wallet to enable "stealth mode" and conduct their transaction anonymously.

Great looking wallet but...no.