 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
A Swedish pool has just opened up. 0.5% fee. http://swedpool.eu/site/miningccminer -a x16s -o stratum+tcp://swedpool.eu:19800 -u PUbPk5X7gfmxUfuSur5MbVXMCZxdSy5f5v -p c=PGN -i 19 pause |
|
|
|
|
I use this and one other miner and these two forks are awesome. I don't mind the dev fee because the increase in hash rate is considerably higher. But this is where I stumble.... I don't know the first thing about overclocking.
I asked this in one other thread, so I am hoping to get a hit, but sorry about my poor netiquitte.
I have a Gigabyte Gaming 1070 Ti and a MSI 960. I am currently using the AORUS software to do the OC'ing with their preset "Overclock" function. I can and have used MSI Afterburner, but sadly I really don't know the first thing about what I should look for and how to establish stability with low risk.
I don't mind if the wattage goes up a little (electricity is pretty cheap), but I do want the hashrate to go up considerably. All I really want to know is what setting should I use that others may have had some success with.
The only other algo I really use is Neoscrypt (which is more memory intensive).
|
|
|
|
I have now successfully used your miner for a short period and I am now ready to make me and you some more coin  But here is where I stumble. I don't know the first thing about overclocking and I really would love some help from the community. So when using the miner I am working with a Gigabyte Gaming 1070 Ti and a MSI 960 (I realise this is less than perfect, but we all have to start somewhere). I am happy using MSI Afterburner, but what should all the settings be? Now, bear in mind I don't know the first thing about OC'ing. Currently I am using the AORUS software that came with the GPU and have used their preset Overclock setting. I feel it is greatly under powering what the card is capable of. Also, I don't mind if the wattage goes up a little so long the cards stay cool enough for efficiency. Thank you in advance for your help. |
|
|
|
|
Just tried to get onto the GunCoin pool, no avail. Timed out. Checked, rechecked. Pretty sure I have everything right on 3337.
|
|
|
|
|
And I actually have a question too..... can we manually set difficulty? I tried a number of options but it didn't seem to work according to the dashboard. According to my miner it seemed to work though.
|
|
|
|
Trying this out.... not too many people in there at the moment making things take a while. But rewards are good Would love it if a few more people would join |
|
|
|
Hello, flags are ok. First, you should give it more time, I think at least 24 hours to get more stats. Second, pool will never show correct speed, there is no way it's possible as miner doesn't report its speed, it just sends shares and pool tries to calculate speed using number of received shares over some time period. Almost all pools claims that pool-side speed is only estimation. Also, at your screenshot I see that pool set high difficulty - 1024. It's high value for only 2 GPUs, so miner will send shares rarely and therefore pool-side stats will be even more inaccurate. You can try to set lower difficulty if pool supports this via -p c=CCC,d=128 where CCC is your coin symbol, like BTC and d=128 is difficulty you are going to use. Thank you for your reply. The screenshot was taken from a Yiimp pool that stated Yiimp automatically adjusts difficulty to get on average 15 submits per minute. But I am going to try and adjust difficulty to 128 and see what happens. I have spent more time using your miner and I am going to say I think it is providing me, on average, more income. It also provides a lower temperature and lower wattage than ccminer yet a higher hashrate. How you do that.... I am just blown away. |
|
|
|
|
Firstly, thank you for this miner, it is very easy to use and it is working very well with my 1070 Ti and my 960 as well! For this, that is impressive.
The downside.... while I have only used it for two hours, the desktop registers a considerably higher kh/s rate (up from about 1400 to 1600) but my pool is registering a lower hash rate, by about 10 or 15%.
I realise I have only a short amount of data to calculate from, but the evidence is fairly clear at the moment, power use is lower, data at the computer end is higher, but the hash rate where it counts is lower.
I can only assume I am doing something wrong. Would love to know how to get this so I am getting 1600 kh/s on Neoscrypt as I have had in the past, at the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
