Terminally ill people are probably willing to do anything just to recover. But, unfortunately, there is still no way guaranteed to cure cancer.

If they do not violate the laws and claims to them can not be. These are the realities of modern life. But I hope that there are people for whom money is not important and they just want to help other people.

Gathering a team that understands the blockchain is good for producing products. But we also don't forget to look for people who understand market behavior that can gain investor confidence so that the team can concentrate on products and not be bothered by price movements in the market because prices will definitely affect investor confidence in the long run

1. Think something that blockchain never had, a project which can be a game changer in the community.
2. gather a good team members which can go high on its own field.
3. advicer is not really important to get as long as you know where you want to be.
4. make a good advertisement, an advance exchange is an addition.
5. choose IEO, which you will get the best exchange to do this!

What you are doing is multiposting and is not allowed on the forum. Even worse because is against the forum rules and you can be punished especially that you post 7 posts in a row.

This should be one long post with all quotes and answers inside. You are still Junior member so I guess didn't know about this.

I would suggest to edit one post and delete others before moderators will step in.

Yes it is a good investment when you look at treating dogs with cancer BUT only if the treatment works. 

So... I am going to make an effort to be as detailed as possible to show you how the treatment works. It is proprietary but I can explain quite a bit.

Here we go:  All cells have what are called MDR protein pumps.  Think of them like a like a straw and when a cell senses something wrong entering the cell, the MDR's will basically pump it out.

One of those drugs that cells reject with the MDR protein pumps are chemotherapy drugs. That is why with normal Chemotherapy treatment, they use such large doses of Chemotherapy drugs to try and kill the cell.  Because as the chemo is entering the cell, the MDR pump is getting it out of the cell.  So if they use large doses of the chemotherapy drug, some hopefully will stay in the cancer cells and kill the cancer.  Hopefully!   That is also why patients have terrible side effects.  Because of these large doses of the chemo patients can make the patient nauseated, they can't eat and they lose their hair plus other side effects.

So what if we could temporarily, say for 70 minutes, turn off the MDR protein pumps? The result would be that even, if we use small doses of the chemo drugs, small enough to not produce bad side effect, the chemo would still work and kill the cancer cells.

So how do we get the cells to turn of their MDR portent pumps for this short period of time or better put how do we specifically turn off the MDR protein pumps in the cancer cells and the cancer stem cells which are the ones that spread the cancer. 

The answer is in understanding that cancer cells, and especially cancer stem cells, are producing at a fast rate and need a lot of energy to do this.  More than normal cells.  So if we for a period of say 70 minutes had a way to deprive the cancer cells of their energy source and because they are constantly grabbing what they need for energy before normal cells do, then IF WE depriving them of these sources of energy, we weaken the cancer cells to the point that they have no energy to properly and efficiently use their MDR protein pumps to eliminate the chemotherapy drugs EVEN when we only use 10% of the normal dose. Thus we are able to kill the cancer cells.

That is the treatment in a nut shell.  And we administer all the drugs, per treatment, over a 70 to 90 minute treatment session via an IV transfusion.  Treatments are most often administered twice a week.  The number of weekly treatments needed depends on the cancer and how far it has progresses.   

I see that you have an honest budget. I even thought that you might not have enough money to open a network of clinics. Alas, I do not know how much it costs in the USA.

I can only answer for myself. As I already wrote I not specialist in medicine and I at all fear different medical procedures. Therefore, there can be no question about the theft of your technology even if I have something to see. To invest or not here everyone has to decide for himself.

I think that If you showed how exactly the treatment is carried out it could help investors to make a decision.  It's one thing when someone says and promises, and another when you can see the real thing. On the other hand, it is not necessary to disclose all the details of treatment that can be stolen.

Of course, a lot more people would invest if they will be able to verify if the procedure works in real life.

I just don't believe that you are not exposing all details because are afraid that somebody stills your technology.

To be honest, if there is a working treatment against cancer then this is like a holy grail and pharmaceutic companies would pay billions to get it. Additionally, if this really works from 2009 then multiple treatments have to be made to this date so I assume if anybody wants he could have all the details a long time ago.

Sorry, but i don't believe it. I haven't heard anything about a cure for cancer so far.

Many medicines and medical techniques are tested on animals. But develop and real use are not the same, especially if it's for people. I don't know all the testing stages, but should be clinical trials at least. I also think that different types of cancer need different drugs and techniques. Therefore, between the treatment of dogs and treatment of people from the point of view of official medicine  must be a very big difference.

As I understood the project does not promise investors a quick profit, but promises them to participate in the profits of the company and ensures that the price of the token will not fall. That's interesting.

A really working cancer drug would be a revolution in medicine. and people with only a small part of the rights (investment) to this drug could become very rich people. But the problem is that no one knows when such a drug will be created.

It's really funny to see posts like this. Asking for idea from the public to create a project? After creating project what will you do?

Some projects are practicing so called buy-back model, when project buy tokens from bounty hunter and other token holders. Did you think about this model?

Multiple Comments and Response


Kira I really like this idea.  I would love for the bounty hunters to understand that it can be more profitable for them to hold on but there is a strong likelyhood that as soon as the tokens are sellable on a exchange most will sell immediately. If we buy back the bounty that would help to not have a massive selling and it will support the price.


That is correct, Kiriya.  Not a crypto exchange.  A real government run, government regulated security token exchange.

Gary

That, I mean massive selling right after the token listing, will be possible only if there will be more than 2000 investors, right?

Yes that is correct. If we get over 2000 investors.  If we work with a broker deal that might not happen.  The broker dealer might have larger investor.  Or it might happen and we do go over the 2000 investors.  Now when we are on the government run exchange if anyone buys tokens on the exchange then that is a secondary purchase and their is no restriction.  They could sell them the same day if they wanted.

They can. But we are talking about another way of token sale, when it is devided to several stages with big period of time between them.

I think, they need to get enough money for at least 1 clinic. That they should stop the fundraising. Work for a while, and after that open the fundraising again.

Tell for those who do not understand. And what is the difference between STO, IEO and ICO for example?

There are differences between these types of fundraising. IEO of STO is the best one for my opinion. ICO is not so interesting.

As for me, when tokens are frozen, it helps the project at the beginning of its business. Because, when tokens are not frozen at the beginning, the price can fall down. And it is not good.

I am pleased to provide all possible support to a project with such a noble mission, because cancer is the scourge of our time and any initiatives to combat it, in my opinion, should be supported in every possible way.

An idea is not enough to achive goal as sucess token in IEO,ICO or STO. You need to implement your idea and build it as Full MVP not shit MVP.

The important thing as token creator, your goal is not in ICO,STO, or IEO. The goals is you can maintain your MVP and your MVP work as income for your company. Many project have a good idea, good team and also good MVP and then got funding from investor but what?? They can not maintain their idea, enough with bullshit MVP.

Let say minexcoin and buddy token. At first, their idea very impresive for me but they become failed project or even as marked as scammer.

1. Do not proud with success ICO,IEO,STO.
2. Do not proud raise high fund from investor, Use brain to return money to investor not Enjoying peoples money

What kind of ideas are those, there are so many ideas that were offered to the community, but it never materialized, some of the ideas are about insurance, transportation clean air, but unfortunately they never materialize, the people behind this project failed to do a feasibility study, if the idea or the concept behind their project will be accepted by the community.

If you think you have a powerful project then ask the community first or you can do a random survey or ask a group of investors if it will generate support, some of the projects now are just copy of the already existing project.

First of all, the project should have a good idea, it may not even be new, the main thing is that the team have the opportunity to implement it and investors believe them. It would also be nice to provide investors with some kind of working model.

Before showing the project to people, you need not only a good idea, but also the availability of a product for which people want to pay money.  I find this one a lot harder than it sounds.

This is only HYPE project not a success project, no product no idea people will leave it, Using IEO in big exchange not guarantee the project will success. If people want to invest he will do research first, if no product, no ide. Do you think people will interested??

The most important things that really matter for a new project or startup to raise funds are the use cases/ applications or the practicality of the project, secondly, some luck is also involved or we can say acceptance level in general public, lastly relevancy of both the team and advisors is very important otherwise no one will take the project seriously.

Financial construction is essential for every project, and every project faces with financial problems sooner or later. Hard times are inevitable, but project is strong when it shows ability to survive hard times, team needs to be aware of that. Project is the team and supporters together, they need to have passion and strength to push even with hard financial problems, it`s the only way to see the project successful in long term, quitters will always quit and will never learn how to deal with problems.

Need good case studies applications in the real world, that it was not another blockchain, and the project is decisive with specific business objectives.

The best way of how to promote your project is doing enough marketing with bounties, trading competitions, partnerships, major exchanges listing and much more. It does not really matter how good the project and its product are, when people do not hear about this coin.

What kind of ideas are those, there are so many ideas that were offered to the community, but it never materialized, some of the ideas are about insurance, transportation clean air, but unfortunately they never materialize, the people behind this project failed to do a feasibility study, if the idea or the concept behind their project will be accepted by the community.

If you think you have a powerful project then ask the community first or you can do a random survey or ask a group of investors if it will generate support, some of the projects now are just copy of the already existing project.

A successful project should have an idea, a foundation. Such an idea that causes widespread interest. Also, the project must have a prototype of the work product. And clear plans for further development (not just holding a tokensale and access to the exchange, but clear steps for the practical application of the proposed product).

good projects may not be able to achieve success because now to find investors who want to participate in ICO or invest in your project is very difficult, many investors are traumatized to invest in a place that can not provide guaranteed benefits.

What is missing from them is consistency from internal team. Most of project I have followed, had problem with their idea. Some of them changed their plan. Of course it will take more cost and decrease their financial. I also think that external factor like Bitcoin and Altcoin volatility make it harder.

Once you feel you have a good idea, and you have the zeal to see it through, because many people that has created projects has lost the zeal to see it through. Once you have that zeal, then you have to go for a very reputable team that can be verified for integrity, once you can have such team, then I think your project can be considered by many investors that will make such project a success when it is being released.

Without those factors put in place, investors would not pick interest and you will end up not meeting of with hardcap, if you decide to raise fund through it. Also, whatever project that you are coming up with will have to be with a product that can speak to the heart of people, I mean products that will be useful for many people out there.

The problem with conventional cancer treatment is that it kills not only cancer cells, but also the patient. But you have a good idea to reduce the number of drugs at the same time with good efficiency.