Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
2
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][AIRDROP]X-CASH | First CNv8 based coin with public & private transactions
|
on: March 05, 2019, 08:40:48 AM
|
NEW WEBSITE AND XBANK UPDATE Dear X-Network community, Today we want to share with our community the new website we have been working on that better reflect our activity since the rebranding. https://x-network.io/ You will find there all the information about our products in development, our updated roadmap ( https://x-network.io/roadmap), the new x-cash website ( https://x-network.io/xcash) and much more. Please be advised that the website is still a work in progress. We plan on adding in the following weeks: - a dedicated mining section with tutorials; - a presentation page for our products, x-payment and x-blockchain. We would also be happy to hear your suggestions as well, to improve your experience on our websites. X-BANK UPDATEThe X-Bank is in its final stage of development. It is ready and deployed internally and we are testing all the features before trusting it to your hands. The airdrop process will resume directly after the release. Meaning that the registration process will start when we release the X-Bank. Thank you all for your patience, we are excited for what's coming. This is the best I've seen in cryptocurrency over the past year!!! Good luck
|
|
|
4
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
|
on: October 31, 2018, 07:33:17 AM
|
We will look into this as an option in the future. What you can do for the time being is manually reorder the cards using the -d option. If you use the option "-d 2,3,0,1", this will result in the GPUs in the miner being reordered so that GPU0 is actually device 2, GPU1 is device 3, GPU2 is device 0, and GPU3 is device 1. It's a bit annoying to setup, but it will work with the current version we have today until we can add an option to do it automatically.
Thank you, your advice will greatly help. I did not think about this method
|
|
|
5
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
|
on: October 31, 2018, 06:14:37 AM
|
Dear, please add the option --bus-order, as in JCE, SRB. Very useful for simply identifying problem cards in rigs with a large number of video cards.
When the miner starts, you can see the PCIE ID, open your device manager, find the VEGA card, and you can see the same PCIE ID. I know that this can be done. But this is not convenient, especially when the card falls off after a while. Sorting by bus number is convenient because it has such an OverdriveNTtool. http://prntscr.com/lcjc3tIdeally, there should be a sorting by bus number based on the value of the --pcie_fmt parameter. That is, for Linux, 'hex' is more preferable, for Windows - 'dec'
|
|
|
11
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU!
|
on: July 29, 2018, 08:50:28 PM
|
Developer, it's excellent that you did temperature monitoring and share counting, thanks! But version 31f is still the best on hash for me. All cards reach their maximum speed within 5 minutes. After this version, as well as the latter does not give such a result. 1-2 cards sometimes can reach their best speeds, but not all. Is it possible to return the old mechanism (slower) of the kernel compilation or to give a choice? - 31f - 32frx 588, adrenalin 18.6.1, win 1709On rx 550, on the contrary, with each version everything is better
|
|
|
13
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU!
|
on: July 18, 2018, 05:01:34 PM
|
Wow, great speed! What settings in miner and overclock settings for 580 card you're using?
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":864 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":864 }, This is the divine micron 1250/2200
|
|
|
14
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU!
|
on: July 18, 2018, 07:52:14 AM
|
In version 31f the overall performance on my rig with 12 552rx fell to 200+ hashes (from one card 347-> 330) The settings were exactly the same, the trick I used, maybe this version does not work now.) I return to the royal 31e version of the miner Developer, what drivers do you use for testing? I'm using 18.3.4. PS: Just in case, I bring the parameters of the video card on which the rig is assembled. Rx550 2gb Baffin 1150/1800 (1071/1500) 768sp/12cu (unlock 640/10), mem Elpida On the test card 588 on the new version, on the contrary, growth is seen on the Heavy Algo from 1100 to 1120 hashes!
|
|
|
18
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU!
|
on: July 05, 2018, 06:52:24 PM
|
The people in other topic tried hard to convince me that my math is bad or I have issues with rigs, and simple change of miner increased my hashrate by like 10%. I have never been more happy to give 1.5% dev fee Dear JCE, thanks for awesome miner, please keep developing! You are not alone, who doubted the srb miner hash. I asked the doctor about the difference between the hash in the miner and the actual month before. Did not get a normal response. And the same people tried to ridicule my tests with numbers. The real difference in the hash was my estimate of about 6%
|
|
|
19
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU!
|
on: July 05, 2018, 06:16:05 PM
|
Hello! First, I thank the developer of this miner, very happy! I would like to emphasize the minuses and advantages of the gpu miner at the moment: Pro: A real hash Many coins supported Normal minimalistic interface Minimal commission Con: No monitoring of temperature and speed, voltage, frequency, their adjustment There is not enough identification of the card on bus_id Display sequence is not the same as in gpuz and overdrive A heavy algorithm on rx550 has an unstable hashrate Very long compilation at startup. Rig on 12 cards about 5 minutes, this makes testing very difficult No failover pools Good luck to the developer!
|
|
|
20
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.9
|
on: June 08, 2018, 02:47:18 PM
|
Huum its like little difference but more stability.
"gpu_conf" : [ { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}, { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}, { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}, { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}, { "id" : 4, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}, { "id" : 5, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0} ] }
[2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU0: 920 H/s [T: 59c, RPM: 2187, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU1: 704 H/s [T: 74c, RPM: 2124, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU2: 872 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 2027, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:4] [2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU3: 850 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 2152, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU4: 920 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2901, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:2] [2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU5: 920 H/s [T: 45c, RPM: 3037, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:6] [2018-06-08 15:38:53] Total: 5186 H/s
Not sure why some of the GPU produce different results, all are same really
Perhaps a strong downvolt, or a shortage of power supply, a poor riser. There are many reasons. My 588 runs 900mv / 850mv 1150 / 2100-2150 (depending on memory and algorithm) 24/7. I advise you to monitor the memory errors in the HWINFO. Ideally, they should always be 0, and do not run any garbage programs like msiab, they affect the stability. Also, the temperature of 74 degrees on one of the cards is super-high for me. I think this can also cause instability. I advise you to set the parameter --gpureorder, this will simplify the setting and monitoring (Bus_id) of the cards using odnttool and gpuz
|
|
|
|