It was answered clearly what happened, instead of continuing false accusations, learn to read. The Ceo whom you are saying different person is wrong, I am sending my selfie right now, you are just annoying me already https://snag.gy/c28qli.jpg

that is enough idiot, you must be schizophrenic if you can't stop your delusions.

He was defined as a CEO because he was managing the project and making things work, nothing more. Now we have more focused and dedicated team. And we are glad all this terrible stuff happened and cleared at the beginning, so we good to go now

This is not scam project, there has been put enough effort. Travel and Tourism industry is huge and with proper management we will make this project big. There were 3 guys in team who were working on other projects too and preferred to stay anonymous thus they got for themselves different profiles (And obviously it is their dumbest fault) for what they got kicked out from the project. We got 2 new members and our young Web Designer who were accompanying us from the beginning. The new team even more dedicated to success because they focus only on this project. Huh, That was terrible beginning for the project but we will do our best to grow it to the one of the working with real use-cases amazing project. It is long journey and we won't stop here.   

He was defined as a CEO because he was managing the project and making things work, nothing more. Now we have more focused and dedicated team. And we are glad all this terrible stuff happened and cleared at the beginning, so we good to go now

No fake ids were used during ico to mislead anyone. What ICOEthics mentioned was way before ico even started. For our ico only members of our own team are publicised.

Can YOU create video of your team members including girl which is exposed as someone else and can you create video of your team members which failed ICObench's KYC test and can you create video of all team members? Do that and upload videos on youtube.

Or get the fuck out of here.

This is Thomas, the managing director at World Help disability Welfare Foundation Singapore. Again it is truly strange and unfortunate that ICOEthics simply choose not to respond to proper replies and explanations provided by the IDAC team aiming at clarifying the doubts.

2. Did we use fake IDs initially before our ICO sale?
Yes.....

We suspect there is blackmailing and foulplay involved with ICOethics. According to some investigation conducted, ICOEthics.com ranks at 5, 524, 013th, with very little traffic and also a donating system that accepts 'contributions' to their organisation. The amount of contributions they received at the moment is '0' ETH.

Within the posts by ICOEthics against IDAC, some choices or words are very unprofessional and there are also obvious racism in some of expression used... which we will take into consideration when discussing our further actions. The team is in the mids of discussing how they can resolve the issue, lawyer engagements are also being discussed.

💥 ICOBench IDAC with good score of 4.7!

We are happy to share the great news! ICOBench, one of the most reputable rating agencies in the field of blockchain startups, kept the best possible rating of 4.7 for our project.

We would like to remind you that earlier our team has undergone the KYC procedure and the IDAC project was awarded the highest rating. The 4.7 awarded points are confirmed by experts’ assessments, who noted a strong team, clear vision and a unique product.

▪️ https://icobench.com/ico/idac