|
I posted a note over on 1creditcoin.org requesting help. Are you up to it?
|
|
|
|
I am not seeing YACC, 1CR, or IMAC listed on this exchange. 1CR, YACC listed. https://crypto-trade.net/nodestatIMAC Please send us information about this cryptocurrency. IMA listed Thank you. Could you please change the symbol to IMAC? |
|
|
|
I am not seeing YACC, 1CR, or IMAC listed on this exchange. |
|
|
|
|
YACC and 1CR are now available on the Bitsquare exchange.
Still learning about this system, its rather different, but seems to have a couple of anti-pump and dump features: Mostly, like trading a stock, there is a 0.01 BTC (about $6) "fee" associated with an exchange. If I'm understanding right, however, after a day your account is refunded that "fee". Basically means people have to be doing the trading, not "run up the price" trading bots. The other limit I've spotted is a daily trade volume per person of 2 BTC. Like I started with... different. Sometime different is good.
Unfortunately Porhasing does not appear to support blockchain explorers for n-scrypt coins. Does anyone know who might? We need one to get IMAC listed.
Thanks,
Cassey
|
|
|
|
I'm doing CPU mining through the wallet atm, but won't help much I guess. I am looking into buying a good GPU for mining, so if by the time I have it set up 1CR isn't yet moving again, I'll point it to 1CR first  Thanks. I should warn you that the entire Script world is owned by ASIC's. You need to get into high n n-scrypt, like IMACredit, for a CPU to be able to compete. Bad news is that most of the Scrypt ASIC providers when out of business over a year ago. Good news is their products are available on e-bay for about a 1/5th of what they once cost, or less. |
|
|
|
WEhat sort of hashing power is needed to break the deadlock?? Im happy to pump a lot of hash at it and say ramp it down to break the dead lock and get the chain moving again let me know Cassey what is needed .. and how you want it implimented , like the coin and am willing to help out !! and ill do it on the mpos pool , just not sure on limitations and so on Anything you can throw at it would be greatly appreciated. Mpos.1creditcoin.org is just a basic mpos implementation - so no limiitation (and no fees). If you can control it and have it up to 800MHz would be good, then back that off 50% per found block, until we are in more normal territory. Greatly appreciated! Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Well, finally got some good news!
Bitsquare has agreed to list YACC and 1CR, and will list IMAC as well once a block explorer is established for it. I've asked the folks over at ProHashing to add IMAC to that list.
Does anyone know of a block explore already working for IMAC???
Cassey
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I can tell you its annoying the hell out of me. I even participated in an e-bay auction for an A2 miner to try and help out, but lost the bid.
I have 26MH working on it, but the last difficulty was based on 845HMz, and that was for the previous block. No telling what the current block difficulty is. mpos.1creditcoin.org predicted it higher, but I can't say how much higher.
Believe me, we worked on algos for 6 months to try and prevent this, and managed to for over 2 years, but not this time. Remember this is a distributed effort, so if we put in something like "After 2 hours, decrease the difficulty across the entire network" people would simply jump their clocks forward. Its not that simple.
If you want to help, point your miners at mpos.1creditcoin.org or another pool. Its tough trying to break this with just one other person mining (that I can see on mpos).
|
|
|
|
|
SCAM... right... spent 2 years setting this up and caring for this coin just to scam you while still holding a major stake in it. FU.
|
|
|
|
What I'm saying is that other coins have been raped repeatedly by multicoin pools and suffer this problem on a fairly regular basis - with the regular, loyal, miners paying the price for get-rich-quick automated processes. I know, because I have authored and still support one of those coins (Yaccoin).
What I'm saying is that, until this recent external pump and dump, the coin has been running perfectly fine for over 2 years.
What I'm saying is that this is one of the things that makes this coin different from others, and that most get it.
Of course I'm not happy about the current situation, but I'm not about to remove the uniqueness of this coin just so it can be like every other coin out there - which wouldn't solve this problem anyway.
Curious how many coins you have authored and support that work better, over periods of years, not just for a weeks or months?
Bottom line: EVERY coin, if you throw 100X more than normal computing at it will adjust its difficulty by 100X. If you then yank the computing and put it back down at 1X, the coin will take 100X the normal time range to find its next block. For 1CR, the actual number was AT LEAST 40X, for a coin that fairly regularly would have a 8+hour block once in awhile, so 10+ days is unfortunate, but not out of the realm of normality, for a one off event like what it just went through. If they do it again, after the coin re-balances itself, I would suggest selling and taking away the pump & dumpers incentive.
I am not a miner but would like to understand basics. I'm not trying to be critical, but you seem to contradict. There have been many times prior to this last pump when the coin would get many blocks mined suddenly then go days without a block. It isn't something that just popped up. You seem to be saying it's a deliberate thing that's built into the coin, but then you also say it is something that shouldn't happen. I don't want to get attacked by you for wondering what the facts are. Just curious. Sorry, but the question is like asking an olympic 200M butterflyer who came in 4th why he didn't try breaststroke instead. Do you honestly think we didn't spend any time thinking about this prior to implementing? |
|
|
|
... In fact, its why 1CR was designed with the wild block time (which still averages out ok): When it was created, multicoinpools would target whatever coin was worth the most, in a short period of time. That would result in brief run-ups followed by abandonment that the regulars would pay for.
Are you saying you favor having a lot of blocks mined in a few minutes then many days without a block? Wouldn't it be better to have a more reliable block time? What I'm saying is that other coins have been raped repeatedly by multicoin pools and suffer this problem on a fairly regular basis - with the regular, loyal, miners paying the price for get-rich-quick automated processes. I know, because I have authored and still support one of those coins (Yaccoin). What I'm saying is that, until this recent external pump and dump, the coin has been running perfectly fine for over 2 years. What I'm saying is that this is one of the things that makes this coin different from others, and that most get it. Of course I'm not happy about the current situation, but I'm not about to remove the uniqueness of this coin just so it can be like every other coin out there - which wouldn't solve this problem anyway. Curious how many coins you have authored and support that work better, over periods of years, not just for a weeks or months? Bottom line: EVERY coin, if you throw 100X more than normal computing at it will adjust its difficulty by 100X. If you then yank the computing and put it back down at 1X, the coin will take 100X the normal time range to find its next block. For 1CR, the actual number was AT LEAST 40X, for a coin that fairly regularly would have a 8+hour block once in awhile, so 10+ days is unfortunate, but not out of the realm of normality, for a one off event like what it just went through. If they do it again, after the coin re-balances itself, I would suggest selling and taking away the pump & dumpers incentive. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah... we are suffering the classic post euphoria depression cycle <smile>. Seriously though, I expected this to last 2-4 days. We went from something like 850MH on the network to 20-30Mh on a coin with a wildly variable block time.
Bottom line: we are just suffering from the sudden withdrawal of a LOT of hashing post the coin run-up and abandonment when the run-up was over.
Happens to virtually ever small coin that gets attention from time to time. In fact, its why 1CR was designed with the wild block time (which still averages out ok): When it was created, multicoinpools would target whatever coin was worth the most, in a short period of time. That would result in brief run-ups followed by abandonment that the regulars would pay for.
|
|
|
|
Nice pump.
Not my doing... but I did sell a few coins... Wonder if it will reach 0.004? Getting closer as the day wears on. |
|
|
|
Any working pool besides yours cassey? diff too low to my rented hash
Sorry, only track my own. Which, apparently is working, although the latest OS patches have goofed up the # of workers being displayed on the dashboard. All three of my pools have the problem, all three are running on the same machine. I have my software guy scheduled to take a look. This one use to be active, no idea if it still is: http://mineblocks.no-ip.org:2627/pool/1CR/ Others have been posted in this thread, might be worth a scan. |
|
|
|
|
Ah, cool. Maybe send them an update then? Just sold a couple of BTC worth at 0.003 over on Poloniex.
|
|
|
|
... I believe I gave them the blockexplorer over on https://prohashing.com, but I'm having problems opening that site right now. That would explain the difference. No, that is not the problem. They need a specific page that has the number, not an explorer. Somebody should make a page with nothing else but the number of coins. It isn't a big deal since only one coin goes out per block but if it is going to be completely accurate and current, rather than accurate as of several weeks ago, then a page has to be made. Also, the blocks are caught up, but prohashing's website is down, as you say. There should be more explorers. I messaged fairglu about an explorer for gapcoin and will ask him if there would be a pricebreak for 2 explorers. Actually, they seem fine with an explorer page they can easily parse. They are using prohashing.com for YACCoin as well. |
|
|
|
... Also noticed coinmarketcap is a bit behind on #coins in circulation: they claim 48K and its a bit over 50K now. Close though.
"Please provide a URL that shows the total supply of coins in real time. Required. For example, Dogecoin's total supply of coins can be found at: http://dogechain.info/chain/Dogecoin/q/totalbc" I believe I gave them the blockexplorer over on https://prohashing.com, but I'm having problems opening that site right now. That would explain the difference. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
