|
Burnside
I just wanted to say I admire how you handled this whole shutdown. You obviously planned it way in advance and gave everyone more than ample opportunity to get their affairs in order. It must be disappointing for you to have to do this, you had one of the best BTC marketplaces on the webbernets.
Are you planning any new Bitcoin projects?
|
|
|
|
This bullshit with Friedcat revealing important plans to some people before telling the rest of the shareholders is just unacceptable. I'm selling my shares, fuck this.  |
|
|
|
I've already bought 55 shares as of today, actually.
Not at 0.3 you didn't. |
|
|
|
I pull my bid out. I know it is an asshole move but it is better than not being able to pay and delaying the auction even more.
WTF dude, pay that man his money |
|
|
|
|
Deposits. Are they working? How many confirmations before my BTC shows up in my wallet?
|
|
|
|
Back to what matters, Guys the hashrate is getting low again  . This time to critical levels something like 30TH or something.... You're looking at the wrong estimate. The only number that matters is the Last 30 hours. 10 hours is not enough, it swings wildly all the time just due to luck. Sometimes it's 120 TH and sometimes it's 0. Ignore that one, just focus on 3 days or 7 day averages. |
|
|
|
So I should just hold on to them shares? It's drop to around 2 BTC now....geesh
Nope You should be buying more shares! AM on SALE BUYBUYBUY  |
|
|
|
|
Party is over. Pack it up, let's go home guys! Friedcat can't even keep his measly 50 TH/s up anymore. AM is dead.
|
|
|
|
 Nice, but let's see if it keeps up or if it's just variance. Looks like it's just variance. The lower AM's share of the total hash rate, the higher the variance. |
|
|
|
What's happening, why are we not shipping block eruptors yet?  |
|
|
|
Why is the AM hash rate not going up yet? They are shipping blades but still only doing about 40GH/s I mean, come on fellas!  |
|
|
|
YAY! |
|
|
|
|
lol everyone selling at 4 or 4.2 are gonna cry in about 2 weeks when the blades send dividends through the roof!
|
|
|
|
AM used to hold 35-40/45 % of the network.
Er... no. There are only a few days where AM went above 30% and it has NEVER held 40% or 45%. The all-time average is 20%. That only helps prove my point so sure. Amazing cognitive dissonance right here. |
|
|
|
AM used to hold 35-40/45 % of the network.
Er... no. There are only a few days where AM went above 30% and it has NEVER held 40% or 45%. The all-time average is 20%. |
|
|
|
|
Splitting the stock 10:1 would mean more work for Friedcat moving shares around so I am against it.
|
|
|
|
Yes because the last 100 years as a sample size is all we need to determine AGW as fact. Could you guys PLEASE stop this shit. Nobody wants to hear about your global warming crap. Take it elsewhere. |
|
|
|
asicminer doesnt have a future
eventualy the block reward will half and so will dividends
Eventually transaction fees will exceed the block reward. There's still several years before the next block reward halving. |
|
|
|
On a sidenote Evoorhees sold Sdice
Wait what |
|
|
|
Your explanation shows a disregard in accepted logic in order to leap to your conclusion.
Please explain? It also implies that TAT.AM can be worth less than zero, which is obviously impossible.
No it does not! My model simply calculates TAT.AM as being worth exactly 95% of the full AM shares if you buy and hold forever. There's no way it can be worth less than zero with my model. You can put any numbers you want into my model, you'll never get a negative valuation for TAT.AM |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
