Probably a stupid question... is there a link to a guide that will tell me how to withdraw my xaurum into my ether mist wallet?

Thanks, bud. Out doing an airport run, I'll test tonight.

LOL, Obama's own home neighborhood is a warzone and people wonder why the country is tearing itself apart...

I would like to do a git clone of the repo on github but the challenge is I do not know what differences there are between that & what's on zpool, or if there are any at all. If there aren't and crackfoo can confirm, I'll get the code from github and see if I can find an answer to the issue.

Those aren't my only concerns but I have to start somewhere with my questions 

Algo?
Pool?
Exchange?

I believe I have identified the issue with sha256 miners on this pool.

My sha256 miners have been repeatedly crashing on this pool, obviously I don't want that but I like zpool so I'm hoping I can help fix this if need be   I've been dev'ing since the 80s so if I can lend a hand in that way, please let me know.

Forgive me for stinking at formatting, if there's something I can do to make what's coming more readable, again please let me know.

So first, here is when everyhing looks fine:


When the log is like that, hashrate stays up, everything is great, blah blah blah...


Next, we come to this, where the extranonce comes in to play:


We start getting timeouts, notice we also start getting empty/garbage packets (the fifo empty lines).

After this it's a long line of timeouts, new block commands, and ridiculously low diff:



Notice the very low diff? It hovers around there, along with an endless log of "Send new block cmd" issues.

This happens very consistently on both my Antminers and Spondoolies.

They're all running cgminer4.8.0 so the log output is nearly identical for all of them.

This would account for what some of the posts in this thread are saying about the slowly reducing hashrate reported by the zpool website that results in 0 hash.

What is the problem?

Well I would have to look at the zpool logs to identify the problem as this is expected behavior from cgminer but since that is unlikely I'll take a stab, it's likely:

When the algo switches coins, one or more of the coins is not sending proper (or empty, or headlerless) packets or NULLs to the miners, which the sha256 miners and cgminer read as empty/garbage, leading to the miner eventually dying. The pool software is not switching to a new coin at that point because it is not receiving the expected output from the miners either, leading it to attempt to resend the same packet over and over as the msg the miner is sending is telling the pool that it didn't receive the packet (hence the timeout), leading to an infinite loop or at least a failing one.


My suggestion:

Do a (relatively) quick look at the logs for the sha256 coins and see which ones have not created any blocks on this pool and remove them, or, trim the sha256 coins down to the only ones with a regular hashrate on the site. It's likely one of the non-producing coins that is causing the issue.

If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know- I love using zpool

There's no lie in his statement or interrogative. I challenge you to pinpoint the "lie" in the above statement to which you reference. He did however, get you to expose your own bigotry, and it is bigotry.

Bigotry: "intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself."

Just because you believe something different from someone else is no reason to belittle someone, act intolerant or other ways that are equally unbecoming of a gentleman, I am confident that you are better than that, especially if you are willing to take such a bold and definitive statement about your origin and demise.

Anyone know if YiiMP is on the right blockchain for NEOS?

Yea, I did read that part. I got confused because for a while every time I refreshed the wallet page it told me a different coin. The front page also says you may have to set the currency if that happens...

Interesting, I know that's how it works on zpool, I set the currency in the -p and the respective wallet address in the -u

On http://yiimp.ccminer.org/ however when on my spondoolie sp20 (sha256) if I set the -u to an FTC wallet (or any other wallet that's not for a sha256 coin) the pool says "dead". If I use a TIT or NEOS wallet (the two sha256 coins on there) it works fine. Clearly I'm doing something wrong.

Probably a stupid question... on YiiMP, let's say I have some sha256 miners there. Can I only withdraw coins on sha256? Currently TIT and NEOS...

From what I'm reading on the site I don't think I could have some sha256 miners on there and throw an FTC address in the username since that's neoscrypt, correct?

You didn't lose them, the site is pretty clear about how it works:

1. you mine on a given algo
2. you set wallet and payout to the coin output you want
3. the mining happens, coins r mined, then they mature, then site exchanges coins based on rates from the current, live rates from the exchanges listed on the front page
4. you get paid based on the post-exchange

Exchange rates change all the time. Some go up, some go down. Sometimes your balance is gonna go up, sometimes down. If you don't like the # of coins you're returned, try a less-volatile coin.

Feel like launching a sha256 coin?

I live near Monroe. I didn't know it was getting pumped. Oh, you mean Monero! Drugs man.. drugs...

I like the Jack Nicholson head-thru-the-door nod 

You just broke the first two rules about Fight Club.

Rule #1: Don't talk about fight club.
Rule #2: DON'T TALK ABOUT FIGHT CLUB.

Any idea if/what new coins you'll be adding?

That is a complete misunderstanding of science and what it is to be a scientist. Einstein did his best work when he was ignored as a patent clerk. Learn by example, learn from your mistakes, use the scientific method and understand that everything you know will be proven wrong on a long enough timeline, THAT is what it is to be a scientist practicing science of any kind.

Well I won't be debating or arguing you. You sure do appear to have a lot of anger in your words. Be careful with that. People control others with their emotions, especially the ones you seem to be exhibiting in your messages. I hope your viewpoint works out for you in the end.