Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]
|
I downloaded both the release as the svn version, but they both have the same problem: I installed wx-2.9 and I verified that I can build and run the demos that come with wx. I have also not been able to find a setup.h file anywhere, so why it refers to that is a mystery to me.
Platform: Ubuntu 10.10 x86-64
make -f makefile.unix g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/local/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -DGUI -o obj/util.o util.cpp In file included from /usr/local/include/wx-2.9/wx/defs.h:26, from /usr/local/include/wx-2.9/wx/wx.h:15, from headers.h:30, from util.cpp:5: /usr/local/include/wx-2.9/wx/platform.h:174: fatal error: wx/setup.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make: *** [obj/util.o] Error 1
Can you fix the release?
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
I am new to this forum, but I have been reading the technical paper behind bitcoin and while I like many of its claimed properties, I would like to see something with a bit more explanation, as I am used from reading other cryptographic papers, which while dense can at least be shown to be wrong. To be able to analyze a system mathematically you need the equations. Pointing at the source code is not a substitute for that.
In a paper I shouldn't be the one who has to figure out why something is true; there should be proofs and a stupid computer should be able to follow it.
I am surprised you already got this far, since I would have expected people to demand that the system is solid first, before using it.
Next to the mathematical points there is also the issue of someone discovering a constructive method to generate blocks. Is there a way to switch to a different hash function if so required?
There is another efficiency issue: how much energy or machine operations of the whole network does it cost to verify one transaction? If it costs more to verify a microtransaction than its value, there seems to be something wrong; it might be that this is a fundamental limitation. A new money system would have to be able to scale billions of users. Is that manageable? If not, why is bitcoin presented as a new money system as opposed to just a cool hack?
So, lots of questions, I hope you can answer them.
|
|
|
|