|
Quick question: if I move my wallets to a new computer and masternode start, everything should work?
|
|
|
|
What do you think about a "minor nodes"?
It's possible the minor nodes work together with master nodes?
For me this possibility increase the darkcoin project.
(sorry for my bad english)
Please define "minor nodes" Minor nodes: a little version of master nodes. Benefits: more speed, more mix, more decentralizes and less work for master nodes. Be Minor nodes: 500 DRK request. Function: assist master nodes. (sorry for my bad english) But what exact service would they provide? The same service. Or specific/dedicated services choise to devs. It's only an idea to relieve a master nodes. And system will be more safe (anti DDos) Those who agree with me? (sorry for my bad english...) There aren't going to be micro, mini, or minor nodes. Evan said the 1k threshold is there to stay. Yes, sure! I think a system more better than this. Anyway it's only an idea... that's it. Good DRK to everyone!   You were right to ask, you never know Cheers! |
|
|
|
nananaNANANANA DARKMAAAAAN nanananaNANANA |
|
|
|
can't download 10.16.16 on dark coin.io
Works fine. I just tried it. weird, tried 20min ago, will try again edit: worked this time, weird |
|
|
|
|
can't download 10.16.16 on dark coin.io
|
|
|
|
Not to be one of those "cryptic" weirdos who out of the blue says something like "the pump is about to begin", but.....Something big is about to happen in DRK's price.
Wait....for...it.....
JL
Is this to do with "that thing" you mentioned the other day that you knew about but couldn't tell anyone ? LETS BET! I say, one of the top 3 dark net market is about to accept dark coin which markets? Dunno the names, maybe Agora, but I'm speculating here bro somewhere in this thread i read that drk was already implemented at one or some of them, but not shure about that Nucleus and Diabolus, two promising, but brand new markets, so a bigger, long term existing one would be a "better" PR |
|
|
|
Not to be one of those "cryptic" weirdos who out of the blue says something like "the pump is about to begin", but.....Something big is about to happen in DRK's price.
Wait....for...it.....
JL
Is this to do with "that thing" you mentioned the other day that you knew about but couldn't tell anyone ? LETS BET! I say, one of the top 3 dark net market is about to accept dark coin which markets? Dunno the names, maybe Agora, but I'm speculating here bro |
|
|
|
Not to be one of those "cryptic" weirdos who out of the blue says something like "the pump is about to begin", but.....Something big is about to happen in DRK's price.
Wait....for...it.....
JL
Is this to do with "that thing" you mentioned the other day that you knew about but couldn't tell anyone ? LETS BET! I say, one of the top 3 dark net market is about to accept dark coin |
|
|
|
Wallet for the Darkcoin Explorer already crashed twice since the update (if you see the blockchain stalled again in the explorer, that's probably why) Hopefully the fix will be coming soon or should it be reverted while bugs are ironed out? I've pushed up a fix, feel free to compile from source: https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoinI love you Evan (no homo) |
|
|
|
 explain this shit HAMMER TIME?!?! bought DRK for 10btc... price increased from .0066 to .00697 Thanks guys, hope I didn`t missed train. Edit: some whale tried to bring price down from .00697, just after I bought  Relax, you shouldn't day trade Dark, but do as you wish. I invested a long time ago and I'm not selling any until we reach $100+. Then I might reconsider for a part. |
|
|
|
Well... if the fee is for a darksend session so you pick the rounds (this only influences how long it will take) and then hit start session and pay your fee.
If you stop the session you'll have to pay the fee again.
Hey presto no spamming.
No, you could stop/start the session as much as you want. The wallet will see you have an active "subscription" and provide that. That's even better, then a pay per session is better than a pay for a certain amount of time imho. |
|
|
|
|
Alright Evan, would you mind recap what the proposal is so far?
Also I think a Pay per Darksend process is better than for a period of time, but it's the source of the issue, right?
|
|
|
|
Well... if the fee is for a darksend session so you pick the rounds (this only influences how long it will take) and then hit start session and pay your fee.
If you stop the session you'll have to pay the fee again.
Hey presto no spamming.
I like this |
|
|
|
I think I misunderstood something here.. If someone pays a small amount to be able to darksend for 24hours, then it means those people could mega spam during 24 hours, regardless of the MNs, no?
EDIT: or you meant people pay for the time the anonymization process? Then they actually darksend 10 days later for free if they want to? So if it's about anonymizing the funds, then yes people can't spam or DDOS
If you owned 20 masternodes, you could send 10-20 transactions a day for free. That's the idea. Without the signature of the masternode, the transactions would be rejected. I agree then with your idea to block to 1-2 (for now at least, we can improve it if necessary), the amount of MN darksend a day. |
|
|
|
Just not sure about the fee for a period of time
Me too. Why? So you pay 0.05DRK when you want to mix, then you mix how ever much you want. If your client goes over 24 hours, it'll spend another 0.05DRK to keep going. It eliminates the timing attacks and double spending attacks. people could still spam during that window and bloat the network for free, no? DOS attacks? We could have a masternode sign the transaction when publishing it. The distribution should be really even among the masternodes, so that would eliminate bloat. So if you own 1 masternode, you could publish 1 transaction every 2 days currently. So it requires 1000DRK to use this feature and you still can't use it very much. I think I misunderstood something here.. If someone pays a small amount to be able to darksend for 24hours, then it means those people could mega spam during 24 hours, regardless of the MNs, no? EDIT: or you meant people pay for the time the anonymization process? Then they actually darksend 10 days later for free if they want to? So if it's about anonymizing the funds, then yes people can't spam or DDOS |
|
|
|
Just not sure about the fee for a period of time
Me too. Why? So you pay 0.05DRK when you want to mix, then you mix how ever much you want. If your client goes over 24 hours, it'll spend another 0.05DRK to keep going. It eliminates the timing attacks and double spending attacks. people could still spam during that window and bloat the network for free, no? |
|
|
|
I think I'm in favor of hard-forking the network to make Darksend transactions completely free. So there will be no fees to track at all. Instead of the miners, they could pay either the masternode network (the one you connected to even), the development fund, foundation fund, etc. These payments would be passed to the masternode and could be cashed later to avoid timing analysis. Another upside to this is it's impossible to do in Bitcoin and the fees could be MUCH lower than 0.0125. Thoughts?
Posted this over at DCT as well, but... Three thoughts/questions: 1. How exactly would this new fee --say, to the masternodes -- be enforced? 2. I thought the DS transaction fee was there not just to prevent Sybil attacks but also to ensure DS blocks get processed immediately by miners. I remember the days of 0.001 fees when RC4 was released and DS rounds >1 not working because of this issue. 3. This seems like a lot more work compared to adding a fees mixing phase. Is there some technical reason why the fee mixing phase can't be done or is a bad idea? 1. I'm thinking the user will pay for Darksend access for a period of time. For example, you do one transaction for 0.1 to the Darksend access address, this is the very first thing you do when Darksend starts. Then you send that transaction ID, and a signature proving you own the input. That gives you access to darksend for 1 day or something. 2. You're correct. That's what the hard fork is for. 3. I think there's a problem with the fee mixing phase. That would be much easier, but every round of a darksend would still go back to 1 Darksend fee mixing transaction. So you could follow a transaction from round 8,7...1. If you control the last masternode, you could tell who owns the final Darkcoin. Just not sure about the fee for a period of time |
|
|
|
That's funny how we are still laughing at funny wallet designs while Evan is pretty much is saying: "You are screwed if you use Darkcoin for any 'dark' purposes until i push a fix"  Or are whales keeping the people distracted on purpose while they are moving their Darkcoins to the exchanges for dumping? lol It's complete and utter trust that the DRK team will resolved the issue, coupled with being happy that bugs are being found when they should be found... +1 It's indicating that the Darkcoin team and community are pretty thorough. We ate so much shit that we're pretty bulletproof now.. Let's be careful not to fall into a cult though Not saying we are, but fair criticism should still be welcomed. I'm glad the bug was found, and I know others might be found in the future - this coin is, after all, pretty young, and Evan is fighting on so many fronts (Masternodes, darksend, instantX,..). I'm not worried at ALL, but let's keep an open mind! |
|
|
|
there is no panic. they are just trading. People are panic selling hard now
Activity: 4 Why you even bother answer ^^ |
|
|
|
|
Thanks theloncrouton for your help over at reddit
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
