Cointelligence never promoted low-risk ICOs or any ICOs. LATOKEN CEO made this up at a debate we had. As you can read here the explanation about our ICO rating system (
https://www.cointelligence.com/content/ico_list/) under the headline "How do we determine our risk score?". Its better to avoid making claims online unless you have evidence to back it up. Cointelligence doesnt have any "personal "scores" with LATOKEN. We investigated and called out LATOKEN as we did with other scammers as a part of our exchanges rating process (
https://www.cointelligence.com/exchanges_list/) and we recieved evidence from doznes of "partners", ex-employees and founders they cheated. You can read about it here:
https://www.cointelligence.com/exchanges_list/latoken/ - You can also read about LATOKEN scammy behavour here:
https://bitcoinist.com/elon-musk-spacex-ieo-appears-on-suspicious-latoken-exchange/ - Beside protecing the community we have no other reason to call out LATOKEN as we were never hurt by them or had any business relationship with them.
Watch out for LA Token. The research firm Cointelligence has found that LATOKEN is a scam exchange. And if you go online you'll see all kinds of stories not just from former customers but even ex employees of the exchange who tells you all the stories of how they were scammed.
And they recently sponsored an event at Davos WEF so you know they're definitely scammers;)
I stopped trading on Latoken exchange in 2018 because they are full with fake volume and they held scam project's IEO on their launchpad! Because of their shitty IEO launchpad, many good projects got ruin! However, could you please give me the link where Cointelligence said Latoken is a scam? I need it to show to the Swapzilla team! As I had a talk with Swapzilla team, I told them to not come through Latoken IEO, they kept replying me with a silly excuse! Lol.
Much has changed since 2018 on Latoken. As of now, they work really fast, their support is perfect, but projects should pay more attention to the marketing responsibility zone. They think that the exchange makes it possible. But actually projects themselves should work on their results by market making etc. Btw, don't remember scam ieos there, remember ieo that didn't do anything for developing.
Actually, Cointelligence has personal scores with that exchange, so you shouldn't take it into account as an independent view on the platform. Besides, I've heard that they were caught on promotion low-risk ICOs that scammed people. So I clearly don't trust their reviews