And this comes from a person who only talks about BSV, his entire history of comments are exclusively from BitcoinScamVersion.
If you don't get paid for this, you're just too fucking stupid   

Do they really though? We've been through this already. The miners make a tiny sliver of what BTC miners make in transaction fees. They have very little incentive to process every transaction because 99.95% of their revenue depends on the block reward.

All metrics are left out of a "global ledger" (in your case, you're referring to a fork of a fork of bitcoin), because a ledger doesn't care about statistics.


I actually never said I "had bet" against BSV, however after BSV reached its new high on what was obviously fake news I opened a short position on it and am doing quite well, thanks. Just because its the "best performing crypto of the top 10" during your arbitrarily and ill-defined time period doesn't mean its not an outright scam.

Funny how that website leaves out the metrics that are actually important in determining the true popularity of a coin, like active addresses, average transaction size and total hash power of the network. Wonder why that is.

BSV is a joke led by a fraudulent cult leader. Its going nowhere as an honest investment until Craig is removed from its equation entirely. Based on its actual utility and minus the Faketoshi Factor, I put the fair price of SV to be somewhere between $30 and $40 a coin. Everything above that at the moment is based on Craig's everlasting charade.

Sometimes I don't know where that user is coming from, claiming that BSV is outperforming BTC? Is he hallucinating or what? Ask any ordinary person if he knows BSV, and I think they will recognize it only because of the words- bitcoin/satoshi in its name. But as a stand alone altcoin? I don't think so. And usage? I don't think BSV is overpowering BTC at any level.

What does it matter when its transactions are tiny?

BSV avg transaction value: $717
BTC avg transaction value: $47,226

BSV sent from addresses: 19,468
BTC sent from addresses: 259,122

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/sentbyaddress-btc-bsv.html


You've been saying that for a year now, yet the BSV hash rate remains a tiny sliver of that of BTC's.

https://coin.dance/blocks/proofofwork

Perhaps you should save your low IQ trolling for the moderated thread. I won't bother to correct your misinformation over there.

Bitcoin Shitty Version adding shitty features 😅 this is going to be hilarious.



source: https://twitter.com/roryhighside/status/1208434774437556224

Its not failed, I would say it went in the unexpected direction b/c at some point Academic Craig Wright got covetous and stopped sending his buddy Roger Ver his 20% cut from newly mined blocks which led to Roger dropping support for Craigs coin. Dont ya recall how BSV network was inundated with transactions? Much activity much hype. Which is now nowhere to be seen. Because Roger has lately abstained from spamming BSV chain with fake tx.

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0

Then why wouldn't they be included in the payment figure? Its because its not actually a payment to anybody. Its somebody artificially upping BSV's transaction count in order to make it appear more popular than it actually is. Look at the active addresses -- that's all you need to know about actual usage of a coin.


Wrong yet again. The last Satoshi build was version 0.3.19.

0.1 is pretty primitive and archaic in comparison, which is why Craig didn't just fork BSV from 0.1. BSV contains improvements made by Greg Maxwell, Peter Wuille and even Amaury Sechet. Your obsession with 0.1 stems from you swallowing yet another stupid CSW talking point hook, line and sinker. You know nothing about Bitcoin or its history. All you know is trolling.

BSV, set in stone, until we change it, again.

The only reason your comments get deleted is when you post twice in a row or if you spam off-topic nonsense. In this case you only posted once, and while your comment is indeed nonsense it is still not off-topic, so it won't be deleted.

BSV muppets always fail to take into account active addresses, which is a much better metric for estimating the popularity of a coin.

Active addresses

BTC: 537k
ETH: 313k
DASH: 64.6k
LTC: 42.8k
DOGE: 34.45k
BSV: 28.4k
ETC: 18.3k
BCH: 17.2k

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/activeaddresses-bsv.html

Congrats, more people use DOGE on a daily basis than BSV, despite it only having 14.5% the total market cap of your tremendously overpriced coin.


The "payment" aspect for BSV accounts for 2.1% of all usage... just like Satoshi intended... 

Wrong ! No fear here whatsoever.

Simply presenting hard facts to prove that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

This is the response we are undertaking in regards to BSV continually claiming to be original Bitcoin (BTC).

CSW has provided no proof to the community here or elsewhere, hard evidence exists to the contrary.

The  #faketoshi  fraud  TIMELINE
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/ponsdeserres.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0

This will continue until you recognize and acknowledge the above. Look at the despicable actions of the people you are supporting.

By supporting BSV you are complicit in the attempt to 'hijack' the original Bitcoin (BTC) project, are you not?

I highly doubt that. Not after Craig said this in court:


That's such hideous bullshit. I don't know how anybody could take Craig seriously after having told such disgusting lies (among many, many others) in a court of law. You should be ashamed for continuing to promote his scam on this forum. Don't confuse theymos valuing freedom of speech for being on the side of one of the biggest conmen the crypto world has ever seen.

False. You literally just said this:


Where do you think that $50 is going? Besides, how can fees be so high if everybody is ignoring the miners?

Bitcoin miners are doing just fine. You're just rehashing that same tired, disproven narrative perpetuated by other BSV idiots that we've heard a thousand times before.

Ohhhh what about the poor, poor miners? Who will think of them???  

Everything is driven by economic incentives. LN will be used because blocks are already quite full, which means the miners are already making maximum income from transaction fees. There's no problem here whatsoever.

Funny how you have to invent competitions in order to have one where you are actually winning.


This statement highlights the cognitive dissonance of BSVers. How can transaction fees be so high if BTC is ignoring miners? Either transaction fees are high, or miners are being ignored. Both items cannot be present at the same time.


Average BSV block reward per day minus fees: $148,950
Average BSV transaction fees per day: $125  

The only way this could possibly happen (before the next halving) is if transaction fees increase by a factor of 1191 while the price remains the same. This will never happen.

Let's compare the same stats for BTC:

Average BTC block reward per day minus fees: $14,400,000
Average BTC transaction fees per day: $136,444

The ratio between block reward and fees for BTC is only 105.5, whereas it is 1191 for BSV! Your entire existence has just been rendered absurd.  

Additionally your last stress test could only produce a block that was 8 MB. Why not just use Bcash? What's the difference? At least the Bcash cult leader doesn't think he's Satoshi.

What a joke.