SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[RivAngE]

Looking forward to hearing how they'll explain why nothing happened.

It's bizarre reading the responses to tweets like that from people who believe their proclamations. I don't see how any faintly normal being can manoeuvre themselves into that position.

I'm looking forward to this one the most -



Not long now until we're all eating humble pie.

First time I heard of this "Tulip Trust", sounds like another fake document made from Craig and his scum-team.
The name suggests that Bitcoin's price will follow the same trend the tulip's price followed, right? Why would the creator of Bitcoin create such a contract? (This is something like a smart-contract I believe?).
The document is supposingly created on 2011, when there was no BCH and everyone was happily united under one project... so why would the creators plant a self-destruction bomb with a doomish name inside their creation?

Even though I can't say for sure if Craig has helped in the creation of BTC or not, I'm totally sure the best way to damage Bitcoin right now would be to prove he is indeed its creator! Everyone hates him so much that we'll feel ashamed for using BTC! (≧∇≦)ﾉ

[gentlemand]

First time I heard of this "Tulip Trust", sounds like another fake document made from Craig and his scum-team.

This is one of his longest standing cons of all and the basis of all this legal stuff he's been entangled in. I can't be bothered with the details but supposedly a 'bonded courier' will arrive on January 1st 2020 and give Craigy the means to control 'his' million coins and then he's all going to teach us a lesson that we won't forget. Oh golly yessir.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

First time I heard of this "Tulip Trust", sounds like another fake document made from Craig and his scum-team.

This is one of his longest standing cons of all and the basis of all this legal stuff he's been entangled in. I can't be bothered with the details but supposedly a 'bonded courier' will arrive on January 1st 2020 and give Craigy the means to control 'his' million coins and then he's all going to teach us a lesson that we won't forget. Oh golly yessir.

Telegram for CSW ...

[Dabs]

One could prepare for a short, but I'm not sure I want to do that and get rekt. In all likelyhood, nothing is going to happen. Or the dog ate his homework. Or some other plausible excuse. The courier got hit by a bus and the sole USB drive containing the private keys got destroyed, then lightning hit the whole thing and burned everyone to a crisp.

[Iamtutut]

Looking forward to hearing how they'll explain why nothing happened.

It's bizarre reading the responses to tweets like that from people who believe their proclamations. I don't see how any faintly normal being can manoeuvre themselves into that position.

I'm looking forward to this one the most -



Not long now until we're all eating humble pie.

First time I heard of this "Tulip Trust", sounds like another fake document made from Craig and his scum-team.
The name suggests that Bitcoin's price will follow the same trend the tulip's price followed, right? Why would the creator of Bitcoin create such a contract? (This is something like a smart-contract I believe?).
The document is supposingly created on 2011, when there was no BCH and everyone was happily united under one project... so why would the creators plant a self-destruction bomb with a doomish name inside their creation?

Even though I can't say for sure if Craig has helped in the creation of BTC or not, I'm totally sure the best way to damage Bitcoin right now would be to prove he is indeed its creator! Everyone hates him so much that we'll feel ashamed for using BTC! (≧∇≦)ﾉ

Tulip trust refers to an empty shell Trust fraudtoshi pruchased in 2014 from a company in the Seychelles Islands, then used forged documents trying to show mined BTCs were sent into it. It utterly failed in Court.

[malevolent]

Or the dog ate his homework.

Speaking of dogs and Calvins.

https://i.imgur.com/kicFFgL.gif

I don't know what game CSW's buddy is playing, other than probably trying to put on a brave face...

[nutildah]

BREAKING NEWS FROM BITCOINTALK

It would appear that the Bitcoin SV thread was written and is moderated by a banned troll!  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53092612#msg53092612

I was wondering who in their right mind at SV (not that there's many) would have sanctioned this idiot to compose and run their Bitcointalk thread for them. Turns out they most likely never did at all, and they probably had no intention of ever having a presence here.

Here's an archive of recent posts in case they get deleted by the banned troll in question.

[Hueristic]

BREAKING NEWS FROM BITCOINTALK

It would appear that the Bitcoin SV thread was written and is moderated by a banned troll!  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53092612#msg53092612

I was wondering who in their right mind at SV (not that there's many) would have sanctioned this idiot to compose and run their Bitcointalk thread for them. Turns out they most likely never did at all, and they probably had no intention of ever having a presence here.

Here's an archive of recent posts in case they get deleted by the banned troll in question.

themos, please help, close Ban this ^^^ troll's topic^^^

FTFY

[Iamtutut]

Faketoshi wants to implement reversible transactions on his shitcoin.
https://twitter.com/Pardigm_Egress/status/1195958922101678080

As Arthur Van Pelt remember the twitter community "Bitcoin transactions can be sufficiently irreversible in an hour or two." - Satoshi Nakamoto, November 11, 2008

BSV is anything but Bitcoin.
Craig S Wright is one of many faketoshis, and a fraud.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Faketoshi wants to implement reversible transactions on his shitcoin.
https://twitter.com/Pardigm_Egress/status/1195958922101678080

As Arthur Van Pelt remember the twitter community "Bitcoin transactions can be sufficiently irreversible in an hour or two." - Satoshi Nakamoto, November 11, 2008

BSV is anything but Bitcoin.
Craig S Wright is one of many faketoshis, and a fraud.

I suggest implementing newly created blocked at will so to through off the scent of them pesky 3-letter agencies.

[BitcoinFX]

Looking forward to hearing how they'll explain why nothing happened.

It's bizarre reading the responses to tweets like that from people who believe their proclamations. I don't see how any faintly normal being can manoeuvre themselves into that position.

I'm looking forward to this one the most -



Not long now until we're all eating humble pie.

"Craig Wright - More Delusional Predictions

Just picked this up from Reddit ( https://www.reddit.com/r/bsv/comments/dy2afs/dont_we_all_believe_in_unicorns_still_waiting_to/ … ) so no idea how old this is. I typically like $BSV on $1,200 by the end of this year and $BTC between $0.10-$0.20. 😂"



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1196448321092685824



...

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - unknown.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics

...

Painting the tape ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_manipulation

[BitcoinFX]

BREAKING NEWS FROM BITCOINTALK

It would appear that the Bitcoin SV thread was written and is moderated by a banned troll!  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53092612#msg53092612

I was wondering who in their right mind at SV (not that there's many) would have sanctioned this idiot to compose and run their Bitcointalk thread for them. Turns out they most likely never did at all, and they probably had no intention of ever having a presence here.

Here's an archive of recent posts in case they get deleted by the banned troll in question.

Not *Satire*

In fond memory of the real Mr. Trololo Satoshi ...

- https://youtu.be/aTqiLPNV0OE

[actmyname]

Bitcoin SV, basically built on the foundation of a cult.

Look at the parallels of Craig's claims compared to that of a cult leader.

Rather than directly prove something that grants him (perceived) power, CSW goes down a path of unreliable, improbable and (possibly) deceptive methods of verifying evidence.
Rather than directly prove that the cult leader has a connection to a deity, the cult leader provides unreliable, improbable and innocuous evidence (which could be done by someone else in a similar position).Religion of BSV

[suzanne5223]

Bitcoin SV, basically built on the foundation of a cult.

Look at the parallels of Craig's claims compared to that of a cult leader.

Rather than directly prove something that grants him (perceived) power, CSW goes down a path of unreliable, improbable and (possibly) deceptive methods of verifying evidence.
Rather than directly prove that the cult leader has a connection to a deity, the cult leader provides unreliable, improbable and innocuous evidence (which could be done by someone else in a similar position).Religion of BSV

You totally make a good point cause no one will go through the path CSW chooses without been back by some kind of brotherhood (cult) or having the support of powerful powerful person in the world working behind which their purpose mainly is to cause misconception within the bitcoin platform, community etc so they can abuse, overtake or destroy bitcoin ( cause they see it as obstacle to their business/income) but they totally underestimated the power of bitcoin.

[actmyname]

-snip-

No, what I mean to say is that CSW's methodology has been analogous to that of religious evidence in various doctrines that you can see nowadays.

It is less about empirical or theoretical evidence that has substance and more about loosely-connected, circumstantial or contrived facets of proof which may not have a fundamental foundation on anything but faith and/or cognitive dissonance induced by habitual actions.In the BSV case, it would be people justifying their use of BSV and faith in CSW being satoshi notwithstanding all the contrarian remarks.

[JayJuanGee]

Bitcoin SV, basically built on the foundation of a cult.

Look at the parallels of Craig's claims compared to that of a cult leader.

Rather than directly prove something that grants him (perceived) power, CSW goes down a path of unreliable, improbable and (possibly) deceptive methods of verifying evidence.
Rather than directly prove that the cult leader has a connection to a deity, the cult leader provides unreliable, improbable and innocuous evidence (which could be done by someone else in a similar position).Religion of BSV

You totally make a good point cause no one will go through the path CSW chooses without been back by some kind of brotherhood (cult) or having the support of powerful powerful person in the world working behind which their purpose mainly is to cause misconception within the bitcoin platform, community etc so they can abuse, overtake or destroy bitcoin ( cause they see it as obstacle to their business/income) but they totally underestimated the power of bitcoin.

Kind of reminds me of the analysis of the methodologies of the Nigerian scammers.  The theory is that the Nigerian scammers had such a high success rate (maybe 1/1000 or whatever) because they would be able to sort out the smarter people by purposefully having grammar errors and logical inconsistencies in their sales pitch, and so in that regard, they are appealing to 1) the dumbest of the dumb 2) the greediest of the greedy 3) the most desperate of the desperate or 4) the most hopeful of the hopeful.

So however fucked up are the Bcash SV believers in order to follow and believe such a fucked up nutjob or in some other ways try to rationalize why Bcash SV is a sound investment - hoping for a pump, hoping for a pump, hoping for a pump.,. whatever, delusional fucktwats are going to follow such a ragtag scamming team is likely to have a decent amount of delusions, even if they otherwise appear to be normal peeps.

[Dabs]

Beeeet connneeeeccct? wasssa wasssa wassaaa ... here we have our esteemed Craig Right! because everyone else is Wrong, so he is Right! ... and beetcoin ess Vee, the original vision ...

I can just imagine the rallies. The poor devs who are in it doing some technical stuff on it, just wondering what's really going on in their heads, adding gigabyte blocks and stuff.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Bitcoin SV, basically built on the foundation of a cult.

Look at the parallels of Craig's claims compared to that of a cult leader.

Rather than directly prove something that grants him (perceived) power, CSW goes down a path of unreliable, improbable and (possibly) deceptive methods of verifying evidence.
Rather than directly prove that the cult leader has a connection to a deity, the cult leader provides unreliable, improbable and innocuous evidence (which could be done by someone else in a similar position).Religion of BSV

A great example is how they were all shouting 'WELCOME TO LAW' when Craig announced his lawsuits against Peter McCormick and Hodlonaut and they were all dismissing the judge's decision in the Kleiman vs Wright case.

[BitcoinFX]

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

[Iamtutut]

Fraudtoshi caught lying for the 1682486764083181486th time.

https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1199301450863505408
WizSec Bitcoin Research
@wizsecurity
Craig Wright says he "definitely knows" he mined these bitcoins and sent them to Mike Hearn, but anyone who spends more than 5 minutes googling those historical transactions will realize this is actually Hearn's address

Debunked more than 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2080936

Whilst reading the emails, assuming they are not fakes, I'd spotted this?

In chronological order.

23-2-2009 10:05:15 Reward From Block 5326 mined by Satoshi Nakamoto. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh.

14-4-2009 7:41 PM Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "If you send to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu and e-mail me your bitcoin address, or IP if you can accept incoming connections, I'll send back the same amount +50" to Mike Hearn.

16-4-2009 13:04:58 Reward From Block 11157 mined by Mike Hearn. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.

16-4-2009 16:33:26 Reward From Block 11173 mined by Mike Hearn. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o.

18-4-2009 13:08:22 Included In Blocks 11395 Mike Hearn sent 32.51 BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 15:08 Mike Hearn emailed, "I sent you 32.51 coins, my bitcoin address is 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 15:55:19 Included In Blocks 11408 Satoshi Nakamoto sent 32.51 BTC back to Mike Hearn. 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n. Satoshi Nakamoto also sent 50 BTC (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n.

18-4-2009 18:16 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "I sent back 32.51 and 50.00" to Mike Hearn.

18-4-2009 19:34:27 Included In Blocks 11426 Mike Hearn sent 50 BTC (mined 16-4-2009 16:33:26) back to Satoshi Nakamoto. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 21:25 Mike Hearn emailed, "Thanks. I sent you back 50, so now we're even" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 22:52 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "Got the 50" to Mike Hearn.