SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[Dabs]

Beeeet connneeeeccct? wasssa wasssa wassaaa ... here we have our esteemed Craig Right! because everyone else is Wrong, so he is Right! ... and beetcoin ess Vee, the original vision ...

I can just imagine the rallies. The poor devs who are in it doing some technical stuff on it, just wondering what's really going on in their heads, adding gigabyte blocks and stuff.

[1582123296]

1582123296

[1582123296]

1582123296

[TheNewAnon135246]

Bitcoin SV, basically built on the foundation of a cult.

Look at the parallels of Craig's claims compared to that of a cult leader.

Rather than directly prove something that grants him (perceived) power, CSW goes down a path of unreliable, improbable and (possibly) deceptive methods of verifying evidence.
Rather than directly prove that the cult leader has a connection to a deity, the cult leader provides unreliable, improbable and innocuous evidence (which could be done by someone else in a similar position).Religion of BSV

A great example is how they were all shouting 'WELCOME TO LAW' when Craig announced his lawsuits against Peter McCormick and Hodlonaut and they were all dismissing the judge's decision in the Kleiman vs Wright case.

[BitcoinFX]

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

[Iamtutut]

Fraudtoshi caught lying for the 1682486764083181486th time.

https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1199301450863505408
WizSec Bitcoin Research
@wizsecurity
Craig Wright says he "definitely knows" he mined these bitcoins and sent them to Mike Hearn, but anyone who spends more than 5 minutes googling those historical transactions will realize this is actually Hearn's address

Debunked more than 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2080936

Whilst reading the emails, assuming they are not fakes, I'd spotted this?

In chronological order.

23-2-2009 10:05:15 Reward From Block 5326 mined by Satoshi Nakamoto. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh.

14-4-2009 7:41 PM Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "If you send to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu and e-mail me your bitcoin address, or IP if you can accept incoming connections, I'll send back the same amount +50" to Mike Hearn.

16-4-2009 13:04:58 Reward From Block 11157 mined by Mike Hearn. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.

16-4-2009 16:33:26 Reward From Block 11173 mined by Mike Hearn. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o.

18-4-2009 13:08:22 Included In Blocks 11395 Mike Hearn sent 32.51 BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 15:08 Mike Hearn emailed, "I sent you 32.51 coins, my bitcoin address is 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 15:55:19 Included In Blocks 11408 Satoshi Nakamoto sent 32.51 BTC back to Mike Hearn. 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n. Satoshi Nakamoto also sent 50 BTC (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n.

18-4-2009 18:16 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "I sent back 32.51 and 50.00" to Mike Hearn.

18-4-2009 19:34:27 Included In Blocks 11426 Mike Hearn sent 50 BTC (mined 16-4-2009 16:33:26) back to Satoshi Nakamoto. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 21:25 Mike Hearn emailed, "Thanks. I sent you back 50, so now we're even" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 22:52 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "Got the 50" to Mike Hearn.

[BitcoinFX]

Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807

hv_ spake thusly:

My advice: Look into the Version 0.1

Set in Stone.

No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level

Note the use of _protocol_.

To which BitcoinFX replied:

*With Sarcasm* ... Not Set in Stone ..., instead consensus based ...

Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21

Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21

Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.

So you're implying that 0.1 isn't an implementation of the protocol but 0.2 and 0.3 are?

I’m not implying anything. I am explicitly stating that the client version 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are all implementations of client code that run the same version of the same protocol.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implementation

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_protocol

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_protocol

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocol



This is what happens when you believe in people who were clearly not around during Bitcoin (BTC) inception, over and above people who were knowingly around.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

...

Yep, more lies from CSW (and in a court of law) ...

Fraudtoshi caught lying for the 1682486764083181486th time.

https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1199301450863505408
WizSec Bitcoin Research
@wizsecurity
Craig Wright says he "definitely knows" he mined these bitcoins and sent them to Mike Hearn, but anyone who spends more than 5 minutes googling those historical transactions will realize this is actually Hearn's address

Debunked more than 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2080936

Whilst reading the emails, assuming they are not fakes, I'd spotted this?

In chronological order.

23-2-2009 10:05:15 Reward From Block 5326 mined by Satoshi Nakamoto. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh.

14-4-2009 7:41 PM Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "If you send to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu and e-mail me your bitcoin address, or IP if you can accept incoming connections, I'll send back the same amount +50" to Mike Hearn.

16-4-2009 13:04:58 Reward From Block 11157 mined by Mike Hearn. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.

16-4-2009 16:33:26 Reward From Block 11173 mined by Mike Hearn. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o.

18-4-2009 13:08:22 Included In Blocks 11395 Mike Hearn sent 32.51 BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 15:08 Mike Hearn emailed, "I sent you 32.51 coins, my bitcoin address is 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 15:55:19 Included In Blocks 11408 Satoshi Nakamoto sent 32.51 BTC back to Mike Hearn. 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n. Satoshi Nakamoto also sent 50 BTC (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n.

18-4-2009 18:16 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "I sent back 32.51 and 50.00" to Mike Hearn.

18-4-2009 19:34:27 Included In Blocks 11426 Mike Hearn sent 50 BTC (mined 16-4-2009 16:33:26) back to Satoshi Nakamoto. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 21:25 Mike Hearn emailed, "Thanks. I sent you back 50, so now we're even" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 22:52 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "Got the 50" to Mike Hearn.

...

Thread ...

"Kleiman v. Wright - The bonded courier is back! 😂

In his latest "Objection" filing late yesterday, Craig #Faketoshi Wright doubles down on the Tulip Trust, bonded courier & being Satoshi bullsh*t.

Source, must read:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.311.0.pdf … "

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1199219782379290624

...

- https://youtu.be/3kqLVeP7iHA

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

Prove me wrong ! Still waiting !

...

*facepalm*

"The Truth About Craig Wright by Lisa N Edwards, Craig Wrights Sister 😱
Watch here:  https://youtu.be/06BcV7voczk
Follow: @LisaNEdwards @mcpauld

#CraigWright #LisaEdwards #Crypto #CryptoTruth #BitcoinSV #SatoshisVision #Satoshi #TheArtOfBitcoin y"



- https://twitter.com/mcpauld/status/1199084957043494913

*double facepalm*

Not *Satire* ...

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807

hv_ spake thusly:

My advice: Look into the Version 0.1

Set in Stone.

No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level

Note the use of _protocol_.

To which BitcoinFX replied:

*With Sarcasm* ... Not Set in Stone ..., instead consensus based ...

Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21

Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21

Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.

So you're implying that 0.1 isn't an implementation of the protocol but 0.2 and 0.3 are?

I’m not implying anything. I am explicitly stating that the client version 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are all implementations of client code that run the same version of the same protocol.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implementation

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_protocol

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_protocol

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocol



This is what happens when you believe in people who were clearly not around during Bitcoin (BTC) inception, over and above people who were knowingly around.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

...

Yep, more lies from CSW (and in a court of law) ...

Fraudtoshi caught lying for the 1682486764083181486th time.

https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1199301450863505408
WizSec Bitcoin Research
@wizsecurity
Craig Wright says he "definitely knows" he mined these bitcoins and sent them to Mike Hearn, but anyone who spends more than 5 minutes googling those historical transactions will realize this is actually Hearn's address

Debunked more than 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2080936

Whilst reading the emails, assuming they are not fakes, I'd spotted this?

In chronological order.

23-2-2009 10:05:15 Reward From Block 5326 mined by Satoshi Nakamoto. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh.

14-4-2009 7:41 PM Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "If you send to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu and e-mail me your bitcoin address, or IP if you can accept incoming connections, I'll send back the same amount +50" to Mike Hearn.

16-4-2009 13:04:58 Reward From Block 11157 mined by Mike Hearn. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.

16-4-2009 16:33:26 Reward From Block 11173 mined by Mike Hearn. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o.

18-4-2009 13:08:22 Included In Blocks 11395 Mike Hearn sent 32.51 BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 15:08 Mike Hearn emailed, "I sent you 32.51 coins, my bitcoin address is 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 15:55:19 Included In Blocks 11408 Satoshi Nakamoto sent 32.51 BTC back to Mike Hearn. 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n. Satoshi Nakamoto also sent 50 BTC (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n.

18-4-2009 18:16 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "I sent back 32.51 and 50.00" to Mike Hearn.

18-4-2009 19:34:27 Included In Blocks 11426 Mike Hearn sent 50 BTC (mined 16-4-2009 16:33:26) back to Satoshi Nakamoto. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 21:25 Mike Hearn emailed, "Thanks. I sent you back 50, so now we're even" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 22:52 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "Got the 50" to Mike Hearn.

...

Thread ...

"Kleiman v. Wright - The bonded courier is back! 😂

In his latest "Objection" filing late yesterday, Craig #Faketoshi Wright doubles down on the Tulip Trust, bonded courier & being Satoshi bullsh*t.

Source, must read:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.311.0.pdf … "

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1199219782379290624

...

- https://youtu.be/3kqLVeP7iHA

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

Prove me wrong ! Still waiting !

...

*facepalm*

"The Truth About Craig Wright by Lisa N Edwards, Craig Wrights Sister 😱
Watch here:  https://youtu.be/06BcV7voczk
Follow: @LisaNEdwards @mcpauld

#CraigWright #LisaEdwards #Crypto #CryptoTruth #BitcoinSV #SatoshisVision #Satoshi #TheArtOfBitcoin y"



- https://twitter.com/mcpauld/status/1199084957043494913

*double facepalm*

Not *Satire* ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06BcV7voczk&feature=youtu.be&t=35

According to Lisa, Craig used to dress up as a Ninja. Ergo, Mark Karpelès is Satoshi ...

[BitcoinFX]

"if you know #CraigisSatoshi and #BSV is original #Bitcoin protocol and you pretend they are not...this is a type of fraud for percieved commercial advantage.  Ver, CZ, Vitalik, Adam Back and others are all guilty of this and history will remember."
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1199363610599923712

No. Calvin. 'i' before 'e' except after 'c' ...

know = knowledge

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology

"Robert Nozick has offered the following definition of knowledge: S knows that P if and only if:

    P;
    S believes that P;
    if P were false, S would not believe that P; <<<<< YOU ARE HERE
    if P were true, S would believe that P."

...

"Since early 2015 Craig Wright has been publicly touting himself as the creator of Bitcoin.

Nearly 5 years on and NOT ONE SINGLE piece of credible evidence or public proof has been provided. Nothing, nada, zilch.

Those that still believe, ask yourself why do you believe.."
- https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1191269045531602944

This ^



...

"Proof Craig Wright and his dopey lawyers can’t even keep their lies straight.

They forgot Craig told the court there’s no such thing as a public address.

Now they’re using the same terminology disavowed by CSW (see tweet below)

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/07/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-3.html … https://twitter.com/mylegacykit/status/1199275484489625600 …"

- https://twitter.com/iwearahoodie/status/1199279505061244929

[Iamtutut]

Craig fraudtoshi Wright arguments in his appeal of Judge Reinhart ruling get heavily burnt by himself. Just have to quote him.

https://www.reddit.com/r/bsv/comments/e2280a/in_which_craig_lies_yes_again/

[BitcoinFX]

Craig fraudtoshi Wright arguments in his appeal of Judge Reinhart ruling get heavily burnt by himself. Just have to quote him.

https://www.reddit.com/r/bsv/comments/e2280a/in_which_craig_lies_yes_again/

Just incredible. Makes you wonder ...

The Satoshi round table without Satoshi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKV_WM6ohlg

"BTC'illuminati's having a party and your not invited!" - SWIM

*Satire*
The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy - Title Sequence - BBC ...
- https://youtu.be/PQjgMF_20dE

Mostly BTCankster's being bankster's and conspiracy theorists being conspiracy theorists, which still does not alter the fact that ...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

...

Deee-Lite - Groove Is In The Heart (Official Video)
- https://youtu.be/etviGf1uWlg

[Hueristic]

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

So not only he's a scum sucking scammer but a necrophiliac as well?

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

So not only he's a scum sucking scammer but a necrophiliac as well?

"He also invented Doors."

When you're strange
No one remembers your name

[TheNewAnon135246]

Here is a video of CSW hyping true fungibility/anonymity for BCH. I wonder what made him change his mind .

https://youtu.be/Z5134UhqSD0

[nutildah]

Here is a video of CSW hyping true fungibility/anonymity for BCH. I wonder what made him change his mind .

https://youtu.be/Z5134UhqSD0

LOL. Good find. Of course, he was full of shit then, and he's full of shit now. If there's one constant in Craig's life, its, well... you guessed it.

[nutildah]

Oh my... 41 new messages? I suddenly got very popular it would appear.



Awww, nope, its just korner (Bitcoin SV) clearing out all my posts from his thread!



 

BSV - is Original Bitcoin.

In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy

Well, so much for that ethos.

[LoyceV]

Awww, nope, its just korner (Bitcoin SV) clearing out all my posts

http://loyce.club/archive/members/31/317618.html

from his thread!

http://loyce.club/archive/topics/498/4985868.html

(I'm currently updating both links, this is not automated yet)

[bitserve]

Here is a video of CSW hyping true fungibility/anonymity for BCH. I wonder what made him change his mind .

https://youtu.be/Z5134UhqSD0

What mind? He doesn't need no fucking reason... The guy is completely nuts, what would you expect? lol

[Iamtutut]

I've also had several messages deleted in the fake bitcoin thread.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Has anyone seen this article claiming that Craig showed a timestamped document to claim the roots of the Satoshi name?. That website has shilled BSV/CSW in the past so it's a total joke (as usual).

[Hueristic]

Another deleted post from his scamcoin thread.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

BSV is not BTC (bitcoin).

BTC is just a platform for other forks. BSV is Original Bitcoin.

You will not get a penny from us! We are transparent and do not need for paid promoters creating lie by artificial opinions

Our personal list of these spammers and his alts:
malevolent, Hueristic, yogg, nutildah, TwitchySeal, mosprognoz, Bthd, ChiBitCTy, CryptopreneurBrainboss, dkbit98, DireWolfM14, dragonvslinux, lighpulsar07, notblox1, Nomar

LOL, thats a list of those that support his Warning tag.

Code:

mosprognoz alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with Bitcoin SV is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.
Support: malevolent, Hueristic, yogg, nutildah, TwitchySeal, mosprognoz, Bthd, ChiBitCTy, CryptopreneurBrainboss, dkbit98, DireWolfM14, dragonvslinux, lighpulsar07, notblox1, Nomar
Opposition: MirkoIta, hv_, Bitcoin SV
Active.
Delete opinion

Quite amusing.

I've also had several messages deleted in the fake bitcoin thread.

Post them in this thread.

[Bitcoin SV]

nutildah SCAM
mosprognoz SCAM

these scammers should be banned