Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2019, 10:28:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [ICO] Robomed Network - a new medical network managed by blockchain token on: October 21, 2017, 07:58:36 PM
I want to participate in bounty program! Is it still possible? Are there any more chances to get some of your tokens? can I talk to any of team directly?
2  Economy / Securities / Re: Bit2Easy Investment fund on: March 09, 2017, 07:34:27 PM
Ok mr.Genius, you are not the scammer that others say that you are.
and Op its not using this bot for his personal benefit, without telling us if its using the same with the one i post.

So where is op just to answer and tell me that i am wrong? i didnt accuse him for anything, i just ask him.
and as i see, you start yelling and cursing and op just...vanish! Roll Eyes
yeah i know, its not weird to you...after all, we are all idiots here, except you ofc.

I wouldn't engage trolls if I were him, so why would he? Yes you are an idiot and you've proven that with your response by completely missing the point of my post. I'm sure that if he did reply, then there would be more accusations by idiots - so what's the point? The point is that if you have no evidence and have done no business with a particular member, keep your mouth shut...and regardless of how "right" you think you are, you're still just talking out of your ass. Remember, you too are an anonymous nobody so the probability that you're a scammer is the same.
3  Other / Meta / Re: Time for an Improved "User Rating" System on: March 09, 2017, 10:51:58 AM
3) Nobody should be able to "rate" another user without having done business with them directly, and it would not be too difficult to create a system where two or more users agree to a transaction and allow themselves to rate each other. This record could then be publicly displayed.

So we wait for an obvious scammer to scam someone before the person who gets scammed can leave trust which will then be pointless as the scammer will have just ditched the account and moved on? This method would only really benefit scammers who would be quick to take advantage of it.

An obvious scammer won't be scamming anyone, it's the cunning scammers who are successful. Assuming guilt (often on a whim) simply doesn't work, regardless of whether the intent is good or not. It just creates another vector for unscrupulous individuals to harass other members.

An example of what would work better:

- User wants to sell/provide service. Creates a thread and selects a checkbox to state that it's a transactional thread. Optionally, limit such threads by category and/or require that a user establish a degree of positive feedback before being allowed to create threads in more 'sensitive' categories.

- Other users who are interested can then contact the seller privately, but cannot post in the thread unless they've actually performed a transaction. The purpose of the thread will be to act as the ad and not a discussion.

- All such threads will be publicly visible from the user's profile, ordered by thread and a summary of +/- ratings. A completed transaction should default to a + rating for both buyer and seller.

- The public rating should be based on last 3-months average to keep values fresh and make it so account selling is unfavorable (i.e. a bunch of old feedback that is >3 months won't be as good as a current account).

With this system, new accounts with no history will not be trusted for anything substantial as a matter of common sense, but the members will have the opportunity to establish trust without trolls leaving fake/baseless negative comments.

Once a user has established trust, anyone can see it for themselves and know that the feedback was genuine. Of course, the problem with users using multiple accounts still exists. One way to get around that is to offer an option for users to have their identify verified by a 3rd party, and once that 3rd party service confirms the verification they get a notation near their name that their identity is verified.
4  Other / Meta / Time for an Improved "User Rating" System on: March 09, 2017, 10:11:44 AM
This site currently is one of the busiest bitcoin websites, yet it hamstrings bitcoin by catering to scammers and trolls.

1) It should be a matter of policy that anyone making false/unprovable accusations against another member be banned for trolling. That's all it is and it should never be encouraged. This assumption that everyone is an idiot, and one member decides he is some kind of cape-wearing hero that must save the world only creates a toxic environment that hinders commerce.

2) The ridiculous "trust" system allows anyone to troll anyone, often with fake + and - comments. Examples being that much of the positive trust is left by one user with multiple accounts, while the same users troll competitors with negative feedback.

3) Nobody should be able to "rate" another user without having done business with them directly, and it would not be too difficult to create a system where two or more users agree to a transaction and allow themselves to rate each other. This record could then be publicly displayed.
5  Other / Meta / Re: Moderated Threads in Marketplace from people with red trust on: March 09, 2017, 10:01:08 AM
The red trust should be sufficient warning.
Anybody who spends a little time in this forum should know that the negative trust and self-moderated thread are red flags.

The "trust" system simply enables trolling for SJW beta fails that bought "hero" accounts. It has nothing to do with integrity and it should be removed and replaced with a transactional model like every other place uses.
6  Economy / Securities / Re: Bit2Easy Investment fund on: March 09, 2017, 09:37:36 AM
I think that users who don't see similarities or what is obvious, can as well get banned. Or at least put some...glasses on! Shocked Cool

What similarities? You are similar to an idiot but I'll give you a chance to show us that you're not the moron I think you are. Waiting...

Quote
To use others instuments/tools, as it seems Op doing here, without telling it right away and charge a fee for that....You call this a serious business?!

Once again, you SEEM like a complete jackass but I'm willing to offer you the benefit of the doubt. Nothing in the original post is any more "shady" than 99% of the bitcoin 'community' anyway.

Furthermore, it's not the job if trolls to declare "scam" without evidence. It's the duty of mods to ban trolls who do make false accusations.

Quote
As i see from your feedbacks, no wonder why... Roll Eyes

Yes, the feedback on this site is as credible as you...where any idiot can troll your feedback regardless of whether or not they have done business with you.

And you have almost exclusively negative feedback which makes it seem that you're not only a troll, but a scammer. What you are definitely not is a phd.
7  Economy / Securities / Re: Any Safe 1.5% Monthly? on: March 09, 2017, 02:44:55 AM
Wow...so much unchecked bad info in here. 1.5% / mo is 18% per year - it's well within the range of attainable returns for straight investing in a variety of moderate risk vehicles. You get paid to take risk, not sit around and play it safe. If you listen to these broke ass clowns telling you anything that pays that much is a "scam" you'll end up just like them - and I know for a fact several of them are scammers.
8  Economy / Securities / Re: Bit2Easy Investment fund on: March 09, 2017, 02:37:32 AM
I think users who make accusations without verifiable evidence should be banned from posting, at least in this forum.

Very difficult to get serious business done between the actual scammers and the whiners who think hoarding bitcoin is going to make them rich.
9  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: March 09, 2017, 01:58:05 AM
@notbatman:
You could more easily make your case for a flat earth by stating that all camera lenses are subject to optical distortion (i.e. pincushion distortion), and could display straight lines as being curved - the same is true for the human eye to some extent.

That being said, the flat earth claims we're under a glass dome of sorts, and that beyond the dome is water. Far fetched, but it does make for fun stories.

10  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: March 08, 2017, 11:46:17 PM
The Coriolis effect is explained by the 23h 56m aether drift cycle I just explained and the triangle experiment is absolutely impractical.

Like I said, I haven't heard any good explanations for the coriolis effect - especially considering that the magnited of the coriolis effect can be calculated repeatedly with math.

You cannot dismiss the path "proof" as impractical. All you need is a compass and enough distance to make 3 lines of equal length, each with a 90 degree turn. Can be done quite easily in a plan, helicopter, or RC drone.
11  Economy / Goods / NEW - Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8g VRII Lens (US Model #2185) on: March 08, 2017, 11:41:31 PM
I have a new 70-200mm f/2.8g professional lens for sale that includes Nikon USA warranty card. This lens is great for sports, weddings, wildlife, etc. Very fast auto-focus and super sharp image quality.

New in the box, with all original accessories.

Recommended for a buyer located within USA. International shipping extra.

Note that Nikon has replaced this model with an updated and more expensive version, but it only offers a benefit if used with D5 camera.

Details:
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/2185/af-s-nikkor-70-200mm-f%252f2.8g-ed-vr-ii.html

Ask Price: 2.0 BTC
12  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: March 08, 2017, 11:30:26 PM
I haven't seen any good explanations for the coriolis effect, if the earth is a flat and motionless disk...and since it must be compensated for by hunters, snipers and anyone traveling from point A to B, it most certainly exists.

You can take a trip due west, then due south, then due east and you will end up at your starting point, forming a triangle pattern of travel path. If earth is flat, you would end up south of your starting point with a C shaped travel path.

One thing, however, is that the recent WMAP experiments that have created visual representations of "cosmic background radiation" show that the earth is centered within the known universe, and that the radiation emanates outward from earth. The idea that earth is insignificant or that our universe has no particular structure aside from random instances of celestial bodies is proven wrong. The CMB experiments were performed over a decade with 3 successive launches, each one delivering the same results.

I am open to new ideas in the pursuit of truth, therefore, I am willing to consider that the physical geometry of our Earth is not as is commonly explained...although I approach the matter with no desire to support an ideological perspective.
13  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I just read an awesome book about evolution on: January 23, 2017, 01:11:52 AM
It IS A FACT, no shit of the gods has ever been found.

If you were a primitive human with a limited understanding of the world, mainly driven by survival instincts and impulses, then you saw a human from 2000+ years in the future fly in on a space raft, get out (wearing a space suit and helmet) you may think that human is a "god like" being from "the heavens". You'd draw crude pictures on cave walls depicting this - and such drawings are abundant around the planet.

Religions have tried to personify god into something relatable to simple humans, and religion is more about politics than it is about spirituality...but the fundamental notion that a universal force with some kind of sentience exists is far more likely than unlikely - even though it cannot be proven either way.
14  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I just read an awesome book about evolution on: January 23, 2017, 01:02:37 AM
Another definition of evolution.

When are people going to realize that there isn't any evolution in the original sense of the word. The only way proponents of evolution are able to make evolution exist, is to change the meaning into some other meaning of something that DOES exist. Of course, that doesn't make the original meaning to be something that exists. It only shows that evolutionists don't like giving up on their religion.

Cool

After reading the book I'd tend to agree with you. I never had strong opinions one way or the other about evolution, but now I'm more inclined to question the textbook claims made about evolution. You should read the book if you have kindle. I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
15  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: January 23, 2017, 12:55:17 AM
He's claiming that it's easy for people to see through the conspiracy theorist bullshit (the bible in his example) because anyone can and should read (the science) and are easily able to realize it's legitimate?

Science is not a replacement for the bible, and trying to dismiss facts and skepticism as a "conspiracy theory" just won't work anymore - but it does make you look like a fool.
16  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: January 23, 2017, 12:50:51 AM
Quote me on where I said bitcoin being the work of some japanese dude?  Did you just post on a thread showing your level of stupid?  demons,lol.  Left wing nutcases is what they were, not demons.  They tried to take over the world and to do that, you must kill millions.  Now go back to your Alex Jones with your tinfoil hats.

That's the official story behind bitcoin - that it was a project started by a japanese guy with a curiosity about economic systems. Alex Jones doesn't shun bitcoin, but it's no secret that central bankers have been working hard to eliminate physical cash and anything else of value, like gold.

Yes, you're so "enlightened" and so sure that demons do not (or cannot) exist. Leftards will never take over the world, especially now that demons have been put on notice. They and their underlings will be vanquished. Alex Jones has been thoroughly vindicated. But thanks for repeating a meme. You're clearly a "free thinker". haha
17  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: January 23, 2017, 12:43:20 AM
Science is a tool... and tools are meant to be used. Meant to be used by scientists. Do you understand what the word scientist means?

No bud, no. The scientific method can be applied by anyone. There are no arbitrary qualifications required to perform science, and a scientist is one who practices science - not one who has "permission" to "perform" science.

Quote
Now that we've established there is a group of people that use science who we call scientists, it should then be fairly easy (for most people at least) to understand that said group of people can have agreements on scientific issues and develop a consensus among the scientific community. So again, I ask you what your credentials are to go against what these people are saying about climate change?

You haven't established anything other than your inability to think independently. You are repeating the same tired leftists tropes that have been said thousands of times before. Answer my question, or shut up. That is how a discussion works...but as we can clearly see, you cannot answer my question which is why you're several responses in and still trying to deflect.
 
Quote
Also, climate gate has been debunked for years, leading scientists have been unequivocally reaffirming the consensus on global warming ever since, and my political party doesn't align with the left.

Wow, what a dipshit. He literally googled "climategate debunked" and posted the first couple of links that google spit out. This braindead zombie wants us to believe he knows what he's talking about, but he thinks that truth can be "debunked" with additional propaganda. LOL

"Leading scientists"? Who? Name one who isn't a leftard shill, and then list a single contribution to science these "leading" scientists have made that would put them in the same class as actual leading scientists such as Einstein, Galileo, or, especially Tesla.

18  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: January 22, 2017, 10:52:03 AM
Many youth in schools are indoctrinated in the idea they should not believe in anything which lacks conclusive evidence.

This is why climate change denialists exist..

They think they should not believe in climate change unless someone can prove 100% it is real.

 Smiley

Yes, they are indoctrinated with leftist propaganda like climate change, multi-culturalism, the idea that we're all some "community", identity politics, victimhood, and many other problematic seeds of division.

Appropriation of science as a tool to give their propaganda false authority is fairly common. Hitler relied on eugenics, a branch of evolutionary theory, as the basis for his regime's genocide.

Man-caused climate change cannot be proven 1%, let alone 100%. Give us an answer to the question I asked a few posts back:

"Why is every "solution" to climate change something to do with expanding govt power, increasing taxes, increasing regulations, coercing companies into producing unnecessary "green" products - all of with have ZERO affect on the alleged cause of climate change?"
19  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: January 22, 2017, 10:45:34 AM
Alex Jones is NOT a new source.  Does anyone remember what he first said about bitcoin.  "demons" priceless!!  He has an agenda, they all do.  stop reading that shit, lol

You're telling us you believe the fairy tale about bitcoin being the work of some japanese dude? Come on...nobody is THAT gullible. And if you think demons don't exist then you haven't watched any video taken during WW2 as socialists rounded up people by the thousands to kill them.

Here's an idea for you and other morons - stop talking. LOL
20  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: January 22, 2017, 10:43:44 AM
So long as your credential is Alex Jones (the man who literally accused Obama and Hillary Clinton of being “demons” who “smelled like sulfur”) to disagree with study after study, scientific institution after scientific institution, and the scientific community as a whole, I think I'll head back to reality, thanks. You want to talk about making money and hoaxes? He rides gullible people like you all the way to the bank. You're in desperate need of a proper education.

Yes, I did say the scientific community as a whole that you for some reason believe you're qualified to speak against. Now apparently because of people like you and Richard Tol who like to misrepresent data, we need a consensus of a consensus.
Here you go, educate yourself: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

I'm glad that you take satire literally, and believe obama and hitlery are demons. That gives us a good gauge for the level of stupid we're dealing with when talking to you. Cheesy

There is not "scientific community" you leftarded parrot. Science is a tool to enable us to improve our understanding of the natural world we live in. It's not a group of people, in fact, most science that matters was performed by non-academic tinkerers in their basements/garages - not pseudo-intellectuals who have no accomplishments to their name or competence to show, but are happy to rattle off credentials nobody cares about outside of the institution that dispenses said credentials.

What you need is to answer some of the basic points I raised - which you cannot, and that is why you're quickly trying to change the topic. This is why you are irrelevant, and your indoctrination materials are unneeded and unwelcome.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Climategate

What's even funnier are all the leftard websites that try to lie to cover for climategate, pathetic as always. But hey, let me know when you come up with responses to my previous message. Don't spam links and don't paraphrase some other website. Speak in your own words, if you can.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!