I want to participate in bounty program! Is it still possible? Are there any more chances to get some of your tokens? can I talk to any of team directly?

I wouldn't engage trolls if I were him, so why would he? Yes you are an idiot and you've proven that with your response by completely missing the point of my post. I'm sure that if he did reply, then there would be more accusations by idiots - so what's the point? The point is that if you have no evidence and have done no business with a particular member, keep your mouth shut...and regardless of how "right" you think you are, you're still just talking out of your ass. Remember, you too are an anonymous nobody so the probability that you're a scammer is the same.

An obvious scammer won't be scamming anyone, it's the cunning scammers who are successful. Assuming guilt (often on a whim) simply doesn't work, regardless of whether the intent is good or not. It just creates another vector for unscrupulous individuals to harass other members.

An example of what would work better:

- User wants to sell/provide service. Creates a thread and selects a checkbox to state that it's a transactional thread. Optionally, limit such threads by category and/or require that a user establish a degree of positive feedback before being allowed to create threads in more 'sensitive' categories.

- Other users who are interested can then contact the seller privately, but cannot post in the thread unless they've actually performed a transaction. The purpose of the thread will be to act as the ad and not a discussion.

- All such threads will be publicly visible from the user's profile, ordered by thread and a summary of +/- ratings. A completed transaction should default to a + rating for both buyer and seller.

- The public rating should be based on last 3-months average to keep values fresh and make it so account selling is unfavorable (i.e. a bunch of old feedback that is >3 months won't be as good as a current account).

With this system, new accounts with no history will not be trusted for anything substantial as a matter of common sense, but the members will have the opportunity to establish trust without trolls leaving fake/baseless negative comments.

Once a user has established trust, anyone can see it for themselves and know that the feedback was genuine. Of course, the problem with users using multiple accounts still exists. One way to get around that is to offer an option for users to have their identify verified by a 3rd party, and once that 3rd party service confirms the verification they get a notation near their name that their identity is verified.

This site currently is one of the busiest bitcoin websites, yet it hamstrings bitcoin by catering to scammers and trolls.

1) It should be a matter of policy that anyone making false/unprovable accusations against another member be banned for trolling. That's all it is and it should never be encouraged. This assumption that everyone is an idiot, and one member decides he is some kind of cape-wearing hero that must save the world only creates a toxic environment that hinders commerce.

2) The ridiculous "trust" system allows anyone to troll anyone, often with fake + and - comments. Examples being that much of the positive trust is left by one user with multiple accounts, while the same users troll competitors with negative feedback.

3) Nobody should be able to "rate" another user without having done business with them directly, and it would not be too difficult to create a system where two or more users agree to a transaction and allow themselves to rate each other. This record could then be publicly displayed.

The "trust" system simply enables trolling for SJW beta fails that bought "hero" accounts. It has nothing to do with integrity and it should be removed and replaced with a transactional model like every other place uses.

What similarities? You are similar to an idiot but I'll give you a chance to show us that you're not the moron I think you are. Waiting...


Once again, you SEEM like a complete jackass but I'm willing to offer you the benefit of the doubt. Nothing in the original post is any more "shady" than 99% of the bitcoin 'community' anyway.

Furthermore, it's not the job if trolls to declare "scam" without evidence. It's the duty of mods to ban trolls who do make false accusations.


Yes, the feedback on this site is as credible as you...where any idiot can troll your feedback regardless of whether or not they have done business with you.

And you have almost exclusively negative feedback which makes it seem that you're not only a troll, but a scammer. What you are definitely not is a phd.

Wow...so much unchecked bad info in here. 1.5% / mo is 18% per year - it's well within the range of attainable returns for straight investing in a variety of moderate risk vehicles. You get paid to take risk, not sit around and play it safe. If you listen to these broke ass clowns telling you anything that pays that much is a "scam" you'll end up just like them - and I know for a fact several of them are scammers.

I think users who make accusations without verifiable evidence should be banned from posting, at least in this forum.

Very difficult to get serious business done between the actual scammers and the whiners who think hoarding bitcoin is going to make them rich.

@notbatman:
You could more easily make your case for a flat earth by stating that all camera lenses are subject to optical distortion (i.e. pincushion distortion), and could display straight lines as being curved - the same is true for the human eye to some extent.

That being said, the flat earth claims we're under a glass dome of sorts, and that beyond the dome is water. Far fetched, but it does make for fun stories.

Like I said, I haven't heard any good explanations for the coriolis effect - especially considering that the magnited of the coriolis effect can be calculated repeatedly with math.

You cannot dismiss the path "proof" as impractical. All you need is a compass and enough distance to make 3 lines of equal length, each with a 90 degree turn. Can be done quite easily in a plan, helicopter, or RC drone.

I have a new 70-200mm f/2.8g professional lens for sale that includes Nikon USA warranty card. This lens is great for sports, weddings, wildlife, etc. Very fast auto-focus and super sharp image quality.

New in the box, with all original accessories.

Recommended for a buyer located within USA. International shipping extra.

Note that Nikon has replaced this model with an updated and more expensive version, but it only offers a benefit if used with D5 camera.

Details:
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/2185/af-s-nikkor-70-200mm-f%252f2.8g-ed-vr-ii.html

Ask Price: 2.0 BTC

I haven't seen any good explanations for the coriolis effect, if the earth is a flat and motionless disk...and since it must be compensated for by hunters, snipers and anyone traveling from point A to B, it most certainly exists.

You can take a trip due west, then due south, then due east and you will end up at your starting point, forming a triangle pattern of travel path. If earth is flat, you would end up south of your starting point with a C shaped travel path.

One thing, however, is that the recent WMAP experiments that have created visual representations of "cosmic background radiation" show that the earth is centered within the known universe, and that the radiation emanates outward from earth. The idea that earth is insignificant or that our universe has no particular structure aside from random instances of celestial bodies is proven wrong. The CMB experiments were performed over a decade with 3 successive launches, each one delivering the same results.

I am open to new ideas in the pursuit of truth, therefore, I am willing to consider that the physical geometry of our Earth is not as is commonly explained...although I approach the matter with no desire to support an ideological perspective.

If you were a primitive human with a limited understanding of the world, mainly driven by survival instincts and impulses, then you saw a human from 2000+ years in the future fly in on a space raft, get out (wearing a space suit and helmet) you may think that human is a "god like" being from "the heavens". You'd draw crude pictures on cave walls depicting this - and such drawings are abundant around the planet.

Religions have tried to personify god into something relatable to simple humans, and religion is more about politics than it is about spirituality...but the fundamental notion that a universal force with some kind of sentience exists is far more likely than unlikely - even though it cannot be proven either way.

After reading the book I'd tend to agree with you. I never had strong opinions one way or the other about evolution, but now I'm more inclined to question the textbook claims made about evolution. You should read the book if you have kindle. I think you will be pleasantly surprised.

Science is not a replacement for the bible, and trying to dismiss facts and skepticism as a "conspiracy theory" just won't work anymore - but it does make you look like a fool.

That's the official story behind bitcoin - that it was a project started by a japanese guy with a curiosity about economic systems. Alex Jones doesn't shun bitcoin, but it's no secret that central bankers have been working hard to eliminate physical cash and anything else of value, like gold.

Yes, you're so "enlightened" and so sure that demons do not (or cannot) exist. Leftards will never take over the world, especially now that demons have been put on notice. They and their underlings will be vanquished. Alex Jones has been thoroughly vindicated. But thanks for repeating a meme. You're clearly a "free thinker". haha

No bud, no. The scientific method can be applied by anyone. There are no arbitrary qualifications required to perform science, and a scientist is one who practices science - not one who has "permission" to "perform" science.


You haven't established anything other than your inability to think independently. You are repeating the same tired leftists tropes that have been said thousands of times before. Answer my question, or shut up. That is how a discussion works...but as we can clearly see, you cannot answer my question which is why you're several responses in and still trying to deflect.
 

Wow, what a dipshit. He literally googled "climategate debunked" and posted the first couple of links that google spit out. This braindead zombie wants us to believe he knows what he's talking about, but he thinks that truth can be "debunked" with additional propaganda. LOL

"Leading scientists"? Who? Name one who isn't a leftard shill, and then list a single contribution to science these "leading" scientists have made that would put them in the same class as actual leading scientists such as Einstein, Galileo, or, especially Tesla.

Yes, they are indoctrinated with leftist propaganda like climate change, multi-culturalism, the idea that we're all some "community", identity politics, victimhood, and many other problematic seeds of division.

Appropriation of science as a tool to give their propaganda false authority is fairly common. Hitler relied on eugenics, a branch of evolutionary theory, as the basis for his regime's genocide.

Man-caused climate change cannot be proven 1%, let alone 100%. Give us an answer to the question I asked a few posts back:

"Why is every "solution" to climate change something to do with expanding govt power, increasing taxes, increasing regulations, coercing companies into producing unnecessary "green" products - all of with have ZERO affect on the alleged cause of climate change?"

You're telling us you believe the fairy tale about bitcoin being the work of some japanese dude? Come on...nobody is THAT gullible. And if you think demons don't exist then you haven't watched any video taken during WW2 as socialists rounded up people by the thousands to kill them.

Here's an idea for you and other morons - stop talking. LOL

I'm glad that you take satire literally, and believe obama and hitlery are demons. That gives us a good gauge for the level of stupid we're dealing with when talking to you.

There is not "scientific community" you leftarded parrot. Science is a tool to enable us to improve our understanding of the natural world we live in. It's not a group of people, in fact, most science that matters was performed by non-academic tinkerers in their basements/garages - not pseudo-intellectuals who have no accomplishments to their name or competence to show, but are happy to rattle off credentials nobody cares about outside of the institution that dispenses said credentials.

What you need is to answer some of the basic points I raised - which you cannot, and that is why you're quickly trying to change the topic. This is why you are irrelevant, and your indoctrination materials are unneeded and unwelcome.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Climategate

What's even funnier are all the leftard websites that try to lie to cover for climategate, pathetic as always. But hey, let me know when you come up with responses to my previous message. Don't spam links and don't paraphrase some other website. Speak in your own words, if you can.