https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5165361.msg51914706#msg51914706
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158272.msg51908171#msg51908171
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4425646.msg51723599#msg51723599
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158272.msg51714265#msg51714265
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161780.msg51714001#msg51714001
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161278.msg51696188#msg51696188
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5160918.msg51692554#msg51692554

Can you help me, by checking these posts?

---

Update:
I am a 16 year old looking to purchase and hold some BTC!!
Spamming service massively. Please nuke!

I don't think one person will use too many exchanges, so it is possible to manage with one exchange, one email to register, and different password for each account.

---

Emails are kind of identities, so I don't think we should not display our emails' addresses publicly, that is so risky. If you don't want to disclose your important things, please don't disclose your emails, or store them on Cloud-based storage service.

In some national, like Canada, and Australia, children have been taught about crypto in their early years in their lives. For kids, they are taught to read, B is for Bitcoin, E is for Ethereum, etc; for older children, they are taught and given exercises on blockchain, and they have to manage their own blockchians for their schools, something like this. I read such articles back in 2017 or 2018.

You wrote a very long sentence, nearly endless one, so it is hard to catch exactly what you raised. However, I want to discuss about ICOs, that is perfect one for risk-accepted investors. ICOs are likely the same as IEOs now. They are both kind of risky investments, and investors should not invest in ICOs, or IEOs of whatever projects/ exchanges, if they don't have plans for losses. That's all. They can win big, lose big with ICOs and IEOs.

Even the forum rules allow this, such merit buying does not make sense at the end. Mainly because total merits of one account do not represent post quality of that account, it is especially right with bought-merits. Users and campaign managers are very easily to check post history and assess post quality of that user. Such users whom bought merits can not hide their real post quality.

With payment option 1. How do supporters get their payments. The application form does not have place for BTC address.

With payment option 2, the same question. Will supporters have to create account on the site and get paid with their account name? If yes, please add place (line) to fill their name.

I am not sure, but is it reliable to use Esrow service from game-protect? There are better Escrow Service Providers:
Few Trusted Escrow Provider

I agree that crypto lovers should not expand their lists of sites (on news, exchanges, ratings on ICOs, IEOs, or whatever) too much, because basically the more sites they visit, the more news they read, they will have more traps and risks that might beat them sometimes. There are so many fake news, and phising sites around. Coinmarketcap.com is the most important site to visit and get official links of projects (sites, forum, exchange lists, and others).
On coinmarketcap.com, there are two options to see exchange rankings:
- Top 100 by Adjusted volume.
- Top 100 by Reported volume.

* Adjusted Volume - Volume from spot markets excluding markets with no fees and transaction mining

https://coinmarketcap.com/rankings/exchanges/

---

If someone want to move further, I suggest this one: https://messari.io/onchainfx
The site gives you some interesting indicators, basically it looks like this below image, but you can customise a few indicators you need.

Sorry for the incovenience because I am unable to display images, for now.

Thank you so much. 

I signed my message with Electrum wallet. I checked, and still can verify this message myself.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am OcTradism from bitcointalk.org and today 04.07.2019
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qea9za3g8prurrh3730nuqfqhag79jj7p503vf7
H4gpfIqPI9lR/Bl0PvDbBj/nA2u1V+FuE3/nswX7fIdmPxzZvsMt2HpicHgMU8UfpfbuxyAGJeoSmEISzwhI5c0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

---

Please help me to verify my message

Maybe they search coin name with the key word 'died'. For example, I searched with key words: Bitcoin + died.
Then, results show:
https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-died-91-times-2018/
I guess that is probably one of the search algorithm applied for their site. Obviously, that leads to false results.  

You can take risks by invest in ICOs, or IEOs, and can get massive return from your capital. However, that risky investment approach will have nearly the same ending, with losses. Your capital might be lost dramatically. Just imagine that you can start your investment career with 0.1 BTC, and you might luckily enough to win up to 10 BTC after 5-successful risky investments. However, with the same approach, you might lose all 10 BTC (includes your 0.1 BTC in capital), by wrong investments into 1 or 2 projects. That's the end of your investment story.

It is a ridiculous service like this one: https://game-protect.com/
There are lots of famous sites listed in the scam list given by that service. I doubt that the main purpose is to prevent people to know about good sites, and force them exposed more with scam sites.

Since merit system born, and demotion on Junior Member, they are unable to wear signature with hyperlinks. Consequently, there is very limited campaigns which accept Junior member, especially campaigns that pay in Bitcoin. All campaigns listed in the table have no slots for Junior Member.
I propose to eliminate the column for Junior Member in order to save more space. Why not?

I called them as False Positive Ratings! Whatever kind of False things should be avoided. ICO-, IEO-, whatever-False Positive Ratings.

Not yet. Because I always try to avoid using third party software. Anyway, because you used it without issues, I will try and let you know results after that.
I did not make backup.

---

I tried all third party softwares in the guide, they do not solve issues (can not find leftover of Brave browser and uninstall it). It's so strange.

This is what I meant with DYOR. Depending too much or entirely on rating sites is not good, extremely bad in reality. I even don't visit those rating sites because their figures can mislead me into wrong directions and bad decisions. No one can maintain stable emotion all the time, and such rating sites likely cause big mistakes of investment someday. For example, if I want to check a coin that I heard from my friend, I will start with coinmarketcap, from which I can get basic things and links to check more. I don't use other sites to get basics of crypto project, coinmarketcap is enough for my interest.

I have only 470 and 570 4GB (not 8GB) graphic cards, so can I mined BANANO with those cards? Are there sites to estimate mining profits with BANANO coin? Appreciate your coming answer.

Newbies should not only be careful when using ICO-rating sites, but also be very careful with ICOs, or IEOs. If they are newbies, and lack of knowledge, they should invest in bitcoin only. Or they can move further by investing in top altcoins, like Ethereum, Monero, Dash, Ripple, Litecoin. Investing in ICOs or IEOs contain lots of risks. ICO- or IEO-rating sites should be considered as one of support tools for them, and newbies have to DYOR before making their investment decisions (ICOs, IEOs, whatever kind of hot trend in crypto to come).

I just knew about BANANO minutes ago, so how many coins I can get per day if I use one AMD 570 4GB to mine the coin? Thank you all BANANO miners.