 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
To understand why blockchain is important, look beyond wild speculation on what is built below.
The Internet bubble of the 1990s is generally considered a period of mad excess that ended with the destruction of hundreds of billions of dollars of wealth. What is less often discussed is how all the cheap capital of the boom years financed the infrastructure on which the most important Internet innovations would be built after the bubble burst. It financed the deployment of fibre optic cable, R&D on 3G networks and the construction of giant server arrays. All this would make possible the technologies that are now the foundation of the world's most powerful societies: algorithmic research, social media, mobile computing, cloud services, large data analysis, artificial intelligence, etc.
We believe that something similar is happening behind the wild volatility and media hype of the stratosphere of the crypto-currency and blockchain boom. The blockchain sceptics growled with joy as cryptographic prices have fallen from last year's dizzying peaks, but they make the same mistake as the crypto fanatics they mock: they associate the price with its intrinsic value. We cannot yet predict what the high-tech industries based on blockchain technology will look like, but we are confident in their existence, because technology itself is about creating an invaluable asset: trust.
To understand why, we have to go back to the 14th century.
It was at that time that Italian merchants and bankers began to use the double-entry method of accounting. This method, made possible by the adoption of Arabic numerals, has provided merchants with a more reliable record keeping tool and has enabled bankers to assume a powerful new role as intermediaries in the international payment system. However, it is not only the tool itself that has paved the way for modern finance. That was how it had been inserted into the culture of the day.
In 1494, Luca Pacioli, a Franciscan and mathematician, codified his practices by publishing a mathematics and accounting textbook presenting double-entry accounting not only as a means of tracking accounts, but also as a moral obligation. Like Pacioli, for everything that merchants or bankers had value, they had to give something back. Hence the use of compensation inputs to record distinct balancing values: a debit coupled to a credit, an asset with a liability.
Pacioli's morally honest accounting granted a form of religious blessing to these previously disparaged professions. Over the following centuries, clean books were considered a sign of honesty and piety, allowing bankers to become payment intermediaries and accelerate the flow of money. This financed the Renaissance and paved the way for the capitalist explosion that would change the world.
Yet the system was not immune to fraud. Bankers and other financial actors have often failed in their moral duty to keep honest accounts, and they always do: just ask Bernie Madoff's clients or Enron shareholders. Moreover, even if they are honest, their honesty comes at a price. We have allowed centralized trust managers, such as banks, stock exchanges and other financial intermediaries, to become indispensable, moving them from intermediaries to gatekeepers. They charge fees and restrict access, create friction, limit innovation and strengthen their market dominance.
So the real promise of Blockchain technology is not to make you a billionaire overnight or to give you the means to protect your financial activities from curious governments. This could significantly reduce the cost of trust through a radical and decentralized accounting approach - and, by extension, create a new way to structure economic organizations.
The need for trust and intermediaries allows giants such as Google, Facebook and Amazon to transform economies of scale and network effects into de facto monopolies.
A new form of accounting might seem like a boring achievement. Yet for thousands of years, since the Babylon of Hammurabi, the great books have been the foundation of civilization. Indeed, the exchange of values on which society is based requires us to trust everyone's claims on what we own, what we have and what we owe. To build this trust, we need a common system for monitoring our transactions, a system that gives definition and order to the company itself. Otherwise, how else would we know that Jeff Bezos is the richest human being in the world, that Argentina's GDP is $620 billion, that 71% of the world's population lives on less than $10 a day or that Apple shares are trading at a multiple of the company's earnings per share?
A blockchain (although the term is loosely used and often misapplied to things that are not really blockchains) is an electronic ledger, a list of transactions. In principle, these transactions can represent almost anything. These could be real money exchanges, as is the case with the block chains underlying crypto-currencies such as Bitcoin. They could mark exchanges of other assets, such as digital share certificates. They can represent instructions, such as orders to buy or sell shares. They could include smart contracts, which are computerized instructions to do something (for example, buy stock) if something is true (the price of stock has fallen below $10).
A blockchain is a particular type of general ledger, because instead of being managed by a single centralized institution, such as a bank or a government agency, it is stored in several copies on several independent computers within a decentralized network. No single entity controls the general ledger. All computers in the network can modify the general ledger, but only in accordance with the rules dictated by a "consensus protocol", a mathematical algorithm requiring that the majority of other computers in the network agree with the modification.
Once the consensus generated by this algorithm has been reached, all computers on the network update their copies of the general ledger simultaneously. If one of them attempts to add an entry to the general ledger without this consensus or to modify an entry retroactively, the rest of the network automatically rejects the entry as invalid.
Generally, transactions are grouped into blocks of a certain size that are linked (hence "blockchain") by cryptographic locks, themselves a product of the consensus algorithm. This produces an unchanging and shared record of the "truth", a record that, if things have been well prepared, cannot be altered.
Within this general framework, there are many variations. There are different types of consensus protocols, for example, and often disagreements about the safest type. There are public registers "without permission", to which everyone can in principle attach a computer and be part of the network; this is what Bitcoin and most other cryptocurrencies belong. There are also "authorized" private ledger systems that do not include any digital currency. These can be used by a group of organizations that need a common recordkeeping system, but are independent of each other and may not have complete self-confidence - a manufacturer and its suppliers, for example.
The common denominator among all is that it is the mathematical rules and impassable cryptography, rather than trust in fallible humans or institutions, that guarantee the integrity of the registry. This is a version of what cryptographer Ian Grigg described as "a three-way accounting": one entry on the debit side, another for credit and a third in an unchanging, uncontested shared ledger.
The advantages of this decentralized model can be seen when comparing the cost of confidence in the current economic system. Consider this: In 2007, Lehman Brothers posted record profits and revenues, all approved by its auditor, Ernst & Young. Nine months later, a fall in these same assets led the 158-year-old company into bankruptcy and triggered the biggest financial crisis in 80 years. Clearly, the evaluations cited in previous years' books were very poor. And we later learned that Lehman's ledger was not the only one containing questionable data. American and European banks have paid hundreds of billions of dollars in fines and settlements to cover losses caused by inflated balance sheets. This was a strong reminder of the high price we often pay for trusting numbers developed internally by centralized entities.
The crisis was an extreme example of the cost of trust. But we also see that this cost is rooted in most other sectors of the economy. Think of all the accountants whose firms fill the world's skyscrapers. Their work, which reconciles their company's books with those of their professional counterparts, exists because neither party has confidence in the other's background. It is a long, costly but necessary process.
The other manifestations of the cost of trust are not in what we do, but in what we cannot do. Two billion people are denied bank accounts, which keeps them away from the global economy because banks do not trust their asset and identity records. In the meantime, the Internet of Things, which is expected to contain billions of autonomous devices interacting to increase efficiency, will not be possible if gadget-to-gadget microtransactions require the intermediation of a prohibitive cost of centrally controlled ledgers. There are many other examples of how this problem limits innovation.
Economists rarely recognize or analyze these costs, perhaps because practices such as account reconciliation are supposed to be an integral and unavoidable feature of businesses (much as pre-Internet businesses assumed that they had no choice but to pay large postal expenses by mail. monthly invoices). Could this blind spot explain why some influential economists do not hesitate to reject Blockchain technology? Many say they cannot see the justification for its costs. Yet their analyses generally do not compare these costs with the social cost of trust that new models seek to overcome.
However, more and more people understand this. Since Bitcoin's quiet publication in January 2009, the number of supporters has grown considerably to include former Wall Street professionals, Silicon Valley technology specialists and experts in development and assistance from organizations such as the World Bank. Many see the rise of technology as a new vital phase in the Internet economy, a phase that is even more transformative than the first. While the first wave of online disruption saw brick and mortar companies dislodged by leaner digital intermediaries, this movement challenges the very idea of for-profit intermediaries.
The need for trust, its cost and dependence on intermediaries is one of the reasons why giants such as Google, Facebook and Amazon are transforming economies of scale and the benefits of network effects into de facto monopolies. These giants are, in fact, centralized general ledger guardians, building vast registers of "transactions" in what is probably the most important "currency" in the world: our digital data. By controlling these records, they control us.
The potential promise to overthrow this entrenched centralized system is an important factor behind the gold rush scene in the crypto token market, with its rising but also volatile prices. There is no doubt that many investors, perhaps most of them, simply hope to become rich quickly and pay little attention to the importance of technology. But manias like this, however irrational they may be, do not come out of nowhere. As with the advent of the transformative platform technologies of the past - railways, for example, or electricity - unbridled speculation is almost inevitable. Indeed, when a great new idea comes along, investors have no framework to estimate the value it will create or destroy, nor to decide which companies will win or lose.
Although major obstacles remain before block chains can fulfil the promise of a more robust system for recording and storing objective truth, these concepts have already been tested in the field.
Open and freely accessible source code is the foundation of the future decentralized economy.
Companies such as IBM and Foxconn exploit the idea of immutability in projects that seek to unlock trade finance and make supply chains more transparent. Such transparency could also give consumers better information about the sources of what they buy - if a t-shirt was made with workshop work, for example.
Another important new idea is that of a digital asset. Before Bitcoin, no one could own a digital asset. Since copying digital content is easy to make and difficult to stop, providers of digital products such as MP3 audio files or e-books never give customers ownership of the content, but rent it out and define what users can do with it in a license. with severe legal sanctions if the permit is broken. That's why you can lend your Amazon Kindle book to a friend for 14 days, but you can't sell it or give it as a gift, like a paper book.
Bitcoin has shown that an element of value can be both digital and unique. Since no one can modify the registry and "double the expenses", or duplicate a Bitcoin, it can be conceived as a "thing" or a unique asset. This means that we can now represent any form of value, for example a title deed or a musical track, as an entry in a blockchain transaction. And by digitizing different forms of value in this way, we can introduce software to manage the economy around them.
As software elements, these new digital resources can be assigned certain properties "If X, then Y". In other words, money can become programmable. For example, you can pay to rent an electric vehicle with digital tokens that are also used to activate or deactivate its engine, thus fulfilling the coded conditions of an intelligent contract. This is quite different from analog tokens such as banknotes or metal coins, which are agnostic about their use.
What makes these money contracts programmable "smart" is not that they are automated; we already have that when our bank follows our programmed instructions to automatically pay our credit card bill each month. This is because the computers performing the contract are monitored by a decentralized blockchain network. This ensures that all signatories to an intelligent contract will be executed fairly.
With this technology, a shipper's and an exporter's computers, for example, could automate a transfer of ownership of goods once the decentralized software they use both sends the signal that a payment in digital currency - or a cryptographically unbreakable payment commitment - has been made. Neither party necessarily trusts the other, but they can still make this automatic transfer without the involvement of a third party. In this way, intelligent contracts take automation to a new level, allowing a much more open and global set of relationships.
Programmable money and smart contracts are a powerful way for communities to govern themselves in the pursuit of common objectives. They even offer a potential breakthrough in the "tragedy of the municipalities", the long-standing idea that people cannot simultaneously serve their personal interests and the common good. This was evident in many of the blockchain proposals of the 100 software engineers who took part in Hack4Climate at last year's UN climate change conference in Bonn. The winning team, with a project called GainForest, is currently developing a blockchain-based system that allows donors to reward communities living in vulnerable tropical forests for their demonstrable actions to restore the environment.
Yet this utopian and friction-free "symbolic economy" is far from reality. Regulators in China, South Korea and the United States have severely repressed issuers and token traders as speculative schemes to make money quickly and avoid securities laws rather than changing new business models. They are not completely wrong: some developers have pre-sold tokens in "initial parts offers" or ICO, but have not used this money to build and market products. Public or "without permission" blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, which offer the best promises of absolute openness and immutability, are facing growth difficulties. Bitcoin still cannot process more than seven transactions per second and transaction fees can sometimes increase, making its use costly.
In the meantime, centralized institutions that should be vulnerable to disruptions, such as banks, are getting involved. They are protected by existing regulations, which are ostensibly imposed to keep them honest, but inadvertently constitute a compliance cost for startups. These regulations, such as the heavy reporting and capital requirements imposed by the "BitLicense" imposed by the New York State Department of Financial Services on crypto-currency fund transfer start-ups, become entry barriers that protect incumbents.
But here's the thing: the open-source nature of blockchain technology, its enthusiasm and the growing value of the underlying tokens have encouraged a global pool of intelligent, passionate and financially motivated computer scientists to work to overcome these limitations. It is reasonable to assume that they will constantly improve the technology. As we have seen with Internet software, such open and extensible protocols can become powerful innovation platforms. Block chain technology is evolving far too quickly for us to think that subsequent versions will not be improved compared to the present, either in the Bitcoin cryptocurrency-based protocol, in the block chain oriented on Ethereum's intelligent contracts or on a platform not yet discovered.
The cryptographic bubble, like the Internet bubble, creates the infrastructure to build the technologies of the future. But there is also a key difference. This time, the funds raised are not used to purchase physical infrastructure, but social infrastructure. It creates incentives to form global networks of collaborating developers, hive minds whose offer of interactive and iterative ideas is codified in lines of open-source software. This freely accessible code will allow the execution of countless ideas that are still unimaginable. This is the foundation on which the decentralized economy of the future will be built.
While few people in the mid-1990s were able to predict the emergence of Google, Facebook and Uber, we cannot predict which blockchain-based applications will emerge from the wreckage of this bubble to dominate the decentralized future. But that's what you get with extensible platforms. From the open protocols of the Internet to the essential components of algorithmic consensus and distributed retention of blockchain records, their power lies in creating an entirely new paradigm for innovators ready to imagine and deploy applications that change the world. In this case, these applications - whatever their form - will be aimed squarely at disrupting many of the control institutions that currently dominate our centralized economy.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you know when the Rich Communication Services (RCS) protocol, also referred to as the trade name and (technically, RCS is based on the IP protocol) will be integrated into the new CROWN wallets?
|
|
|
|
|
Why Crain can't access his Bitcoin treasure until 2020?
|
|
|
|
It time for the DEX's to rule like KMD's Atomic Swap and others, they are the future.
Is very good idea. Result : Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digital Currency with DEX and Atomic Swap fonction ! Devs working on that!? Sounds interesting with less than 6M of CLOAK the potential would be as great as DASH or MONERO in the top 15 in terms of market capitalization but for that you need to roll up your sleeves or hire service providers if time lacks cohesion. Maybe a new challenge even for block chain developers or Chainsulting. |
|
|
|
|
Well, I see that your overall investment has been cut in half as a result of the de-listing of Bittrex. They are not the only exchanges. They don't know what they're missing for their business. It is time to be able to invest at half price up to the mediane line or even up to the next ATH. I recommend CLOAK and its environment as a financial "possible".
|
|
|
|
Development update June 2019Onwards and upwardsOur developers, Artem and Ashot have been hard at work since the last development update.
Version 0.13.4.0 was released a week later than we had hoped but was worth the wait. Everyone who has updated is experiencing improved stability, lower resource consumption and fast syncing. The network node count has recovered from its dip and there are currently around 1000 masternodes and 1500 systemnodes online. The systemnode count is still much lower than it traditionally has been because the depressed price makes them unprofitable (in fiat terms) on many hosting platforms at present. However, canny community members know the systemnode ROI is higher than the masternode ROI, take a long term view and keep running those nodes.TrezorThe final pre-reqs for Trezor integration have been completed: Bitcore-Crown and the associated Crownsight explorer the pull-requests to Trezor-firmware for the prefix change and explorer links We now have to wait for Trezor to push a new firmware release. These happen roughly every 3 months and the last was in March so we’re hoping it will happen this month. NFT frameworkArtem is still concentrating on development of the non-fungible token (NFT) framework. He has completed coding of most of the APIs (get, getbytxid, totalsupply, balanceof, ownerof) and has a couple more still in progress. He’ll be working on the documentation soon and we’re hopeful for a testnet release on 20 June 2019. Codebase refreshAshot evaluated the best Bitcoin codebase to migrate to and has settled on v0.17. This is going to be a complex and time-consuming process. He basically has to take all the changes over the last four years which made Crown Crown, and re-apply them to a clean Bitcoin base. A very rough guestimate for how long this might take is 3–6 months. Astute readers might wonder why we chose Bitcoin v0.17 rather than v0.18 since the amount of effort is about the same. The reason is account support. Accounts are the flaky wallet code for partitioning wallet funds into separate chunks. Some centralised exchanges are known to rely on this functionality. In Bitcoin v0.17 the functionality is deprecated but still present. In Bitcoin v0.18 it is removed completely. Switching to the v0.18 codebase without prior agreement from exchanges could cause us problems. The new codebase will bring security, speed and stability enhancements. It will also make it easier to keep up to date with critical Bitcoin changes and ease maintenance into the future. https://medium.com/crownplatform/development-update-june-2019-a1086c5d3aa0 Very well, I have been following the development of the project with great interest for some time now. The predominance of development over marketing and attention to technical innovations makes it in my opinion one of the most promising projects for the future, especially in the masternodes space where there are really few projects that look far ahead. I think also it is one of the projects with one of the healthiest and most motivated community in the whole crypto space. I'm willing to admit what you say but 3h of confirmation 100 or 150 confirmation for CROWN on = 2h or 3h30 MN exemple it's much very toooooooo long even for POS example CLOAK or VIOG or ExSolution coins 5 confirmation and everyone is happy. How can the mass adopt if we have to wait X confirmation with 107 years? |
|
|
|
|
I see that the fintech sector is exploding with new and innovative products and services. Since it covers monetary transactions in the fields of credit, payments, insurance and trading, most of which are processed in end-to-end processing (STP) mode, regulatory compliance is a must. Promoting innovation without the overhead costs of over-regulation and consumer protection requires a balanced approach, for which regulators in many countries have adopted a "regulatory sandbox" approach and allows authorised companies to test their innovative products, services, business models and delivery mechanisms in the real market, with real consumers, on a trial basis. It helps reduce time-to-market at low cost, improves access to capital and ensures compliance with compliance requirements. These regulatory sandboxes allow direct communication between fintech developers, companies and regulators, while mitigating the risks of unintended negative consequences, such as security breaches. It is nice to see that CRW meets these criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
I have analyzed your project, it is realistic and seems to be performing well. Can you confirm when the next division of annual percentages will take place in 2020 or 2021?
|
|
|
|
Craig Wright has filed a copyright claim with the US Copyright Office in the United States on the Bitcoin White Paper. According to Emin Gün Sirer, professor at Cornell -Ithaka New York, it is specified that according to the Berne Treaty, copyright belongs to the author and that the deposit of copyright for the original content is unnecessary. Copyright does not imply authorship and does not mean that the plaintiff created the content.
Intellectual property expert Alex Meijas says that once you have received a patent, all derivative works are also legally owned by you. This means that Craig Wright can potentially sue Bitcoin Cash and other forks for violating his work.
Yes CRW, this person seems to be honest because he explains that BSV's vision is a conversion to change what the BitcoinCore team has produced. (This confuses the new BTC programmer with the overlay of the Lightning network core, making the process illegal by not recording transactions in the block chain.) It recreates the cleaning protocol step (Bitcoin) with a clean version with unlimited block size and Op_return protection. Before starting, they would fix other people's conditions of the new nChain roadmap is as follows: figure https://bitcoinsv.io/roadmap/. see. |
|
|
|
|
I recommend to the person concerned
1. Don't put all your eggs in one basket" to keep in mind that there is no 100% safe investment and that it is important to diversify!
2. Make and organize your savings before your expenses, so you put your savings aside before you even plan your expenses. This makes it possible to hold his savings project, it's as simple as that!
3. Precisely, when talking about expenses, the successful investor mentions "that purchases of things you don't need will result in sales of things you need".
For those who do not know without going into details I suggest unilateral advice:
Invest in Yourself - Get Confidence - Surround Yourself with the Best - Don't Keep Cash in the Long Term - Observe Stock Market Indices - Understand the Company, Consumer Demand and Product Quality - Diversification - Never Pay Too Much for Shares - Know What to Invest in - Put Money in Long Term - When making a medium or even long term investment, you must be aware of the time it takes to act to achieve an interesting level of profitability - Be Patient - The best investments are the easiest - Do not try to anticipate the market - Continue to learn.
Remember that risk exists when you don't know what you're doing. For my part nChain and their BSV to my blessing.
|
|
|
|
How to grow a Bitcoin SV marketplace
The low transaction costs of Bitcoin SV (BSV) are paying dividends for a startup called FiveBucks. It’s a digital marketplace that connects service providers round the world with customers. The starting price for a job is just US$5, paid in BSV.
The entrepreneur behind it is Getar Hoti, who started the business last year and has already attracted almost 500 people offering their services—everything from “I will create a powerful logo for your business” to “I will record a professional British voiceover” or “I will talk to you in Italian on Skype for 15 minutes.”
Thanks to the use of BSV, no money goes to payment processors. FiveBucks only charges 10% for connecting the freelancers with customers, not the 20% that “most freelance platforms charge,” according to Getar, “and long term, with what’s happening on BSV, we plan to decrease this more and more.”
Since the arrival of BSV after the hard fork from Bitcoin Cash last year, “We have been doing great, because in BSV you have this stable ecosystem, stable protocol, a strong market.”
Although the service provider may only get paid the starting price of $4.50 (after FiveBucks has taken it’s 10% or $0.50 from the initial $5), added services can soon bump up the final fee. Getar says he saw a tweet recently from someone who’d earned $105 on a job.
“By allowing jobs to start from $5, we allow these freelancers to make money until a big business comes to buy from them—because they can’t just wait for one big job every three months,” he says. “In the meantime they can do a lot of small jobs for smaller businesses which have simpler requirements, lower expectations and generate some cash flow. It’s important to think of $5 as a starting point.”
Getar has experimented with some other digital startup businesses and is a big supporter of BSV, because it “does things that no other cryptocurrency does—and the immense opportunity here is that nobody sees this yet.”
The biggest opportunity will be to move to on chain transactions, allowing serverless data storage. That means “you can save a lot of money for you and your customers …Businesses will love this.” For the moment, businesses have been “sucked into these dead ends …like BTC, BCH and others.” When they “wake up,” a lot of entrepreneurial activity on BSV will follow, Getar predicts.
Hear the full interview with Getar Hoti on this week’s CoinGeek Conversations podcast: https://www.buzzsprout.com/241544/1183538-how-to-grow-a-bitcoin-sv-marketplace or https://youtu.be/XEfte4APyKo
Source: https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1134197213666729984
It's accurate, it's a very clean analysis, the opening up of "enterprise markets" is a fundamental key, but the approaches must be plural and unilateral. As long as there is no regulation, the big players will play against the grain, in the background. |
|
|
|
|
I look forward to hearing all the speakers! yesterday it was very interesting, today I feel it will be even better. Craig is scheduled to speak late afternoon here, it seems he will talk about Bitcoin creation (In the Beginning).
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone, conference starts in 2 hours, I can't wait to see what happens next!
|
|
|
|
|
Today BSV to increase to +98% with a market cap of $4116534356 following the interventions of more than specialists at the Coingeek conference in Canada in Toronto:
Jimmy Nguyen Founding President, Bitcoin Association, President, Strategic Advisory Council, nChain talk very good to BSV road.
Then a presentation of infrastructure with Bitcoin SV Node: A Development Update with the Bitcoin SV Node Team including Daniel Conolly - Lead Developer and Steve Shadders - Technical Director.
Then there was the Building a BSV block explorer presented by Simon Ordish
Co-founder, WhatsonChain.com
Then BSV Scaling Test Network led by Brad Kristensen
Operations Manager, Bitcoin SV Scaling Test Network Developer, nChain.
User experience condition The peer-to-peer payment experience
presented by Maria Eugenia Lopez Experience Designer, Money Button.
Then a debate WeChat wallet and boarding of the Chinese user
Lin Zheming Co-founder and CEO, Mempool.
The afternoon was devoted to the Developer Experience, Developer Documentation and Getting Started with BSV Development Ryan X. Charles Founder and CEO, Money Button.
nChain's Nakasendo SDK for Javascript led by Matej Trampuš CEO, CREA d.o.o.
Using _unwriter Tools on BSV
bye Josh Henslee from Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP Consultant
The subject Tokenized: Building tokens on BSV by James Belding Co-founder & CEO, Tokenized.
Discussion forum The Metanet project * presented by Jack Davies Researcher, nChain.
A whole other epic subject Unlocking the mysteries of Bitcoin Script
presented by the distinguished Dr. Craig S. Wright Chief Scientist, nChain
Then followed by: The future for BSV developers: Panel discussion
Jerry Chan - Managing Director, SBI Group and Ryan X. Charles - Founder & CEO Money Button and Jack C. Liu - Founder of FloatSV and RelayX and Rafael Jimenez Seibane - Technical Director, HandCash
This conference was rich in the knowledge sharing and divulgation of the acquired knowledge. BSV is a strong, solid project and ambitions commensurate with the crypto phenomenon. There will be other surprises to come tomorrow for the second day of this wonderful conference.
|
|
|
|
|
BSV +95% not surprising, we understand why! if you attended the conference then you will understand.
|
|
|
|
@BOoOBa - Yes, the BAY community is waiting for OEX.com to fulfill their commitment to be listed with their very important exchange.
Let's hope they are honorable and do it. I've been hearing about it for a few months now, with launch dates kept being pushed back.
I tried your project, it's viable. I wish you success because your idea is practicable. |
|
|
|
Satoshi is a group of three: Dave Kleiman, Hal Finney and Craig Wright. The first two have already left our world, so the alias Satoshi now belongs only to Craig Wright on a completely legal basis
Seems obvious, the rude morons are determined to refuse the facts. The world may see that this gentleman (CSW) is who he claims to be, when he decides. After all, he doesn't owe anything to anyone and Especially not to stupid Internet users from this place or around the crypto world and beyond. Understand that I am not young, I have succeeded in my life beyond what I could have imagined. I have various experiences and some of them go back on things when they happen. The basic principles will be organized, the same goes for the use of crypto in the world, it will depend only on you and what you decide to grant yourself and do with it. BSV is credible, it is a statement without fail. I personally support Craig Wright and nCHAIN. I encourage you to do the same. If this is too difficult then it is better to leave this place to go back into the shadows and stop making your theatres " in a nervous breakdown " and wasting people's time. WB |
|
|
|
|
