Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 10:57:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: June 17, 2019, 05:15:38 PM
...

I appreciate what you are doing! I understand this undertaking is a big ordeal that will take a lot of time. My only ask i's that you make it publicly available so that we can analyze your findings for ourselves.  I mean what's the point of posting findings if we can't go through the data and come to the same conclusions.

I make my claims based on logic such as saying that the Socrates system does not tell the user what to trade, for how long to trade it, with what stop loss and so on. So even if we had all the data, we would still not be able to test it because there are no objective test criteria.

If nobody has historical data because the Socrates system does not provide it, then the Socrates system is flawed because it hides the historical data from us.

The burden of proof is on the Socrates system not on us.

If I do not provide the data now then that does not prove that the Socrates system is correct. If I provide the data then anybody could say my data is flawed because it cannot be corroborated because Socrates does not provide it. I could have just made it up. And as I said, it provides an attack surface where Armstrong proxies can come forward with their well known beat around the bush forecast array method where they will perhaps say that this and that weekly reversal should have been traded only for a day because there was a strong turning point on Monday.

Obviously socrates should provide historical data, but that isn't happening.  I just want to test what Martin says that the reversal system will produce the expected result within 3 time units, nothing to do with the forcast arrays.  Also, did you buy 10+ premium subscriptions for the purpose of collecting reversals? If I could buy this many subscriptions I would, but I don't have the funds.  But you have this great dataset that is going to waste because you are afraid of some criticisms from "Armstrong proxies".  It sounds like you are trying to take a scientific approach with your experiment.  Well this is how science works, you provide your results WITH underlying data so others can scutinize and design further experiments based on your results and data.  I'm trying to do this because I see a flaw in your methodology.  The methodology I am proposing fixes your flaw, and can bring further understanding to this whole reversal system

Thereīs no historical data to user to test maybe because Reversals as standalone investment approach, donīt work. Our research group have built-in Reversals calculation inputs in our software to back-test it. But if you just want to test Reversals election entry/exit system you could just use a simple Excel spreadsheet to test it too. Our back-testing suggest some evidence that results are better than using simple trendlines support/resistance/pivots breakout approach, but NOT good enough to be profitable as standalone system.

Additional, one of the main Reversals features is that they change dynamically if the market make new highs/lows in next time units, so without forward looking capacity from a future teller or something that enable to confirm on the present that in the future the Reversal level will remain valid, it have limited use to trading/investing, specially the Monthly reversals which up to 1 month after election the system can come-back and change the Reversal level or cancel the election or simple change from Bullish to Bearish reversal election (as it happen recently on Crude OIL market). If your broker donīt allow you to change a entry made 1 month ago, you better of not use Reversals as standalone investment approach).

During the last century had been develop awesome work on financial markets - Elliot Waves, Fibonacci, Gann, Larry Williams, John Murphy just to name a few awesome work on the area that we had been able to test together with the Reversals...
1) ALL of them have some validity/value
2) some of them used together are very profitable
3) No amazing indicator/Reversal system or whatever is good enough to be used profitable as standalone trading approach


I started to regular share on twitter some potential trading opportunities that use Reversals, Cycles alongside with other back-tested tools that work very well combined with the Reversals, be my guest to look into it
https://twitter.com/ricardosousaIA

RS
2  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: June 13, 2019, 06:59:34 PM
Weīre mixing things here.

One thing is MA forecasts, which donīt have any value to trading/investment as the entry/exit timing is unknown variable. If their forecasts were of any value for Investment, they were not given for free from someone that charges so much for simple market history review reports.

 The other thing is Socrates which have built-in some good technical indicators (some of them with fancy names like Energy instead of regular know as Momentum oscillator and Cycles represented on fancy graphics/ARRAYīs instead of plain english cycle is up on X time frame but at same time is down on X time frame like Charles Nenner do on his research/market alerts service).

Some of technical indicators are very valuable, specially the internal calculation of support/resistance price areas (Reversals). But as overall standalone product for trading/investing missing extremely important features:
1) Search on database for setups/ alignment between indicators/reversals.
2) You been able to back-test your ideas using the indicators built-in on the software to find a approach that fits you and more important than that: Gives you confidence to stick to your rules when things start to go wrong on one trade.

As the system is a black-box system, that people suppose to use blind, for anyone that want to invest some serious $, is worthless until the point you be able to replicate the formulas/inputs on the indicators in the "black-box" indicators and youīre successful on built-in the data on a decent software with back-testing features or simple that let you export the data into spreadsheet/excel to back-test and to see with your eyes what really work and what is worthless inside the large number of indicators/tech tools inside Socrates. And getting it to next level, you use what work best from Socrates with what had been working best for you on the markets - Elliot Waves, Fibonacci, Gann, Wyckoff, Cycles studies, RSI, MACD I could go on forever naming good approaches/indicators as theīre +100 good ones. What been working best together along so much tools/approaches you only could know if you can test it.

Without back-testing it you will never know the real numbers/success rate/win rate to be able to manage your risk and build a trading/investment approach.

Using Socrates, is like driving your car blind on a well know route, it could go well and youīre a hero, but most of the time you will just crash your car and have a expensive hospital and car repair service bill!  

RS
https://twitter.com/ricardosousaIA
3  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: June 12, 2019, 10:10:37 AM
Who forecast that the Yield on 10-Year Treasury note would fall bellow 2.5% this year? Martin? NO Socrates? NO
Not a single market forecaster/analyst respondent in Januaryīs Wall Street Journal survey of economists predicted that:
https://twitter.com/NorthmanTrader/status/1138184175201193984

You know who called the timing of the last recessions? Nobody. Not the Fed, not economists. Why? Because nobody knows. Confidence and cycles are very tricky things. In case of the Fed I would go further and say that, even if they knew, which they don't, they wouldn't tell anybody!

Now back to primary reason you using Socrates/MA forecasts as investment/trading tool. Do you know what is the forecasts hit rate of MA in last 4 years? No more than 30%, so clearly you have negative expectation of using it as a trading/investing tool.

I will not comment on forecast accuracy of Socrates as it donīt forecast anything, is just a software created +30 years on MS-DOS disaster code & full of bugs but back then that created one of the 1st financial markets historic database of prices and some few technical indicators, on the time that most of the exchanges floor traders markets resources were made by pen+paper. Cutting-edge breaking 30 years ago, underdog nowadays to any current available technical/financial software available on the market.  

If you believe that GOD, super-computer or any person on earth could reach a hit Rate forecasting financial markets of +80%, why do you think he/she will give it away for free on his blog or sell that information instead of leverage their own capital with huge debt and put their own $ on that very accurate forecasts?

Over last 4 years, a small group of high skilled/experienced persons on different areas from Trading, risk management, software engineers, code writers, we have back-test +90% market approaches, theories, strategies including reversals, cycles, Elliot waves, fibonacci, Gann, Pii cycles and all kind of technical analysis tools (which all are basically derivation of the same thing - price, volume and cycles/seasonal information, which is the main information available on all markets). The main conclusion we had reached is that as we try to build a system that reach 70-80% winning trades, the profit of system would drop exponential as the number of trades/year would be reduced exponential and lot of confirmations needed to +70% win rate on trades bring up exponential rise in price risk (the % risk that you have to take or simply speaking the risk/reward ratio will be too high and getting exponential worst as the systems approach +75% winning trades). So, with that in mind, the Win Rate of system isnīt a good measure of their performance, risk/reward ratio or profit factor is much more useful.

I have attended 2 WECīs already and wasted lot of hours reading MA blog posts and I never ear/read in  
it the profit factor/ risk/reward ratio of any back-test in any instrument in Socrates, but read/ear several claims that Socrates never wrong, heīs always right which is nonsense to anyone with a basic understanding that financial markets are the most competitive markets in the world, so even the best traders/investors edge is very small and of course very far from 100%.

We have to give, merit to MA in one thing. Heīs a hell of a salesmen/marketeer! Heīs the only person in the world that can Sell a market history review class (WEC conferences) for $2750 or having people paying minimum +$2000/year to beta test 1 instrument/market access in the Socrates database/ black box system. He have top-notch charisma, when youīre close to him and ear him speaking you completely forget that what heīs saying canīt be real, isnīt possible on earth a system/super-computer that is always right or anything close to it.

RS  
https://twitter.com/ricardosousaIA

  


4  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: June 03, 2019, 02:40:38 PM


We have already shown how turning points are inaccurate


... or how we don't know how to read them ...

We do. Armstrong says that it is based on Composite highs are where highs or lows are formed on intraday or closing highs. So for example, if it shows that October is a turning point on the monthly level, it means that it is supposed to be the the lowest close for the month or the lowest intraday, or highest close or highest intraday. Same can be done on the weekly level. Many have followed Armstrong on here for years including MA and myself and we both have concluded that turning points don't work, and we have shown why that is the case on this thread.

Thereīs a misconception about the meaning of "turning point" because people confuse it by the english dictionary meaning. But turning point can be a low/high or simple a breakout in the same direction of the trend. How you use that information is the key point as their value is very limited before the fact and you only have enough information, after the fact. After the fact everyone knows what happen in the past, just need to look at a price graphic on the asset :-)

RS
https://twitter.com/ricardosousaIA
5  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 29, 2019, 06:59:58 PM
https://i.imgur.com/nwNXegi.png Also, a classic signature 'perfect setup' today. Fade the move on extremes: /ES and QQQ both hit support at the same time on LoD inflection points while volatility hits resistance, all on previously untested points. It isn't a 100% winrate- but it's close enough.

pls explain further your approach. You use NQ, YM, ES intraday futures data + VIX. How you see the alignment for a sweet spot entry counter-trend?
6  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 24, 2019, 06:29:23 PM
Yes, that's right a holiday weekend. MACD is turning negative on the weekly...


yes, I will favour short-positions in next week(s). 2nd scenario is that we continue choppy between Weekly reversals, key turning week for markets looks like going to be week 10 June.

I Notice that you have Reversals numbers wrong. I had tweet the graphic of DOW30 with updated reversals, enjoy!  https://twitter.com/ricardosousaIA
7  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 23, 2019, 01:07:49 PM
voilá! alexxxxxx4712@gmx.net

Thanks!

Alex

I activate newbies pvt messages. just pvt message me. Donīt post your email on a open public forum, it will be used/abused by spammers.
8  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 23, 2019, 11:36:56 AM
dirxtyxxxdetxxx xxxxx  ne@gmxxxx.xxde

done, invitation sent! you could now ERASE your message so your email address donīt end up on spam bots email list.
9  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 23, 2019, 11:26:37 AM
I have found the last couple of days' discussions very informative on here. A huge thank you to all that have shared. A few take aways for me at this point in no particular order:

1. GMW useless for trading
2. Arrays confusing as crap for everyone as sometimes they are 'right' sometimes they are dead wrong and sometimes what was to happen doesn't and is called a cycle inversion. Therefore unreliable for trading. More of a confirmation tool or a heads-up ...something may happen tool
3. Most important information for trading is the reversals
4. You can trade against the reversals long or short, but if elected the trade should be in the direction of the reversal with a tight stop above or below the reversal depending on the trade direction.
5. Daily reversals are mostly just noise, but at times have offered support and resistance levels
5. Weekly and monthly levels are more important.
6. WECs are overpriced and are a repeat of his blog posts
7. Private reports are overpriced history texts with little information offered for trading.
8. Armstrong does cover both sides in blog posts as he states if this then that, but this may happen too.
9. No individual on this forum can prove consistent profitability using Socrates
10. Socrates pro level is expensive and to add several individual equities is costly.
11. Recent and past private blog posts have been outright wrong with regard to timing calling temp tops/ bottoms, etc...
12. Socrates missed the up move from Jan to April - how? That was a massive move.

The list goes on....But I'll stop there for now. I have more questions than answers.

I have a video of a German guy explaining the reversal system form the VOD WEC a few years ago. Nothing special, most has been discussed here, but I will try to locate it. I do remember audience members asking ridiculous questions and not having clue about trading - as it appeared. It was once posted on the Vimeo site but I believe has been removed. I must have it on some drive somewhere.

What is frustrating to me is the concept of buying and selling against the reversals. If we look at the spread in the DOW right now there is about a 1400 point gap between weekly bullish and bearish reversals. This equates to a between 4.5-5% move.



5) Daily reversals arenīt noise, theyīre useful to trading intraday/short-time frame and it just represent what market do in short-term, markets donīt trend 70% of the time and as you come down on your time frame, more sideways/trend less is the market action. But you can make money on sideways market, your approach have just be completely the opposite of any trend following system/rules.

11) that isnīt 100% true. To be fair, he call it both ways, so heīs always right. For trading, his blog posts have negative EV (expected value) as it just confuses you and take you away the confidence to make trading decisions, you just freeze and do nothing after your 1st misstep on the market.

12) Socrates donīt miss trends as it have trend following approach to markets. If you refer to stock market bounce since 26th Decemberī18. Socrates started electing Daily bullish reversals in the end of December and Weekly reversals in Janī19 month end elected Bullish Reversals on US stock market indexes (DOW, NASDAQ, SP500,...)

The major take away you missing on your review is that trading isnīt about forecasting or being right or wrong. Trading is about formulating the possible scenarios and trade in the direction of the most likely scenario to happen. Trade with the odds in your side, will make you $ over time.

Most people have unrealistic expectations about trading systems/ forecasting systems. A trading approach that identify markets trending and enter on the direction of the trend only have to be right around 30% of the trades to make $. Socrates have a trend following approach to markets, so we should expect something between 30-50% winning trades depending on time frame youīre trading. Most people following Martin Armstrong have a misconception about that key statistic, they believe thereīs GOD and higher than GOD itself thereīs Martin Armstrong Socrates which can forecast markets with something near 80-100% hit rate. That donīt exist in financial markets, unless youīre able to travel throw time!

10  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 23, 2019, 10:52:53 AM
[

I can send invitations to anyone who wants to join, just send me your email in a pvt message and you will receive a Slack invitation to join ECM-Traders.

I tried but your settings seems not to allow pvt messages from newbies like me. Could you change that? then I can pvt message you. Would be great, many thanks for your support here!



There had been some years since I stop using this kind of web forums and I stop using it just because of all this limitations, link bans, etc. I received pvt messages from one of the members already, so the issue should be with your account. But I lack full knowledge on this Forum restrictions/rules. Sorry, canīt help you further, Slack invitations have to be sent to a email address. I could suggest you just create a alias email that will not waste your time checking in the future so will be no spam bots issue posting it on a public forum. 
11  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 23, 2019, 12:44:18 AM
@rosousa  ECM Slack Groups ? I would be interested to join.

+1

2 of them are private groups but ECM-Traders slack group I can send invitations to anyone who wants to join, just send me your email in a pvt message and you will receive a Slack invitation to join ECM-Traders.
12  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 23, 2019, 12:23:05 AM
https://imgur.com/a/VVpSY6B I happened to find the proof I was talking about before by coincidence. See when this was posted? JUNE. These arrays were in the Socrates system well before the Pro version came out. So how were they accessed?

Socrates has been available for many that have attended his WECs over the years. I know of an individual that has been receiving socrates reports since the time they were being faxed out decades ago

That's the thing, the person who messaged me had it for various products for whatever he wanted whenever he wanted while paying only for the basic service. Which reflects lack of security. As for this person who has been using Socrates for decades- does eh profit consistently? And how?

Socrates is just a software/financial instruments huge database. Itīs up to you to filter the best resources define rules that fits your trading/investing goals and much more important, stick to them without emotional decisions overrules/violations.

I have with me soccer equipment that Cristiano Ronaldo used in one of his best exhibitions in last years, the same tools and could have him teaching me for 1 week how to play soccer and score amazing goals, that will make me a great soccer player in 1 week? in 1 year? in 5 years?!  Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes


As a WEC attendee do you receive and examples or training on how to use the socrates system? Are you taught how to use the array, Directional changes panic cycles in combinations with the reversals, what about the energy and indicating ranges, pivot points technical levels, does anyone use these?
There is a guide and old posts but you really have to look for the information on the website to try and figure it all out, and as you can see here there is a lot of discussion but there is no real agreement on how it all works.

Just curious what the wec people get what we donīt, maybe with that it clears up a lot.

thanks

As WEC attendee you will receive some basic instructions and examples how to use Socrates. Most of the conference is dedicated to historical roundup of the markets and one of the most expensive history classes I ever attended.

People which arenīt already experts in technical analysis and have developed a good trading plan will not came out of the conference or after reading their materials with one solid plan.

"Everyone got a plan until they got punch in the face", if you didn't had a solid trading/investing plan before attending the Conference maybe you will get out of it with the Confidence you need to put some $ on the line and get your first punches in the face as wake up call.

Most of the things in Socrates are 100 years old technical analysis stuff, some of them with new fancy names. ARRAYīs on itīs "core" could be described as fancy representation of Cycles, Energy are just Momentum Oscillator. Indicative Ranges and Pivots were calculated and widely used by pit traders on NYSE, CME, CBOT long time before Socrates "born" and still been used as reference for support/resistance/reversals levels. What is unique on Socrates database is the amount of data it have on some key markets like metals which have +2000 years of data. As I said before, Socrates is mostly a huge database, is up to you to came out with a winning strategy to approach the markets. 

For my 1st impression, the members of this discussion group that had come to comment are discussion something theyīve no experience as never attended a Martin Armstrong Conference, arenīt Socrates subscribers. So just hearsay, gossip stuff.

On your defence, I must say if I ever come close to have the perfect trading system, I would not looking to sell it on a Conference/Report. I would open a Prop shop, hire and train traders to trade for me and make great $ for us like I did back on the years I played poker professional.  

Trading the financial markets are just like playing poker, it takes you 10 minutes to learn how to do it and learn all the rules, but it generally take long painful years to begin to Master it...  thereīs no short-cuts to years of experience.
13  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 22, 2019, 05:33:42 PM
Sorry, Iīm not here to discuss my performance or initiate a flame war. Iīm not here either to defend Martin Armstrong or express my opinion about the person.

Iīm here to discuss some of his work/models, which are valid and COULD give you a edge on the markets. Some of his models, are general math derivations and technical analysis stuff, Iīm not interested in discuss it. I see value in discussion only their proprietary models.

GMW for me is trash, I trade numbers, not words/opinion or descriptions of what happening in the market;

ARRAYīs is a very complex way of representing cycles, I look at them before my final trading decision but donīt waste more than 10-20 seconds looking at it.

Reversals are the most valuable part of his work (itīs just my opinion)

ECM models and Pii cycles frequency are valuable at academic level, I see as a big improvement over most of economic models/theory on cycles but think have limited use as trading/investing tool.

14  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 22, 2019, 04:21:19 PM
https://imgur.com/a/VVpSY6B I happened to find the proof I was talking about before by coincidence. See when this was posted? JUNE. These arrays were in the Socrates system well before the Pro version came out. So how were they accessed?

Socrates has been available for many that have attended his WECs over the years. I know of an individual that has been receiving socrates reports since the time they were being faxed out decades ago

That's the thing, the person who messaged me had it for various products for whatever he wanted whenever he wanted while paying only for the basic service. Which reflects lack of security. As for this person who has been using Socrates for decades- does eh profit consistently? And how?

Socrates is just a software/financial instruments huge database. Itīs up to you to filter the best resources define rules that fits your trading/investing goals and much more important, stick to them without emotional decisions overrules/violations.

I have with me soccer equipment that Cristiano Ronaldo used in one of his best exhibitions in last years, the same tools and could have him teaching me for 1 week how to play soccer and score amazing goals, that will make me a great soccer player in 1 week? in 1 year? in 5 years?!  Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes


What is the point of telling everyone that you have "invented the airplane", and then tell them that this airplane requires 10+ years of training to master, and that there is no actual training provided along with the airplane?

Anyone can claim that he made a super-AI computer that predicts the future, and the problem of all the subscribers' failed trades is simply because all of them failed to understand this super-sophisticated 72 models.  The problem of failure is always on others, not being able to understand and decode the "array" and "reversals", and never on the models.

If you claim that Armstrong's stuffs are good, then DEMONSTRATE it.  Anybody can talk about the "past" success, and nobody can verify it, because there is no way to distinguish that from fake paper trades.

Since you have traded successfully using such, how about showing your monthly brokerage statements for gains and all the trades that you did.

And show that in this forum that you can do that in real-time too.

By the way, you seemed to be an old timer with Armstrong, and yet you are a newbie on this forum, when all of the previous newbies have disappeared one by one, Strike Eagle, DigiLab, etc.  And yeah, you pick up the trail where they left off in no time.



Huh Can you be concise and to the point. I read it 5 times and still donīt get it.

1) I donīt claim anything;
2) If you were a member of any of the official Martin Armstrong / ECM-Traders slack group you would recognise me by the username as one of the most active members in the groups in last 4 years. I came to here because a new member on Socrates slack group that have attended WEC Rome few weeks ago have mention this group.
15  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 22, 2019, 03:27:01 PM
https://imgur.com/a/VVpSY6B I happened to find the proof I was talking about before by coincidence. See when this was posted? JUNE. These arrays were in the Socrates system well before the Pro version came out. So how were they accessed?

Socrates has been available for many that have attended his WECs over the years. I know of an individual that has been receiving socrates reports since the time they were being faxed out decades ago

Correct. I been on beta testing user of Socrates since 2015. The 2015 release of Socrates were more powerful and full feature than the "pro" level being now offered.  

Why is this beta not being offered if it is better?

Do you still have it and if so, can you post some real time examples of trades based on them with rationale?

(...)

The beta testa of a software ends when it is released. It were released few months ago.

Anyway, Socrates is mainly a financial markets database cloud software, is traderīs choice what to do with the information to initiate a trade.

I use mostly Reversals and Cycles. On the following link--->https://cl . ly/cf36fd7b7cea" you find DOW JONES industrial futures (YM) trading ranges in last days. As you easily notice, the market reverse often on Reversals and/or elect them and accelerate move on the reversal election when that happen. With that information there all kind of trading strategies you could build around that. Trade in direction of reversals election, trade against reversals failed election (the trade I have open right now on DOW30), etc.    

on the link use "cl . ly" without spaces  (I waste +20 minutes trying to post a CloudApp link, for whatever reason the Forum erase it and sign the link as suspicious
 
16  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 21, 2019, 04:08:16 PM
https://imgur.com/a/VVpSY6B I happened to find the proof I was talking about before by coincidence. See when this was posted? JUNE. These arrays were in the Socrates system well before the Pro version came out. So how were they accessed?

Socrates has been available for many that have attended his WECs over the years. I know of an individual that has been receiving socrates reports since the time they were being faxed out decades ago

Correct. I been on beta testing user of Socrates since 2015. The 2015 release of Socrates were more powerful and full feature than the "pro" level being now offered. 

More powerful and full of features? Can you elaborate? In what ways?

They cut of the ability to see the Reversals from where they were generated/on generation that will allow us to easy filter "what if" reversals and "what if" scenarios trading approach. They cut that feature in charts.
17  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 21, 2019, 01:45:07 PM
https://imgur.com/a/VVpSY6B I happened to find the proof I was talking about before by coincidence. See when this was posted? JUNE. These arrays were in the Socrates system well before the Pro version came out. So how were they accessed?

Socrates has been available for many that have attended his WECs over the years. I know of an individual that has been receiving socrates reports since the time they were being faxed out decades ago

Correct. I been on beta testing user of Socrates since 2015. The 2015 release of Socrates were more powerful and full feature than the "pro" level being now offered. 
18  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 21, 2019, 01:37:58 PM
https://imgur.com/a/VVpSY6B I happened to find the proof I was talking about before by coincidence. See when this was posted? JUNE. These arrays were in the Socrates system well before the Pro version came out. So how were they accessed?

Socrates has been available for many that have attended his WECs over the years. I know of an individual that has been receiving socrates reports since the time they were being faxed out decades ago

That's the thing, the person who messaged me had it for various products for whatever he wanted whenever he wanted while paying only for the basic service. Which reflects lack of security. As for this person who has been using Socrates for decades- does eh profit consistently? And how?

Socrates is just a software/financial instruments huge database. Itīs up to you to filter the best resources define rules that fits your trading/investing goals and much more important, stick to them without emotional decisions overrules/violations.

I have with me soccer equipment that Cristiano Ronaldo used in one of his best exhibitions in last years, the same tools and could have him teaching me for 1 week how to play soccer and score amazing goals, that will make me a great soccer player in 1 week? in 1 year? in 5 years?!  Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes
19  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 21, 2019, 01:23:19 PM
Looking back at alerts for the day, if LOW can make an open above 109.90 and hit intraday, it can hit 111.80 in less than a week.

If QQQ can open under 182.97 and hit that number during the day, it should be a decent short intraday. I am not a great QQQ trader however, it tends to be tricky- but the setup itself looks nice.

I also think UAL will visit 79 this week. Thinking I should learn to hold overnight sometimes, with smaller size and greater DTE. Am learning; holding XME calls overnight but will close if we gap down.

I'd also like to ask again, if there are any longtime Armstrong followers who consistently profit, please show us how.

Now with new micros US stock indexes futures you should be able to hold positions overnight and let the market workout moves between the reversals. Socrates reversals numbers works great on very volatile markets like QQQ/NASDAQ, OIL,etc...
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!