Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Thanks for develop this superb bot. I’ve been having a problem tracking notifications from BTT. Well, with this - I know I’d have lesser worries. Most importantly I set up a notification for new merits. No better news.
|
|
|
Y’all calm down with baseless price predictions. The price is fine the way it is. We ought to be seeking wider adoption, and not miraculous bull run.
|
|
|
That is a fraudster. It is best you ignore. I found a mail similar to that in my spam folder sometime last year. I was glad Google already figured out that it is from a spammer. Try not to click on any link within the mail.
|
|
|
Sometimes a mobile wallet offers encryption, and that is appealing to me. The flexibility and ease is also cool, you don’t have to turn on your computer to carry out transactions. Well, I have a mobile wallet that even supports trading. So mobile crypto wallet has been very helpful.
|
|
|
A project name is a crucial part of it's branding. One tends to remember the name of a project when it appears simple. There are also names that sound so appealing to the ears. A good name doesn't guarantee returns, but it has a great influence in a crypto project.
|
|
|
Anyone can make losses in the market. So yeah, whales can get burnt. As a trader, you'd notice that price fluctuations could be losses if they are not wedged against. I've met a few whales that traded a popular token get burnt for refusing to sell at the right time.
|
|
|
Have you considered getting a credit or debit card for yourself? It didn't take up to 30 mins before I got my last debit card. You could get scammed, because you'd have to bay before such services are offered to you.
|
|
|
Bounty creators are usually more concerned about the exposure and positive outcome that may result from conducting a bounty. The bounty fee itself is more of an investment. They'd have to pay Devs, managers and participants, but that is hoping that the bounty would be successful. It would definitely cost a few hundred dollars for management.
|
|
|
I'd say crypto exchanges low-key manipulate token prices. Many people do not talk about that, but we all know that is not far from the truth. I don't know if that would count as a taboo by the way.
|
|
|
I think the shift of attention from major exchanges is a good thing. It would make it easier for smaller exchanges to grow, and in particular for DEXs to be used more. That would also mean that there may not be much sell orders as compared to previous times. A bull run might just be lurking.
|
|
|
I can't change your mind. Only you can. But I'd tell you about a father that gave birth to so many children. Amongst the children, some grew to become successful, while others didn't. The children learnt so much from their parents, but were not completely similar. From the short story the father created the opportunities for the children, and they relied on the father's influence. I think that's one way to describe the relationship between bitcoin and majority of the alts. There would be no alts without bitcoin, and majority of them relies on bitcoin. Just so you know, I'm not trying to win your mind over
|
|
|
I do like as Satoshi is unknown. His identity may be bringing undue attention to the person and not the project. It also shoes how an anonymous founder can impact the world just with a good computer. The identity of Satoshi being unknown is fine.
|
|
|
Good advisors could actually be of help if they are consulted. Sadly, in most cases the core team just try to thrive of the influences of advisors, instead of seeking to learn from them. People get interested when they see some big names as advisors, but that shouldn't be the primary reason of getting advisors.
|
|
|
As you mentioned, looking into the team members is important. You may easily identify a goof, it is a fraudulent project. The way funds are used could also be examine. Although one shouldn't expect the get every information on funding and spending of the startup. One have to know that startups are not liquid or entirely transparent with money. If it were, it would be publicly traded stocks. It's not a problem with it though, private money is fundamentally different from public money. You shouldn't expect everything to be available as such structure could easily be replicated. And most founders are scared of that.
|
|
|
Sounds like good news. The use of multi-sig wallets is what I find most interesting. It reduces the security risk. Although I'm not a fan of most centralised products, this is a fine advancement.
|
|
|
You should know it's not just about having many tokens in one's portfolio. I'm only invested in about 5 tokens, and I think is sufficient. Just do your diligent studies and make well informed decisions.
|
|
|
There are always changes when bitcoin is involved. All the options you mentioned are factors that could influence the usage of BTC. I think centralised exchanges play a much bigger role now. If the trading volume is increasing in these exchanges, then new developers would be interested in incorporating BTC into their products.
|
|
|
I only regret that I do not have the patience to keep the coins to the end. I take them off very quickly. And I often suffer from this. In this way I try to reinsure myself, but it turns out just the opposite.
I used to have similar attitude. I couldn't hold my tokens for a longer time. I tried to change, then I refused to sell my tokens during a bull run. The reverse also hurts, but we move on.
|
|
|
|