 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Hello member,
I am new member in here. I don’t know about withdrawal system of it. Can you tell me something about withdrawal?
|
|
|
|
Disclosure Group Investment Bitcoin barred by the CVM in Brazil Jul. 25, 2012 Location: Brazil  |
|
|
|
I noticed Strange thing Some or most of the exchanges (require KYC to withdraw) - This is no problem
But Allow users to Deposit Even if they are not Complete KYC (in exchange require KYC) - Here the problem
after that exchange do not allow withdraw Their money !!
why this ?!
Why they allow them to deposit before Complete KYC
They say we follow the law Does the law recommend doing so? Something weird!
Often exchanges hide KYC paragraph (in Privacy Policy or Usage Policy) Or users do not know Only when They want withdraw!!
what I think from like this exchanges They want Attract Volume Without regard to the interest of users
I hope the post on the right place if not Please Tell me right place
Sorry if the translation Incorrect !
They'll probably answer you with some statement like : "We have described that deposit doesn't require KYC but withdrawal does, here and there, so the fault is in our customer". I know several exchanges who did this, and sadly they don't even give notifications when users are trying to deposit that if they wish to withdraw they have to do KYC first. |
|
|
|
At the early stages Russia ruled it as illegal, China outlawed all withdrawals and some other country also spoke against it. But now everything seem to be smoothing up at least on the government side. Surely Bitcoin must be seen as challenging their authority. Is there something I am failing to see? All it would take is a 51% attack or a new law.
Perhaps with such rapid growth and popularity and by seeing the enormous potential of bitcoin. it attracts the attention of governments to give statements about the legality of bitcoin. Although currently not many countries are adopting bitcoin and declare about its legality but it is proven that bitcoin can be a good innovator for the development of digital currency. And with bitcoin declaration as the official payment instrument, it is necessary to revise finance law on bitcoin services for countries that have declared their Legality. |
|
|
|
As the titles says
Regarding using graphics on the net and bitcoin logo
Is it open for public/commercial use freely? Or will Getty images / ect start hunting for using bitcoin logos
Bitcoin logo is part of public domain not private so the is no one holding bitcoin logo rights. |
|
|
|
At the early stages Russia ruled it as illegal, China outlawed all withdrawals and some other country also spoke against it. But now everything seem to be smoothing up at least on the government side. Surely Bitcoin must be seen as challenging their authority. Is there something I am failing to see? All it would take is a 51% attack or a new law.
Simply, Bitcoin is currently a decentralized open-source voluntary p2p network. Each of the above terms prevents specific legal actions from occurring to the network. |
|
|
|
I noticed Strange thing Some or most of the exchanges (require KYC to withdraw) - This is no problem
But Allow users to Deposit Even if they are not Complete KYC (in exchange require KYC) - Here the problem
after that exchange do not allow withdraw Their money !!
why this ?!
Why they allow them to deposit before Complete KYC
They say we follow the law Does the law recommend doing so? Something weird!
Often exchanges hide KYC paragraph (in Privacy Policy or Usage Policy) Or users do not know Only when They want withdraw!!
what I think from like this exchanges They want Attract Volume Without regard to the interest of users
I hope the post on the right place if not Please Tell me right place
Sorry if the translation Incorrect !
They'll probably answer you with some statement like : "We have described that deposit doesn't require KYC but withdrawal does, here and there, so the fault is in our customer". I know several exchanges who did this, and sadly they don't even give notifications when users are trying to deposit that if they wish to withdraw they have to do KYC first. Unless there's public information about their team, it's not really that bad. The bad news is when the exchange you use doesn't have any public info, therefore it's almost impossible to sue them. And in the end, you lost your money. There's no one will help in this case, so let's be wary and only use exchanges that don't look suspicious. |
|
|
|
Is it possible to do money laundering via bitcoin? I mean as no one knows if you have bitcoin and how much bitcoin do you actually own, it could be used to convert black money to white right? Or at least store your black money without much hassle. But there is the risk of its value but I think for people who have lots of black money and don't want to be caught, this risk might be worth taking for them isn't it?
What are your thoughts?
Bitcoin is many places is not considered a currency or money but is called a virtual service, so in some places, it's just considered as a commodity rather than as a currency. Of course I am sure governments will try to regulate and control if they see too much money is being drained from their country. |
|
|
|
|
They'll probably answer you with some statement like : "We have described that deposit doesn't require KYC but withdrawal does, here and there, so the fault is in our customer". I know several exchanges who did this, and sadly they don't even give notifications when users are trying to deposit that if they wish to withdraw they have to do KYC first.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think exchanges realize that they have to adhere to the FATF rule.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it is possible to launder money via Bitcoin. Otherwise, Bitcoin cannot be considered the equivalent of a real currency, because the ability to launder money is a "feature" of every fiat currency.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know why you ppl seem confused. If you want to buy altcoin, you need to buy btc almost always to get that altcoin. Example say you want to buy lisk, you can't just send money to coinbase or bittrex and then buy lisk with usd.
|
|
|
|
|
Simply, Bitcoin is currently a decentralized open-source voluntary p2p network.
Each of the above terms prevents specific legal actions from occurring to the network.
|
|
|
|
|
Most rewards in the way that bounties are handled are done in an anonymous way even before bitcoin was in existence.
|
|
|
|
|
That's like mentioned above There are many variations of the original design made by different companies. I feel those can be copyrighted if sufficient modifications are made.
|
|
|
|
KYCs are not the problem here. The problem I see is where you are entrusting your information to. Because their are certain ICOs that will only fish out your information as it has more value for them rather than the token they are creating. KYCs are a requirement of some countries' government as it is their way of regulating or being in touch with their citizens.  |
|
|
|
|
every country has different rules and tax rates. some jurisdictions have no capital gains tax at all. for instance, residents of Puerto Rico legally pay zero capital gains tax. (although if you move there and then realize past gains, there is a 5% tax during your few years of residency)
|
|
|
|
Of course it is possible to launder money via Bitcoin. Otherwise, BTCBitcoin cannot be considered the equivalent of a real currency, because the ability to launder money is a "feature" of every fiat currency. |
|
|
|
|
