 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
PLEASE keep in mind that while the dollar may end up as a safe haven for Europe, DO NOT expect that to last beyond 2 years at best. There is nothing which is permanent as we head into 2032. source: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/comment-from-texas-the-end-result/This is a complete reversal of Armstrong's claim that the dollar is the long term reserve currency when it would be the LAST to fall AFTER all other currencies have fallen. This is just another attempt at capitalizing on fear to sell more drivel, vis-a-vis reports. |
|
|
|
Martin is useless when it comes to trading .
He correctly call the low in march .but missed calling the huge rally .
For gold ,he call the 1755 high correctly .a correction into second half for gold means the stock might see some really crazy action ..
Not really true if you read through his blogposts back then: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg54513757#msg54513757He's kind of suggesting that it could be a temp low, but a real bottom call? He was still looking for lower lows later, and then retests of course. That's not what I would call calling the low. With Gold he's been wrong ever since 2015; and a correction into the second half of the year is also very, very vague. Armstrong is still calling this a false rally and a retest of the march low is still in play, the timing may be off but this information is invaluable. Hey what happens when you trade and your timing is off? |
|
|
|
Ok, then what is the magic number for shorting this market? Short the market after it has already declined? You will find yourself sitting on the sidelines waiting for these magical numbers to be or not be elected only to see the goal posts constantly move.
What a joke.
MA will provide the precise magic number. Just ask him in hindsight. |
|
|
|
No answers to the tough questions huh? Just insults? You are only insulting yourself bud by not answering. Showing your true colors.
Everyone can see you for what you really are. Ask a question that does not gel with your agenda, start the insults and diversions. lol.
Thanks for proving our point.
the answer to all those forecasts is that they are simply out of date. Socrates updates the array/reversals every day/week/month and you want to cling to a static blog post.  New reversals are generated if new highs/lows are made, which of course are not going to be included. That is the mistake that is being made so there is nothing to address and those blog posts prove nothing at all. That destroys all so called claims about failed forecasts posted here. The private blog of course would of included updates but that is conveniently never mentioned. They have already come to their conclusion why should they bother looking any deeper into it. Armstrong claims to be able to forecast long-term trends, years or decades before they happen. Now, Gumbi says that these forecasts are simply out of date. If I continue to change my forecasts all the way dynamically, I can get everything right. I will just stay behind current events by 1 day, and everyday I will come out and say that "see, I predicted the exact things yesterday. You all need to pay me and subscribe the private blogs." Let's see, Dow Jones next major test going to be 40000. On Jan 24, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wJ_BTOLxxoHmm. Isn't that too close to the sharpest stock market crash, and the great forecaster did NOT warn anything about major crash? "Great" call. again you continue to make the same mistake and cling to a static forecast which is what it looked like at specific point in time, but the market was unable to get passed key bullish reversals and time was simply up. Armstrong can predict turning points, such as the one in 2022(ECM date) with the Dow Jones yearly array lining up with the ECM. You can argue whether 2022 will be a high or a low at this time, we will ultimately need to see new highs above that made this year in 2020 and elect key monthly to yearly bullish reversals to confirm that move with confidence that we will see a temp high in 2022. but mark my words 2022 will be a turning point. Armstrong and his model can forecast turning points nothing more, nothing less it is your own misunderstanding but time is more important than price. If you like i can post the yearly array for the Dow Jones, the longer term has the most accuracy when it comes to the array. A forecast has to be static, otherwise it is useless! If a business is relying on a forecast, they make decisions in the PRESENT based on FUTURE expectations. What good is a weekly, monthly or yearly forecast if it dynamically changes when the forecast date approaches? The so called failed calls I saw were weekly/monthly reversals which of course are static until the end of each week/month whereby new reversals can be generated and elected based on the price movement for that period. it is exactly that a yearly forecast will remain static until the end of the year and only then will your position will need to be reevaluated if you are trading purely based on the yearly reversal points.Yep, therein lies the MAJOR PROBLEM. Look at the 1996 Oil futures arrays in the DOSBOX Emulator screenshot and video. Notice the panic cycles are EMPTY for multiple years, including 2020. What you are telling everyone is the FORECAST ARRAYS are updated EVERY time cycle! That means the YEARLY forecasts made in 1996 about 2020 will be updated over 24 times!? WHAT KIND OF YEARLY FORECAST GETS 24 UPDATES!? Does that mean the daily forecasts for an event precisely 24 years from now will be updated 8760 TIMES BEFORE THE EVENT!? |
|
|
|
No answers to the tough questions huh? Just insults? You are only insulting yourself bud by not answering. Showing your true colors.
Everyone can see you for what you really are. Ask a question that does not gel with your agenda, start the insults and diversions. lol.
Thanks for proving our point.
the answer to all those forecasts is that they are simply out of date. Socrates updates the array/reversals every day/week/month and you want to cling to a static blog post. New reversals are generated if new highs/lows are made, which of course are not going to be included. That is the mistake that is being made so there is nothing to address and those blog posts prove nothing at all. That destroys all so called claims about failed forecasts posted here. The private blog of course would of included updates but that is conveniently never mentioned. They have already come to their conclusion why should they bother looking any deeper into it. Armstrong claims to be able to forecast long-term trends, years or decades before they happen. Now, Gumbi says that these forecasts are simply out of date. If I continue to change my forecasts all the way dynamically, I can get everything right. I will just stay behind current events by 1 day, and everyday I will come out and say that "see, I predicted the exact things yesterday. You all need to pay me and subscribe the private blogs." Let's see, Dow Jones next major test going to be 40000. On Jan 24, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wJ_BTOLxxoHmm. Isn't that too close to the sharpest stock market crash, and the great forecaster did NOT warn anything about major crash? "Great" call. again you continue to make the same mistake and cling to a static forecast which is what it looked like at specific point in time, but the market was unable to get passed key bullish reversals and time was simply up. Armstrong can predict turning points, such as the one in 2022(ECM date) with the Dow Jones yearly array lining up with the ECM. You can argue whether 2022 will be a high or a low at this time, we will ultimately need to see new highs above that made this year in 2020 and elect key monthly to yearly bullish reversals to confirm that move with confidence that we will see a temp high in 2022. but mark my words 2022 will be a turning point. Armstrong and his model can forecast turning points nothing more, nothing less it is your own misunderstanding but time is more important than price. If you like i can post the yearly array for the Dow Jones, the longer term has the most accuracy when it comes to the array. A forecast has to be static, otherwise it is useless! If a business is relying on a forecast, they make decisions in the PRESENT based on FUTURE expectations. What good is a weekly, monthly or yearly forecast if it dynamically changes when the forecast date approaches? |
|
|
|
The monthly forecasting array on the Dow Jones was showing a panic cycle in March 2020 as far back as SEPTEMBER 2019. it called for February 2020 as a turning point which produced a high, March as the next which produced a low which was also a panic cycle, April was the next turning point which produced a high, now we have May which should produce a low on an intraday/closing basis. See link for monthly array in September 2019: https://ibb.co/YWqR9YpThat is what real PROOF looks like, there is tremendous value in Armstrong's work. Have you ever thought for a single moment that you could be wrong? People with real intelligence doubt and question things but coder is utterly convinced that I am Armstrong based on a PM message, as usual always jumping to conclusions  how stupid and naive do you have to be? The only thing it proves is that you must have some mental disability. Every single conclusion by coder requires a massive leap of faith. Where did you go for the past month or so? Couldn't take the heat on all the wrong calls? Think people already forgot, so you are back again to pump some more before the dump? Oh wait of course nobody here knows how to read an array. There is no discussion happening here. This is the losers club, I am already gone.  He can't even spell correctly. "Monthly Forecast Array Arrticulation" The arrays as you have shown MUTATE. They are dynamically updated using LINEAR formulas on a SINGLE TIME SERIES on a closing basis. Therefore, the arrays are USELESS because what you see and act on TODAY can be changed and thus nullified TOMORROW. |
|
|
|
https://vimeo.com/400842901This was from his conference Oct 19. I think Anonymous Coder is the real fraud trying to promote his website. Think, why would someone be so obsessed with hating on another man every day? If you don't find Socrates useful just don't use it, everything ain't for everyone.. Martin has been spot on the DOW. JAN 2018 called a sell to the day. Then foretasted a likely down to sideways market with, ideally a low in jan 2020. After the 18 high was exceeded we warned that a high on the 2020 turning point would indicate a severe correction there after. I have never seen anyone else even remotely more useful as Martin. The haters here are ether looking sort term or completely do not understand how to use socrates. I'ts not a magic computer giving you buy and sell signals, more like weather forecasting. Martins forecasts are very long term and he is often looking at charts where a year or quarter are one candle. As far as reversals and arrays, they tend to work great in a trending/volatile market even on the daily. Not so well in chop but you can trade against them as support/resistance on a range. As for him spending 11 years in jail, he was held in contempt the entire time without a charge and the people he supposedly defrauded did everything they could to help him and come to his defense... Anyone who is in the ECM group please send me an invite. the critical support in the dow during 2020 will be 24876.
the 2018 closing was 23327.46
therefore, to accomplish a 2020 low, the dow would need to close below the 2018 closing to keep that pattern intact. in other words, 2020 close of 23327.46 (below 2018 low) will mean it's a low... Oh really now?? So marty's convoluted thought process on a self fulfilling prophecy is: A low is a low when 2020 closing is lower than 2018 closing, therefore you have a low predicted by Socrates precisely to the day. otherwise, a closing above 24876 will raise the possibility of a high with a drop back down into 2021 before we see a resumption of the vertical market which is still on target for a 23-year high in 2032 in other words, a 2020 close of 24876 indicates a POSSIBILITY that it will be a high? or go higher? But it's just a possibility, so it could go lower, who knows!? and if 2020 is a high, then 2021 is a low, and then 2022 it just keeps on going up. People pay for this crap? All he is saying is a lower low is a low. and a higher high is a high. And are we going to completely ignore the FAILED OIL PREDICTIONS and the FAILED OIL ARRAYS!? PROOF https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg54266763#msg54266763HIS 1996 OIL ARRAYS FAILED TO FORECAST THE 2020 OIL CRASH! LOOK AT THE VIDEO AT 4:10. 2020. NO PANIC CYCLE! 2020. LITTLE TO NO VOLATILITY! Yes, these are all just possibilities, its not just so simple that the computer prints out a chart of the future for you. Marty, I mean origin-AL, I would agree with you if he did not claim to have a self aware, self conscious AI system deeply embedded in a DOSBox emulator. Marty claims to predict events precisely to the day years in advance. So yes, it should be just as simple as a computer printing out a chart of the future years in advance. After all, that's what you're claiming, right Marty, I mean origin-AL? |
|
|
|
https://vimeo.com/400842901This was from his conference Oct 19. I think Anonymous Coder is the real fraud trying to promote his website. Think, why would someone be so obsessed with hating on another man every day? If you don't find Socrates useful just don't use it, everything ain't for everyone.. Martin has been spot on the DOW. JAN 2018 called a sell to the day. Then foretasted a likely down to sideways market with, ideally a low in jan 2020. After the 18 high was exceeded we warned that a high on the 2020 turning point would indicate a severe correction there after. I have never seen anyone else even remotely more useful as Martin. The haters here are ether looking sort term or completely do not understand how to use socrates. I'ts not a magic computer giving you buy and sell signals, more like weather forecasting. Martins forecasts are very long term and he is often looking at charts where a year or quarter are one candle. As far as reversals and arrays, they tend to work great in a trending/volatile market even on the daily. Not so well in chop but you can trade against them as support/resistance on a range. As for him spending 11 years in jail, he was held in contempt the entire time without a charge and the people he supposedly defrauded did everything they could to help him and come to his defense... Anyone who is in the ECM group please send me an invite. the critical support in the dow during 2020 will be 24876.
the 2018 closing was 23327.46
therefore, to accomplish a 2020 low, the dow would need to close below the 2018 closing to keep that pattern intact. in other words, 2020 close of 23327.46 (below 2018 low) will mean it's a low... Oh really now?? So marty's convoluted thought process on a self fulfilling prophecy is: A low is a low when 2020 closing is lower than 2018 closing, therefore you have a low predicted by Socrates precisely to the day. otherwise, a closing above 24876 will raise the possibility of a high with a drop back down into 2021 before we see a resumption of the vertical market which is still on target for a 23-year high in 2032 in other words, a 2020 close of 24876 indicates a POSSIBILITY that it will be a high? or go higher? But it's just a possibility, so it could go lower, who knows!? and if 2020 is a high, then 2021 is a low, and then 2022 it just keeps on going up. People pay for this crap? All he is saying is a lower low is a low. and a higher high is a high. And are we going to completely ignore the FAILED OIL PREDICTIONS and the FAILED OIL ARRAYS!? PROOF https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg54266763#msg54266763HIS 1996 OIL ARRAYS FAILED TO FORECAST THE 2020 OIL CRASH! LOOK AT THE VIDEO AT 4:10. 2020. NO PANIC CYCLE! 2020. LITTLE TO NO VOLATILITY! |
|
|
|
Hi 'decipher11'!
I would like to ask you if there is any possibility to get the reversal pin script you wrote on the blog also in a prorealtime code? I don't have tradingview. I use prorealtime for TA analysis and Interactive brokers for trading. As since the WEC 2015 I first got in touch with Armstrong and for years tried to figure out how to use it....though in the end I always ended up being deluded because I didn't know where the numbers came from. So thnx a lot as now you made me understand where the numbers come from and they can be used as simple resistance and support assistance points. But as they lack any proof or basis bit simply are previous highs ....I am near unsubscribing to the premium level. For that reason: could you help me out getting the code for the reversals in to the prorealtime code?
thnx a lot for your answer!
Raylow, go in your profile settings and “allow PM from newbies” |
|
|
|
 Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedianMore comedy below: “ You must realize we are the largest forecasting firm in the world.” Hahaha. “ When the surge of millions of people tries to get in at one time, the system is designed to automatically scale up more servers, but the surge today was far beyond anything anyone has ever expected.” Maybe if you’re a cheap charlatan and set your AWS billing to not scale up properly you will run into problems on your micro instance when you get a few concurrent connections. “We may have to split the system further as some have suggested that each level becomes its own server group so that when tens of millions trying to get into the basic level, it does not bring down all levels”Tens of millions!!!??? Hahahah. So at this rate he has tens of millions of subscribers paying him 300 to 500 million dollars per month. Not bad, charlatan claims to be making 6 billion per year. |
|
|
|
|
In a recent show on FSN, Armstrong is now claiming he predicted this crash and severity, which is a LIE.
He is on record for saying there will be a minor dip and then go right back up! He never emphasized a major crash of this magnitude beforehand!
He always makes claims of accurately predicting the future in hindsight! If he opened his blog up for comments he would be inundated with factual criticism.
|
|
|
|
“ “The Fed is being called into action, and we expect a [half of a percentage point] cut at the upcoming March 18 meeting,” Bank of America Global Research said in a note before the Fed announcement. “ An emergency cut by the Fed prior to the meeting is possible — it will depend on the extent of market dysfunction.”” https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/02/28/interest-rate-cut-federal-reserve-118207Article listed at 02/28/2020 02:43 PM ESTArmstrong claims to have predicted the rate cut. Compare the date of the politico article above and Armstrong’s “prediction” “ We warned on the weekend that Socrates had pinpointed this week and then the week of March 23 for actions by the Fed” “Will There be Coordinated Central Bank Action This Week?” Posted Mar 1, 2020 by Martin Armstrong |
|
|
|
... Truth 727
You are as deceitful as MA.. you fail to post any Proof in advance always talking the talk but can’t show and prove one call in advance.. I spent 2 years worth of Pro subscriptions with him. So I have history and experience to back this post. I stopped subscribing when his DO NOT GO LONG THIS MARKET call was proven wrong
There was no numbers as he states changed the call it was all hindsight bullshit
provide the calls in advance if we are all wrong as has been asked by hundreds of of posters here
You can’t . It’s not cause you won’t. Be a hero and prove us all wrong.MA would love you for it cause the rush of subscribers would make His Socrates system viable for the future of his family which he states is why he has done this from the start. It’s not for the money it’s for his family and the average person that he states is getting done over by the corrupt big boys club.
Your answer will be a lot of shit justifying why you won’t
Now that’s my call in advance. You can’t do it
Riddle for u. DUAaFaFOff
What post did he say "DO NOT GO LONG THIS MARKET" ? He has a post that says "DO NOT SHORT THIS MARKET" but I did not find one that publicly said the opposite. source: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/training-tools/vertical-market-are-the-most-difficult-to-trade-even-with-30-years-experience/FACTS DO MATTER! Marty says DO NOT BUY THE LOW 4 days after the 2018 LOW Private Blog: Dow & Euro for 12/21/2018
By: Marty Armstrong
Friday, December 21, 2018
Now it is the threat of a government shut down. In reality, the cycles rule and the excuses are made up to match the price movement. We are clearly electing several weekly Bearish Reversals in the 23000 zone which is confirming our forecast that we should see lower lows into January. We do have another Weekly Bearish Reversal at 22739 and a closing below that could warn of a Cycle Inversion meaning down into new week bottoming perhaps on the 26th and then rally into the following week for year-end and then turn back down into January.
The main support remains at the 21600 area. followed by 21495. Taking out this area on a year-end closing will point to a drop to 19135 zone. The prospect for a low does not come into play until January/February. DO NOT attempt any long position in the share markets at this time. Be patient and sit on your hands.
Note also that the Euro is breaking to the downside as the greenback rallies. This is also a sign that things outside the USA can end up playing a key role in early 2019. This week was also a Directional Change for the Euro as well. The main turning point is the week of 12/31 and then look at January into February - rising volatility. We have a MINOR Weekly Bearish Reversal at 11302 today
So hang tight. Everything is unfolding in line with the cycles rather nicely.
TRUST HIM. REVERSALS, CYCLES ... Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedian Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. That’s a clear example of a failed forecast. Thanks for finding that. How long was he bearish while the market was already recovering? |
|
|
|
Truth 727
You are as deceitful as MA.. you fail to post any Proof in advance always talking the talk but can’t show and prove one call in advance.. I spent 2 years worth of Pro subscriptions with him. So I have history and experience to back this post. I stopped subscribing when his DO NOT GO LONG THIS MARKET call was proven wrong
There was no numbers as he states changed the call it was all hindsight bullshit
provide the calls in advance if we are all wrong as has been asked by hundreds of of posters here
You can’t . It’s not cause you won’t. Be a hero and prove us all wrong.MA would love you for it cause the rush of subscribers would make His Socrates system viable for the future of his family which he states is why he has done this from the start. It’s not for the money it’s for his family and the average person that he states is getting done over by the corrupt big boys club.
Your answer will be a lot of shit justifying why you won’t
Now that’s my call in advance. You can’t do it
Riddle for u. DUAaFaFOff
What post did he say "DO NOT GO LONG THIS MARKET" ? He has a post that says "DO NOT SHORT THIS MARKET" but I did not find one that publicly said the opposite. source: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/training-tools/vertical-market-are-the-most-difficult-to-trade-even-with-30-years-experience/ |
|
|
|
See, this is exactly the problem with Armstrong. How in the world could anyone have traded off this 'forecast'?
A) "The ECM turning point was worked like a charm"
B) "The Dow peaked precisely with the ECM, which often warns of a reasonable correction in the 20% range is possible"
C) 2nd Feb - "We did close the week below the 28,375 level, which implies we do have a correction in progress" THE FOLLOWING 4 DAYS THE DOW WENT UP 1,200 POINTS IN A STRAIGHT LINE
These are the facts, I'm not sorry if you find them offensive.
A) Yes, Armstrong is correct here. The ECM turning point (i.e., con) was worked like a charm. Never fails in its fraud.. B) Yes, Armstrong is also correct here. It often warns of a reasonable correction. It is YOUR fault for not subjectively interpreting his writings in such a way as to profit from it. C) Yes, Armstrong again is also correct here. If you looked in the rear view mirror as Armstrong teaches, you would have clearly confirmed that a correction was in progress. Now if you look again in hindsight, you will clearly see the uptrend. What you need to do now is wait until the following week for the next installment of Armstrong correctly predicting the past. |
|
|
|
So far, Socrates has been spot on which I find remarkable if this continues.
According to MA, a lower closing this week will mean that we go down further in February.
That's an incredibly remarkable forecast. Absolutely amazing. Hopefully it continues so you can keep finding it remarkable. /s |
|
|
|
|
