Of course lord marty is correct, if the market goes up then hes bullish and if the market goes down then he's bearish, he's never ever wrong lol.

 

Give it a break whatever you really do talk nonsense.

I think over45 needs a reminder.

As previously said, Gumbi's and cohorts' posts get replied to in a way that will remind them of the context in which we showed them that Martin Armstrong is a charlatan.

Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. Here we show how Martin Armstrong's fraud manifests itself. Beyond any doubt. A self-documenting case. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end.

Whatever smokescreen over45, Gumbi, s96 and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know they just want this message to go away but I am not going to do Martin Armstrong the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more.

The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing.

I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side.



Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!

Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that


Martin Armstrong had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?

In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!

If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.

You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!


And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!

More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.



Here is a detailed time line of the events:


Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Multiple software developers performed extensive back testing of the Armstrong Reversal System.

Statistically, on average, the system produces losses.

It is possible however to produce gains during specific limited periods of time. Still we consider it futile to discuss the performance of the system in great detail for multiple reasons.

First, Martin Armstrong uses the ambiguity of the trading rules around it to fraudulently misrepresent the performance of it in such a way that it appears in hindsight that it never failed, and he typically blames and abuses his clients in such cases.

Second, Martin Armstrong does not provide the historical data of the system for examination. We do have a large cache of that data.

Third he changes the rules of the system in hindsight to mark an obvious failure a success.

However, it is instructive to document a snapshot of the following large scale Monthly Bearish Reversals failure across multiple markets.

The Reversals were elected on Dec 31 2018 and the Profit/Loss for a short trade with a close date of Jan 31 2019, the one month unit of time for a Monthly Reversal is recorded for a selection of markets covered by Socrates:

Symbol	Reversal	Close	Next Close	P/L%
BAC	2511	2464	2847	15.5% loss
COMP	680595	663527	728174	9.7% loss
$DJI	2399720	2332746	2499967	7.2% loss
FCHI	499506	473069	499272	5.5% loss
GS	18151	16705	19801	18.5% loss
RUT	149877	134856	149942	11.2% loss
$SPX	268235	250685	270410	7.9% loss
TCMP	149185	143229	155406	8.5% loss
XOI	122281	115910	128401	10.8% loss
/CL	5070	4541	5379	18.5% loss
/HO	16940	16794	18774	11.8% loss

Notes:

The $DJI reversal election has been disputed by a Martin Armstrong agent on the grounds of a non-election of another reversal:


The undisputed fact is that at this time, the implied rule, the "Elected Reversal Invalidation Rule" as I call it, which forces the invalidation of an elected Reversal by another non-elected Reversal, does not exist in any of the Socrates reference documentation The Reversal System. The rule is therefore made up in hindsight as usual - here for the single purpose of discrediting this entire analysis - and more generally to fraudulently misrepresent the performance of the Reversal System, creating the false impression that Reversals never fail.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

This is tedious isn't it when marty takes on 1 person to write under 2 blog names lol. I just watched some of the video hes posted today, had to switch it off, just the usual lies and rubbish he spouts a bit like these 2 new muttons.

If you had read this blog you would be in no doubt about the validity of MA but you spout nonesense instead. I never traded one of his forecasts I only watched on as call after call failed until you are left with nothing more than a dart throwing exercise. Now he can't even forecast bonds so what chance has he got with any other asset that moves faster than bonds which most of them do? That would be a question too far ahead of mr and mrs mutton that recently joined or it could be MA trying out writing in england terms to branch out from his same old same old nonsense on his wordpress website.

Time to close down marty....and stop ripping people off...

Not really sure if you and this "WHATEVERBABY2" guy (nice name, btw) are Armstrong himself or staff people of Armstrong Economics (i.e. financially dependent on Armstrong's scam), but either way: why are you so obsessed with defending a proven conman and convicted felon? And provide proof when you say he's more correct than the mainstream ones, because his track record has been horrible in the past few years (see all the previous pages in this thread).
Well, my Alexa also generates texts when I ask something, but that thing can actually say things that have value.