Do you mean 100 were initially for sure exposed to covid in sufficient dose to certainly infect non vaccinated people?
Maybe better to have dosed the entire sample with covid and see the difference?


I will try to read about the entire experiment more deeply.
The 90% seems a open to a few factors that were not controlled and could have contributed to the difference between the groups other than the vaccine. Then again I'm not clear on the conditions or duration of experient. Will have look.

Imagine youd been here 8 years or 9 years and crushed the scammer lauda and stopped his fav scam dethroning bitcoin and made a tons of people into millionaires and pushed multiple projects to be fairer to all participants.


Then you got red tagged by the scammer lauda for presenting independently verifiable evidence about his past.
Then all his scammy DT pals added more red trust and admitted they gave you red for presenting facts.
Then theymos went on their side.

You think you have it bad. I know of a case where that happened.

Rather than begging for help for yourself only. Better to force changes where such abuse can not and will not be possible for all members.
Shame you didnt know lauda and his pals were known for giving each other 50 merits for fun.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2829282

No point fixing one persons problems the system needs fixing for all to enjoy fair and equal treatment.

Having said that I hope yours gets fixed if you deserve it.

I'm not sure yet but anyway...
Let's not go off topic.
Let's stick with the possible alts of Arcas. Aka nutildah, GP, CH and that other guy who is maybe from Indonesia.

Now have you examined thoroughly nutildah? And CH ? Maybe they are working together as a team?
Those two are always chatting away together or maybe to themselves.

I'm just saying don't exclude any possibility.
Are you Arcas? Seek only the truth however painful.

Don't get fixated on your first suspicion.

You see that outburst from the new nutildah account owner?
That's a sign you're on track.

Cross reference his account sale with his password changes.
Tell.me what you find.
Then cross reference those with CH and GP and Arcas

When considering who is an alt or possible alt of another member then consider all available data.

Listing accounts for sale is a big red warning.
Follow the link above.
Nutidah = Arcas?
That is a far higher probability that it being CH as you speculated above.
But I wouldn't rule CH out.

Yahoo will promote scams if he makes money out of it.
Of course he will have his DT dogs back him up like jollygood scammer supporter

They will run around tagging those in Yahoo's campaigns ( not other dts) lol for promoting his sponsor but then praise him and probably add him to their trust includes.

Yahoo will promote anything. DT will promote anything.
They just want da money.
What you are hinting at is not anything shocking going on his past.

What? You can even work that out?

Clearly lfcbitcoin could be the one that purchased the nutildah account when the original nutildah put it up for sale

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0

So the person controlling lfc would probably consider that the original with his alt being his new purchased account.

I say this is possible but unlikely. Both have never achieved anything and are clearly retarded.
However, lfc is retarded and has a poor command of English. I expect it is not his first language.
Nutildah is thick as shit but has a more polished output.  Obviously you can not polish a turd but it reads a little easier.
I like the word Chode.

I doubt they are one and the same. Bitcointalk is hardly worth the effort of switching posting styles. I mean you can for a few posts then just get sloppy and cant be bothered.

I mean when I sometimes adjust to Indonesian or Italian or chinese output it is fine because the output is immediately unrecognisable by the confines and natural flow of each language. Variant forms of the same language especially if not your first language is more tedious.
You need to have a strong reason.

The top 200 merit earners lose around 80% of their merits if you subtract that which they have sent each other.
Some perhaps  even more if you just take away their top 10 merit fans.

So basically merit sources and their pals send each other lots of merit.

It's far more akin to pal points or let's give each other all the merit so we can dominate DT and thus the best rev streams and enforce double standards on everyone else.

If you want to ask some of these " top" .merit earners to present their very best original thought provoking posts that made any real lasting difference here on this forum get ready for a deafening silence from 90% of them.

Here have a try with

Thepharmacist. - an moron defending his merit swag bag who has never made an notable post or achieved anything here.
Lfcbitcoin- his first 3000 posts are mostly 1 liner speculative crap or sports betting.  Youd get banned for that now.
Tman ? - clearly retarded.


Well most of them really.

Also your principle only considers those that have earned 1 merit.
Making the merit distribution look more reasonable than it really is if you consider the forums membership or even prior active membership.

Also why worry about the distribution of a meaningless mess like merit at all.

The real genius members posting here have earned in some cases perhaps 20 merits total and you have complete imbeciles with 3000 earned. Lol

So from millions of members those giving merits  out, give them out mostly to each other and their pals or alts.
I'm sure that principle is evident somewhere. ....like the central banking system, big corps etc

The selfish self serving colluding scum principle let's call it    ... pareto doesn't do it justice.

1. You didnt debunk or even try tefute any point I made regarding icopress
2. You're a proven scammer protector.
3. Lol at no red trust from current DT. That probably means you're dirty. Which you are.

Lol at the pharmacist i can see he is still opening his moronic gob.
That non achieving retard keep talking as if his opinion has any credibility.  

I think objective obaervers can see you're a pathetic drooling imbecile ready to suck up to anyone that will support you on DT.
Your judgement is literally meaningless. So shut up about it as if it is some piece of important and weighty data that needs to be given serious consideration. Lol

You're clearly deranged or a serious drug user.

You are one of the dumbest and least successful legends here. Still begging and spamming around on a 3rd rate sig.
What a loser. And a scammer protector.

I have clearly demonstrated that

1. Icopress uses the trust system as a tool for personal retribution
2. Icopress has given red trust for personal retribution on weaker and less appropriate evidence than he is crying he received it.
3. Icopress is a cry baby bitch who wants to be treated way better than he treats others.
4. Icopress is clearly trying to pass art off as his own that is the work of others.
5. Icopress appeared from WHERE? Never heard of this loud mouth twat attention seeker before lauda and tman started vanishing.
6. Icopress seems to be getting the nullius protection racket text wall defense treatment that lauda did.

Complaining about unfairness whilst presenting a solid case that has never been debunked that corroborates everything you say is not trolling.
Please stop promugating such nonsense.
Hate speech? Another meaningless term. Is this any speech someone else doesn't approve of.
Your post could be hate speech? Why trying to conflate independently verifiable evidence as trolling?
Sounds like hate speech to me.
Also sounds like trolling as per the rules.

Sadly a Red trust account has zero meaning any longer.

Only a type 2 or 3 flag should have some meaning but don't be shocked if you find that proven scammers on DT have no red tag or flag of any kind. Because they collude to prevent them.  

Red tagged accounts have zero meaning aka you cant say oh look a DT1 or multiple DT1 have tagged them they must behaviors in their histories that show they are scammers or attempting to scam or setting up a scam.

Even the flags that claim this are bogus for type 1 or can be.

If you were trust abused on the old system ( pre flag) you are treated to a red tags and a nice warning banner defaming your account as financially dangerous or telling lies that some members have located such behaviors.  This could be entirely untrue if you analysed it.

Repeat after me. Red tags mean nothing alone. You would need to investigate the entire background to the claim yourself. Most are too dumb or lazy to do that.

All you have are type2 and type3 flags to rely on.  Even then I would be checking for myself.
Campaign managers on the  big projects are working with DT to ensure they get the best spots regardless of whether they have red tags or can even make objectively valuable posts.  

Don't contradict me unless you can debunk my points with evidence because you just look like a pleb to those that will objectively analyse your reply. Bring evidence or request it from me if you're not privy to the core arguments around here since the silly new merit and trust mess was introduced.

Nullius is not on DT.
It is undeniable that nullius does indeed attempt to abuse the trust system.

People can try to legitimise any reason to leave red trust. These says red tags are worthless.
However one thing that always keeps catching people out is clear double standards.

Double standards are a form of deception and scamming. The changed my mind phoney defense doesn't work since they have the option of undoing their prior actions to fit with their convenient change of mind where the trust system is concerned.

People that have a change of heart or mind that suddenly places them or their pals at an advantage over their prior stated views ....well lol we know all about those generally.

Nullius is dirty in numerous ways.
Doesn't matter if he makes it on to DT. Plenty more like him there.
Double standards pushed for personal gain is their mantra.

Yes indeed.
However if there is no punishment or requirement to use red tags in a useful and credible way and there is clear financial incentive not to use them correctly... the guess what happens?

The system is wide open to abuse and gives financial incentive to abuse it 
Hence those controlling it miraculously have all the best sig spots and control the other rev streams.

It's a mess. Its undeniable.

Calm down and take a breath.

I'm sure that once it's all been analysed and found to be in order Trump will do what is required.
Those that seem to worry and complain about scrutiny are often found to be hiding something.

1. If it the rules have been provably broken = Trump and the US majority have a right to be upset and demand fair treatment.
2. If there is strong corroborating evidence the rules may have been broken = Then time must be allowed to thoroughly investigate.
3. If the rules themselves have not been broken but holes have been found and used to unfairly and inaccurately misrepresent the will of the majority then they must be fixed but it must be legally decided upon when they will be fixed.

There is no point either Trump or Biden trying to claim this until full analysis and investigation has been completed.
Anyone trying to rush or skimp on thorough investigation and analysis looks dirty.

Surely nobody can disagree that there is no harm in rooting out the truth.
Some shady sounding events have seemingly taken place. If there are not conclusively and thoroughly debunked you will end up with some very disgruntled people believing genuinely they have been scammed.

Some people make it sound very easy to cheat this voting by mail system. If it is then this could provide the impetus to plug the holes.
Trump or Biden? Let the genuine votes decide.

Perhap blockchain could help fix this shambles.

Will this not all get appealed to the supreme court? Or if the local courts feel there is no grounds for considering a case does it just get shelved there and then with no route to supreme? RG is a high profile lawyer isn't he? Wouldn't be pushing this if he knew there was zero evidence to corroborate ? I don't know much about the legal system.

I mean ruling the observers should be permitted closer to the counters now won't help them see that which they previously missed observing closely enough?

Surely everything contested will need to be counted again under tighter scrutiny.

I don't care which wins that much but surely everything must be observably and unquestionably and strictly by the rules.
This is a closely run and rather important event right?

This shit happens everytime recently. How can this process be so sloppy and open to such abuse?

Who ever wins should do so fair and square.
The numbers are super close in some states.

Tokens are tokens and go on the tokens board.
What's hard about it.

There are tokens that will be swapped 1:1 with their own designs later. Then they will no longer be tokens.
Then the project will need to be swapped back.
Defi isn't a scam. Most tokens are a scam.
Defi is actually a very useful tool.

Some saying projects that slip and perhaps lose 90% or greater in sats terms are therefore a scam are wrong.
I see some excellent projects that have lost 90% from peak that will likely reach new ATH at some stage.
Sometimes projects lose due to exchange bias and scams. Lack of savvy investors etc

Sometimes suchmoon is the second most sensible poster on a thread I contribute to.
This is of course a rare instance of clear sighted appraisal by her.

I agree this is a deliberate calculated and cunning attempt to claim these pieces of art are you own and for no other reason than to gain unwarranted kudos. It's not like you were going hell for leather fighting armies of colluding scammers and using evidence someone made to support your claims and forgot to reference it on some occasions and not others and gaining a 2 000 000 000 usd equiv air drop for the entire forum. That was apparently reason for a ban lol  NOT.
Laudas sneaky grafting others words inside her own paragraphs on multiple occasions and then punishing others for way way way less intentional copy and paste is worse than icopress but you should be watched closely.
"Those that are faithful in little things " ...

You are just simply wishing to look cool posting others art hoping they will believe you're the original source.
Then complain about a red tag for that when giving out red tags for totally bogus reasons.
I have no idea where you sprung from anyway noob trash. At just the time some other trust abusing scammer plagiarist leaves.
Icopress who speaks English with the same condescending shady tones as conniving cat. Both of who's plagiarism is gladly defended by the notorious plagiarism hater ..err I mean hypocrite nullius.

Accept your red tag icopress because by your own standards you clearly deserve to have it  
Sneaky little cry baby turd.

You use the trust system for personal vendettas based on way way less ... actually nothing that would hold up to scrutiny at all.
Live by your own standards

I don't think it's bad enough for you to have a ban. However you give red tags for nothing so stop crying when you get one for being sneaky and greedy. Make your own art in future.

I don't know if I agree with suchmoons choice with regard  to the voting.
However, people are entitled to do as they wish.

Thanks for stalking me though my fav BBW. 

Icopress should have another award.

Biggest hypocritical cry baby twat award.  I vote for icopress or nullius. Perhaps it doesn't matter they both win either way.

Hasn't he got a type1 flag which can be for any reason?

Type2 and 3 flags are the only sensible or credible threshold for "scammer" that we have right now.
If someone is a confirmed scammer why would you worry if they lost their PM privilege.
Makes zero sense

Besides if QS wants to reach out he can use primenumber7  or one of his others.
I see no reason not to delete confirmed scammers accounts.
The counter arguments are kind of weak considering the state of the trust system.
Credible accounts even alts take a bit of time and that's if they are merit source DT atls.

Where did this new stench of pure hypocrisy and scammer protecting filth icopress come from?

Looking over its post history it has a very familiar laudaesque pong about it. That condescending tone whilst being dumb as shit and getting caught out in double standards and hypocrisy.

I note it is enjoying the same over protective slobbering and retarded self debasing hypocritical dumb arguments voiced by that creepy old perv nullius,  that lauda received. Now on some red tagging crusade to establish itself as a " scamhunter of zero use"
Obviously starting with those that are not scammers before it moves on to those that are probably not scammers. So entirely devaluing and polluting the real warnings. useless turd.

This to me either means its

1. Lauda
2. Nullius
3. A member nullius believes may be open to showing him its genitals. Nullius is hoping for a vagina but even a juicy cock would have to suffice. I mean so long as its willing that's all you can realistically hope for in nullius shoes.
Beggars cant be choosers and all that.

So which is it?

Icopress - this is you chance to shine you pathetic cry baby.

Apparently although icopress can give out red tags for any reason he likes.
If you give him a red tag for something more sensible he will cry and beg his DT pals to help remove it.

Where did this noob trash dirty smell on DT come from?
What fellow turds have smeared icopress on their trust includes?

The smell of double standards and hypocrisy reeks the most foul...but their tears of genuine outrage at others daring to do anything remotely similar is putrid beyond what honest members should be made to endure.

Flush this turd someone.

No time for double standards scammer protectors or supporters who cry when then get some blow back.

Give your stupid awards out that nobody obviously gives a shit about.

This thread gets better by the post.

Now we have that sad old perv nullius complaining about getting trust abused.

Let's think about this.  Nullius account is resurrected to red tag cryptohunter for not even excusing plagiarism but simply saying making fun of their rather sad stories was in poor taste. Now nullius here again trying to defend plagiarism from icopress  after already debasing himself and looking like a total idiot and hypocrite defending laudas sneaky deliberate plagiarism.

He should have already a tag from every DT who should be holding nullius to his own publicly stated opinions on the use of the trust system.

Nobody can take nullius serious after that.  I mean that and stalking out and pestering members he considers may be female.

Everyone should be held to their own standards at the very least.
Icopress is clearly another spaz who thinks he can give out red tags for any reason he wants but requires others to spare him red tags for clearly far more serious " evils" than being ignored by a bunch of scammers and scammer protectors.

Lol these threads are more hilarious by the day.

These weasels are crying about being treated a lot better than they treat others? Go cry to momma icopress you pathetic hypocritical gimp. Bring some real gripes where people are treating you any worse than you treat others

Only icopress is allowed to use red tags for personal retribution folks. Same for that pervy ugly old turd nullius.
I'm using a special method to transform their tears into lube. Feels lush. Splat.


Btw Lfcbitcoin is a proven liar and proven bitch that will say what lauda or likely icopress tells them too so you can ignore that twat.

Ask lfcbitcoin if he thinks giving red tags for

1. Saying it is in poor taste to make fun of peoples reasons for copy and paste
2. Being on ignore lists.
3. Undeniable proof of telling lies
4. Bribing people and abusing the trust system
5  scamming?

You will find his answers very amusing.

Let's hear them?

Most of the twats here deciding if Whitemanwhite is allowed to use red tags in a far more sensible manner than they are shouldn't even be in positions of trust in the first place.

Don't believe me then ask for evidence you can confirm for yourselves.

Not one person here claiming what WMW has done is wrong would be able to defend their post sensibly in light of their other actions.

Lfc bitcoin has given out red tags to this account for telling the truth?? Lol is that allowed lfcbitcoin?
Want to deny it?
Bring your argument here for me to eviscerate.

The end result is WMW is fully entitled to red tag for any reason he wants like the other DT members do and his reason is far more valid than theirs. If you want to make fair comparisons.

We can do that now if you're still not clear.  

When you see nullius now defending copyright or plagiarism you can smell icopress is either lauda or nullius alt.

Icopress himself uses the trust system for personal vendetta. I posted on his shitty awards thread and he then gave me a red tag for... being on peoples ignore lists? Lol

Then comes crying someone else has correctly noticed he is using on many many different occasions many many examples of other peoples work with no references at all.  These were not intended for his use or purpose.

So he is a hypocrite and pathetic cry baby duplicitous weasel who looks shady and by his own standards clearly meets the threshold for red trust.

If you see nullius defending someone that is usually the gold standard to tell if they are dangerous and high risk.
I suspect this icopress is lauda or nullius. Look at his prior posts they stink of lauda.

He deserves red tags by his own standards of giving them out.
Let him live by his own standards.