 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
I believe it is a relevant question because it contradicts the current narrative which deflects all responsibility for delays away from the IOTA Foundation. After years without shipping a working decentralised Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), the IOTA Foundation has successfully pushed the following narrative to the market: Innovation is unpredictable!
Blame Sergey Ivancheglo!
Delays are normal in software! Nobody seems to take into account the fact that none of the current members of the Board of Directors (BoD) of the IF has never managed a company with real customers for more than 5 months. If we exclude mini-startups and solopreneur projects, none has managed a company ever. Ralf Rottmann was the only member with previous management experience. On 13 August 2018, after the Board leak, the Board of Directors signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) where Ralf Rottmann tried, among other things, to stop the members of the Board from interfering in day-to-day operations. Presumably, to prevent them from managing the IOTA Foundation with zero management experience as well as from using the IOTA Foundation for personal profit ( David using the BoD to advance Jinn, his own private company). The MoU included a whole section about this topic (section 2 titled "*Role of the Board of Directors and Organizational Development*"), which reads as follows: 1.c. The BoD's primary roles and responsibilities are: [...] Setting goals for the Executive Team.
2.f. The Executive Team will run day-to-day operations of IOTA Foundation as the BoD members gradually step back from all operational tasks. On 14 August 2018, one day after signing the MoU, Ralf Rottmann was visibly excited: Good evening! We’ve reached a milestone and I couldn’t be more happy! — We are currently discussing to release a part of the MoU that describes in detail, how we envision the interaction between the BoD and the (new) Executive Team. I am actually working on a blog post detailing the IF organization and making it a lot more transparent. One key change: The Executive Team will be empowered to run the day-to-day operation, while the Board will focus on setting direction, strategy and budget. On 29 March 2019 Ralf Rottmann left the Board and insisted at the time: IOTA Foundation succeeded to build and grow a super capable Executive Leadership team and I am a huge advocate for Governing Boards to not interfere with day-to-day operations. On 30 March 2019, one day later, Ralf Rottmann insisted again on the same idea: As I outlined in my medium post: IF has managed to hire an awesome executive leadership team. One, that I don’t need to “govern” anymore. In fact, I haven’t added a lot of value for a longer period now, apart from representing IOTA Foundation with my name and evangelizing it to people in the industry. One year after Ralf Rottmann left the IOTA Foundation, and despite their absolute lack of management experience, the members of the Board of Directors are still involved in day-to-day operations of the IOTA Foundation, from software through marketing to sales and partnerships projects. The IOTA Foundation claims that the constant delays in shipping working decentralised DLT are due to a variety of reasons. When they were working on cutting edge concepts, they placed the blame on the unpredictability of innovative projects. When they stopped working on cutting edge concepts, they placed the blame on Sergey Ivancheglo. Now that Sergey is gone, they blame the intrinsic nature of software development. Lack of business management experience should also be taken into account when analysing the reasons behind the dismal performance of the IOTA Foundation. |
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know if a member of the Board of Directors of the IOTA Foundation has managed a company with real customers for more than 5 months? Who? Which company?
|
|
|
|
sounds really like a bad joke when you´ve heard Sønstebø´s official noble statements like "I´ve sold almost nothing", "here for the tech, not for the money", (overdrawn) "frozen pizza 4ever" etc., and then see his shady "behind the scenes"-palaver/behavior.
That's true. David seems to have very different public and private discourses regarding his motivation. Here is a summary: David Sønstebø in private: The moneyOn 29 March 2018 David Sønstebø said privately: Well I see one reason: we lose total control of IOTA, all the work we've done, all the strategy I've had since day 1 will be lost in an instance [sic] as we no longer control the board. Jinn will not sell millions upon millions of chips and become a household name, it will die. I will quit instantly as I am no longer able to carry out any master plan. This has been our strategy since before we even started Jinn, but in order to carry it out the two of us MUST be on the same page and we MUST have the majority in the board.
I genuinely suggest reading up on the strategy of the roman generals both in the battlefield and in the senate
This is no game On 13 September 2018 David Sønstebø said privately: I will take this here rather than IF Slack
With this our entire strategy for Jinn is gone
I will be selling most of my iotas at the next bull run and then reconsider Jinn's purpose, as we no longer have a path to market On 6 December 2019 David Sønstebø said privately: I refuse to be fucked over by you suddenly announcing a fork and crashing all my value after you cashed out.
It will be a fork meaning 1) The market will crash
that’s a fork that affects my iotas and our Jinn iotas.
Oh, I can? So I should sell now, at 20 cents. Right that’s fair. Since you seem hellbent on not giving a fuck, the only fair road forward is then that you announce your fork post-Coordicide (and all the other major events upcoming in IOTA), when the price presumably goes high. We split Jinn funds and make a joint-announcement. I refuse to be fucked over anymore and have literally years of my life go to waste.
Nowhere close. In those 5 years I could easily have had much, much more (than $30 millions), even without IOTA; so **until the price of IOTA goes back to 60 cents fuck that**.
But don’t touch those iotas, don’t liquidate anything. Remember the goal here is to boost their value and there are some major, major things going on right now that will assist in that David Sønstebø in public: The visionOn 4 February 2020 David Sønstebø said publicly: Fuck sake, me and Dom (and others in IF and the community) live this shit. We could just cash out years ago, be multimillionaires and chill in some extravagant mansion at some tropical seashore somewhere posting stupid instagram photos with lavish toys and scantily clad women. All with a clean conscience knowing we made everyone who believed in us millionaires. Instead we are exhausting ourselves in front of computers to make our vision a reality. On 3 July 2020 David Sønstebø said publicly: One of the things that you learn coming into this distributed crypto space is that a lot of the people are essentially just out for money. They’re not out for the technology. They’re not out for the ethos, or vision or whatever you want to call it. And if you trust those people, you will get burned. On 16 July 2020 David Sønstebø said: Zero regrets. I much prefer to have a clean conscience and know that everyone that believed in me got a historical payoff. You can't put a price on liberty. I keep working on my IOTA vision out of passion and conviction, not money. I will look for the ones you mention ("I´ve sold almost nothing", "here for the tech, not for the money", "frozen pizza 4ever) to add them. |
|
|
|
A new IOTA leak shows that David Sønstebø planned to sell his stake of iotas if he couldn't use the Board of Directors of the IOTA Foundation to make Jinn a success
Plans to sellOn 26 May 2018 Richard Soley joined the Supervisory Board of the IOTA Foundation. Three days later, on 29 March 2018, David Sønstebø said:  Three months later, on 8 August 2018, Ralf Rottmann, the first member of the Board of Directors who was not a co-founder, said: We sometimes forget that the founders chose a *foundation* for a reason. That’s at least my impression. A foundation has no boss. No owner. No founder. No shareholders. All of these superiors roles deliberately cease to exist the moment you decide to do a foundation. For the simple reason to *avoid power grabs at all cost*. Because power grabs are almost always an indication for not being a charitable non-profit. Shortly after, Ralf Rottmann resigned from his position. On 13 September 2018 David Sønstebø said:  On 6 December 2019 David Sønstebø asked Sergey Ivancheglo to not announce the fork before he could dump his tokens on the market at 0,60 cents:  On 4 February 2020, after David Sønstebø and Sergey Ivancheglo announced their breakup, David Sønstebø announced that Jinn was dead:  Remember what David Sønstebø said he would do if Jinn could not be a success: Jinn will not sell millions upon millions of chips and become a household name, it will die. I will quit instantly as I am no longer able to carry out any mater plan.
With this our entire strategy for Jinn is gone. I will be selling most of my iotas at the next bull run. Amount to sellApart from his personal stake, David Sønstebø owns 50% of an 86 Ti family-fund (43Ti):  Through IOTA AS (aka. Jinn Labs) David Sønstebø also owns, or claims to own, non-reclaimed IOTA tokens (81 Ti):  David Sønstebø also own payments from the IOTA Foundation to IOTA AS in exchange for IP assets (13.5 Ti).  In other words, David Sønstebø owns, at least, 4,95% of the total supply of IOTA tokens. An amount much bigger than the 0.8% per founder he claimed in 2017. AnalysisThis new leak includes the first two screenshots in this post. Sergey Ivancheglo (aka. CfB, Come-from-Beyond) provided these screenshots to me in a private conversation on 24 June 2020 and gave his consent for publication. On 16 July 2020, after I published the leak in Discord, David Sønstebø said in a poor attempt to control the damage that he remained committed to the IOTA vision (no mention to the Jinn vision): Zero regrets. I much prefer to have a clean conscience and know that everyone that believed in me got a historical payoff. You can't put a price on liberty. I keep working on my IOTA vision out of passion and conviction, not money. However, it is hard to believe him. Now that everybody knows that David Sønstebø's planned to sell his iotas if he couldn't make Jinn a success, that Jinn is dead indeed and that David's planned exit price is 0,60 cents, everybody will set their ask orders below "the Sønstebø resistance". Once David gets tired of waiting for the pump (believers buying the Coordicide rumor), he will probably dump his stake and the IOTA "Community" will become a legion of Carlos Matos. In the light of the above information, speculators should be extremely careful regarding iota tokens and buy the rumor and sell the news at their own peril. *** THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE. I AM JUST DISSEMINATING SOME OF THE FINDINGS OF THE #cleanIOTA INVESTIGATION ***
|
|
|
|
He was never hiding his hacker background and even talked a bit about it in a big german TV show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeHWXXWa--oThere are no english subtitles, but he basically says, that he - maybe among other things - hacked Call of Duty to become the #1 player in this game. He also sold these "opportunities" (as he calls it) to other players then. It's not a crime or illegal according to his point of view. This is simply not true. He did hide it. Hacking computer games is not the same as Hacking and defacing websites, installing keyloggers, selling administration logins, selling site databases, and buying, using and selling remote access trojans. Don't forget that he stole all the identification information from people trying to reclaim their lost IOTA. 2 years later and those same people are asking where their lost IOTA is and what happened with all the personal information they sent to this "hacker". For the sake of clarity: - "Unclaimed" are IOTA tokens which have never been claimed after the initial IOTA token sale.
- "Non-reclaimed" are IOTA tokens which have not been reclaimed after protocol upgrades.
Questions: - 1. With "trying to reclaim" do you mean "unclaimed" or "non-reclaimed" IOTA tokens?
- 2. How do you know that Dominik Schiener "stole" this personal information and didn't simply use it for the KYC process and destroy it afterwards?
- 3. Where can I find information of people that completed the IOTA reclaim process ands still didn't receive their IOTA tokens?
|
|
|
|
Circumstantial evidence points to Dominik Schiener, co-founder of the IOTA Foundation, being the criminal hacker known as Cystomatic aka. Alhalama.
Several pieces of evidence show the connection between the hacker Cystomatic (aka. Alhalama) and Dominik Schiener: - Cystomatic created a MySpace account with the name "Dominik Schiener".
- Cystomatic announced a social media marketing project similar to Fileyy.com, Dominik Schiener's first startup.
- Cystomatic announced plans to relocate his Affiliate Marketing business (Fileyy.com?) to Malta. As Dominik Schiener, Cystomatic is Italian, speaks German, is a precocious entrepreneur, is working on an Internet Marketing project and is fond of tax havens.
- Cystomatic requests quote to create the logo for Fileyy.com. The winning logo was the same used by Fileyy.com and by Dominik Schiener in his LinkedIn page.
The following evidence shows that Cystomatic changed his name to Alhalama and, therefore, Cystomatic and Alhalama are the same person. - In the Hack Forums, Cystomatic says "Nice, tell me again how much of a marketer you are, and how long your crypter will stay FUD". Cystomatic later changes his username to "Alhalama". However, another user has already quoted Cystomatic's sentence and, as a result, the connection between both usernames is revealed.
- Alhalama contact details are the same as Cystomatic's.
Crimes committed by Cystomatic aka. Alhalama include hacking and defacing websites, installing keyloggers, selling administration logins, selling site databases, and buying, using and selling remote access trojans. - Alhalama hacks 11 sites on 6 June 2011.
- Alhalama defaces 2 sites on 12 June 2011.
- Alhalama hacks 1 site on 13 June 2011.
- Alhalama sells site admin logins and databases on 18 June 2011.
- Alhalama celebrates his success using the Rapzo Keylogger on 21 June 2011.
- Alhalama sells a Blackshades VPN and Blackshades RAT. Blackshades infects the victim's computer when the victim visits a malicious webpage (drive-by download). The FBI run operations in 2012 and 2014 to combat the use of Blackshades, which led to the arrest of near 100 people in 19 countries.
After starting IOTA, Dominik Schiener described his hacking experience: "I started hacking computer games when I was 14 and then sold these modifications and earned a fair amount of income for my age and effort. With the money, I then tried to build an advertising platform" "And so with that experience I started going on this quest, kind of hustling, like bring out what kind of product I should create to make money because at the time I really wanted to be independent. I wanted to make money so I don't rely on anyone". The IOTA community and investors have the right to know this information. I have posted it in r/Iota and r/IOTAmarkets but the posts have been removed. Sources:
|
|
|
|
I hope you have success in your investigations and hope you post updates here as and when you able to. Thank you for your support. I will keep on posting here the main findings. |
|
|
|
He was never hiding his hacker background and even talked a bit about it in a big german TV show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeHWXXWa--oThere are no english subtitles, but he basically says, that he - maybe among other things - hacked Call of Duty to become the #1 player in this game. He also sold these "opportunities" (as he calls it) to other players then. It's not a crime or illegal according to his point of view. This is simply not true. He did hide it. Hacking computer games is not the same as Hacking and defacing websites, installing keyloggers, selling administration logins, selling site databases, and buying, using and selling remote access trojans. |
|
|
|
Circumstantial evidence points to Dominik Schiener, co-founder of the IOTA Foundation, being the criminal hacker known as Cystomatic aka. Alhalama.
Several pieces of evidence show the connection between the hacker Cystomatic (aka. Alhalama) and Dominik Schiener: - Cystomatic created a MySpace account with the name "Dominik Schiener".
- Cystomatic announced a social media marketing project similar to Fileyy.com, Dominik Schiener's first startup.
- Cystomatic announced plans to relocate his Affiliate Marketing business (Fileyy.com?) to Malta. As Dominik Schiener, Cystomatic is Italian, speaks German, is a precocious entrepreneur, is working on an Internet Marketing project and is fond of tax havens.
- Cystomatic requests quote to create the logo for Fileyy.com. The winning logo was the same used by Fileyy.com and by Dominik Schiener in his LinkedIn page.
The following evidence shows that Cystomatic changed his name to Alhalama and, therefore, Cystomatic and Alhalama are the same person. - In the Hack Forums, Cystomatic says "Nice, tell me again how much of a marketer you are, and how long your crypter will stay FUD". Cystomatic later changes his username to "Alhalama". However, another user has already quoted Cystomatic's sentence and, as a result, the connection between both usernames is revealed.
- Alhalama contact details are the same as Cystomatic's.
Crimes committed by Cystomatic aka. Alhalama include hacking and defacing websites, installing keyloggers, selling administration logins, selling site databases, and buying, using and selling remote access trojans. - Alhalama hacks 11 sites on 6 June 2011.
- Alhalama defaces 2 sites on 12 June 2011.
- Alhalama hacks 1 site on 13 June 2011.
- Alhalama sells site admin logins and databases on 18 June 2011.
- Alhalama celebrates his success using the Rapzo Keylogger on 21 June 2011.
- Alhalama sells a Blackshades VPN and Blackshades RAT. Blackshades infects the victim's computer when the victim visits a malicious webpage (drive-by download). The FBI run operations in 2012 and 2014 to combat the use of Blackshades, which led to the arrest of near 100 people in 19 countries.
After starting IOTA, Dominik Schiener described his hacking experience: "I started hacking computer games when I was 14 and then sold these modifications and earned a fair amount of income for my age and effort. With the money, I then tried to build an advertising platform" "And so with that experience I started going on this quest, kind of hustling, like bring out what kind of product I should create to make money because at the time I really wanted to be independent. I wanted to make money so I don't rely on anyone". The IOTA community and investors have the right to know this information. I have posted it in r/Iota and r/IOTAmarkets but the posts have been removed. Sources:
|
|
|
|
Circumstantial evidence points to Dominik Schiener, co-founder of the IOTA Foundation, being the criminal hacker known as Cystomatic aka. Alhalama.
Several pieces of evidence show the connection between the hacker Cystomatic (aka. Alhalama) and Dominik Schiener: - Cystomatic created a MySpace account with the name "Dominik Schiener".
- Cystomatic announced a social media marketing project similar to Fileyy.com, Dominik Schiener's first startup.
- Cystomatic announced plans to relocate his Affiliate Marketing business (Fileyy.com?) to Malta. As Dominik Schiener, Cystomatic is Italian, speaks German, is a precocious entrepreneur, is working on an Internet Marketing project and is fond of tax havens.
- Cystomatic requests quote to create the logo for Fileyy.com. The winning logo was the same used by Fileyy.com and by Dominik Schiener in his LinkedIn page.
The following evidence shows that Cystomatic changed his name to Alhalama and, therefore, Cystomatic and Alhalama are the same person. - In the Hack Forums, Cystomatic says "Nice, tell me again how much of a marketer you are, and how long your crypter will stay FUD". Cystomatic later changes his username to "Alhalama". However, another user has already quoted Cystomatic's sentence and, as a result, the connection between both usernames is revealed.
- Alhalama contact details are the same as Cystomatic's.
Crimes committed by Cystomatic aka. Alhalama include hacking and defacing websites, installing keyloggers, selling administration logins, selling site databases, and buying, using and selling remote access trojans. - Alhalama hacks 11 sites on 6 June 2011.
- Alhalama defaces 2 sites on 12 June 2011.
- Alhalama hacks 1 site on 13 June 2011.
- Alhalama sells site admin logins and databases on 18 June 2011.
- Alhalama celebrates his success using the Rapzo Keylogger on 21 June 2011.
- Alhalama sells a Blackshades VPN and Blackshades RAT. Blackshades infects the victim's computer when the victim visits a malicious webpage (drive-by download). The FBI run operations in 2012 and 2014 to combat the use of Blackshades, which led to the arrest of near 100 people in 19 countries.
After starting IOTA, Dominik Schiener described his hacking experience: "I started hacking computer games when I was 14 and then sold these modifications and earned a fair amount of income for my age and effort. With the money, I then tried to build an advertising platform" "And so with that experience I started going on this quest, kind of hustling, like bring out what kind of product I should create to make money because at the time I really wanted to be independent. I wanted to make money so I don't rely on anyone". The IOTA community and investors have the right to know this information. I have posted it in r/Iota and r/IOTAmarkets but the posts have been removed. Sources:
|
|
|
|
How is the investigation going? Did many people send valuable information to you anonymously?
Yes. There are several people who have contacted me and shared valuable information. Sometimes it doesn't lead to anything, other times they help a lot. This is going to take time. There are many angles to explore. |
|
|
|
|
Of course, it is my opinion.
Using a non-profit for personal enrichment is not decent nor good for IOTA.
What is your opinion?
|
|
|
|
Sergey Ivancheglo has published the Memorandum of Understanding that the Board of Directors of the IOTA Foundation signed five days after the 2018 Board leak. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/IOTA-Foundation-0c96e7936c164dfe9e8ef1218fe0e13a#327e67a54a314fa9bea3619add62543dThe revelations included in this document, make the "MoU leak" as big as the 2018 "Board leak" and the 2020 "Breakup leak". In the 2018 Board leak, Ralf Rottmann said: “Just thinking about all of the other stuff that will come to light, makes me extremely worried”. He later addressed the concerns of the community about this sentence. https://www.reddit.com/r/Iota/comments/95qi3b/just_thinking_about_all_of_the_other_stuff_that/e3vg700/The MoU sheds light on why Ralf Rottmann was "extremely worried". He feared that, in his struggle to control the Board, David Sønstebø could reveal sensitive personal information about Dominik Schiener, co-founder of the IOTA Foundation. /cleanIOTA-Board-of-Directors]http://[Suspicious link removed]/cleanIOTA-Board-of-DirectorsThe MoU refers to IOTA AS and Jinn Labs as two separate entities. This contradicts David Sønstebø's claim to disgruntled Jinn investors that "Jinn Labs is IOTA AS". The MoU was signed by David Sonstebo himself. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/823de8eb6bee4ba78026d429957018a0#b19c32f251494b3483504c8341c6031dDominik Schiener said in the 2018 Board leak: "good luck. IOTA AS will have some serious legal issues with the advisor tokens and the impending tax audit. I am done with this. I am done with being threatened." https://pastebin.com/482HVvPuTo avoid potential tax issues, the MoU established that all the proceeds from the "Big Deal Fund" would be owned by "Schiener & Sønstebø GbR", an unregistered partnership, and used to fulfil the advisor token "verbal" agreements, without the intervention of IOTA AS or the IF. The MoU confirms that the IOTA Foundation transferred 0.5% of the total supply of IOTA "unclaimed" Tokens to IOTA AS, a company owned by David Sønstebø. The MoU refers in several occasions to Serguei Ivancheglo as a shareholder of IOTA AS. Together with Sergey Ivancheglo's employment contract with IOTA AS, this contradicts David Sønstebø's recent claims stating that David Sønstebø is the sole owner of IOTA AS. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/9d007a5d94a6400abe057c327e566b1c#45b186ba0e334161b91732979d05600bhttps://www.notion.so/cleaniota/823de8eb6bee4ba78026d429957018a0#05e6300b145d4decb117c356f6378183I submitted the news about the "MoU leak" to r/Iota and r/IOTAmarkets. Both submissions have been removed by the moderators. https://www.reddit.com/user/Hund_cleanIOTAIOTA investors and members of the IOTA Community have a right to know about the MoU leak. David Sønstebø should resign from the IOTA Foundation as soon as possible, for the sake of decency and for the good of IOTA. |
|
|
|
Sergey Ivancheglo has published the Memorandum of Understanding that the Board of Directors of the IOTA Foundation signed five days after the 2018 Board leak. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/IOTA-Foundation-0c96e7936c164dfe9e8ef1218fe0e13a#327e67a54a314fa9bea3619add62543dThe revelations included in this document, make the "MoU leak" as big as the 2018 "Board leak" and the 2020 "Breakup leak". In the 2018 Board leak, Ralf Rottmann said: “Just thinking about all of the other stuff that will come to light, makes me extremely worried”. He later addressed the concerns of the community about this sentence. https://www.reddit.com/r/Iota/comments/95qi3b/just_thinking_about_all_of_the_other_stuff_that/e3vg700/The MoU sheds light on why Ralf Rottmann was "extremely worried". He feared that, in his struggle to control the Board, David Sønstebø could reveal sensitive personal information about Dominik Schiener, co-founder of the IOTA Foundation. /cleanIOTA-Board-of-Directors]http://[Suspicious link removed]/cleanIOTA-Board-of-DirectorsThe MoU refers to IOTA AS and Jinn Labs as two separate entities. This contradicts David Sønstebø's claim to disgruntled Jinn investors that "Jinn Labs is IOTA AS". The MoU was signed by David Sonstebo himself. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/823de8eb6bee4ba78026d429957018a0#b19c32f251494b3483504c8341c6031dDominik Schiener said in the 2018 Board leak: "good luck. IOTA AS will have some serious legal issues with the advisor tokens and the impending tax audit. I am done with this. I am done with being threatened." https://pastebin.com/482HVvPuTo avoid potential tax issues, the MoU established that all the proceeds from the "Big Deal Fund" would be owned by "Schiener & Sønstebø GbR", an unregistered partnership, and used to fulfil the advisor token "verbal" agreements, without the intervention of IOTA AS or the IF. The MoU confirms that the IOTA Foundation transferred 0.5% of the total supply of IOTA "unclaimed" Tokens to IOTA AS, a company owned by David Sønstebø. The MoU refers in several occasions to Serguei Ivancheglo as a shareholder of IOTA AS. Together with Sergey Ivancheglo's employment contract with IOTA AS, this contradicts David Sønstebø's recent claims stating that David Sønstebø is the sole owner of IOTA AS. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/9d007a5d94a6400abe057c327e566b1c#45b186ba0e334161b91732979d05600bhttps://www.notion.so/cleaniota/823de8eb6bee4ba78026d429957018a0#05e6300b145d4decb117c356f6378183I submitted the news about the "MoU leak" to r/Iota and r/IOTAmarkets. Both submissions have been removed by the moderators. https://www.reddit.com/user/Hund_cleanIOTAIOTA investors and members of the IOTA Community have a right to know about the MoU leak. David Sønstebø should resign from the IOTA Foundation as soon as possible, for the sake of decency and for the good of IOTA. |
|
|
|
Sergey Ivancheglo has published the Memorandum of Understanding that the Board of Directors of the IOTA Foundation signed five days after the 2018 Board leak. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/IOTA-Foundation-0c96e7936c164dfe9e8ef1218fe0e13a#327e67a54a314fa9bea3619add62543dThe revelations included in this document, make the "MoU leak" as big as the 2018 "Board leak" and the 2020 "Breakup leak". In the 2018 Board leak, Ralf Rottmann said: “Just thinking about all of the other stuff that will come to light, makes me extremely worried”. He later addressed the concerns of the community about this sentence. https://www.reddit.com/r/Iota/comments/95qi3b/just_thinking_about_all_of_the_other_stuff_that/e3vg700/The MoU sheds light on why Ralf Rottmann was "extremely worried". He feared that, in his struggle to control the Board, David Sønstebø could reveal sensitive personal information about Dominik Schiener, co-founder of the IOTA Foundation. /cleanIOTA-Board-of-Directors]http://[Suspicious link removed]/cleanIOTA-Board-of-DirectorsThe MoU refers to IOTA AS and Jinn Labs as two separate entities. This contradicts David Sønstebø's claim to disgruntled Jinn investors that "Jinn Labs is IOTA AS". The MoU was signed by David Sonstebo himself. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/823de8eb6bee4ba78026d429957018a0#b19c32f251494b3483504c8341c6031dDominik Schiener said in the 2018 Board leak: "good luck. IOTA AS will have some serious legal issues with the advisor tokens and the impending tax audit. I am done with this. I am done with being threatened." https://pastebin.com/482HVvPuTo avoid potential tax issues, the MoU established that all the proceeds from the "Big Deal Fund" would be owned by "Schiener & Sønstebø GbR", an unregistered partnership, and used to fulfil the advisor token "verbal" agreements, without the intervention of IOTA AS or the IF. The MoU confirms that the IOTA Foundation transferred 0.5% of the total supply of IOTA "unclaimed" Tokens to IOTA AS, a company owned by David Sønstebø. The MoU refers in several occasions to Serguei Ivancheglo as a shareholder of IOTA AS. Together with Sergey Ivancheglo's employment contract with IOTA AS, this contradicts David Sønstebø's recent claims stating that he is the sole owner of IOTA AS. https://www.notion.so/cleaniota/9d007a5d94a6400abe057c327e566b1c#45b186ba0e334161b91732979d05600bhttps://www.notion.so/cleaniota/823de8eb6bee4ba78026d429957018a0#05e6300b145d4decb117c356f6378183I submitted the news about the "MoU leak" to r/Iota and r/IOTAmarkets. Both submissions have been removed by the moderators. https://www.reddit.com/user/Hund_cleanIOTAIOTA investors and members of the IOTA Community have a right to know about the MoU leak. David Sønstebø should resign from the IOTA Foundation as soon as possible, for the sake of decency and for the good of IOTA. |
|
|
|
Hello, My name is Hund. I have decided to carry out an investigation into the management practices of the IOTA Foundation. I will be focusing on both potentially illegal and unethical behavior. The topics I am currently interested are the use of the IOTA Foundation resources for personal profit and the leadership practices of the members of the Board of Directors. If you believe you have valuable information and wish to collaborate, please write to Hund at cleaniota@protonmail.com. https://notion.so/cleaniotahttps://notion.so/cleaniota/FAQ |
|
|
|
Hello, My name is Hund. I have decided to carry out an investigation into the management practices of the IOTA Foundation. I will be focusing on both potentially illegal and unethical behavior. The topics I am currently interested are the use of the IOTA Foundation resources for personal profit and the leadership practices of the members of the Board of Directors. If you believe you have valuable information and wish to collaborate, please write to Hund at cleaniota@protonmail.com. https://notion.so/cleaniotahttps://notion.so/cleaniota/FAQ |
|
|
|
Hello, My name is Hund. I have decided to carry out an investigation into the management practices of the IOTA Foundation. I will be focusing on both potentially illegal and unethical behavior. The topics I am currently interested are the use of the IOTA Foundation resources for personal profit and the leadership practices of the members of the Board of Directors. If you believe you have valuable information and wish to collaborate, please write to Hund at cleaniota@protonmail.com. https://notion.so/cleaniotahttps://notion.so/cleaniota/FAQ |
|
|
|
|
