Yes but in decentralized form and not centralized. However, it may be good if we compare to centralized currency. As we all know the so many benefits of decentralized currency.

I think it all depend on the person. Being greedy could really go down a person but others are not. They tend to get more lucky than everyone else that instead of going down they tend to become successful. This is why I believe that failing down still depend on the individual. There are lucky individual out there.

Yeah you got some point buddy. But I think when it comes to number there are quite few women are interested too in technology. I think their numbers are quite high also. However, majority or most likely men are good or technically inclined compared to women. This could be one of the main reason. Nice pointing out this one.

Because women are not good in analyzation. They really poor to it but when it comes to nagging then clearly they are expert. Women are interpersonal or more on speaking and can learn through speaking while mean are good at observation and analysis. This is why only few women are in cryptocurrency but still if you are in cryptocurrency your money can be spend to those nagging women like in a date. Wether we like it or not we do like women and we are born innate to like them.

To gain of course. Entering into considered as the new financial aspects that could get the chance to gain was the primarily goal of an individual racing with others doing smart decisions compared to others. Just like trading when you gain others are losing and when you are losing others too are gaining. This is why when you enter into crypto market. You should consider outsmarting others in your decision making.

Well, do not consider that much importance with money. I know that money the material thing could give you a lot in exchange but not all things money could buy. There are other things that money could not compensate.

A piece of advise is that while giving importance to money make sure that you balance everything espcially other priorities like giving time to love ones.

I just read the OP's reply and it is up to OP if he will be able to recover the loss. This is another way of development against decentralization because there are already options that mistakes like the one OP stated above could now be resolve. I think we can still see more of this kind of feature in the future.

I prefer bitcoin due its anonymity when sending payment and being decentralized but the fees are high I think it could be more than you pay the third party service to ensure smooth transaction. Hoping that bitcoin transaction fee will going to be cheaper than the current.

No, those industries that has a waste product of carbon will most likely to become the number 1 reason for global warming. In my opinion those power plant that uses coal will produce more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere unless they adapted new ways to prevent their waste product to reach the atmosphere.

Bitcoin mining could be a different story and for me does not contribute that much in the atmosphere pollution. Bitcoin mining can  be operated in low enegy consumption   by using other means to save electricity like capacitor bank. The engineering works will matter and can minimized all the possible waste products that could destroy the atmosphere.

We all need to sacrifice as a result of this pandemic keeping humanity active by helping others that are really in need. This is why government are optimizing their capabilities to help recover by balancing the system in which they see that in digital currencies huge cash flowing and that they can get a lot to it.

I will agree to the government moves for sure that those rich people will directly affected to this with their huge asset on cryptocurrency.

There is no perfect system and that same thing with absolutism. Absolute decentralized is not effective nor absolute centralized system. Therefore a combination of both system should do in order to get an effective and efficient system.

In the case of cryptocurrency, some are relying too much on complete decentralize system or platform.  Of course as expected there are occuring problems that arises and that still now does not resolve.

Some problems I had seen and observe.

1. The lack of authority from the crypto founder to resolve issues from its user. We will not talk about the authority coming from the government because many of us here will not agree of them to interfere in the system because they can just ruin the anonymity by conducting KYC and other preventive measures. So, what I am seeing is the lack of addressing problems from the founder of the crypto. After they implemented the system they will just say that system is good and ready to go and if you as a user will get mistake then that is your problem and your fault. No one had force you to join in cryptocurrency and you must adapt to it. This is not good for those who wishes a better system.

2. Miners service are decentralize.
Who would ever thought that they could get you a 1$ transaction of a fee which could be more than a thousand dollar's fee? There is something wrong and miners should be held liable into this by only limiting the transaction fee to be deducted not more than the transacted amount. They are abusing due to the fact that their service is in demand especially the bullish trend of bitcoin.

3. The abuse may be only happening and will be resolve between both parties. Same thought about in number 1 but this talk about resolution between both parties and not about the lack of authority from the founder. A certain user could mistakenly send high amount in the transaction without checking it and will be requested for a refund. The other party could deny and there us nothing you could do because it was your fault and no one can help you.

4. Complete decentralize platform may gone wrong.
Again, there is no perfect system and if there will be errors that will going to take place expect that you can no approach any technical team to resolve the issue. Reminders that there are no technical team to review in that errors but only the forum provided.

5. Abusers are free to do scamming in their own decentralized way. The ICO projects before are really worth it and  investors are really earning after investing but today they created a lot of ways in crowdfunding but many of it are just like robbing a bank easily stealing crowdfund even in the daylight.

So much to improve about the cryptocurrency and I think that there should be a need to insert centralized system to get the authority not coming from the government but to the cryptocurrency founder itself.

Consider my post OP to the development of the forum. This could be a substantial posts in which the admin can make adjustments for the forum in the future.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5298682.msg55792123#msg55792123

Consider my post my post as substantial to the developement of the forum,

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5298682.msg55792123#msg55792123

uniswap is taken from the idea of coinswap? Well, when you convert a coin to other coin is consider as swapping. But uniswap has better way of doing it like a complete decentralize exchange. However, I am hearing bad feedback of uniswap recently.

Post good or quality and informational posts, technical like data analysis and awareness like scam busting. I will guarantee that you can get merits and then you will grow up to full member in no time or it could even go beyond that if you will going to continue doing it so and receiving merits.

Agree,

I do not like to argue with anyone here I respect all the users but If you have just read the title and that how high rank users or DT could use their privilege for a personal attack because they get mad at your reply and they don't like you this is why they give you a negative feedback or trust.

Giving a negative trust is not necessary but that user did to degrade me as a user and the account I had which is a low rank.

Anyway, the world is not fair I know of that. I should better to start all over again. I was only sad that this happen with just a baseless negative trust being given.

I had been also a victim of a trust system attack. I do not know that the user does not like what I was talking about but he uses the trust system against me by giving a negative feedback on my account. This is another form of abuse but I could not do nothing against it because he is already a legendary user and I was a low rank user.  

I do not like to complicate more things here by providing the information about the certain user for that is not about him on why I write this post. This is all about the possible flaws of trust system that had been implemented here in the forum that some members become abusive when they get into the position of something in which they can step on others by using the trust system. They know how trust system should be use like giving it to suspected scammers, fraudsters and phishers but becase they hate you as a member then they can cast you with a negative trust due to a certain topic in which he does not like.

In my part of doing that reply was just only a pure intention to help for the forum, to OP and to give or share ideas and thoughts about the concern but I did not expect that he will not going to like it.

Well, I just express my thought and never had any problem with that user. I had only stipulated the possible flaws and abuses of this trust system that can do to other users. You know that merits are only for good users and it is not readily given so it may be hard to start over again to earn to avoid seeing the negative trust provided by that user. Though I can live with it but hopefully other DT members should also correct other DT members for possible abuse.

You are good because you are in the position and it has nothing to do with you. But for the low rank users which has been enjoying a lot in the forum getting a negative trust is likely a disgrace in our part.