Use this pool people.

http://int.kiramine.com/#

Network stuck again, i recommend you should try another coin. do not waste of time to mine, while the block sticking.

No it's not at the moment.
After block 60k it will be POW & POS.
After block 100k it won't be mineable only POS from then.

The hybrid PoS and PoW phase will last for 1,500 blocks.
This phase will begin once PoW reaches block 98,500 and
will end once miners find and complete block 100,000. The
hybrid phase is estimated to last for approximately 1.5
days.

Once the available 100,000 PoW blocks have been mined,
Signatum will transition into a full PoS coin.

That Troll

You need to wait about 2-3 weeks to be again in stock.
1060 has lower hashes, 23-24MH/s I think look at benchmarks, but better power consumption.

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.