 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
The fate of the world is at stake and I'm going to get to the gist of it. The world is run by a satanic pedophile elite who are all black mailed by their handlers. Soon deep fakes (A LOT OF THEM) will emerge which will render them useless to the holder because anyone can simply say that this fabricated or a lie. (meaning the people who are of power money and influence will be free from the shackles of which they are chained , either they kill their handlers as revenge or they grasp for power by creating new alliances and most of these people are some of the most powerful people in the world) (Blackmail is the best tool because if you can't persuade someone with $ then you move to blackmail) Quite simply. Get a gun / camera / kid -> Make your target have sex with them , then kill them. The world is run on blackmail currency but this currency may die and their handlers are scrambling to "Sell" the blackmail before it becomes useless. Now Julian assange had access to this treasure trove , and he put it up on wikileaks as insurance file , in the case that he dies , the file would be released. The files listed on the wikileaks may be different now if you check the hash and MD5 of the files from the original back in the mid 2010+. Now recently a guy named LLinWoods was talking about some stuff on twitter with Issac Kappy , who had seen this type of stuff and called out a bunch of pedos in hollywood and bunch of other people. So he got off'd. Now LLinwood is releasing the password for Issac Kappy (Which i believe connects back to Julian assange) A lot of bread crumbs have been released on 4chan but i need your help to find the files that this key opens. https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/301450101#p301450101It may be corelated to the BTC Blockchain , potentially (I believe holding somewhere on the blockchain between 2013-2014) is a treasure trove of data that would expose very rich and powerful people who run our world today. Please help us find this and release it. This is the key. 86d53c1315f42ea48caa0dc1b82a1c61e988b1035db897e90c2303c05d8721648ca816eada320c9 50b75985575b495a12c06d0a0ba77b9e23ccbd7d31b5bd035 We don't know where the file is but are currently looking for it. |
|
|
|
Whats to stop someone from creating their own USDC or some form of fiat currency with no central backing and issuing it to every person in the world and told them collectively that this value will always valued to the USD or whatever.
What’s stopping this is that without the ability to peg it to the USD, nobody would have any reason to believe them. You’d have to have the ability to pay out anyone wishing to convert the new coin in USD if you’re promising it’s going to be pegged to the value of it, so you’d have to have reserves equal to that. If you were able to do that, it would indeed have that value. But obviously nobody can do that, which is why the coin eill Be worthless. So what about DAI? It's a decentralized stable coin. If they're allowed to do it , why can't others right? |
|
|
|
If it would be arbitrary, those people who would agree upon the use of that currency perhaps, will be the only one who will be exchanging with one another and transactions will be only limited to them. Same logic occurs in trading, collections as an example wherein there are other factors affecting the value of something, for the collectors. But for the normal people outside that circle, prices will depend to its price when it was released to the market as is. As what other users mentioned, what makes a currency totally accepted is due to legality issues regarding different governments or to the world market in general. With that being said, I think it would be hard for total acceptance to occur into something if it won't undergo legal procedures.
What if it was forced by its users upon the ones who wield this power? Can collective conscious come together to bring it to fruition assuming numbers? |
|
|
|
I cannot imagine Monero (XMR) to reach $3000 as it's not considered a truly anonymous coin anymore.
Who says that Monero isn't completely anonymous anymore?! Only because of the Ciphertrace patents?
To come back to the topic of this thread: My picks for this year are: ETH DUSK AERGO Radix Polkadot Utrust
XMR? You sure this is not a typo? Its currently at like $150 and its peak was maybe $450. I don't think its possible for it to hit $3000 ever. Sure its a privacy coin but there is going to be regulation against privacy coins and it will prevent some exchanges from using it. Look what the US regulators are trying to do now with self-hosted wallet. So this is why I don't think $3000 is possible for XMR.
Pretty ironic that a few hours after I made this post, Bittrex has decided to delist privacy coins. Basically I think there is going to be more regulation in the near future and coins like XMR posses a problem especially when deaing with KYC. What is surprising is that ZEC is still listed at Gemini, however Bittrex has decided to delist it. The big question is why they are doing it all of a sudden. A few days after SEC sues ripple. I think they were maybe contacted and warned to delist these coins. We will find out in the next few days what happens. If more US based exchanges decide to delist privacy coins then we know that its due to regulations and this is the reason why I don't see it going to $3000 with all these issues. Anyone saying monero isn't anonymous is using poor OPSEC. Only reason it will go to 3k is the utilities which will be built on it. (Even if the supply is uncapped , The supply will remain smaller than BTC for the upcoming years with the emission rate @ 0.3XMR when it hits 18.4M.) You also mean to tell me that the rich and powerful who may be escaping laws regarding money laundering / "Tax avoidance" / Tax evasion and perhaps some of you Bitcoiners who perhaps cash out into fiat by alternative means to hide your actual amount of BTC available to the masses? Just consider for a second and see that 3k is not out of the realm of possibility only assuming that 55.2B in market cap. Seems small compared to the vast wealth scattered across different subsidiaries and shelf corps. Imagine if Monsack Fonseca event again and these powerful people being exposed again. Dash and Zcash are dogshit. If you believe in BTC then XMR is truly what you'd want in your portfolio. Monero won't just be a privacy coin. It'll be privacy coin that will rival ethereum and cause another influx of capital to enter the space. Monero is digital cash. Doesn't matter if they delist it. It can still be used on decentralized exchanges. Centralization is simply another alternative to the ones in this space. |
|
|
|
What altcoins are you bullish in 2021?
These are my picks in no definitive order with speculative estimates.
$LINK = 100 USD in Q2-3 2021 -> Q1 2022 = 1k USD
$XMR = 3000 USD in Q4 2021.
$GRT = 5 USD Q4 2021
$UMA = 50USD Q4 2021
What are your picks?
nice pick, but why you didn't add ethereum in your lists my friend personally i will picks ethereum and binance coin as my first choise in altcoins investments buddy Ethereum should have been on my list. It's going to 5k USD+ I'm also diversified as i have a healthy risk tolerance. This coins are my conservative picks. I don't like BNB because CZ can still exit scam or "randomly die" |
|
|
|
Legal issues will be your problem.
You will need to abide by the rules first especially when you are stationed in a strict country.
You can make altcoins, that's alright but it will have no value until you put it in the market.
By putting it in the market means you have filed legal documents which I bet will be expensive and you will need to worry about it being passed.
I don't think creating money out of thin air is really "legal" only the fed can do what they want right? hahaha Money is the thing that hard to get and many people want it.
People would do anything for money because people are very smart about money
Everyday people are always worry about money
Everyday couple fighting for money
Everyday people working for money
Every 10 minutes people are making money from mining new block
Money is moving very fast, money today move faster than speed of light, it’s running at about a dozen exa hash a second, yup speed of light look pathetic
Money is a solution is also a problem
Money give happiness, money give sadness
Money money money!
I dunno what’s money, it’s just a wall of texts
Money is simply a tool. Nothing more nothing less but i'd be curious if people were to receive a mass amount of capital (to pay off debts / build businesses etc) and also assuming that we aren't increasing inflation of course which of the people who received the amount of capital , how many would end up with more debts and end up in the same place before if not worse? |
|
|
|
The main point is that this is a" consistent " term. Money is not just " I'll go print some papers and say that you can buy food with it." Money is a social contract between so many agents. Between the state, people, other states, other people.
If no one accepts your "currency" as a means of payment, then it will be just useless garbage.
If no one wants to fool around with the new conversion rates and the need for cross-conversion in calculations , then it will be just useless garbage.
If no one wants to use your "money" because "why?" Then it'll just be useless trash.
You look at money as the result of the printing press and think that it is all very easy and simple but in fact you are deeply mistaken.
The main initiator of the creating of this social contract is at least the government and at most a fairly large number of people. think again why you can not just take and make money.
Seems like this is simply a perception play? Seems like you would only need the masses to accept this as "tender" that it ultimately becomes something of value (Of course providing the social contract is with a lot of people which implies network effect) Fascinating. |
|
|
|
So if money is simply an agreed upon term of which each of us understand by the numbers of which the money issued is by a "Trusted" authority and the faith in them... Whats to stop someone from creating their own USDC or some form of fiat currency with no central backing and issuing it to every person in the world and told them collectively that this value will always valued to the USD or whatever. Would then people find a way to be able to use it? And if it was all collectively agreed (of course without seeing the actual treasury of issued funds because you know... "Fractional Reserve Banking") then couldn't that money now exist in USD? And if this were to happen , what would happen to the USD itself if everyone on the planet were to receive lets say 10000USD. Would that affect our current monetary system or is it made it up money issued by some random person on the internet?
That's actually the issue facing China rn with Antgroup controlling credit instead of the central bank. The reason why regulations have tightened is that China obviously wants to maintain a degree of monetary policy sovereignty as opposed to having to submit themselves to the arbitrary decisions of Ma who could have essentially been operating on fractional reserve since so many people use their Alipay "CNY" as default currency. To answer your question, yes, anyone can create their own "currency" that is fractionally backed, or perhaps not even backed at all. But your credibility has to stem from somewhere to create value in your currency. It's all about trust. If no one trusts that you have the reserves to back up deposits then your currency will not be valuable. Whereas if everyone trusts that you have the backing, then you could theoretically have more influence on money supply than even the central bank (something that could have happened if Antgroup were to be kept relatively unregulated). Interesting , but doesn't China (CCP) control their own economy? And aren't all corporations beholden to the CCP and not to any other group? I'm sure Jack Ma wouldn't be a problem especially if they needed him to be removed...But it seems to me that BTC itself is the "digitized trust" (or blockchain) But it seems to me that it only needs to be trusted by the people as a means of exchange with federal backing...Hmm. |
|
|
|
|
So i had an idea for an asset that only increases in value (In terms of USD) But that's also assuming that users don't sell a large portion of their holdings and also assuming that there is a consistent flow of traffic + capital flowing into the asset itself.
The one thing i'm currently looking into , is maybe a burn that would burn some of the transactions of each individual one thus increasing demand and lowering the supply available. But in my mind , if you need to burn something , it ain't worth poop.
Another option would be to set up derivatives with a USD pair and let others users bet against each other in a decentralized way. (Gnosis) Seems like it would drive users because who wouldn't want to be able to catch the falling knife , inviting traders and market makers into the space because they can bet against the other parties who are playing the game as well. (Hedge funds / Traders etc) Obviously this can be problematic because as more capital inflows enter the market and whales start appearing , I think there could be a host of financial manipulation against others. (Assuming that there is a large short position on our asset , and someone sees this and bets against them by going long then buying up a majority and or a lot of the coins in the market to push up the price liquidating the counter party risk. (or doing it the opposite way)
So what are some pitfalls that you see , and what are your thoughts behind my experiment?
Because i've come to conclude that people realistically are only interested in number go up not the tech. And if this is the case , would you join?
|
|
|
|
What altcoins are you bullish in 2021?
These are my picks in no definitive order with speculative estimates.
$LINK = 100 USD in Q2-3 2021 -> Q1 2022 = 1k USD
$XMR = 3000 USD in Q4 2021.
$GRT = 5 USD Q4 2021
$UMA = 50USD Q4 2021
What are your picks?
I want to know why you chose the coin? Why don't you put big coins like BTC, ETH or BNB into it? Didn't Chainlink have a problem with the SEC, by the way? or is it just a hoax ? This is the altcoin section so i'm picking altcoins not BTC  BNB can always be exit scammed. All it takes is someone to take down CZ and BAM all of your money is screwed. I'm bullish on $XMR for one reason. Tari.com it's like ETH / XMR banged to make Tari. AND ITS GOING TO BE OPEN SOURCE / DECENTRALIZED / WITH NO PREMINE UGHGGHJFKASHGDAGHSDKHGASJH sorry i got a little excited there. Link is going to have a problem with the SEC because they are listed on Gemini / Coinbase. These 2 companies are listed in the US. But LINK is based in the Caymen Islands. If they weren't listed on CB / Gemini , they would be free from the SEC. But of course if you are WORTH BILLIONS in market cap , YOU CAN ALWAYS PAY OFF THE SEC Also because i have suspicions that link is intentionally hacking other protocols (oracle solutions) Example Compound by messing with their oracles , and IF that is the case , then I'd go all in on Link because their founder is playing the game of monopoly and thats what i want in my CEO. (As an investor anyways) |
|
|
|
~snip~
Single mothers cannot raise men. PERIOD. They require the masculine energy to guide them. The feminine only nurtures them. The children are well mannered to you because they are conditioned on the feminine imperative which is social and expressive. (Which can be viewed as fake such as make up + eye lash extensions + heels etc) Statistics of single mother households are significantly different for men / women. Women raising women without a father make sluts. Higher chance of suicide Higher chance of incarceration rate (There's more) Obviously there are outliers but at the end of the day , a woman can never raise a man. Only a man can raise a man. We might not be living in the 1950s but those ancient rules still exist today. 1. Ohhhh no no no no, single women can raise men, example men raised by a single moms are Former US President Barrack Obama, Kevin Durant and Michael Phelps. Addition to this I've known several colleague of mine who I can testify to be gentlemens who are also raised by woman. You are belittling the ability of woman, disregarding their efforts, wisdom and knowledges. I've respected your former opinion but not on this one. "Single mothers cannot raise men." you say?, but there are examples of respected gentlemens in different countries that will disprove your statement. 2. Sucide rates, and different kinds of statistics have different factors. For example, for suicide rates in Japan, the main cause of it is not single parents, but the pressure the family gives to the child, and bullying. (Pressure from parents, not just a mother or a father). Also, if you may, can you give me the study about the statistics you mentioned about the higher chances of suicide, etc. or you are just making that up? In conclusion, women can raise a man. PERIOD!. 1. You are pointing at outliers. I'm saying that a lot of people with single family households will have emotional damage. Obama wasn't necessary a nice guy either. You think politicians are good people , then you are deluded. http://marripedia.org/effects_of_fatherless_families_on_crime_rateshttps://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20030123/absent-parent-doubles-child-suicide-risk#1Single mothers cannot raise men period. They just make more effiminate men. You didn't say some or a lot, you say That "THEY CANNOT RAISE MEN", which is wrong, and a direct insult for those mothers who have raised gentlemen by themselves. You are literally saying "ALL" by that statement. So what do you think of men? if obama is not included? huh?, nice guy really? is that the definition of men? Also, the first link corresponds to studies made in 1800's and early 1900's, ergo it is not a valid study in this time and date. While the second link only mentions single parents, without identifying if it is a single father or a mother. In addition to the second link, it is doesn't state anything about "SONS" of a single parent, instead it talks about the "CHILDRENS" which maybe your daughter or son. "You need a man to teach you how to be a man." - 2pac I'll simplify it for you. Women raise EFFIMINATE MEN. More feminine than masculine. |
|
|
|
What altcoins are you bullish in 2021?
These are my picks in no definitive order with speculative estimates.
$LINK = 100 USD in Q2-3 2021 -> Q1 2022 = 1k USD
$XMR = 3000 USD in Q4 2021.
$GRT = 5 USD Q4 2021
$UMA = 50USD Q4 2021
What are your picks?
XMR? You sure this is not a typo? Its currently at like $150 and its peak was maybe $450. I don't think its possible for it to hit $3000 ever. Sure its a privacy coin but there is going to be regulation against privacy coins and it will prevent some exchanges from using it. Look what the US regulators are trying to do now with self-hosted wallet. So this is why I don't think $3000 is possible for XMR. LINK might of peaked at like $20 or so however there is huge supply of LINK. If you expect it to go to $100 it means that its market cap will need to be $40 BILLION. That is going to be very difficult. To put in perspective its basically more than Tether and half of Ethereum. I think the MAIN Reason is Tari which is the ethereum competitor on the monero blockchain. Obviously i'm bias because i love XMR but it is what Satoshi would have wanted. Just wait til we have ICOs on XMR. It'll be the game changer. Also i have dreams of premonitions that i saw $LINK At 1k USD. Not sure of the time exactly but it went to 1k. I also saw this in my dreams when i saw monero go to 390 USD in 2017. (Had this dream in 2015) |
|
|
|
|
How would you create a monetary system? Keynesian economics? Austrian? Lets get creative!
HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!
|
|
|
|
|
What altcoins are you bullish in 2021?
These are my picks in no definitive order with speculative estimates.
$LINK = 100 USD in Q2-3 2021 -> Q1 2022 = 1k USD
$XMR = 3000 USD in Q4 2021.
$GRT = 5 USD Q4 2021
$UMA = 50USD Q4 2021
What are your picks?
|
|
|
|
That's a really cool poster. It's massive, here's a tiny part of it:  LOL CHEMTRAILS? NAZIS? ESCAPE? HITLER? What the fuck are these people smoking because I would really love to smoke some of it. Seems to really bring you into a beautiful fantasy world that can help you believe anything and everything that your brain wants you to. Logic doesn’t matter. Take everything with a grain of salt. Chem trails are real though http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/what-is-geoengineering/what-is-geoengineering/Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth. What's up with using a mirror of the actual oxford site? I'm just curious, is there a reason you don't want to link this: https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/geoengineering/ ? Don't see anything about chemtrails from Oxford, Harvard does though https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/chemtrails-conspiracy-theoryThe Author leads the solar geoengineering program and is Professor of Applied Physics at Harvard’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. Not sure but i pulled that from google. |
|
|
|
That's a really cool poster. It's massive, here's a tiny part of it: LOL CHEMTRAILS? NAZIS? ESCAPE? HITLER? What the fuck are these people smoking because I would really love to smoke some of it. Seems to really bring you into a beautiful fantasy world that can help you believe anything and everything that your brain wants you to. Logic doesn’t matter. Take everything with a grain of salt. Chem trails are real though http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/what-is-geoengineering/what-is-geoengineering/Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth. |
|
|
|
A six figure Bitcoin price.
GIVE ME 9 FIGURE BITCOIN PRICE LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Happy New Year to all my fellow forum member,
I don't really expect much on 2021 I just hope that it would be better than the previous year.
I hope that all of us who survive the 2020 would get through again no matter what happen.
WE ARE ALL GOING TO MAKE IT. |
|
|
|
|
So if money is simply an agreed upon term of which each of us understand by the numbers of which the money issued is by a "Trusted" authority and the faith in them... Whats to stop someone from creating their own USDC or some form of fiat currency with no central backing and issuing it to every person in the world and told them collectively that this value will always valued to the USD or whatever. Would then people find a way to be able to use it? And if it was all collectively agreed (of course without seeing the actual treasury of issued funds because you know... "Fractional Reserve Banking") then couldn't that money now exist in USD? And if this were to happen , what would happen to the USD itself if everyone on the planet were to receive lets say 10000USD. Would that affect our current monetary system or is it made it up money issued by some random person on the internet?
|
|
|
|
|
Happy New years fellow Bitcoiners!
It's 2021. What will you be expecting to see this new year?
|
|
|
|
I respect your opinion regarding the matter, but the current situation suggests that you are probably wrong, as I have seen many different independent woman, especially those single moms who have raised their children's at the best they can while providing the same as what men can give. Aside from single moms, I've also seen families run by women who are in no way that is wrong. The children's are well mannered, the authority of father is still there but mother is still higher in many ways.
So just like as I've said, circumstances in this time and date matters in this kind of topic, as we are not living in 1950's anymore.
But I myself, would be part of your vision of being the one who will provide and being the head of the family. It is just that I've seen many things that I can't turn a blind eye.
Single mothers cannot raise men. PERIOD. They require the masculine energy to guide them. The feminine only nurtures them. The children are well mannered to you because they are conditioned on the feminine imperative which is social and expressive. (Which can be viewed as fake such as make up + eye lash extensions + heels etc) Statistics of single mother households are significantly different for men / women. Women raising women without a father make sluts. Higher chance of suicide Higher chance of incarceration rate (There's more) Obviously there are outliers but at the end of the day , a woman can never raise a man. Only a man can raise a man. We might not be living in the 1950s but those ancient rules still exist today. 1. Ohhhh no no no no, single women can raise men, example men raised by a single moms are Former US President Barrack Obama, Kevin Durant and Michael Phelps. Addition to this I've known several colleague of mine who I can testify to be gentlemens who are also raised by woman. You are belittling the ability of woman, disregarding their efforts, wisdom and knowledges. I've respected your former opinion but not on this one. "Single mothers cannot raise men." you say?, but there are examples of respected gentlemens in different countries that will disprove your statement. 2. Sucide rates, and different kinds of statistics have different factors. For example, for suicide rates in Japan, the main cause of it is not single parents, but the pressure the family gives to the child, and bullying. (Pressure from parents, not just a mother or a father). Also, if you may, can you give me the study about the statistics you mentioned about the higher chances of suicide, etc. or you are just making that up? In conclusion, women can raise a man. PERIOD!. 1. You are pointing at outliers. I'm saying that a lot of people with single family households will have emotional damage. Obama wasn't necessary a nice guy either. You think politicians are good people , then you are deluded. http://marripedia.org/effects_of_fatherless_families_on_crime_rateshttps://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20030123/absent-parent-doubles-child-suicide-risk#1Single mothers cannot raise men period. They just make more effiminate men. |
|
|
|
|
