Opinions on relationship in the society.

[Ratash]

I think that there are a lot of aspects to consider before engaging in a relationship the most important one is to choose your partner wisely by choosing someone with similar ideologies and same way of thinking and similar objectifs to avoid future problems and the second one is to be in a good financial situation.

[1715222436]

1715222436

[1715222436]

1715222436

[Shagufta3]

In a typical small town indian society relatives interfere in every personal matter of people, from education to job, from marriage to number of children. And if you are a female, they are always on your head to judge your actions, from way of laughing to attitude.. Life is a joke in this society 

Relatives r to fuck up your life and mental peace.

Not at all times, you just have significantly, unhealthy relationship with your relative if you think this so. I have a pretty supportive relatives, while some aren't that much, that's why I choose and pick among those relatives whom I want to bond with whenever we're in gathering.

In relation with the topic, opened up by the author, you are the one in control if you want someone in your family/ relatives to know what is happening in your relationship. It is in your control, what they can see and what they cannot. Given that you can't control they're assumptions on what's happening about it, it is you again, who can justify if this were real or not. You don't need to explain why their assumptions is right or wrong. A simple YES or NO is enough.

[Rabi3]

i think relationships are stupid, how could women leave men because they have financial problems when your friends would do all they can to help you out ?! and especially marriage, a lot of men gave so much importance to women who doesn't deserve shit, and i agree with what Bill Burr once said "women are so overrated"

[Natsuu]

i think relationships are stupid, how could women leave men because they have financial problems when your friends would do all they can to help you out ?! and especially marriage, a lot of men gave so much importance to women who doesn't deserve shit, and i agree with what Bill Burr once said "women are so overrated"

There are many happy relationships in this world who are strong, and comfortable through rich and poor. Though these relationships experiences ups and downs. You can assure that they are happy for what they are, and willing to help and support one another. Concluding that all woman are like that because some just did, is a typical stereotyping sht. The world is vast and there are many more women who are meant for one another. Don't lose hope in relationship my guy 

[Mauser]

i think relationships are stupid, how could women leave men because they have financial problems when your friends would do all they can to help you out ?! and especially marriage, a lot of men gave so much importance to women who doesn't deserve shit, and i agree with what Bill Burr once said "women are so overrated"

The problem is that men and woman think so differently about relationships and marriage. For woman financial security is much more important. So when having a new relationship woman look for a provider, someone to have a family with. While men just go for looks mainly.

[Crptomagma]

I basically believe in relationships their is no formula because everyone has their own individual differences and insecurities. What keeps relationships isn’t love it’s understanding.

[CryptocurencyKing]

I was hoping that the relationship in discussion was going to be about the relationship that exists between people in the society far from the regular romantically involved relationship but as that tends to be the bone of contention, I'll say, it's just human behavior in display between both genders and strives in various conditions.

1. There are relationships that strives when one of the partner is in hardship and the finance is one sided. Once the other party seems to acquire wealth, it becomes an issue as pride and lack of trust finds its way into the relationship.

2. Some relationships don't do do well when the finance is one sided as the productive partner fills burdened by the other party whom is not productive. A typical parasitic kind of relationship but then, love is supposed to override all and that is hardly the case.

3. There are other relationships that tend to strive based on sex. The urge for sex is all that drives this sort of relationship and it very much overrides other odds so long as, the both partners are sexually available for themselves at all times.

[Mauser]

I feel like the number of singles is rising each year. In my country the TV program is full of advertising for dating companies. In one  5 minute TV break there are atleast 3-4 companies which offer dating services. The number of platforms keeps rising. And thus doesn't even include companies like tinder. So without high demand these companies could never afford paying so much for ads. Its crazy

[Slow death]

Generally speaking girls won't accept someone who is financially in bad situation and also men also concerned about extra burdens and what we can do after getting in to relationship because they get more responsibility. Perfect relationship are mever exist, so make money then you have more choice to choice to choose from.

You're generalizing. There are as many types of women as there are types of men.
Most women want strong men to accompany them, men who can take care of them, protect them, stay calm in dangerous situations, but not all demand men to be rich and pay for everything. They see it as an additional quality, but not a must.
None of my friends are rich and they have women. It's funny but I know 2 guys that are doing pretty good financially and both of them are struggling with women. They both look good and are in their 30s, drive nice cars, but women just don't stick with them.

I'm sorry, but even I live in Africa can see the behavior of women in Europe and America and from what I see most women in Europe and America only want men who have money, even in Africa this trend is becoming common in last years.

If a man is rich, then that man will be wanted by hundreds of famous women or not. if we go on the streets and do research on whether women want rich men or not? you will see that more than 80% of women will not be ashamed to say they want rich men

[FEELEPIC]

I think the masculine and feminine need to be together. Men are the gate keepers of relationships and women the gate keepers of sex.

I think that men should be strong and able to LEAD. It's not just about money. Sure women want a man who is financial viable , because they want to be able to take care of their offspring. But you must remember that not all women are going to be compatible with you , and the ones who aren't compatible that you try to MAKE "COMPATIBLE" will be detrimental to your mental well being. (Try dating a stripper and you'll find they have a LOT OF BAGGAGE and somehow HER Problems will be yours.

Most women are never happy. You can't make a woman happy because she lives off her emotions , so 1 minute she may be happy , the next she may be mad. You as a man have to dispel those bad emotions and keep her in the frame that you want her to be in.

The problem in our society is that women now have a host of potential male suitors and with the rise of dating apps , a "5" can find and bang a 9/10 dude and still have lots of options available for them. Allowing women to fuck anyone and everyone will be the downfall of western civilization as women when left unchecked will destroy civilizations. (If you go back in history , many lineages and kingdoms fell because of a woman and a mans lust of want of a woman.) Just like in the bible with adam and eve. The devil couldn't trick Adam but he got to Adam through Eve.

The devil is still present today and still operating to destroy man through eve. At the end of the day , I consider women to be government agencies assets because once you get involved , and lets say you get married , sign the contract etc... she can divorce you and take half of your assets with the state backing her.

Remember gentlemen , she's not yours , it's just your turn. 

[Natsuu]

I think the masculine and feminine need to be together. Men are the gate keepers of relationships and women the gate keepers of sex.

I think that men should be strong and able to LEAD. It's not just about money. Sure women want a man who is financial viable , because they want to be able to take care of their offspring. But you must remember that not all women are going to be compatible with you , and the ones who aren't compatible that you try to MAKE "COMPATIBLE" will be detrimental to your mental well being. (Try dating a stripper and you'll find they have a LOT OF BAGGAGE and somehow HER Problems will be yours.

Most women are never happy. You can't make a woman happy because she lives off her emotions , so 1 minute she may be happy , the next she may be mad. You as a man have to dispel those bad emotions and keep her in the frame that you want her to be in.

The problem in our society is that women now have a host of potential male suitors and with the rise of dating apps , a "5" can find and bang a 9/10 dude and still have lots of options available for them. Allowing women to fuck anyone and everyone will be the downfall of western civilization as women when left unchecked will destroy civilizations. (If you go back in history , many lineages and kingdoms fell because of a woman and a mans lust of want of a woman.) Just like in the bible with adam and eve. The devil couldn't trick Adam but he got to Adam through Eve.

The devil is still present today and still operating to destroy man through eve. At the end of the day , I consider women to be government agencies assets because once you get involved , and lets say you get married , sign the contract etc... she can divorce you and take half of your assets with the state backing her.

Remember gentlemen , she's not yours , it's just your turn. 

There are different circumstances available in the society that your assumptions didn't cover, therefore you may be right for some, but can be always wrong.

Stereotypically, your statements may be right, but not in this time and date.The role of both men and women nowadays can be switched depending on the situation and how they lead. Woman empowerment are a thing in this generation, although I myself believed that equality can never be achieved as per difference in views and opinions on how the roles of men and women act. I still think that circumstance matter per relationships.

That last quote is somewhere and something deep. Just remember always that you must treat your spouse the same way you treat them when you were dating, as this is the you who he/she believed in.

[FEELEPIC]

Remember gentlemen , she's not yours , it's just your turn.  

Make sure you make her getting addicted to you and keep her in the same state until she looks oldie or else there are boys everywhere to pick girls and make their turn.

Remember the most valuable asset that we have is time. Make the best of it. Also only date from 18-25. Anything over has too much baggage.

I think the masculine and feminine need to be together. Men are the gate keepers of relationships and women the gate keepers of sex.

I think that men should be strong and able to LEAD. It's not just about money. Sure women want a man who is financial viable , because they want to be able to take care of their offspring. But you must remember that not all women are going to be compatible with you , and the ones who aren't compatible that you try to MAKE "COMPATIBLE" will be detrimental to your mental well being. (Try dating a stripper and you'll find they have a LOT OF BAGGAGE and somehow HER Problems will be yours.

Most women are never happy. You can't make a woman happy because she lives off her emotions , so 1 minute she may be happy , the next she may be mad. You as a man have to dispel those bad emotions and keep her in the frame that you want her to be in.

The problem in our society is that women now have a host of potential male suitors and with the rise of dating apps , a "5" can find and bang a 9/10 dude and still have lots of options available for them. Allowing women to fuck anyone and everyone will be the downfall of western civilization as women when left unchecked will destroy civilizations. (If you go back in history , many lineages and kingdoms fell because of a woman and a mans lust of want of a woman.) Just like in the bible with adam and eve. The devil couldn't trick Adam but he got to Adam through Eve.

The devil is still present today and still operating to destroy man through eve. At the end of the day , I consider women to be government agencies assets because once you get involved , and lets say you get married , sign the contract etc... she can divorce you and take half of your assets with the state backing her.

Remember gentlemen , she's not yours , it's just your turn.  

There are different circumstances available in the society that your assumptions didn't cover, therefore you may be right for some, but can be always wrong.

Stereotypically, your statements may be right, but not in this time and date.The role of both men and women nowadays can be switched depending on the situation and how they lead. Woman empowerment are a thing in this generation, although I myself believed that equality can never be achieved as per difference in views and opinions on how the roles of men and women act. I still think that circumstance matter per relationships.

That last quote is somewhere and something deep. Just remember always that you must treat your spouse the same way you treat them when you were dating, as this is the you who he/she believed in.

I disagree.  I don't believe that women as a WHOLE (obviously generalizing) should lead because they aren't as capable as men to lead. (Greed / Power is different with men and women of course but women will use it for censorship and evil) (Look up 8 Goddesses Cult)    Sure there are outliers in every group , I just believe that women have the most important role of being MOTHERS to nurture and take care of our next generation to create well adjusted adults who create stuff and help humanity as a whole. (Which in and of itself is a hard task but a fruitful and rewarding one) If they were to be lead astray without a strong leader or a strong father figure , we will have degeneracy and the fall of civilization because women procreated with the wrong people and then the state got involved and destroys the nuclear family. (of course this is over-generalizing but this is leading towards that) Example Rome.

A woman always reserves the right to change her mind. But like women / children /dogs , they will be loved for who they are.

Men on the other hand are the disposable sex. We are only loved by what we provide in this world.

I Only have two things of value when i came into this world. My word. And my balls.  Because no one gives a shit about us.

And i agree that a man should always hold his frame with his woman. If she senses weakness within you , she'll be gone.

So be the best version of yourself. And also a woman should be a compliment to your life! NOT THE FOCUS MEN!

[Natsuu]

I disagree.  I don't believe that women as a WHOLE (obviously generalizing) should lead because they aren't as capable as men to lead. (Greed / Power is different with men and women of course but women will use it for censorship and evil) (Look up 8 Goddesses Cult)    Sure there are outliers in every group , I just believe that women have the most important role of being MOTHERS to nurture and take care of our next generation to create well adjusted adults who create stuff and help humanity as a whole. (Which in and of itself is a hard task but a fruitful and rewarding one) If they were to be lead astray without a strong leader or a strong father figure , we will have degeneracy and the fall of civilization because women procreated with the wrong people and then the state got involved and destroys the nuclear family. (of course this is over-generalizing but this is leading towards that) Example Rome.

A woman always reserves the right to change her mind. But like women / children /dogs , they will be loved for who they are.

Men on the other hand are the disposable sex. We are only loved by what we provide in this world.

I Only have two things of value when i came into this world. My word. And my balls.  Because no one gives a shit about us.

And i agree that a man should always hold his frame with his woman. If she senses weakness within you , she'll be gone.

So be the best version of yourself. And also a woman should be a compliment to your life! NOT THE FOCUS MEN!

I respect your opinion regarding the matter, but the current situation suggests that you are probably wrong, as I have seen many different independent woman, especially those single moms who have raised their children's at the best they can while providing the same as what men can give. Aside from single moms, I've also seen families run by women who are in no way that is wrong. The children's are well mannered, the authority of father is still there but mother is still higher in many ways.

So just like as I've said, circumstances in this time and date matters in this kind of topic, as we are not living in 1950's anymore.

But I myself, would be part of your vision of being the one who will provide and being the head of the family. It is just that I've seen many things that I can't turn a blind eye.

[FEELEPIC]

I disagree.  I don't believe that women as a WHOLE (obviously generalizing) should lead because they aren't as capable as men to lead. (Greed / Power is different with men and women of course but women will use it for censorship and evil) (Look up 8 Goddesses Cult)    Sure there are outliers in every group , I just believe that women have the most important role of being MOTHERS to nurture and take care of our next generation to create well adjusted adults who create stuff and help humanity as a whole. (Which in and of itself is a hard task but a fruitful and rewarding one) If they were to be lead astray without a strong leader or a strong father figure , we will have degeneracy and the fall of civilization because women procreated with the wrong people and then the state got involved and destroys the nuclear family. (of course this is over-generalizing but this is leading towards that) Example Rome.

A woman always reserves the right to change her mind. But like women / children /dogs , they will be loved for who they are.

Men on the other hand are the disposable sex. We are only loved by what we provide in this world.

I Only have two things of value when i came into this world. My word. And my balls.  Because no one gives a shit about us.

And i agree that a man should always hold his frame with his woman. If she senses weakness within you , she'll be gone.

So be the best version of yourself. And also a woman should be a compliment to your life! NOT THE FOCUS MEN!

I respect your opinion regarding the matter, but the current situation suggests that you are probably wrong, as I have seen many different independent woman, especially those single moms who have raised their children's at the best they can while providing the same as what men can give. Aside from single moms, I've also seen families run by women who are in no way that is wrong. The children's are well mannered, the authority of father is still there but mother is still higher in many ways.

So just like as I've said, circumstances in this time and date matters in this kind of topic, as we are not living in 1950's anymore.

But I myself, would be part of your vision of being the one who will provide and being the head of the family. It is just that I've seen many things that I can't turn a blind eye.

Single mothers cannot raise men. PERIOD. They require the masculine energy to guide them. The feminine only nurtures them. The children are well mannered to you because they are conditioned on the feminine imperative which is social and expressive. (Which can be viewed as fake such as make up + eye lash extensions + heels etc)  Statistics of single mother households are significantly different for men / women. Women raising women without a father make sluts.

Higher chance of suicide
Higher chance of incarceration rate (There's more)

Obviously there are outliers but at the end of the day , a woman can never raise a man. Only a man can raise a man. We might not be living in the 1950s but those ancient rules still exist today.

[FEELEPIC]

Remember gentlemen , she's not yours , it's just your turn.  

Make sure you make her getting addicted to you and keep her in the same state until she looks oldie or else there are boys everywhere to pick girls and make their turn.

Remember the most valuable asset that we have is time. Make the best of it. Also only date from 18-25. Anything over has too much baggage.

Just stick to the same age group of yours for perfect understanding if you consider her as your life partner for the remaining ages, apart from this you can maintain side chicks who are completely young and perfect bodyline is your extra skill.

Why anyone would want to be tied down to one specific person is beyond me. Women ain't the same as the 1950s. Only reason to be together is to have a nuclear family.

[Natsuu]

I respect your opinion regarding the matter, but the current situation suggests that you are probably wrong, as I have seen many different independent woman, especially those single moms who have raised their children's at the best they can while providing the same as what men can give. Aside from single moms, I've also seen families run by women who are in no way that is wrong. The children's are well mannered, the authority of father is still there but mother is still higher in many ways.

So just like as I've said, circumstances in this time and date matters in this kind of topic, as we are not living in 1950's anymore.

But I myself, would be part of your vision of being the one who will provide and being the head of the family. It is just that I've seen many things that I can't turn a blind eye.

Single mothers cannot raise men. PERIOD. They require the masculine energy to guide them. The feminine only nurtures them. The children are well mannered to you because they are conditioned on the feminine imperative which is social and expressive. (Which can be viewed as fake such as make up + eye lash extensions + heels etc)  Statistics of single mother households are significantly different for men / women. Women raising women without a father make sluts.

Higher chance of suicide
Higher chance of incarceration rate (There's more)

Obviously there are outliers but at the end of the day , a woman can never raise a man. Only a man can raise a man. We might not be living in the 1950s but those ancient rules still exist today.

1. Ohhhh no no no no, single women can raise men, example men raised by a single moms are Former US President Barrack Obama, Kevin Durant and Michael Phelps. Addition to this I've known several colleague of mine who I can testify to be gentlemens who are also raised by woman.

You are belittling the ability of woman, disregarding their efforts, wisdom and knowledges. I've respected your former opinion but not on this one.

"Single mothers cannot raise men." you say?, but there are examples of respected gentlemens in different countries that will disprove your statement.

2. Sucide rates, and different kinds of statistics have different factors. For example, for suicide rates in Japan, the main cause of it is not single parents, but the pressure the family gives to the child, and bullying. (Pressure from parents, not just a mother or a father).

Also, if you may, can you give me the study about the statistics you mentioned about the higher chances of suicide, etc. or you are just making that up?

In conclusion, women can raise a man. PERIOD!.

[BADecker]

^^^ You really need to go see the shrink. That way you will feel good about the money you lose when you pay him/her.

[FEELEPIC]

I respect your opinion regarding the matter, but the current situation suggests that you are probably wrong, as I have seen many different independent woman, especially those single moms who have raised their children's at the best they can while providing the same as what men can give. Aside from single moms, I've also seen families run by women who are in no way that is wrong. The children's are well mannered, the authority of father is still there but mother is still higher in many ways.

So just like as I've said, circumstances in this time and date matters in this kind of topic, as we are not living in 1950's anymore.

But I myself, would be part of your vision of being the one who will provide and being the head of the family. It is just that I've seen many things that I can't turn a blind eye.

Single mothers cannot raise men. PERIOD. They require the masculine energy to guide them. The feminine only nurtures them. The children are well mannered to you because they are conditioned on the feminine imperative which is social and expressive. (Which can be viewed as fake such as make up + eye lash extensions + heels etc)  Statistics of single mother households are significantly different for men / women. Women raising women without a father make sluts.

Higher chance of suicide
Higher chance of incarceration rate (There's more)

Obviously there are outliers but at the end of the day , a woman can never raise a man. Only a man can raise a man. We might not be living in the 1950s but those ancient rules still exist today.

1. Ohhhh no no no no, single women can raise men, example men raised by a single moms are Former US President Barrack Obama, Kevin Durant and Michael Phelps. Addition to this I've known several colleague of mine who I can testify to be gentlemens who are also raised by woman.

You are belittling the ability of woman, disregarding their efforts, wisdom and knowledges. I've respected your former opinion but not on this one.

"Single mothers cannot raise men." you say?, but there are examples of respected gentlemens in different countries that will disprove your statement.

2. Sucide rates, and different kinds of statistics have different factors. For example, for suicide rates in Japan, the main cause of it is not single parents, but the pressure the family gives to the child, and bullying. (Pressure from parents, not just a mother or a father).

Also, if you may, can you give me the study about the statistics you mentioned about the higher chances of suicide, etc. or you are just making that up?

In conclusion, women can raise a man. PERIOD!.

1. You are pointing at outliers. I'm saying that a lot of people with single family households will have emotional damage. Obama wasn't necessary a nice guy either. You think politicians are good people , then you are deluded.

http://marripedia.org/effects_of_fatherless_families_on_crime_rates
https://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20030123/absent-parent-doubles-child-suicide-risk#1

Single mothers cannot raise men period. They just make more effiminate men.

[Igebotz]

Relationship is not for the weak you must be financially stable no woman would want to stay with someone who can't add value to them it very difficult now to see a girl who is coming for the love thing believe it or not relationship is expensive thus you might be lucky enough to meet someone who believe in your dream, someone who believe in you, someone who is ready to build with you.

[Natsuu]

~snip~

Single mothers cannot raise men. PERIOD. They require the masculine energy to guide them. The feminine only nurtures them. The children are well mannered to you because they are conditioned on the feminine imperative which is social and expressive. (Which can be viewed as fake such as make up + eye lash extensions + heels etc)  Statistics of single mother households are significantly different for men / women. Women raising women without a father make sluts.

Higher chance of suicide
Higher chance of incarceration rate (There's more)

Obviously there are outliers but at the end of the day , a woman can never raise a man. Only a man can raise a man. We might not be living in the 1950s but those ancient rules still exist today.

1. Ohhhh no no no no, single women can raise men, example men raised by a single moms are Former US President Barrack Obama, Kevin Durant and Michael Phelps. Addition to this I've known several colleague of mine who I can testify to be gentlemens who are also raised by woman.

You are belittling the ability of woman, disregarding their efforts, wisdom and knowledges. I've respected your former opinion but not on this one.

"Single mothers cannot raise men." you say?, but there are examples of respected gentlemens in different countries that will disprove your statement.

2. Sucide rates, and different kinds of statistics have different factors. For example, for suicide rates in Japan, the main cause of it is not single parents, but the pressure the family gives to the child, and bullying. (Pressure from parents, not just a mother or a father).

Also, if you may, can you give me the study about the statistics you mentioned about the higher chances of suicide, etc. or you are just making that up?

In conclusion, women can raise a man. PERIOD!.

1. You are pointing at outliers. I'm saying that a lot of people with single family households will have emotional damage. Obama wasn't necessary a nice guy either. You think politicians are good people , then you are deluded.

http://marripedia.org/effects_of_fatherless_families_on_crime_rates
https://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20030123/absent-parent-doubles-child-suicide-risk#1

Single mothers cannot raise men period. They just make more effiminate men.

You didn't say some or a lot, you say That "THEY CANNOT RAISE MEN", which is wrong, and a direct insult for those mothers who have raised gentlemen by themselves. You are literally saying "ALL" by that statement.

So what do you think of men? if obama is not included? huh?, nice guy really? is that the definition of men?

Also, the first link corresponds to studies made in 1800's and early 1900's, ergo it is not a valid study in this time and date. While the second link only mentions single parents, without identifying if it is a single father or a mother. In addition to the second link, it is doesn't state anything about "SONS" of a single parent, instead it talks about the "CHILDRENS" which maybe your daughter or son.