Latest posts of: iamonlinenow

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Craig Wright? - signed Bitcoin message

on: October 31, 2021, 01:18:21 PM

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on October 30, 2021, 05:08:09 PM Quote from: iamonlinenow on October 30, 2021, 04:27:52 PM To the creator: To whom your speak to? Aren't you the one who brought this or just read it somewhere?. source: https://pastebin.com/mNcAPrRv Posted the link in the first post. 2 early mined blocks (2009): 1st Bitcoin address in the list 1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF Bitcoin block 6629 (03/07/2009) 2nd Bitcoin address in the list 1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5 Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009) This list https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.512.7.pdf contains these two addresses I am interested in the early days of Bitcoin and am finding such things sometimes.

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Craig Wright? - signed Bitcoin message

on: October 30, 2021, 04:27:52 PM

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on October 30, 2021, 01:03:54 PM Quote from: mynonce on October 30, 2021, 10:49:18 AM So we can say, that if you can sign with (1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W) then you have the private key of Satoshi's key. Yeah. If you knew the private key of - 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W - you'd be one step far from calculating this sought after Satoshi's address. It's simple elliptic curve maths. If `k₁G + k₂G = k₃G` then `(k₁ + k₂)G = k₃G` → `k₁ + k₂ = k₃`. Beautiful, isn't it? Quote from: pooya87 on October 30, 2021, 07:00:28 AM ... the idea is the same, you keep going backwards (t > h > g > i > r > W > C)... That means the creator can't sign with the 'r' key, similar to the 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W case. The creator starts with the signature address 17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L then calculates the pubkeys for (t > h > g > i > r > W > C) but for 'r' = 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG the creator doesn't have the private key but can show the public key and the address. To prove the ownership of satoshi"s private key we would need 2 signatures: 1. for 17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L (it is posted) 2. for 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG (not posted) To the creator: Post a signature for 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Craig Wright? - signed Bitcoin message

on: October 29, 2021, 08:19:33 PM

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on October 29, 2021, 04:20:24 PM ... So what? I can do this too and form a fancy saying using dozen of addresses whose public keys once summed in secp256k1 will give you satoshi's public key. The result is the ECC sum of 7 pubkeys from which 2 are early (2009) addresses. And the result has been signed. How can one add addresses and sign with the sum/result? I would be grateful if you explained it here with examples. Quote from: bL4nkcode on October 29, 2021, 04:27:15 PM At least learn first how signed message works, and how it can be verified using tools (signature verifier). Provide wallet address, message (signed message) with date, and the signature. What you show is just wallet address and random characters (public keys) you're calling signature or what?. (Edited the 1st post. The signature was in the code box.) I checked the signature, it is working. (https://www.verifybitcoinmessage.com/)

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Craig Wright? - signed Bitcoin message

on: October 29, 2021, 04:08:08 PM

C Wright - signed message - Bitcoin
https://pastebin.com/mNcAPrRv

Code:

Pubkeys and Bitcoin addresses

04d285c703648887f226137be3f3868a95ca562f70fa1654f19d530d134cbc00edf6f5827b367d9b358b4ea00f32486b19e630603f5f8708d068c2ba759dec9665
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF

04b0f7845182d287fa5896b9cdac747726564a6aa4db97f5a84e4884a5af2b16f5a5637f889292add9c51415f9ff30caba43e637b2251f143b5bd73d57dd120fad
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5

04379abc41da6ba6a1d9494aa0c345658d1d67d9900e04344683f9de4255a29cf0a8d20b0e1e59f1ab9bc08537c57c72485600ab7e4edd866c0b2434d3a5235af7
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG

04f8c0244bfe78228c7eee52ee1842e6092b5bff2b907575f5dd9fe1d0c3b45645ba9d301fb45407aaa1a9a4a54547bbfa5b861f007ed7e5bc97c6697d57b17621
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw

04ab022c4b71590a621ba06dd78ccc8b41d8d741c29d0486ba79527cbcd16a788920cdee7d02a80bd67f85e930f6182f0cccc41a2bf67665f6e03776a05bea797e
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT

04dd2e147a2d489d5afa2331e3adaf27a8bf2ce5176b574cc3f15d254475c3bac96361776d17560d019981a70f31e246aa6632428e57f787ef6915ebae19f04e1c
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm

04876ca85b08d1adb23639410084ea4953cfda40c676f8e10be5dd08eefee5065527ff2580ee182aa46f1bde2fa3a3c80bde963e7fba24a1e60f4d81d1cf9a03ea
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq


2nd chars of the addresses: CWright

1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq


ECC sum of the 7 pubkeys:

041cdced0646879da917d4d9eba9669329c8feb29425d5b192f722a00eebc0d216a4969ce2061614087ba4a631618f322cbda3dddaf79205db95bba4d24939701e
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L


1st Bitcoin address in the list
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
Bitcoin block 6629 (07/03/2009)

2nd Bitcoin address in the list 
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009)



Bitcoin signature:
Signed message:
CWright?
Signature:
G/3yr8ouR8jhC+Bv5K+q/vGHuwX/hp9Kx7pQ6Coxt3a/Wmd2yif6e2nf8Srnx/dpR1rIFUpV8qf+rW6B+ktKjTk=
Bitcoin address:
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L

2 early mined blocks (2009):

1st Bitcoin address in the list
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
Bitcoin block 6629 (03/07/2009)

2nd Bitcoin address in the list
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009)

3rd - 7th addresses: no transactions found

The sum of these 7 addresses (ECC) :
Pubkey:
041cdced0646879da917d4d9eba9669329c8feb29425d5b192f722a00eebc0d216a4969ce206161 4087ba4a631618f322cbda3dddaf79205db95bba4d24939701e
Address:
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L

Signature:
Signed message:
CWright?
Bitcoin address:
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L
Signature:
G/3yr8ouR8jhC+Bv5K+q/vGHuwX/hp9Kx7pQ6Coxt3a/Wmd2yif6e2nf8Srnx/dpR1rIFUpV8qf+rW6B+ktKjTk=

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain

on: February 27, 2021, 01:10:08 PM

Just an idea / part 3: It is also possible that the solution is a combination of data from the blockchain and brute forcing. The nonce values (LSB) of Satoshi's mined coins have a range 0-58 but 10-18 are missing. That could be the range for brute forcing. Here you can check the nonce values: https://medium.com/@mytechmix/the-mysterious-19-79d0f338a06c

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain

on: February 26, 2021, 04:07:52 PM

'Some old coins moved today (100 BTC from June 2010). It's very rare to see pre-GPU era bitcoins move, it only happened dozens of times in the past few years. And no, it's probably not Satoshi.' https://twitter.com/khannib/status/1364600079580094464 Yes, it is not from Satoshi, what Sergio Demian Lerner had defined as 'Patoshi' https://bitslog.com/2019/04/16/the-return-of-the-deniers-and-the-revenge-of-patoshi/

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Researcher Finds an Old Twitter Profile May Have Been Satoshi Nakamoto's Account

on: February 24, 2021, 04:13:09 PM

On February 22, 2021, an author published a post on substack.com about an anonymous Twitter account that may have belonged to the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto. The researcher discovered a Twitter account dubbed ‘Goldlover,’ and found some interesting coincidences with the account’s tweets and Bitcoin’s creator. https://news.bitcoin.com/researcher-finds-an-old-twitter-profile-may-have-been-satoshi-nakamotos-account/

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain

on: February 23, 2021, 02:17:19 PM

“If you know where there are oranges in the sky in Winter Garden, you are on the right track for locating a treasure box,” Goldlover tweeted. https://news.bitcoin.com/researcher-finds-an-old-twitter-profile-may-have-been-satoshi-nakamotos-account/ Although some believe that you have to look outside the blockchain Quote from: MagicByt3 on October 26, 2019, 02:20:18 PM I still think the keys are out there. We're just looking in the wrong places. I have done LOT of research into this and I do believe there is another project that is linked to bitcoin in more ways than one that may hold the answer to this question. To seek the truth one must think outside the "blox" pardon the pun. I do think that there are keys out there to be found I highlty doubt the person behind the satoshi name was a greedy or self centered individual I would put money on it there is a cryptographic puzzle out there related to numbers, Images, and the blockchain. The question is who will solve it? we think that one can solve it with the data inside the blockchain.

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I gathered every Satoshi Nakamoto thread.

on: February 21, 2021, 02:46:36 PM

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on August 27, 2020, 03:48:31 PM I collected every single topic related with Satoshi Nakamoto and I post it below. You forgot: ' Maybe Satoshi created the greatest prize competition and the privatekeys are somehow within the blockchain.' Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313377.0

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain

on: February 08, 2021, 03:31:48 PM

https://twitter.com/SDLerner/status/1145128910176378881 @MarkLundeberg 28/Jun/2019 ' Very odd with the 300 s activation time there... my gut is telling me that satoshi was playing around with timestamps, and IIRC his block times are badly out of sync with the other miners...' He also fingerprinted his timestamps. https://bitslog.com/2020/06/22/a-new-mystery-in-patoshi-timestamps/ 'This strange pattern is a new way to distinguish the Patoshi pattern from all other coinbase sets. We had three methods already (steep fast extranonce increment, reduced nonce LSB range, no timestamp reversals), and now we add a fourth (and in a next post I will show a fifth!). So why timestamp deltas are oddly distributed is a new unsolved mystery for our large collection. In my opinion, the existence of so many distinguishers is an indicator that Patoshi wanted his/her blocks to be identified.' Identified for what? We say: for the privatekeys of the early mined coins. But as of February 2021 we still don't have discovered how he implemented the privatekeys into the blockchain.

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain

on: February 06, 2021, 04:00:08 PM

https://bitslog.com/2013/09/03/new-mystery-about-satoshi/ 'The selected set of bytes (0 to 9, 19 to 58) could have been selected to map a somewhat extended alphabet into this set. This must be explored further. Another idea that crossed my mind is that the set itself has a kind of hidden message... I hope my friend Timo (the mathematician) now finds the hidden message and brings me some peace.' Base58 isn't appropriate for text messages. Bitcoin uses Base58 for WIF publickeys and privatekeys.

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain

on: February 05, 2021, 01:30:15 PM

Just an idea / part 2: For the privatekeys we would need a set of Base58 characters from the blockchain. And this we can find in the coinbase addresses. And the LSB values could be connected with them. 🙂 Would be amazing if in the future that idea will be regarded as the key to the privatekeys.

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's early mined coins & the message left in the blockchain

on: February 03, 2021, 04:01:32 PM

Quote from: oldgolddigger on February 02, 2021, 04:20:06 PM https://bitslog.com/2013/09/03/new-mystery-about-satoshi/#comment-1376 'Great work and what an incredible finding, would love to know the answer! Do you think it’s a bit odd that he used a proprietary Base58 for the address encoding and just happens that you’re seeing the spike between values 0-57? ... I know it’s probably just coincidence but it would be amazing if there was a secret message in the LSB to explain this' https://bitslog.com/2013/09/03/new-mystery-about-satoshi/ 'The selected set of bytes (0 to 9, 19 to 58) could have been selected to map a somewhat extended alphabet into this set. This must be explored further.' Just an idea: The privatekey in Wallet Import Format (WIF) is for example 'KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9M7rFU73sVHnoWn' and contains 52 Base58 characters. The first two characters are always 'Kw', 'Kx', 'Ky', 'Kz', 'L1', 'L2', 'L3', 'L4' or 'L5'. The Base58 alphabet = '123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz' and the 19th character is 'K', maybe indicating the beginning of the key. When we create 100 privatekeys so we will have on average each Base58 character 86 times. But the first two characters starting with 'K' only 44 times and with 'L' only 56 times. That's approximately half of the rest of the characters in the key. That is maybe the reason for the LSB value of 19 being half of the others.

Pages: [1]